While reading the reviews for a book called The Historical Jesus I came across a typical anti-Christian rant in need of a smack down. In quotes are sections of the rant by "A Customer" and I've replied to them:
The title of his review:
"Please! Faith and historical research don't mix well."
Bcuz! You Said! So! So is that your atheist science lesson for the day? Why then do so many evolutionists believe faith that evolution is true mixes with historical research? Do you even know what faith means? Hint: It doesn't mean "belief without evidence" which you clearly think it means from reading your stupid rant.
"By A Customer"
What's wrong, didn't you have time enough to tell us who you were? Aren't you proud of your scholarly scientific review?
"If this is the 'factual' basis for the historicity of Jesus, then Christianity is in trouble."
Bcuz u said so, and whatever the atheist says is true is true. Not very scientific are you?
"What a joke."
Bcuz u said so, and whatever the atheist says is true is true. Not very scientific are you? Hint: Evidence doesn't mean, "Whatever you feel is true." Use a dictionary and stop being lazy.
"The 'evidence' -- ?"
That's your "evidence" so far --? Atheists, always wasting time with their stupidity and pretension.
"Well, it isn't there."
Am I the only one who feels like there a fly buzzing in my ear, or is it just me?
"I was very excited to read this book;"
Because you had new material to find imaginary faults in.
"it was recommended to me by thoughtful, intelligent Christians who I greatly respect."
I smell self-serving flattery.
"But the book was a real shock -- "
Holy mother of mothers! Really! Shocking!
"the author contradicts himself all the time,"
Bcuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true is true bcuz ye said it.
"the author uses the New Testament primarily to 'prove' the truth of the New Testament -- Hm..."
Hmmmm, he's trying to "prove"? So because it didn't convince your illogical self it wasn't proof to anyone else lol? Did you forget the meaning of proof too? Damn you're an arrogant babbler aren't ya?
Can you shut up already or come up with evidence? You're wasting my time.
"That's some fishy logic, no?"
No, whatever you say is not true bcuz u you posted a rhetorical question. Furthermore, questions do not equal evidence in and of themselves, sarcasm does not equal evidence in and of itself. You are really dying to end up in Hell aren't you? Tell us all wise one where he says, "The NT is true bcuz it says it is true". Show us. Oh, you can't, bcuz you're a careless liar.
"I strongly suggest that those who are earnestly interested in the history of Christianity and its beliefs concerning Jesus -- "
And we saved Christians forgiven of our since care what an opinion-bashing ranter strongly suggests bcuz?
"who are not biased a priori by their 'faith'"
Insane one why did you put "faith" in quotes? Are you stupid? So you don't truly believe that they have faith, LOL? Well what do you think it is then, logical belief? Is that it Mr. Confused?
Mr. A Priori do you think you are smart because you said "a priori" rather than "because" like a non-vain person who truly cares about making sense and helping others (rather than being a show off) would have said? It makes you look stupid and vain to me and the millions of Christians on my side.
And what is your evidence that the author is biased? Do you wan't us to just have, lol, "faith" that you're right because you have "faith" that you're right?
Contradictory one did you notice you are biased because you have faith that the Bible isn't true? Blind much? Again, look up the meaning of the word faith before spitting all over everyone. Furthermore contradictory one, are you really that stupid as to think 100+ million Christians cannot think logically because they trust that God's word is true based on the logical things it states? You're seriously that stupid? Then you who have faith God and Jesus do not exist can never be logical either.
"which immediately necessitates certain conclusions --"
Trust "immediately" (the hell?) necessitates certain conclusions? Genius, did you mean, trusting in something means you conclude that something is true? Was that so hard to say Mr. Word Salad Master?
And why are you telling us that it's immediate? Hey, I've got some useless information to waste your time with while I'm pretending to be smart too: If you say something you've immediately said something! Neato huh?
Now, your point that trust means you have concluded certain things, IS? So if an evolutionist trusts that evolution is true based on his reading of books endorsing evolution means he is biased? Huh? Can we say, "contradiction" or how about "I'm ranting and have made no point"?
"then check out the work by [blah, blah blah, blah blah], and [blah bleah]."
No thanks, clearly if they have as careless garbage research skills and moral logical as you aren't worth reading.
"The bottom line: the authors of the New Testament simply used Old Testament, Pagan, and Greek sources to construct their jesus tales."
Bottom line: saying "bottom line" with the feeling that you are oh so wise doesn't cut it. Bottom line: Bcuz u said so does not equal evidence. Bottom line: Parroted tales like yours does not equal evidence. Bottom line: Fancy word salad does not equal evidence, let alone nonsensical word salad. Bottom line: You've wasted out time again. Bottom line: You are still sinning against God and pretending he doesn't exist despite the clear evidence the universe has been designed and that Jesus was a good and truthful man. Bottom line: You need to learn the definitions of the words you use before acting like you know what you are talking about.
"It is all there -- for anyone willing to look for the truth."
It is all there -- for anyone willing to look for the truth. Woah, I can say that to you too! That must make me right!
Monday, January 28, 2008
Saturday, January 26, 2008
Wikihypocrisy - Darwinists Protect Their False god Darwin
Well did they bury my edits? A very openly gay moderator who instantly erased my edits based on his "doesn't appear to be constructive" feelings did so repeatedly, he even went so far as to delete my rebukes on his talk page. You can tell that this "moderator" (Allstarecho) is trolling because he literally will delete any condemning info about Darwin if he catches a change within seconds. No one is going to tell me this guy is making careful judgments with reasonless personal attacks like that. Ironically I was banned for supposedly attacking him by pointing out his hypocrisy and trolling. That's Darwin-worshipping pleasure-addicts for you. On top of that there was a blatant self-admitted troll who got rid of the criticism on the Origin of Species page. Did any Darwinists undo his dirty work? Nope, they sanction him. It's just like Yahoo Answers where the top moderators use stalkers and harassers to do their dirty work.
Thursday, January 24, 2008
I Wonder If the Atheist Evolutionists Will Allow This Relevant Info
I decided to add some important information to the wikipedia pages on evolutionist "Eiseley" and "Origin of the Species" concerning Darwin's credit thievery. I wonder if they've buried it already.
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Wikipedia Still Dominated By Hypcoritical Snakeoil Scientists
I posted this rebuke on the discussion page on Venus of Wikipedia:
Unscientific Hypocritical Propaganda
Unscientific Hypocritical Propaganda
Saidsoisms:
"Venus is thought to undergo periodic episodes of plate tectonics, in which the crust is subducted rapidly within a few million years, separated by periods of a few hundred million years of relative stability. This contrasts strongly with Earth's more or less steady state of ongoing subduction and continental drift, but is consistent with how geological processes operate without oceans, since oceans are believed to act as a lubricant in subduction. It is believed the surface rocks of Venus are only about a half-a-billion years old as impact crater analysis suggests that its surface dynamics have exchanged its surface for a clean face (wiping out old craters) sometime in the last billion years."
Where is the citation for even one of these statements? Where even a "citation needed"? Why hypocrites you evolutionists and panspermians are. It is also false as there are many scientists who believe it is about 6000 years old. SINCE WHEN IS EVIDENCELESS SPECULATION, "just trust me" "cuz I said so" objective fact? Is this the same as what so many anti-christians on wikipedia call weasel wording? It should be. It is weaseling in anti-biblical propaganda in the guise of science.
So this is what the wikipedia "community" (anti-christian propagandists) considers one of the best examples of their Wickedpedia work? They are right, it is one of the best examples of their subtle sneaking in of lies without immediately looking like hypocrites to the masses of gullible and deluded. I think you all should watch Tainted Evidence - Forensics On Trial and Forensics on Fire to get another dose of reality. Mere pretension does not make something scientific.
References:
http://media.gospelcom.net/aig/Volume_072/03.mp3
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i3/venus.asp
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i4/galileo.asp
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Are Aliens and UFO's Satanic?
I received a question on youtube, on whether or not I believe aliens were demons. I already said I didn't in various ways on the homepage of my youtube page itself, but, here is an extensive analysis by me as to why I don't believe aliens are demons. This is my personal response to the questioner:
I've thought about that and a few days ago too. I was thinking about the behavior of ghosts / demons, non-sinning angels, humans and aliens, and have concluded that aliens do not fit into the category of demons:
1. Demons are interested in causing strife, does flying around in a ufo or appearing as an alien and showing themselves collecting some plants have that effect, even indirectly to any great degree? It's as useful as pretending to be a human with purple skin, walking by someone's house, and hoping an argument will arise over someone seeing a purple guy walking by, which is absurd. Demons may be immoral to the point of occasional stupidity, but in my educated opinion that is too stupid even for a demon to spend their time on. There known behaviors are this:
a) They love appearing in photos as humans, animals or perhaps showing an occasional object related to the history of an area. The obvious idea they are trying to convey is that there is no heaven or hell or that the Bible is a lie because God doesn't really make an unsaved person "sleep" or end up in Hell and they can just wander around or go to a higher plane etc.
b) They love scaring people:
b1) messing with objects, like throwing them around or making them appear in another place. The idea behind that is related to a. and to get people to fear or be in awe of them rather then god.
b2) Demons often physically harm people, either the people they possess or those they rule over, and in many different ways. The worst aliens are known for doing, and it's rare, is helping one army defeat another, a few instances of kidnapping, and maybe two or three of mass kidnappings, destroying jets that were pursuing them, giving people one or few minor scars, temporarily suppressing scary memories (is that what a demon would do?) causing electronic interference, destroying the space shuttle Columbia, destroying the space tether, destroying a Russian probe going near the moon called Phobos, and supposedly giving false gospels or making the false claim that they've been genetically engineering humans in mass. All those acts of violence or defensive behavior are very rare. Over a period of 5000 years that's the worst most people can think of, unless you include the supposed butt probing and alien breeding. Now, compare those incidents with the mass murder of Christians and people of various ethnicities. How does that compare? The two behaviors are very distinct: Demons are frequently violent, and often boastfully so, and aliens are hardly ever around and apparently don't do much but explore and take a break, as if they were tourists.
c) Assuming Satan goes about like a roaring lion and that that means he regularly possesses people and gets them to do evil, such as preaching false gospels and committing major acts of violence, why then do so few aliens behave the same way? Why aren't aliens regularly committing violent acts to the point of ending up committing suicide or accidentally ramming homes and trees just like a human being violent or who is drunk? If aliens are the ones responsible for kidnapping people all the time, why are so few aliens caught doing so? Why do so many show up dazzling, using tractor beams, or having to get people to come out and get you? Why wouldn't God want us to know that Satan is the one making people disappear? Furthermore, since when to people simply vanish? What's Satan doing, burying them 400 feet underground? Making them reappear in space? What kind of violent act is that? If he's that powerful why not make them reappear in a jail cell of a violent person to be raped and have their body scattered all over the ground? That way stories would spread about loved ones being raped or their bodies being found scattered all over. An example of Satan's known style is to get a person kidnapped, tortured maybe, then they get buried in place that is sometimes found. Then the parents or friends sometimes find out and turn against God usually more so then before. But making a person disappear, and not even hinting to anyone that it was caused by a UFO or hardly ever doing so, is that his style? And how tormented would a foolish person who thinks aliens are friendly? Surely Satan knows that there a great many people who think all aliens are friendly, so then why would he choose such a poor means of tormenting anyone? And sure he knows that God would not let him simply vanish the human race by making them disappear to who knows where if that is his true intent as some might argue.
