According to the annoying-voiced radio show babbler Mark Davis, "I would kick 9/11 Truthers in the crotch if I could" and that he would only listen to their evidence if "even half of structural engineers come forward" to support the movement. He also said that they had no business using "9/11" and "truth" in the same sentence.
Well don't you know Mark the Truth-hater that truth is determined by consensus and is not truth if it after eight years not more than half support the truth it? Common Sense Wrong. Using your anti-Christian logic, Darwinian evolution must be false and anti-9/11 Truthers must be wrong since you've still not come up with any evidence, let alone scientific evidence, to refute ours. You're own evil logic has refuted itself.
And if you and other bigots won't listen to the less than half of engineers supporting 9/11 Truth, than what is it you are angry about them saying? How can you know the evidence they have is wrong if you won't listen? And so good science is to reject any hypothesis because it's not supported "by even half" of whoever is in the field to judge the hypothesis when it's created? What an anti-scientific moron you are. It's because of stupid, babbling, narcissist, anti-God, anti-truth idiots like you that the sciences of the world are stagnating.
If it were you idiot then all kinds of lies would have been perpetuated from the beginning of time, like that LYING is good as long as no one is hurt, idiot. And of course liars, being liars, define "hurt" however they want, just like you, liar.
You're an annoying-voiced hypocrite who insulted kids, female, military service men and women, those who lost their relatives in 9/11, military service men and women and the growing number of structural engineers who support the 9/11 Truth Movement.
And Mr. It's Wrong to Bully and Obfuscate - or should I call you, Mr. Blacks Are Subhumans Because Most Evolutionary Scientists Agreed They Were - do you really think that threatening to kick people in the crotch encourages free speech, let alone truthful free speech? Could it be that it's because of violent-mouthed threatening psychos like yourself that chill free speech, that after eight years not half of structural engineers have supposedly not supported the 9/11 Truth Movement?
And what business do you have judging anyone who is religious, like you did Catholics today, when you use weasel phrases like, 'I oppose indoctrination' to subliminally bias people against religion? Do you know what indoctrination means?
Your no libertarian and you're no conservative; you're sick.
Monday, August 31, 2009
To Calvinists: Does God Predestine Anyone To Hell?
I don't like the label "Hyper Calvinist". It's puke and reminds me of "spaz" atheists. So don't call me one after reading this.
Who agrees that God destines everything, including who goes to Hell? I believe that it is illogical and unbiblical (and makes Calvinists look stupid) to claim that God doesn't destine anyone to Hell when it's claimed that he is the one who is required to save you. Further, think of it this way: does God do anything without knowing the result? Doesn't God know the result of his action of inaction? Is God the one who decides what will happen or is he not all-knowing? Are there things God is unsure of? Is God only sure of what will happen to a person he intends to save? Further, why wouldn't God destine someone to Hell when he hardens a person's heart so that they WON'T do good? Why cut it short at destining someone to Hell if he chooses what sins a person will commit indirectly? Again:
How can anyone say, "God doesn't destine anyone to Hell," when he is in control of everything either directly or indirectly and knows the future perfectly and his turning our hearts to him for forgiveness is required for us to be saved from Hell?
I hope that any Calvinists who claim God doesn't destine anyone to Hell or who says, "Well I don't know" will stop, and admit the truth so that we aren't seen as insane idiots anymore by Christians and Arminiests, who use that illogical fudging to turn or keep people away from the only way to eternal peace. It's not enough to unifiy under the name "Calvinist" anymore than it was enough to unify under the name "Christian": We must get our gospel straight and stop spreading Hellish confusion and stop pandering and giving Arminiansts room in the Church to spread their deception.
And just what is the problem with saying that God destines anyone to Hell? Everyone knows that false and non-Christians are arbitrary with their condemnation of God anyways, they say, "He's always angry" and hateful for sending anyone to Hell except Satan and the demons that follow him, or that he's always allowing the innocent to suffer (and ironically they unkowingly include "Christians" under 'innocent', sometimes).
There ar already the "blinded" and "hardened" verses and the punishment verses, so what does it matter if we acknowledge that God does destine people to Hell as well? They already say he is mean when about none of us bring that point up and rarely!
This denying that God destines anyone to Hell allows millions of Arminiests, whether they call themselves or not, to disguise themselves as one of us. How? Because in their confused minds they think that so long as they wet say that God doesn't destine anyone to Hell that a person can be saved by their own goodness, and if that is true, then God doesn't need to destine anyone to get eternal life, and if he doesn't need to, then he doesn't. If that's not how they reason then why else would they divide from Calvinists on that point above the others they differ from us on? Why else would they always be babbling about how man has a free will and how God gave us a free will? Their denial that God destines anyone to Hell above destining anyone at all combined with their endless trumping of "free will" and not God's show how they think. We Calvinists must not give them weasel room anymore and must let the falling away occur, and it will occur when we shut the door to their lies. The longer we allow their foot in the door on this issue, the more people they will deceive and the worse the condemnation of those going to Hell will be. It's better for the world to revert back to idolatry as Revelation seems to imply will happen, than people continually drawing near to Christ under the false idea that they can earn their way into Heaven or just by saying, "I accept Jesus into my heart," and ask for forgiveness again and again when they sin and or just doing some good deeds.