Now contrast the frequency of human and animal violence to that of aliens. If aliens are demons because aliens sometimes scar people that would make all humans demons as well, and animals. You could even argue trees were demons then because trees sometimes scratch and kill people.
d) They attempt to tempt people to commit sins in general, such as how Satan "rose up against" David, which I think was done by possessing someone who was not saved and having that person get David to count his army. I used to think Satan maybe influenced David's thoughts, but I realized the Spirit is in control of the mind of those who are saved, not Satan, and I seriously doubt the Spirit opens a person up for an occasional attack. Assuming Saul was saved the spirit that tormented can be explained as it either whispering hellish things in his ear and or causing him some sort of physical pain. Do aliens do that? Has anyone ever reported the appearance of a UFO coinciding with someone being tormented with a demon? I've never heard of such a thing in my many years worth of studying UFO's and ghosts / demons. How is an alien floating in the air often from very far away and then zipping away or slowly floating away, or crashing into the ground, an attempt at getting you to sin? You might as well say the moon is a demon, that birds are demons, and that anything unclear you can't make out or that is very strange to you is a demon or Satanic. Remember what the Catholics did to Galileo? That's where that kind of flawed logic leads.
e) Some demons love to frequent or stay at a certain spot, a very limited area usually. There are only a very few stories of false humans (demons pretending to be humans). These stories are about a few ghost hitchhikers who were in the image of formerly living persons. UFO's on the other hand are almost always seen traveling great distances or only showing up a few times in the space of a week. As for UFO's caught by infrared cameras, there are no reports of these UFO's coming back to the same spot and interestingly, no ghosts have been caught floating around in the air or sky using infrared cameras. As for ghosts caught on infrared cameras in homes, why are they always in the shape of blobs or something living like an animal or human rather than a disc, cigar or saucer shape if it's really demons who are making such things? Are demons not clever enough to try and trick people into thinking UFO's also explore the interior of homes? What would make more sense is that UFO's do not enter into homes is because the aliens in them can easily observe humans from outside or remove them or do not want to accidentally damage a person's home or their ship (which could happen if the ship were to revert to being solid). The risk of aliens or ships being destroyed by merging with solid objects explains why they becoming solid again before entering oceans or lakes and are never seen passing straight through mountains or the ground or even going into them a little whether in solid or in a "higher vibratory" form.
f) If demons can frequently appear as aliens and UFO's, why not anything else? Why not appear as planets, asteroids, animals, plants, humans, cars, needles, x-ray machines, computers, and on and on. Is there some demon with a "let's look like weird people and boringly shaped ships that sometimes shut off electrical things and kidnap you, get you pregnant and then take the baby off your hands, crash, and mess with wheat fields making pretty designs and not even destroying the wheat, and occasionally go under and out of the lakes and oceans" fetish? That's too bizarre to believe. Even if there was a demon with such a fetish, why is it so narrow as not to include UFO's traveling in and out of the ground, straight through mountains, floating through trees and buildings? Instead they avoid touching anything but the top of the ground, and that's only to land. Ghosts / demons pretending to be human spirits or just being themselves do not give a consistent display of carrying about not doing things that would give the appearance that they were not solid.
g) Demons possess people. Do aliens possess people? Supposedly some claim they do, but there is no evidence for their claims. They haven't gone off and built alien technology or anything that can be verified as being so strange that it surely must have been something from an alien civilization.
h) Demons communicate with a person either verbally or possess them and talk into their mind for lack of a better explanation. Aliens either use verbal, sign language, or telepathy.
Conclusion:
The behavior of aliens does not match demons, only occasionally. and there is no evidence I know of to say, "An alien broke this law of God". There is no evidence that aliens are bound by human laws any more than animals. Their behavior matches more that of angels. In order for them to have developed extremely advanced technology they would have to have a very high desire to learn how better to survive and explore and to avoid strife which would hinder survival and exploration. We know that strife-lovers horde wealth and centralize power to the point where only other strife-lovers have it. They cause the majority of people to be stuck in a limited area, Earth. We know that strife-lovers are materialistic and love causing even strife among themselves. This does not seem to lead to interplanetary exploration on a weekly basis let alone intergalactic. If there is such going on, it's obviously on a very small scale from what was learned about the activities at Area 51, which wasn't that big a deal. The behavior of aliens matches that of beings who God has either restrained to be very peaceful with very little evil behavior, or who he has kept entirely sinless like certain angels and animals who don't harm any humans.
There is the sea, vast and spacious,
teeming with creatures beyond number—
living things both large and small.
There the ships go to and fro,
and the leviathan,
which you formed to frolic there.
These all look to you
to give them their food
at the proper time.
Psalm 104:25-27
I've thought about that and a few days ago too. I was thinking about the behavior of ghosts / demons, non-sinning angels, humans and aliens, and have concluded that aliens do not fit into the category of demons:
1. Demons are interested in causing strife, does flying around in a ufo or appearing as an alien and showing themselves collecting some plants have that effect, even indirectly to any great degree? It's as useful as pretending to be a human with purple skin, walking by someone's house, and hoping an argument will arise over someone seeing a purple guy walking by, which is absurd. Demons may be immoral to the point of occasional stupidity, but in my educated opinion that is too stupid even for a demon to spend their time on. There known behaviors are this:
a) They love appearing in photos as humans, animals or perhaps showing an occasional object related to the history of an area. The obvious idea they are trying to convey is that there is no heaven or hell or that the Bible is a lie because God doesn't really make an unsaved person "sleep" or end up in Hell and they can just wander around or go to a higher plane etc.
b) They love scaring people:
b1) messing with objects, like throwing them around or making them appear in another place. The idea behind that is related to a. and to get people to fear or be in awe of them rather then god.
b2) Demons often physically harm people, either the people they possess or those they rule over, and in many different ways. The worst aliens are known for doing, and it's rare, is helping one army defeat another, a few instances of kidnapping, and maybe two or three of mass kidnappings, destroying jets that were pursuing them, giving people one or few minor scars, temporarily suppressing scary memories (is that what a demon would do?) causing electronic interference, destroying the space shuttle Columbia, destroying the space tether, destroying a Russian probe going near the moon called Phobos, and supposedly giving false gospels or making the false claim that they've been genetically engineering humans in mass. All those acts of violence or defensive behavior are very rare. Over a period of 5000 years that's the worst most people can think of, unless you include the supposed butt probing and alien breeding. Now, compare those incidents with the mass murder of Christians and people of various ethnicities. How does that compare? The two behaviors are very distinct: Demons are frequently violent, and often boastfully so, and aliens are hardly ever around and apparently don't do much but explore and take a break, as if they were tourists.
c) Assuming Satan goes about like a roaring lion and that that means he regularly possesses people and gets them to do evil, such as preaching false gospels and committing major acts of violence, why then do so few aliens behave the same way? Why aren't aliens regularly committing violent acts to the point of ending up committing suicide or accidentally ramming homes and trees just like a human being violent or who is drunk? If aliens are the ones responsible for kidnapping people all the time, why are so few aliens caught doing so? Why do so many show up dazzling, using tractor beams, or having to get people to come out and get you? Why wouldn't God want us to know that Satan is the one making people disappear? Furthermore, since when to people simply vanish? What's Satan doing, burying them 400 feet underground? Making them reappear in space? What kind of violent act is that? If he's that powerful why not make them reappear in a jail cell of a violent person to be raped and have their body scattered all over the ground? That way stories would spread about loved ones being raped or their bodies being found scattered all over. An example of Satan's known style is to get a person kidnapped, tortured maybe, then they get buried in place that is sometimes found. Then the parents or friends sometimes find out and turn against God usually more so then before. But making a person disappear, and not even hinting to anyone that it was caused by a UFO or hardly ever doing so, is that his style? And how tormented would a foolish person who thinks aliens are friendly? Surely Satan knows that there a great many people who think all aliens are friendly, so then why would he choose such a poor means of tormenting anyone? And sure he knows that God would not let him simply vanish the human race by making them disappear to who knows where if that is his true intent as some might argue.
Now contrast the frequency of human and animal violence to that of aliens. If aliens are demons because aliens sometimes scar people that would make all humans demons as well, and animals. You could even argue trees were demons then because trees sometimes scratch and kill people.
d) They attempt to tempt people to commit sins in general, such as how Satan "rose up against" David, which I think was done by possessing someone who was not saved and having that person get David to count his army. I used to think Satan maybe influenced David's thoughts, but I realized the Spirit is in control of the mind of those who are saved, not Satan, and I seriously doubt the Spirit opens a person up for an occasional attack. Assuming Saul was saved the spirit that tormented can be explained as it either whispering hellish things in his ear and or causing him some sort of physical pain. Do aliens do that? Has anyone ever reported the appearance of a UFO coinciding with someone being tormented with a demon? I've never heard of such a thing in my many years worth of studying UFO's and ghosts / demons. How is an alien floating in the air often from very far away and then zipping away or slowly floating away, or crashing into the ground, an attempt at getting you to sin? You might as well say the moon is a demon, that birds are demons, and that anything unclear you can't make out or that is very strange to you is a demon or Satanic. Remember what the Catholics did to Galileo? That's where that kind of flawed logic leads.
e) Some demons love to frequent or stay at a certain spot, a very limited area usually. There are only a very few stories of false humans (demons pretending to be humans). These stories are about a few ghost hitchhikers who were in the image of formerly living persons. UFO's on the other hand are almost always seen traveling great distances or only showing up a few times in the space of a week. As for UFO's caught by infrared cameras, there are no reports of these UFO's coming back to the same spot and interestingly, no ghosts have been caught floating around in the air or sky using infrared cameras. As for ghosts caught on infrared cameras in homes, why are they always in the shape of blobs or something living like an animal or human rather than a disc, cigar or saucer shape if it's really demons who are making such things? Are demons not clever enough to try and trick people into thinking UFO's also explore the interior of homes? What would make more sense is that UFO's do not enter into homes is because the aliens in them can easily observe humans from outside or remove them or do not want to accidentally damage a person's home or their ship (which could happen if the ship were to revert to being solid). The risk of aliens or ships being destroyed by merging with solid objects explains why they becoming solid again before entering oceans or lakes and are never seen passing straight through mountains or the ground or even going into them a little whether in solid or in a "higher vibratory" form.
f) If demons can frequently appear as aliens and UFO's, why not anything else? Why not appear as planets, asteroids, animals, plants, humans, cars, needles, x-ray machines, computers, and on and on. Is there some demon with a "let's look like weird people and boringly shaped ships that sometimes shut off electrical things and kidnap you, get you pregnant and then take the baby off your hands, crash, and mess with wheat fields making pretty designs and not even destroying the wheat, and occasionally go under and out of the lakes and oceans" fetish? That's too bizarre to believe. Even if there was a demon with such a fetish, why is it so narrow as not to include UFO's traveling in and out of the ground, straight through mountains, floating through trees and buildings? Instead they avoid touching anything but the top of the ground, and that's only to land. Ghosts / demons pretending to be human spirits or just being themselves do not give a consistent display of carrying about not doing things that would give the appearance that they were not solid.
g) Demons possess people. Do aliens possess people? Supposedly some claim they do, but there is no evidence for their claims. They haven't gone off and built alien technology or anything that can be verified as being so strange that it surely must have been something from an alien civilization.
h) Demons communicate with a person either verbally or possess them and talk into their mind for lack of a better explanation. Aliens either use verbal, sign language, or telepathy.
Conclusion:
The behavior of aliens does not match demons, only occasionally. and there is no evidence I know of to say, "An alien broke this law of God". There is no evidence that aliens are bound by human laws any more than animals. Their behavior matches more that of angels. In order for them to have developed extremely advanced technology they would have to have a very high desire to learn how better to survive and explore and to avoid strife which would hinder survival and exploration. We know that strife-lovers horde wealth and centralize power to the point where only other strife-lovers have it. They cause the majority of people to be stuck in a limited area, Earth. We know that strife-lovers are materialistic and love causing even strife among themselves. This does not seem to lead to interplanetary exploration on a weekly basis let alone intergalactic. If there is such going on, it's obviously on a very small scale from what was learned about the activities at Area 51, which wasn't that big a deal. The behavior of aliens matches that of beings who God has either restrained to be very peaceful with very little evil behavior, or who he has kept entirely sinless like certain angels and animals who don't harm any humans.
There is the sea, vast and spacious,
teeming with creatures beyond number—
living things both large and small.
There the ships go to and fro,
and the leviathan,
which you formed to frolic there.
These all look to you
to give them their food
at the proper time.
Psalm 104:25-27
Pirate Bay and Mininova, Self-Defeating, Anti-Christain, Money-Loving Hypocrites
While posting various comments and links to my sites on piratebay, in order to be able to afford to safely upload to it without the authorities being able to pester me, some hypocrite or hypocrites decided to report me. Why hypocritical?
1. I was posting critical information that the world needed to know but is suffering and dying from not knowing: That the teaching of micro-evolution is a destructive life-threatening teaching, and that Darwin's very theft of his idea of natural selection from a Christian Creation Scientist was clear evidence that atheists could not be trusted to tell the whole truth let alone give credit to whom it belongs.
2. On piratebay exists massive amounts of space-wasting banter totally unrelated to the torrents uploaded. Often the comments or chatting is very foul. But who is reporting them for spreading hateful filthy comments that kids can easily see? No one.
3. Furthermore, you can find a huge amount of links promoting sites other than piratebay and using porn to do it.
4. Furthermore, some of my posts were relevant need-to-know comments, far more relevant than "seed plz" or mere opinions like "christians are stupid" or "great vid".
5. As can be seen from one of my blog entries, I not only defended the likes of piratebay, but I directly defended them on youtube. Some appreciate huh? But since they have played the part of Nebal; attacked the one who defended them.
6. I joined their suprnova forum to ask why I wasn't able to post urls and a moderator named Dr. something or other insulted me for asking and said basically, "You can!" and spammed his personal site which was totally unrelated to my post. Another member then posted a reply and severely insulted me for asking and excused his insult by saying that my post would be trashed anyways. I rebuked the moderator and told him that merely saying, "You can" was not evidence that I could post urls and that he was spamming. For that he banned me and his reason was "Idiot". He banned me again when I signed up a few minutes afterwards and again his reason was "Idiot" despite me not having posted anything. This is his typical behavior I found out. A few minutes later I discovered why piratebay was giving me error messages when I tried t post, it turned out that snipurl.com was banned from being posted. That sure makes me an idiot doesn't it?
7. I also learned that on that forum foul language reigns supreme as well as making jokes about abusing children, and that includes raping, molesting and murdering them.
It was days later that I then began my hours long campaign of "spamming" myself, but of course, good spam is an abomination to the wicked, and so I was banned.
And how about mininova? Is that a good site? No way. I had uploaded a book I wrote showing how all anti-Christian arguments used against Christians failed. On one attempt however I accidentally mistyped something and so unseeded the torrent. For that alone I was banned. Nope, no bigotry there. I made another account later, and one of the forum moderators got anally upset out on me when I asked for the keys to various programs. Why? He implied I was lazy and that they could be found despite the fact that I looked everywhere and could not find them which was why I was posting my request in the first place, and despite the fact that unlike so many I had carefully typed out the program names and version numbers and their location and said I was disabled. He also had to say that he didn't think anyone would help me. Isn't that just so helpful? Who cares about his stupid ignorant opinions? But this moderator banned me for pointing out he was being stupid. On top of that, for no logical reason, the word "eternian" is designated as a swear word on mininova. Imagine that, a Christian denomination name is a swear word, but not the ones of proven murderous groups: Islam, Muslim, Catholic, Mormon and atheist.
I also signed up again to use mininova's forums about two days ago. It was stupid. There was no explanation as to why you couldn't edit your forum profile, and no link or button to go directly to the forum posts. When I clicked the link to see the newest posts I got an error message. I got a few more error messages when I tried to do other things there. It was a big waste of time.
In conclusion, the owners and keepers of piratebay and mininova are clearly anti-christian bigots.
That's atheists and evolutionists for you, self-defeating, greedy, reasonless brutes.
You know who is better than piratebay and better than mininova?: Torrentreactor. They don't engage in truth-hiding and it's a lot more useful. I like Btjunkie better too.
1. I was posting critical information that the world needed to know but is suffering and dying from not knowing: That the teaching of micro-evolution is a destructive life-threatening teaching, and that Darwin's very theft of his idea of natural selection from a Christian Creation Scientist was clear evidence that atheists could not be trusted to tell the whole truth let alone give credit to whom it belongs.
2. On piratebay exists massive amounts of space-wasting banter totally unrelated to the torrents uploaded. Often the comments or chatting is very foul. But who is reporting them for spreading hateful filthy comments that kids can easily see? No one.
3. Furthermore, you can find a huge amount of links promoting sites other than piratebay and using porn to do it.
4. Furthermore, some of my posts were relevant need-to-know comments, far more relevant than "seed plz" or mere opinions like "christians are stupid" or "great vid".
5. As can be seen from one of my blog entries, I not only defended the likes of piratebay, but I directly defended them on youtube. Some appreciate huh? But since they have played the part of Nebal; attacked the one who defended them.
6. I joined their suprnova forum to ask why I wasn't able to post urls and a moderator named Dr. something or other insulted me for asking and said basically, "You can!" and spammed his personal site which was totally unrelated to my post. Another member then posted a reply and severely insulted me for asking and excused his insult by saying that my post would be trashed anyways. I rebuked the moderator and told him that merely saying, "You can" was not evidence that I could post urls and that he was spamming. For that he banned me and his reason was "Idiot". He banned me again when I signed up a few minutes afterwards and again his reason was "Idiot" despite me not having posted anything. This is his typical behavior I found out. A few minutes later I discovered why piratebay was giving me error messages when I tried t post, it turned out that snipurl.com was banned from being posted. That sure makes me an idiot doesn't it?
7. I also learned that on that forum foul language reigns supreme as well as making jokes about abusing children, and that includes raping, molesting and murdering them.
It was days later that I then began my hours long campaign of "spamming" myself, but of course, good spam is an abomination to the wicked, and so I was banned.
And how about mininova? Is that a good site? No way. I had uploaded a book I wrote showing how all anti-Christian arguments used against Christians failed. On one attempt however I accidentally mistyped something and so unseeded the torrent. For that alone I was banned. Nope, no bigotry there. I made another account later, and one of the forum moderators got anally upset out on me when I asked for the keys to various programs. Why? He implied I was lazy and that they could be found despite the fact that I looked everywhere and could not find them which was why I was posting my request in the first place, and despite the fact that unlike so many I had carefully typed out the program names and version numbers and their location and said I was disabled. He also had to say that he didn't think anyone would help me. Isn't that just so helpful? Who cares about his stupid ignorant opinions? But this moderator banned me for pointing out he was being stupid. On top of that, for no logical reason, the word "eternian" is designated as a swear word on mininova. Imagine that, a Christian denomination name is a swear word, but not the ones of proven murderous groups: Islam, Muslim, Catholic, Mormon and atheist.
I also signed up again to use mininova's forums about two days ago. It was stupid. There was no explanation as to why you couldn't edit your forum profile, and no link or button to go directly to the forum posts. When I clicked the link to see the newest posts I got an error message. I got a few more error messages when I tried to do other things there. It was a big waste of time.
In conclusion, the owners and keepers of piratebay and mininova are clearly anti-christian bigots.
That's atheists and evolutionists for you, self-defeating, greedy, reasonless brutes.
You know who is better than piratebay and better than mininova?: Torrentreactor. They don't engage in truth-hiding and it's a lot more useful. I like Btjunkie better too.
Monday, January 21, 2008
Atheists Who Love Torturing (Including Raping) and Murdering Christians
(Note, this entry was removed by Yahoo 360 moderators from a 360 blog I was using under the Cave Atheist account when either the atheist anti-christian stalker Gorgeoustxwoman or Footprints in the Sand (a.k.a. Persephone) reported it to them. Isn't she just so loving like she claims to be? Not. You won't find this entry in the Cave Atheist 360 blog because it is trolled by sanctioned atheist stalkers like gtxwoman who would just get it deleted again. Yahoo sanctions stalker-harassers like her and does not want any negative articles on China's human rights abuses, apparently because there are Chinese people in control of Yahoo and China is one of their major customers. Yahoo's moderators ignored me when I pointed out that I was being harassed by her and her other friends on my other Yahoo 360 blog. When I reported that stalkers like Jesus Myth Superstar - who called me a rapist on my blog -, Run James Run, Footprints in the Sand and Gtxwoman were slandering me I was ignored. But when I responded to Gtxwoman in my blog by pointing out her own major family problems she or or one of her group retaliated by reporting me to the moderators who then erased all my blog entries except the last one which was linked to the one in which the one in which they had heavily slandered and mocked me. Want evidence? I save a ton of pages showing how the moderators were treating me vs. the atheists and neo-pagans who were harassing me, I even saved emails I sent to them. You can ask to see this evidence at cbg777 - at - gmail.com. One of their group, Novangelis, went so far as to edit the wikipedia entry about things like this so that no one would realize that atheism is a life-threatening belief. And now the article that they deleted:)
According to some childish Christian-hating atheists (Footprints in the Sand a.k.a. Persephone and Jesus Myth Superstar - see http://snipurl.com/stalkers) no atheist has ever raped anyone or even been accused of being a rapist. Well besides that being childishly absurd because there are a large number of atheists in the world and atheists aren't known for being peaceful anymore than anyone else in any encyclopedia (just the opposite actually) and it should be obvious then that out of a large population of such people there would be crimes of all sorts committed by them. It also demonstrates an incredible willful ignorance and lack of care for what really goes on around them and what has been recorded all throughout history.
Irrefutable Evidence That Atheists Are Far More Prone To Committing Atrocities Than Bible-Obeying Christians
Did you know Japan has the highest suicide rate in the world, or one of them? You know what their main religion is right? Did you know Catholic dominated Lithuania has the highest suicide rate in the world?
Did you know atheist dominated Sweden is number 31 on the list of countries with the highest suicide rates? "Just a coincidence"?
Would you like to know atheist dominated Vietnam's dirty little rape-those-Christians-for-worshipping-Christ "secrets"?:
Christian Persecution in Vietnam
Homes in Vietnam Burned for Refusing to Deny Christ
U.S. and Vietnam Reach Agreement on Religious Freedom
How about atheist dominated China's "secrets"?:
China's Christians suffer for their faith
How about Buddhist dominated Burma's?:
Country Report: Burma
How many suicides occur in Tonga every year? Here's a clue:
Becoming Tongan: An Ethnography of Childhood
Can you figure out what the main religion of Tonga is and what that main religion teaches in comparison to the others?
The Insanity of Doubt: The Code of Hammurabi, Ten Commandments, and Skepticemia
While researching ancient law I came upon a pseudo-history page on a website on the Code of Hammurabi and Ten Commandments, made by, no surprise to me, an atheist. Here are quotes from that page in the order I found them in with my replies to the sections I divided them into:
"Around 1750 B.C.E. the Code of Hammurabi, one of the oldest known legal codes, was cast in stone in Mesopotamia. This remarkable stone exists today in the Louvre museum in Paris.The code has elements of contract law, various human rights, and was considered so fundamental that they even applied to the king. The code included prohibitions against lying, theft, and murder, which are so universal that there are few cultures without them."
Why don't you tell everyone what the punishments were in his code? Why are you such a truth-hiding hypocrite you self-righteous bigot? Why don't you quote these allegedly ripped off laws? What's wrong, too harsh and merciless for you, too arbitrary?
"Roughly a thousand years later, Yahweh, the tribal god of the Israelites,"
What is your evidence he was merely a tribal God when he judged and punished the world, when he judged and punished the Egyptians and Babylon? Why are you so ignorant of the history you pretend to know? He is the God of 100+ million Calvinistic Christians and even more Catholics. Hardly a tribal God, big duh.
"is claimed in Biblical lore to have created a list of commands on stone tablets for Moses"
It's not a mere claim it is evidence from archaeological findings which you clearly don't want to study or hear about because you are a self-obsessed opinion-basher. Now what is the evidence for your claims besides your petty emotional banter?
"to give to his people. Perhaps the writers of the Torah coveted the power of the Babylonian stone tablets and created a story about stone tablets of their own in response."
"Perhaps"? Your evidence is your ignorant speculation yet you call Yahweh a hypocrite? What a massive slanderous hypocrite you are. Talk about stupidity, talk about hypocrisy, talk about a time-waster. So call Christians and Yahweh hypocrites based on your "perhaps"? Get a life you deluded hypocrite.
"Upon returning to his people, Moses found his followers worshiping a golden calf and in a dramatic huff he smashed the tablets and they were never mentioned again."
So the Bible must be repetitive on every single event? Don't fault-finding hypocrites whine about the Bible being boring because it always repeats? Damn God if he does damn him if he doesn't, right arbitrary babbler, right opinion-parrot?
"(Yahweh clearly didn’t foresee the event"
"Clear" because he said so, and whatever the opinion-basher says is true is true, cuz he said so.
"nor did he use a more suitable material for the tablets, such as diamond coated titanium.)"
And it's more suitable cuz? Cuz the confused babbling opinion-parrot said so. Ye said it so I believe it. Aliens like to eat bananas while spinning on inverted toilets because the color blue smells good. Hey, makes as much sense as what you said.
"After 3000 people were immediately killed and a plague sent for their transgression, Yahweh dictated a second set of commandments"
Not blind babbler they are based on the ten. Get a clue and study rather than babbling. Please learn what logic and evidence and stop babbling nonsense so that there is less useless time-wasting clutter on the net to distract people from learning the truth. Oh, my bad, your lies are useful for one thing, pointing out the stupidity and hypocrisy of non-Christians.
"to Moses that were clearly meant to replace the first set"
Cuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true cuz ye said it. If it was meant to replace the first set, why is the first set still in the Bible, and repeated twice, AFTER the golden-calf creation, which for no logical clear reason you imply is why a second set is created? Moreover wannabe scholar, did you notice the first set says not to make idols? So how is the second set a replacement lol? Blind to what is obvious and clear much?
"and the only ones called his commandments by Yahweh."
Wrong again, they are called "the ten words" (Exodus 34:28) more than once, implying they are the main commandments. Furthermore, Yeshuah, who is Yahweh, said, "You know the commandments: 'Do not commit adultery, Do not murder, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother.'" - Luke 18:20. Now how is it you don't know these commandments let alone that they are commandments? So someone needs to say, "This is a command", or you can't recognize what it obviously is? Do you need every little thing pointed out for you fault-finder, to understand what it is that is right in front of your hateful face?How did the utter obvious slip right past you in your "research"? Ooops?
"The second, undamaged set was placed in the mythical Ark of the Covenant."
Mythical cuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true cuz ye said so.
"Strangely, the contents of the second set are largely ignored today."
Cuz ye said so, and whatever the wannabe scholar says is true is true, cuz he said it. Now, largely ignored by who hypocrite? Hypocrites like you of course who make up imaginary 'facts' backed by emotionalism and not evidence.
"You might be surprised to learn that the real tenth commandment is a prohibition on a method of cooking kid goats."
Cuz ye said so, and whatever ye said is true cuz ye said it.
"There are many more problems with the Exodus story and the reader is encouraged to explore skeptical criticisms of it."
Wow, I thought you were giving factual criticisms lol. Not. Instead, big surprise, you tell us it's biased (skeptical) criticisms. Do you know what a pseudoskeptic is? Hint: Or how about skepticemia? Here's more careful legwork for you:
Dictionary
Chapter Entry
After you get the mental and spiritual help you need to cure you of your compulsive hatred, try carefully reading this real scholarly historical piece on the Code of Hammurabi and Moses.
I hope you get the help you need to get true peace.
"Around 1750 B.C.E. the Code of Hammurabi, one of the oldest known legal codes, was cast in stone in Mesopotamia. This remarkable stone exists today in the Louvre museum in Paris.The code has elements of contract law, various human rights, and was considered so fundamental that they even applied to the king. The code included prohibitions against lying, theft, and murder, which are so universal that there are few cultures without them."
Why don't you tell everyone what the punishments were in his code? Why are you such a truth-hiding hypocrite you self-righteous bigot? Why don't you quote these allegedly ripped off laws? What's wrong, too harsh and merciless for you, too arbitrary?
"Roughly a thousand years later, Yahweh, the tribal god of the Israelites,"
What is your evidence he was merely a tribal God when he judged and punished the world, when he judged and punished the Egyptians and Babylon? Why are you so ignorant of the history you pretend to know? He is the God of 100+ million Calvinistic Christians and even more Catholics. Hardly a tribal God, big duh.
"is claimed in Biblical lore to have created a list of commands on stone tablets for Moses"
It's not a mere claim it is evidence from archaeological findings which you clearly don't want to study or hear about because you are a self-obsessed opinion-basher. Now what is the evidence for your claims besides your petty emotional banter?
"to give to his people. Perhaps the writers of the Torah coveted the power of the Babylonian stone tablets and created a story about stone tablets of their own in response."
"Perhaps"? Your evidence is your ignorant speculation yet you call Yahweh a hypocrite? What a massive slanderous hypocrite you are. Talk about stupidity, talk about hypocrisy, talk about a time-waster. So call Christians and Yahweh hypocrites based on your "perhaps"? Get a life you deluded hypocrite.
"Upon returning to his people, Moses found his followers worshiping a golden calf and in a dramatic huff he smashed the tablets and they were never mentioned again."
So the Bible must be repetitive on every single event? Don't fault-finding hypocrites whine about the Bible being boring because it always repeats? Damn God if he does damn him if he doesn't, right arbitrary babbler, right opinion-parrot?
"(Yahweh clearly didn’t foresee the event"
"Clear" because he said so, and whatever the opinion-basher says is true is true, cuz he said so.
"nor did he use a more suitable material for the tablets, such as diamond coated titanium.)"
And it's more suitable cuz? Cuz the confused babbling opinion-parrot said so. Ye said it so I believe it. Aliens like to eat bananas while spinning on inverted toilets because the color blue smells good. Hey, makes as much sense as what you said.
"After 3000 people were immediately killed and a plague sent for their transgression, Yahweh dictated a second set of commandments"
Not blind babbler they are based on the ten. Get a clue and study rather than babbling. Please learn what logic and evidence and stop babbling nonsense so that there is less useless time-wasting clutter on the net to distract people from learning the truth. Oh, my bad, your lies are useful for one thing, pointing out the stupidity and hypocrisy of non-Christians.
"to Moses that were clearly meant to replace the first set"
Cuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true cuz ye said it. If it was meant to replace the first set, why is the first set still in the Bible, and repeated twice, AFTER the golden-calf creation, which for no logical clear reason you imply is why a second set is created? Moreover wannabe scholar, did you notice the first set says not to make idols? So how is the second set a replacement lol? Blind to what is obvious and clear much?
"and the only ones called his commandments by Yahweh."
Wrong again, they are called "the ten words" (Exodus 34:28) more than once, implying they are the main commandments. Furthermore, Yeshuah, who is Yahweh, said, "You know the commandments: 'Do not commit adultery, Do not murder, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother.'" - Luke 18:20. Now how is it you don't know these commandments let alone that they are commandments? So someone needs to say, "This is a command", or you can't recognize what it obviously is? Do you need every little thing pointed out for you fault-finder, to understand what it is that is right in front of your hateful face?How did the utter obvious slip right past you in your "research"? Ooops?
"The second, undamaged set was placed in the mythical Ark of the Covenant."
Mythical cuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true cuz ye said so.
"Strangely, the contents of the second set are largely ignored today."
Cuz ye said so, and whatever the wannabe scholar says is true is true, cuz he said it. Now, largely ignored by who hypocrite? Hypocrites like you of course who make up imaginary 'facts' backed by emotionalism and not evidence.
"You might be surprised to learn that the real tenth commandment is a prohibition on a method of cooking kid goats."
Cuz ye said so, and whatever ye said is true cuz ye said it.
"There are many more problems with the Exodus story and the reader is encouraged to explore skeptical criticisms of it."
Wow, I thought you were giving factual criticisms lol. Not. Instead, big surprise, you tell us it's biased (skeptical) criticisms. Do you know what a pseudoskeptic is? Hint: Or how about skepticemia? Here's more careful legwork for you:
Dictionary
Chapter Entry
After you get the mental and spiritual help you need to cure you of your compulsive hatred, try carefully reading this real scholarly historical piece on the Code of Hammurabi and Moses.
I hope you get the help you need to get true peace.
Friday, January 18, 2008
Evolutionists Approve of Rape, Child Molestion, Thievery and Lying
What has happened when not just your typical ignorant evolutionists, but the most well educated ones do not accept these most basic and obvious and facts, even scientifically evident: that the universe is designed and all the things in it?
What happens when people think mere rhetorical questions, sarcasm, mockery, insults, their skepticism, disbelief or belief or the strength of their belief = evidence?
What happens when people forget the most basic meanings of common and essential words and concepts such as truth, lie, evidence, proof, love, mercy, justice, law, good, evil, material, spiritual, and God?
What happens when Darwin-worshipers, anti-creationists, and moral, scientific, and historical ignoramuses pretend that everyone is his own god? You get a nutty rape-infested liar's paradise:
http://digg.com/world_news/Rapists_and_Child_Molestors_Find_Paradise
http://digg.com/world_news/Darwin_Plaguarized_a_Creation_Scientist
Stupidity, bias, and complacency leads to destruction, not evolution. The fittest won't just survive, but will live forever in peace and joy.
What happens when people think mere rhetorical questions, sarcasm, mockery, insults, their skepticism, disbelief or belief or the strength of their belief = evidence?
What happens when people forget the most basic meanings of common and essential words and concepts such as truth, lie, evidence, proof, love, mercy, justice, law, good, evil, material, spiritual, and God?
What happens when Darwin-worshipers, anti-creationists, and moral, scientific, and historical ignoramuses pretend that everyone is his own god? You get a nutty rape-infested liar's paradise:
http://digg.com/world_news/Rapists_and_Child_Molestors_Find_Paradise
http://digg.com/world_news/Darwin_Plaguarized_a_Creation_Scientist
Stupidity, bias, and complacency leads to destruction, not evolution. The fittest won't just survive, but will live forever in peace and joy.
Big Business Vs. The Little Guys: The Truth About Copyrights and Patents
My studies have shown me that copyrights and patents or rather copyright and patent enforcement are destructive to the world in general. They temporarily benefit a small few while oppressing most everyone else.
1. Copyrights and patents prevent technological progression from happening fast and even happening at all. It can even drive people to revert to using older and inferior technology if someone decides to be mean or greedy and enforce their copyright and patent 'rights'.
2. It is easily used as a tool by elites to land people in prison merely because they personally don't like that person or because that person is against their philosophical beliefs not even related to copyright or patent philosophy directly.
3. It keeps many people jobless or working poor jobs. For example a person who could be mass producing some valuable and life-saving medication may instead use his money to build himself a new home and buy a car, and then end up working at McDonald's or even homeless should his home burn down. But if he had lived in some cheap apartment, spent his money on a drug business making some cancer drug, he could employ many workers, be a ceo and expand his business. You may think, "Well without copyright and patent people would just face competition from others for the same stuff so it would cancel out the benefits" however that would forget the competition factor. In the face of such competition with such a large population as America's, with decent business laws not including copyright and patent laws, someone wins out and often has a superior and more affordable product. They may at first be making an already available generic cancer drug, but during the competition produce something better in order to stay in business. The huge pharmaceuticals in power now deliberately delay producing more effective drugs because they like to play it safe and conserve their money while making as much profit as possible. That is not good for anyone but the shareholders and even the shareholders are suffering in a sense since they could possibly be making much more money if they would improve their products or sell completely new and better ones.
4. Copyright and patent enforcement wastes money and time. Tax payers end up paying for lengthy trials which end up profiting not necessarily the patent and copyright owners, but the person with the most money who is suing or being sued.
5. It's impossible to enforce. Some argue that if people are stealing hard goods all the time should we just let them do it? Jesus would say to just let yourself be stolen from (although allows for the possibility of complaining to the authorities) but to compare stealing hard goods to information is a poor comparison. The reason is because information is 'stolen' infinitely more than hard goods. The number of copyrighted things being downloaded and copied is way way more then the theft of hard goods stolen each day, unless you want to include kids taking their parents' food and pocket change without permission, but I doubt that even comes close to the amount of copyrighted things being copied each HALF-HOUR let alone day. I know this from personal research. So, should the entire world (minus poor countries to poor to download no thanks to greedy and lazy big businesses) be arrested so that the rich can get richer and the poor more poor to the point of them being murderous rebels?
I believe that musicians and artists and inventors can, without copyright and patent laws, make a good living. They have the possibility of getting donations, or playing their music live, doing artistry before their viewers, continuing to paint (rather then being lazy and trying simply to live off royalties), and inventors, rather than hoping for or relying on royalties, would instead be offered a huge one lump some of cash or steady payments over time regardless of the sales of their invention or not. To me, trying to live off royalties is like someone claiming they own some new dance move, and that anyone making money off it owes them money. Or imagine a teacher telling his students they will owe him or his children money for the rest of their lives if they profit off what they've learned from him, it's absurd, complicated to the point of impossibility, and everyone would end up being poor in the end, or their would be a profit of zero from everyone passing on money repeatedly to give everyone their never-ending royalties.
Related info:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=600802
http://www.tinaja.com/glib/casagpat.pdf
http://libertariannation.org/a/f31l1.html
1. Copyrights and patents prevent technological progression from happening fast and even happening at all. It can even drive people to revert to using older and inferior technology if someone decides to be mean or greedy and enforce their copyright and patent 'rights'.
2. It is easily used as a tool by elites to land people in prison merely because they personally don't like that person or because that person is against their philosophical beliefs not even related to copyright or patent philosophy directly.
3. It keeps many people jobless or working poor jobs. For example a person who could be mass producing some valuable and life-saving medication may instead use his money to build himself a new home and buy a car, and then end up working at McDonald's or even homeless should his home burn down. But if he had lived in some cheap apartment, spent his money on a drug business making some cancer drug, he could employ many workers, be a ceo and expand his business. You may think, "Well without copyright and patent people would just face competition from others for the same stuff so it would cancel out the benefits" however that would forget the competition factor. In the face of such competition with such a large population as America's, with decent business laws not including copyright and patent laws, someone wins out and often has a superior and more affordable product. They may at first be making an already available generic cancer drug, but during the competition produce something better in order to stay in business. The huge pharmaceuticals in power now deliberately delay producing more effective drugs because they like to play it safe and conserve their money while making as much profit as possible. That is not good for anyone but the shareholders and even the shareholders are suffering in a sense since they could possibly be making much more money if they would improve their products or sell completely new and better ones.
4. Copyright and patent enforcement wastes money and time. Tax payers end up paying for lengthy trials which end up profiting not necessarily the patent and copyright owners, but the person with the most money who is suing or being sued.
5. It's impossible to enforce. Some argue that if people are stealing hard goods all the time should we just let them do it? Jesus would say to just let yourself be stolen from (although allows for the possibility of complaining to the authorities) but to compare stealing hard goods to information is a poor comparison. The reason is because information is 'stolen' infinitely more than hard goods. The number of copyrighted things being downloaded and copied is way way more then the theft of hard goods stolen each day, unless you want to include kids taking their parents' food and pocket change without permission, but I doubt that even comes close to the amount of copyrighted things being copied each HALF-HOUR let alone day. I know this from personal research. So, should the entire world (minus poor countries to poor to download no thanks to greedy and lazy big businesses) be arrested so that the rich can get richer and the poor more poor to the point of them being murderous rebels?
I believe that musicians and artists and inventors can, without copyright and patent laws, make a good living. They have the possibility of getting donations, or playing their music live, doing artistry before their viewers, continuing to paint (rather then being lazy and trying simply to live off royalties), and inventors, rather than hoping for or relying on royalties, would instead be offered a huge one lump some of cash or steady payments over time regardless of the sales of their invention or not. To me, trying to live off royalties is like someone claiming they own some new dance move, and that anyone making money off it owes them money. Or imagine a teacher telling his students they will owe him or his children money for the rest of their lives if they profit off what they've learned from him, it's absurd, complicated to the point of impossibility, and everyone would end up being poor in the end, or their would be a profit of zero from everyone passing on money repeatedly to give everyone their never-ending royalties.
Related info:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=600802
http://www.tinaja.com/glib/casagpat.pdf
http://libertariannation.org/a/f31l1.html
Friday, January 11, 2008
The Evolutionary Advantage of Christianity
I'm in the middle of reading an article titled Why the intelligent design lobby thanks God for Richard Dawkins by Madeleine Bunting of The Guardian news magazine and have come across various statements in it:
"Dennett cites those who argue that faith improves cooperation within groups (though not between them). This argument raises the crucial question of whether, in an era of globalisation and limited resources, religion has outrun its evolutionary advantage."
Christians successfully persuade people of hostile life-destroying groups such as the atheist group to be cooperative all the time, and help millions from various anti-Christian groups (to varying degrees) each year to become saved Christians or for a while, outwardly peaceful Christians. Since when have atheists spontaneously decided to become Christians? Since when as any non-Christian? They don't, they become Christians because of either the Bible, penned by Christians under God's control, and / or because of recorded or in person persuasions made by Christians after the Bible was written. It is false to claim Christians only improve cooperation between their groups. Furthermore Christians helped invent or nearly entirely some historians believe the modern scientific methods. And many Christians are scientists or inventors who have helped improve living standards for people all over the world. Some are doctors and nurses who help non Christians and often free of charge. So none of that improves cooperation outside of Christians? Wow. Now that is major historical ignorance and ignorance of the common place things that happen around you. Talk about opinion-obsessed and bigotry.
Also from the article:
"No one argues that it's a useful project for year 10s to research flat-earth theories, so why intelligent design?"
Why doesn't the deliberate history and science ignorant find out instead of asking a question that has been repeatedly answered by the Bible for 6000 years? Why doesn't he read the scientific evidence from anti-creationists and creationists which has been put out for the past 100 years or 6000? And is the type of ignoramus who thinks asking a sarcastic question = scientific evidence? And is the type of bigot who believes only "scientific evidence" counts as evidence? There is no scientific evidence for micro evolution. He would know that if the ranter bothered to read more than his own ancient parroted myths of walking fish with toes interested in sex and eating popping out of magical puddles from an imaginary billions of years old magical bomb from no where.
Also from the article:
"All protagonists in a debate have a moral responsibility to ensure that the hot air they are expending generates light, not just heat. It's a point that escapes Dawkins."
It's a point that escapes you too Miss Bunting.
"Dennett cites those who argue that faith improves cooperation within groups (though not between them). This argument raises the crucial question of whether, in an era of globalisation and limited resources, religion has outrun its evolutionary advantage."
Christians successfully persuade people of hostile life-destroying groups such as the atheist group to be cooperative all the time, and help millions from various anti-Christian groups (to varying degrees) each year to become saved Christians or for a while, outwardly peaceful Christians. Since when have atheists spontaneously decided to become Christians? Since when as any non-Christian? They don't, they become Christians because of either the Bible, penned by Christians under God's control, and / or because of recorded or in person persuasions made by Christians after the Bible was written. It is false to claim Christians only improve cooperation between their groups. Furthermore Christians helped invent or nearly entirely some historians believe the modern scientific methods. And many Christians are scientists or inventors who have helped improve living standards for people all over the world. Some are doctors and nurses who help non Christians and often free of charge. So none of that improves cooperation outside of Christians? Wow. Now that is major historical ignorance and ignorance of the common place things that happen around you. Talk about opinion-obsessed and bigotry.
Also from the article:
"No one argues that it's a useful project for year 10s to research flat-earth theories, so why intelligent design?"
Why doesn't the deliberate history and science ignorant find out instead of asking a question that has been repeatedly answered by the Bible for 6000 years? Why doesn't he read the scientific evidence from anti-creationists and creationists which has been put out for the past 100 years or 6000? And is the type of ignoramus who thinks asking a sarcastic question = scientific evidence? And is the type of bigot who believes only "scientific evidence" counts as evidence? There is no scientific evidence for micro evolution. He would know that if the ranter bothered to read more than his own ancient parroted myths of walking fish with toes interested in sex and eating popping out of magical puddles from an imaginary billions of years old magical bomb from no where.
Also from the article:
"All protagonists in a debate have a moral responsibility to ensure that the hot air they are expending generates light, not just heat. It's a point that escapes Dawkins."
It's a point that escapes you too Miss Bunting.
A Critical Critique of the Critical Thinking Skills of Harvard University's Evolutionists
According to some evolutionists at Harvard evolution has been proven true to everyone in the world. Yeah.
Some excerpts from their rant "Snails Caught in Act of Evolution" with my commentaries:
"Walking along the south shore of Great Inagua Island, the Agassiz Professor of Zoology noticed a telltale change in the shells of land snails scattered on a mud flat. He saw large, finger-shaped shells of Cerion excelsior, an extinct snail once widespread in the Bahamas. Nearby were smaller, rounder, vertically striped shells with prominent whorls, belonging to a species called Cerion rubicundum"
He found devolved snails, small and puny. That's some great convincing "proof" of evolution already. Why is it "proof" of MICROevolution (yes, there are more then two kinds despite evolutionists repeatedly "forgetting" that important fact) always comes in less complicated punier versions of their ancestors?
"The history of life on Earth is written in shells, bones, footprints, and imprints found in mountains, canyons, and at the bottom of the seas. Over millions of years, movements of air, water, and continents destroy these silent signs, creating gaps in the natural record, or the fossils are scattered and compressed in different layers of sedimentary rocks."
In other words, "Satan did it; he removed layers of strata and put all those inexplainable fossils, polonium halos, and artifacts that 'shouldn't be' in millions or billions of year old strata and rocks. If not, then God is oh so devious trickster for making us evolutionists assume the earth is billions of years old. He made them draw false conclusions. God made us do it. Forget the fact he let others figure out the truth and he spread it at the cost of their family and lives, they are liars and don't deserve to speak! Cuz!"
Moving on:
" ... That was just a theory, however; Gould hadn't proved it. ... the researchers used a more expensive and time-consuming clock, the decay of radioactive carbon present in the shells. ... The oldest hybrids, those most resembling excelsior, were alive about 17,000 years ago. The youngest fossils, those most resembling the rubicundum invaders, lived on Great Inagua as recently as 3,000 years ago."
Cuz faulty radiocarbon dating which is unreliable after 5000 years according to your own anti-creationists said so: see What about carbon dating? "The dates provided enough proof for Gould and Goodfriend to go public."
Not enough proof for me and saved creation scientists however.
"They published their findings in the Dec. 13 issue of Science, the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (and got applauses from ignorant, wannabe scientists desperate for vain exaltation and easy and gullible "chics" and the back pats and prizes of deluded anti-creationists, therefore: Snails Caught in Act of Evolution By William J. Cromie of the Gazette Staff is true.)
So Harvard is a university of critical thinking skills and "higher learning" huh? Evolve into reality already.
Now here's a" real" article on snails: The Historical Development of the Old-Earth Geological Time-Scale
Some excerpts from their rant "Snails Caught in Act of Evolution" with my commentaries:
"Walking along the south shore of Great Inagua Island, the Agassiz Professor of Zoology noticed a telltale change in the shells of land snails scattered on a mud flat. He saw large, finger-shaped shells of Cerion excelsior, an extinct snail once widespread in the Bahamas. Nearby were smaller, rounder, vertically striped shells with prominent whorls, belonging to a species called Cerion rubicundum"
He found devolved snails, small and puny. That's some great convincing "proof" of evolution already. Why is it "proof" of MICROevolution (yes, there are more then two kinds despite evolutionists repeatedly "forgetting" that important fact) always comes in less complicated punier versions of their ancestors?
"The history of life on Earth is written in shells, bones, footprints, and imprints found in mountains, canyons, and at the bottom of the seas. Over millions of years, movements of air, water, and continents destroy these silent signs, creating gaps in the natural record, or the fossils are scattered and compressed in different layers of sedimentary rocks."
In other words, "Satan did it; he removed layers of strata and put all those inexplainable fossils, polonium halos, and artifacts that 'shouldn't be' in millions or billions of year old strata and rocks. If not, then God is oh so devious trickster for making us evolutionists assume the earth is billions of years old. He made them draw false conclusions. God made us do it. Forget the fact he let others figure out the truth and he spread it at the cost of their family and lives, they are liars and don't deserve to speak! Cuz!"
Moving on:
" ... That was just a theory, however; Gould hadn't proved it. ... the researchers used a more expensive and time-consuming clock, the decay of radioactive carbon present in the shells. ... The oldest hybrids, those most resembling excelsior, were alive about 17,000 years ago. The youngest fossils, those most resembling the rubicundum invaders, lived on Great Inagua as recently as 3,000 years ago."
Cuz faulty radiocarbon dating which is unreliable after 5000 years according to your own anti-creationists said so: see What about carbon dating? "The dates provided enough proof for Gould and Goodfriend to go public."
Not enough proof for me and saved creation scientists however.
"They published their findings in the Dec. 13 issue of Science, the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (and got applauses from ignorant, wannabe scientists desperate for vain exaltation and easy and gullible "chics" and the back pats and prizes of deluded anti-creationists, therefore: Snails Caught in Act of Evolution By William J. Cromie of the Gazette Staff is true.)
So Harvard is a university of critical thinking skills and "higher learning" huh? Evolve into reality already.
Now here's a" real" article on snails: The Historical Development of the Old-Earth Geological Time-Scale
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
Yet Another Atheist Pretending to Be a Scientist Exposed
On amazon you can find a false review by IslandMoonWatcher (because the amazon moderators are anti-christian bigots who refuse to be fair to Christian authors and film-makers unless maybe you complain). Here my refutation:
"More idiotic drivel from the creationist camp."
Cuz u said so, and whatever the false scientist says who provides no evidence says is true, is true.
"It actually deserves zero stars. Even your own evangelists like Chuck Colson, Phillip E. Johnson and Hugh Ross agree on a "Big Bang", ie; God waved his magic wand about 14.7 billion years ago (or 6,600 years ago....whatever) and "POOF","
Cuz u said so, and whatever the false scientist says who provides no evidence says is true, is true.
"the universe and everything else was magically created out of pixie dust--fully aged of course,"
Who said it was created by pixie dust you slandering hypocrite? Slandering hypocrite where did the big bang come from? Ooops? Blind and bigoted much? Second, contradictory hypocrite, who said it appeared fully aged? Just because something as an appearance of age to you = it's therefore aged? You can that science you ranting, slandering, hypocrite? Hypocrite, if it was created new, then the AGE is not AGED you hypocrite, big duh. Also hypocrite it's already been shown that a new geological feature can have the appearance of being aged, see Tuluman Island you arguer from ignorance.
"like a good cheese."
God has problems making good cheese? Are you stupid? Why would it be hard for God to make good cheese if he can make a universe? Can you make any sense you babbler?
"PLEASE get a life"
Say what about eating your words?
"and leave science to scientists, not fairy-tale mythicists."
Cuz the non-scientist said so, and whatever the non-scientist says is true is true.
"Maybe I'll write a convincing-sounding fairy tale story about Noah and the Flood so I can sell books to the choir and steal a few thousand dollars too! "
So stereotypes = the truth? Hypocrite? So over 40 million Presbyterians and Baptists including their pastors and elders donating their hard earned money, not out of their riches and risking their lives to save others in third world countries and gang plagued areas, not thanks your evil silly Darwin god's racist preaching and you who parrot it like you've done here, are stealing and greedy? Thanks for the deep reasonless hatred that is the heart of a atheist myth-loving evolutionist.
Note: Notice you can't tell what IslandMoonWatcher has "reviewed"? So this is atheist "science" for you: ranting stupidity and falsely accusing others of the very evil the love.
"More idiotic drivel from the creationist camp."
Cuz u said so, and whatever the false scientist says who provides no evidence says is true, is true.
"It actually deserves zero stars. Even your own evangelists like Chuck Colson, Phillip E. Johnson and Hugh Ross agree on a "Big Bang", ie; God waved his magic wand about 14.7 billion years ago (or 6,600 years ago....whatever) and "POOF","
Cuz u said so, and whatever the false scientist says who provides no evidence says is true, is true.
"the universe and everything else was magically created out of pixie dust--fully aged of course,"
Who said it was created by pixie dust you slandering hypocrite? Slandering hypocrite where did the big bang come from? Ooops? Blind and bigoted much? Second, contradictory hypocrite, who said it appeared fully aged? Just because something as an appearance of age to you = it's therefore aged? You can that science you ranting, slandering, hypocrite? Hypocrite, if it was created new, then the AGE is not AGED you hypocrite, big duh. Also hypocrite it's already been shown that a new geological feature can have the appearance of being aged, see Tuluman Island you arguer from ignorance.
"like a good cheese."
God has problems making good cheese? Are you stupid? Why would it be hard for God to make good cheese if he can make a universe? Can you make any sense you babbler?
"PLEASE get a life"
Say what about eating your words?
"and leave science to scientists, not fairy-tale mythicists."
Cuz the non-scientist said so, and whatever the non-scientist says is true is true.
"Maybe I'll write a convincing-sounding fairy tale story about Noah and the Flood so I can sell books to the choir and steal a few thousand dollars too! "
So stereotypes = the truth? Hypocrite? So over 40 million Presbyterians and Baptists including their pastors and elders donating their hard earned money, not out of their riches and risking their lives to save others in third world countries and gang plagued areas, not thanks your evil silly Darwin god's racist preaching and you who parrot it like you've done here, are stealing and greedy? Thanks for the deep reasonless hatred that is the heart of a atheist myth-loving evolutionist.
Note: Notice you can't tell what IslandMoonWatcher has "reviewed"? So this is atheist "science" for you: ranting stupidity and falsely accusing others of the very evil the love.
James Randi Minions Can't Take Sarcasm, From Christians
Poor James Randi moderator, couldn't stand a christian joking about skepticemia, amazingly, it's okay to talk about big foot, the invisible kind, and all kinds of other absurd "look at me everyone I doubt it!" stories, as long as you don't point out how absurd it is.
"Your account has either been suspended or banned.
"Your account has either been suspended or banned.
If you have any questions regarding this you can use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page to contact the administrators."
Hypocrites.
Hypocrites.
High Weirdeness: Evidence for God
I was watching fraggle rock cartroons yesterday, then while looking up info on a invention salesmen named Dennis Lee just now found a wikipedia article on "Dennis Lee" " but it turns out to be another Deniss Lee who wrote the lyrics to the Fraggle Rock intro theme.
And I was talking to an atheist acquaintance about God, the Bible, and why I think I'm saved just before I read the page.
WEIRD.
I found a news article recently showing that Global Warming scare mongers ripped off over $2 billion from poor countries while simultaneously making the whole world worse according to certain of their like-minded scientists. On top of that, these scientists had been warning them that they would make things worse or were for years. That just goes to show how sick these global warmers are.
Damn those stupid auto keywords for blogspot tags are making me sick, they keep inserting words I don't want in there. How can such a rich tech company be so tech poor?
And I was talking to an atheist acquaintance about God, the Bible, and why I think I'm saved just before I read the page.
WEIRD.
I found a news article recently showing that Global Warming scare mongers ripped off over $2 billion from poor countries while simultaneously making the whole world worse according to certain of their like-minded scientists. On top of that, these scientists had been warning them that they would make things worse or were for years. That just goes to show how sick these global warmers are.
Damn those stupid auto keywords for blogspot tags are making me sick, they keep inserting words I don't want in there. How can such a rich tech company be so tech poor?
Friday, January 4, 2008
Greenpeace Whines Again When EU Comes To It's Senses
"European Parliament fails planet, panders to profits, Tough regulations on planet-imperilling chemicals rejected" whined the hypocrite Greenpeace moneybaggers. Greenpeace is a virtual corporation and has decided to spin a planet-saving action into doin' the planet bad:
Hypocritical Whining
Apparently the EU saw this video and decided to stop pandering to Greenpeace money baggers and similar lying thieves:
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Video Size: 640 x 368)
Or maybe they read these great books:
The Satanic Gases: Clearing the Air about Global Warming
Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming
The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World
Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming
Or maybe they felt too ashamed and guilty to continue being hypocritical, planet-destroying, terrorist thieves with greenpeace, earth-first and the sierra club:
CFC Substitutes Fix Ozone Hole, But Speed Up Global Warming. The title of that article from Fox News is a lie by the way. Notice the article says nothing about the hole magically being sealed let alone any evidence for that which would be quite amazing if true. Even when the global scare mongering thieves manage to tell some truth, they can't help but add some lies.
Hypocritical Whining
Apparently the EU saw this video and decided to stop pandering to Greenpeace money baggers and similar lying thieves:
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Video Size: 640 x 368)
Or maybe they read these great books:
The Satanic Gases: Clearing the Air about Global Warming
Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming
The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World
Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming
Or maybe they felt too ashamed and guilty to continue being hypocritical, planet-destroying, terrorist thieves with greenpeace, earth-first and the sierra club:
CFC Substitutes Fix Ozone Hole, But Speed Up Global Warming. The title of that article from Fox News is a lie by the way. Notice the article says nothing about the hole magically being sealed let alone any evidence for that which would be quite amazing if true. Even when the global scare mongering thieves manage to tell some truth, they can't help but add some lies.
Thursday, January 3, 2008
2nd Blog On Carl Flygare, a Super Anti-Christian Bigot
Note that the moderators of amazon.com are severe hypocrites. They have deleted my reviews for being "dissertations" and always reviews which are on anti-Christian books. Yet why then do these hypocrites allow Carl's dissertations which are much longer then the longest reviews they've deleted? Here is another example of Carl's ranting stupidity masquerading as a scientific review:
Carl Flygare - The wannbe scientist and bigot who amazon moderators sanction,January 3, 2008
Apologetics Cross-Dressed As Science Redux, or Whack-a-Mole 2.0, November 30, 2007
By Carl Flygare
"Did you know that Master Books, the publisher of "The Young Earth: The Real History of the Earth - Past, Present, and Future" by John Morris, President of The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is the publishing arm of the ICR - an ethical, functional, intellectual and in this case incestuous oxymoron - staffed by a bizarre bestiary of barking-mad biblical literalists; a priori dedicated to the preposterous presupposition that any myth or fable in the Bible - however hermeneutically contrived or at odds with objective reality - must trump the findings of modern science?"
Yawn. When will Carl stop wasting time being pretentious, pretending that his ranting mockery is evidence. When will this demon-loving hypocrite get down to real science?
"The Master Books mission statement commits to "Publishing creation-based materials for all ages that defend the Bible from the very first verse." No reputable mainstream publisher would ever consider or release such a farcical farrago of fervent faith-based fantasy - Morris essentially self-published his own book, the iconic imprimatur of a crank."
When will this hypocrite review the book and stop pretending to be putting forth evidence of wrong doing? We're waiting.
"This "Revised and Expanded" edition, burdened by an equally puerile fact and content-free PowerPoint presentation on CD (for witnessing to the witless perhaps), regurgitates the same creationist canards, denialism, and fallacies - in the service of the supposedly divine - that defaced and laced the original printing of "The Young Earth" in 1994."
Learn what evidence hypocrite: Hint, it doesn't mean, "Whatever Carl the hypocrite says it means."
"Morris falls into the "God said it, I believe it, that settles it" dogma dumpster"
Why is this hypocrite raving and slandering? Why is he taking Morris and all creationists out of context? Lying hypocrite who needs to learn what context means, we believe God because what he says is evident you moron, not because someone called God merely said it you moron. That is why the book Morris wrote and Ken Ham contains scientific evidence you moron, not simply one page with one sentence saying "God said it therefore it's true." Idiot liar, stop lying already. You're not cool, you're a lying hypocrite who thinks his opinions are evidence in and of themselves.
"but surreptitiously substitutes "I said it, God agrees with it, that settles it logic."
Carl said it, therefore it's true. You hypocrite, you are doing the very thing you are falsely accusing Morris and Ken and Duane for doing. You hypocrite, we present scientific evidence and logical evidence, where the hell is yours you raving hypocrite? Your logic stinks, when will you come up with actual evidence?
"He uses God like a ventriloquist uses a dummy - by putting words into his mouth - to defend otherwise indefensible arguments from authority; a desperate gambit necessary to sustain a contorted and contrived strain of anti-intellectual Christian fundamentalism with spectacularly inane pseudoscience."
Massive hypocrite insults and mere claims are not evidence and of themselves. Because Carl said it does not make it true. When do you think Carl will stop being such a hypocrite and pretending that what he says is true merely because he said it? This is Carl the hypocrite's logic:
"If a Christian says it it must not be true, if an anti-Christian like me Carl says it, then it must be true." That's you, hypocrite, not us. Carl the hypocrite then said:
""The Young Earth" - with increasing ineptitude in every chapter - attempts to justify a 6,000 year old Earth; a harlequin hypothesis conjured into existence by Archbishop James Ussher who credulously concluded that the Earth was created on Sunday, October 23, in 4,004 BC. John Lightfoot, a contemporary of Ussher even ventured a time of day - 9:00 AM!"
Massive hypocrite, once again, mere mockery is not evidence in and of itself your opinion is not magically self justifying. Laughing is not evidence. What a hypocrite. The hypocrite then says:
"Over the past two hundred years scientific advances in a number of disciplines, ranging from cosmology to physics and geology, have allowed researchers to determine the age of the Earth with remarkable accuracy - 4.54 billion years (plus or minus 1%)."
Because you said so bigoted moron. Master hypocrite, there are also creation scientists, did you notice? Did you notice super hypocrite that not all say the Earth is billions of years old? Hyper moron how could you miss that when you've "reviewed" the books of some of them? Dur? Duh? Doh? Super hypocrite how does it escape your ignorant self that Copernicus, Galileo and Newton, were all creationists? How does it escape your evil self that Christians scientists are the ones who created the modern scientific method and not idiot atheists like you? Big duh. Learn history and stop bashing people merely because they disagree with your stinky breathed self. Here ignorance-lover, more legwork for you:
Five historians all agree that the Bible and Christianity led to the modern scientific methods.
So, Carl the ranting hypocrite who posted a false stinky review, will you also post false reviews against those historians and pretend to be a historian yourself? Clearly the rest of your rant is not worth reading. You are a stubborn rebellious hypocrite trying to look cool, dying for worthless temporary back pats and invitations to parties from fellow hypocrites like yourself. See how many back pats you'll be getting in Hell.
Note to my readers, amazon moderators have deleted my reviews on various anti-christian and anti-calvinistic books for being dissertations, yet they sanction Carl's false raving reviews which are at least twice the size of my longest reviews. Amazon's CEO sanctions the moderators' actions, that makes amazon.com an anti-christian company who merely tolerates Christian books so as to not look totally biased and lose all their Christian customers. I suggest you buy the books through my amazon store and boost their rank to the top of amazon's book rank and by doing so push their junk propaganda to the bottom.
Carl Flygare - The wannbe scientist and bigot who amazon moderators sanction,
A Kid's Review (lol, Carl is a kid? Something tells me not, emotionally it's no doubt true though. Look up the definition of kid instead of taking Carl's word for it).
Since Car refuses to give a true review, and the amazon hypocrite moderators approve of that, shouldn't I, a Christian, also be allowed to post a non-review in like manner? At least mine are true. Now, let's analyze what the bigot ignorant Prententious Carl the Mentally Ill Mad Raving Wannabe Scientist and Contentious Genie said:Apologetics Cross-Dressed As Science Redux, or Whack-a-Mole 2.0, November 30, 2007
By Carl Flygare
"Did you know that Master Books, the publisher of "The Young Earth: The Real History of the Earth - Past, Present, and Future" by John Morris, President of The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is the publishing arm of the ICR - an ethical, functional, intellectual and in this case incestuous oxymoron - staffed by a bizarre bestiary of barking-mad biblical literalists; a priori dedicated to the preposterous presupposition that any myth or fable in the Bible - however hermeneutically contrived or at odds with objective reality - must trump the findings of modern science?"
Yawn. When will Carl stop wasting time being pretentious, pretending that his ranting mockery is evidence. When will this demon-loving hypocrite get down to real science?
"The Master Books mission statement commits to "Publishing creation-based materials for all ages that defend the Bible from the very first verse." No reputable mainstream publisher would ever consider or release such a farcical farrago of fervent faith-based fantasy - Morris essentially self-published his own book, the iconic imprimatur of a crank."
When will this hypocrite review the book and stop pretending to be putting forth evidence of wrong doing? We're waiting.
"This "Revised and Expanded" edition, burdened by an equally puerile fact and content-free PowerPoint presentation on CD (for witnessing to the witless perhaps), regurgitates the same creationist canards, denialism, and fallacies - in the service of the supposedly divine - that defaced and laced the original printing of "The Young Earth" in 1994."
Learn what evidence hypocrite: Hint, it doesn't mean, "Whatever Carl the hypocrite says it means."
"Morris falls into the "God said it, I believe it, that settles it" dogma dumpster"
Why is this hypocrite raving and slandering? Why is he taking Morris and all creationists out of context? Lying hypocrite who needs to learn what context means, we believe God because what he says is evident you moron, not because someone called God merely said it you moron. That is why the book Morris wrote and Ken Ham contains scientific evidence you moron, not simply one page with one sentence saying "God said it therefore it's true." Idiot liar, stop lying already. You're not cool, you're a lying hypocrite who thinks his opinions are evidence in and of themselves.
"but surreptitiously substitutes "I said it, God agrees with it, that settles it logic."
Carl said it, therefore it's true. You hypocrite, you are doing the very thing you are falsely accusing Morris and Ken and Duane for doing. You hypocrite, we present scientific evidence and logical evidence, where the hell is yours you raving hypocrite? Your logic stinks, when will you come up with actual evidence?
"He uses God like a ventriloquist uses a dummy - by putting words into his mouth - to defend otherwise indefensible arguments from authority; a desperate gambit necessary to sustain a contorted and contrived strain of anti-intellectual Christian fundamentalism with spectacularly inane pseudoscience."
Massive hypocrite insults and mere claims are not evidence and of themselves. Because Carl said it does not make it true. When do you think Carl will stop being such a hypocrite and pretending that what he says is true merely because he said it? This is Carl the hypocrite's logic:
"If a Christian says it it must not be true, if an anti-Christian like me Carl says it, then it must be true." That's you, hypocrite, not us. Carl the hypocrite then said:
""The Young Earth" - with increasing ineptitude in every chapter - attempts to justify a 6,000 year old Earth; a harlequin hypothesis conjured into existence by Archbishop James Ussher who credulously concluded that the Earth was created on Sunday, October 23, in 4,004 BC. John Lightfoot, a contemporary of Ussher even ventured a time of day - 9:00 AM!"
Massive hypocrite, once again, mere mockery is not evidence in and of itself your opinion is not magically self justifying. Laughing is not evidence. What a hypocrite. The hypocrite then says:
"Over the past two hundred years scientific advances in a number of disciplines, ranging from cosmology to physics and geology, have allowed researchers to determine the age of the Earth with remarkable accuracy - 4.54 billion years (plus or minus 1%)."
Because you said so bigoted moron. Master hypocrite, there are also creation scientists, did you notice? Did you notice super hypocrite that not all say the Earth is billions of years old? Hyper moron how could you miss that when you've "reviewed" the books of some of them? Dur? Duh? Doh? Super hypocrite how does it escape your ignorant self that Copernicus, Galileo and Newton, were all creationists? How does it escape your evil self that Christians scientists are the ones who created the modern scientific method and not idiot atheists like you? Big duh. Learn history and stop bashing people merely because they disagree with your stinky breathed self. Here ignorance-lover, more legwork for you:
Five historians all agree that the Bible and Christianity led to the modern scientific methods.
So, Carl the ranting hypocrite who posted a false stinky review, will you also post false reviews against those historians and pretend to be a historian yourself? Clearly the rest of your rant is not worth reading. You are a stubborn rebellious hypocrite trying to look cool, dying for worthless temporary back pats and invitations to parties from fellow hypocrites like yourself. See how many back pats you'll be getting in Hell.
Note to my readers, amazon moderators have deleted my reviews on various anti-christian and anti-calvinistic books for being dissertations, yet they sanction Carl's false raving reviews which are at least twice the size of my longest reviews. Amazon's CEO sanctions the moderators' actions, that makes amazon.com an anti-christian company who merely tolerates Christian books so as to not look totally biased and lose all their Christian customers. I suggest you buy the books through my amazon store and boost their rank to the top of amazon's book rank and by doing so push their junk propaganda to the bottom.
Wednesday, January 2, 2008
Ending Abortion Would Save Social Security, Group Argues
Susan Jones
Morning Editor
(CNSNews.com) - President Bush can protect Social Security by "curing" abortion, a pro-life group says.
The American Life League is running a full-page newspaper ad in Thursday's Washington Times, explaining that since 1973, more than 50 million babies have been killed through abortion.
"Those are the very babies that, today, would be living, working -- and paying into Social Security," said Judie Brown, president of American Life League. "However, the national plague of abortion has eliminated those contributors from society."
Full story here: http://www.crosswalk.com/1306821
Morning Editor
(CNSNews.com) - President Bush can protect Social Security by "curing" abortion, a pro-life group says.
The American Life League is running a full-page newspaper ad in Thursday's Washington Times, explaining that since 1973, more than 50 million babies have been killed through abortion.
"Those are the very babies that, today, would be living, working -- and paying into Social Security," said Judie Brown, president of American Life League. "However, the national plague of abortion has eliminated those contributors from society."
Full story here: http://www.crosswalk.com/1306821
Tuesday, January 1, 2008
Lying About Pygmies - Evolutionists "Bull-shitting" Again
"Pygmies’ short life spans may be behind their small size
December 11th, 2007 - 4:17 pm ICT by adminWashington, December 11 (ANI): A new study suggests that the smaller life spans of pygmies across the world might be a reason as to why they are smaller in size than average humans.
The research suggests that brief life spans put evolutionary pressure on pygmy women to stop growing and to start giving birth sooner."
And it "suggests" meaning what? Who wrote this article? An evolutionist of course, so of course it's going to suggest evolution is true. Big duh. And suggests to who lol? To creationists who don't lie for profit and pride? Creationists who aren't in the habit of lying? So that's the powerful evolutionary evidence? To bullshit and be vague? And how does brief life span = stop growing? Is evolution now like karma? It's magically intelligent? It's some sort of god now? The article goes on to say:
"As a result of this, the energy that should normally be expended on growth gets spent on reproduction at a younger age."
Wow, check that out, their evidence is to repeat what they just said. Thanks for wasting my time. No wait, not a total waste, they've demonstrated more evidence for their "repeat a lie enough and people will believe it" technique. The article then says:"“The idea is that (pygmies) have to stop growing earlier, because when you start reproducing at least for women all the energy you would put in growth is put into reproduction,” the National Geographic quoted Andrea Migliano, the lead author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow at Clare College, Cambridge, in the United Kingdom, as saying."
For the third time the article repeats this theory without citing evidence for its validity. And besides that did you notice any errors? Notice Andrea avoided the issue of why the men would not grow taller being that they don't have to expend much energy carrying around and feeding a baby? So much for her "idea". Furthermore, what is the evidence that "all of the energy" a pygmy uses is put into reproduction? You mean they don't dance, sing, learn, hunt, grow, nurse babies, or have fun doing other things? So they can't do both huh, they can only be baby machines? Would pygmies disappear if they were more active? Furthermore, how much energy could it possibly for a human to grow from 1 foot to 5 or 7 feet in FOURTEEN-EIGHTEEN YEARS? Since when does growing to even eight feet after eighteen years make a person unable to give birth to two or three kids and unable to be a very active person? Does anyone notice anyone living shorter and shorter lifespans from being very active lol? So this is evolutionary science? Teaching evolutionary theory is a shameful waste of tax-payer money (including that of creationist Christians who are illegally made to fund it when it is opposed to their conscience), time that could be used to make real advancements in technology and science. It is worthless compared to bull shit; bull shit can be used as fertilizer and fuel and used to save lives. But what is good is evolution except to show that creationists are right and that evolutionists are wasting-time?The article then says:
"“You have to choose either you grow or you reproduce,” she added."
Cuz she said so (damn, I can either be 1 foot or have kids), and didn't I virtually read that stupid teaching three other times in this article without any evidence to back it? And what's with the switcheroo? First were talking about life-span, then it shifts to height. What the hell? Can evolutionists stop going off on illogical tangents?There is no magical evolution law that says, "Hi, if you live longer you can't more kids!"
Ironically, in atheist-evolutionist dominated China, they even force abortions on those, including christians who try to have more then one or two children. Sick atheist-evolutionists try and force their theories to come true. Sick, vile, sick.
The Gospel In All Languages - My Gospel Translation Project
I started a project that I had forgotten about for many months, a project to translate my version of the gospel into all the major languages of the world. I barely have any money and the majority of it will take up all or almost all of my disability check for next month, leaving me with nothing. I'll finally be forced to use food stamps again. I've already got one translation in Portuguese and one woman is working on a Russian translation.
Should I meet Pastor Galen of First Family Church of Albuquerque, New Mexico again, perhaps he will once again encourage me and make me feel "apart of the family" with another bitter, "You reap what you sow" come back if I tell him that I 'm impoverished again.
My next project is to have certain other verses translated in fulfillment of a certain prophecy.
If anyone wants to donate to me to help me out, contact me.
Should I meet Pastor Galen of First Family Church of Albuquerque, New Mexico again, perhaps he will once again encourage me and make me feel "apart of the family" with another bitter, "You reap what you sow" come back if I tell him that I 'm impoverished again.
My next project is to have certain other verses translated in fulfillment of a certain prophecy.
If anyone wants to donate to me to help me out, contact me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