Another problem withing denying or hiding that we believe God destines anyone to Hell is that it makes it harder to distinguish a true from a false Christian. The Pentecostal churches are infested with fakes in part, because of true Christians pandering to the fakes and denominations similar to ours, like the Methodists appear to be "as Christian" as us. So, for those Calvinists who keep giving ground to the enemy, stop: draw the line clearly in the sand and stay there.D
Who agrees that God destines everything, including who goes to Hell? I believe that it is illogical and unbiblical (and makes Calvinists look stupid) to claim that God doesn't destine anyone to Hell when it's claimed that he is the one who is required to save you. Further, think of it this way: does God do anything without knowing the result? Doesn't God know the result of his action of inaction? Is God the one who decides what will happen or is he not all-knowing? Are there things God is unsure of? Is God only sure of what will happen to a person he intends to save? Further, why wouldn't God destine someone to Hell when he hardens a person's heart so that they WON'T do good? Why cut it short at destining someone to Hell if he chooses what sins a person will commit indirectly? Again:
How can anyone say, "God doesn't destine anyone to Hell," when he is in control of everything either directly or indirectly and knows the future perfectly and his turning our hearts to him for forgiveness is required for us to be saved from Hell?
I hope that any Calvinists who claim God doesn't destine anyone to Hell or who says, "Well I don't know" will stop, and admit the truth so that we aren't seen as insane idiots anymore by Christians and Arminiests, who use that illogical fudging to turn or keep people away from the only way to eternal peace. It's not enough to unifiy under the name "Calvinist" anymore than it was enough to unify under the name "Christian": We must get our gospel straight and stop spreading Hellish confusion and stop pandering and giving Arminiansts room in the Church to spread their deception.
And just what is the problem with saying that God destines anyone to Hell? Everyone knows that false and non-Christians are arbitrary with their condemnation of God anyways, they say, "He's always angry" and hateful for sending anyone to Hell except Satan and the demons that follow him, or that he's always allowing the innocent to suffer (and ironically they unkowingly include "Christians" under 'innocent', sometimes).
There ar already the "blinded" and "hardened" verses and the punishment verses, so what does it matter if we acknowledge that God does destine people to Hell as well? They already say he is mean when about none of us bring that point up and rarely!
This denying that God destines anyone to Hell allows millions of Arminiests, whether they call themselves or not, to disguise themselves as one of us. How? Because in their confused minds they think that so long as they wet say that God doesn't destine anyone to Hell that a person can be saved by their own goodness, and if that is true, then God doesn't need to destine anyone to get eternal life, and if he doesn't need to, then he doesn't. If that's not how they reason then why else would they divide from Calvinists on that point above the others they differ from us on? Why else would they always be babbling about how man has a free will and how God gave us a free will? Their denial that God destines anyone to Hell above destining anyone at all combined with their endless trumping of "free will" and not God's show how they think. We Calvinists must not give them weasel room anymore and must let the falling away occur, and it will occur when we shut the door to their lies. The longer we allow their foot in the door on this issue, the more people they will deceive and the worse the condemnation of those going to Hell will be. It's better for the world to revert back to idolatry as Revelation seems to imply will happen, than people continually drawing near to Christ under the false idea that they can earn their way into Heaven or just by saying, "I accept Jesus into my heart," and ask for forgiveness again and again when they sin and or just doing some good deeds.
Another problem withing denying or hiding that we believe God destines anyone to Hell is that it makes it harder to distinguish a true from a false Christian. The Pentecostal churches are infested with fakes in part, because of true Christians pandering to the fakes and denominations similar to ours, like the Methodists appear to be "as Christian" as us. So, for those Calvinists who keep giving ground to the enemy, stop: draw the line clearly in the sand and stay there.D
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Crooks, Liars, and Master Accuser John Amato and Mentally Ill Daughter Abbywood Can't Hide Their Hatred for Science and Truth
Here's a late pathetic attempt by John Amato to look oh so macho, pro-science, and pro-life,by persecuting the 'stupid pathetic sheep' (in other words, "Dumb", "weak" [and harmless] Christians):
John Amato: Oh, no.., What will the Dinosaurs think? The pro-birth anti-evolution Christian evangelism movement just suffered a horrible blow.
Oh no..., could you be keyword spamming you moron anti-child, pro-murder, anti-science Liberal evangelism movement which repeatedly suffers horrible blows to its fat beaten bitter target of a head? Spammer much? What is, "...,"? So you're what liberal baby-haters consider a top blogger? *Laughs*.
And why are you asking what dinosaurs would think? How is that funny? Where's the punchline idiot? Insane much? Terrorists a.k.a. "bombers" (lol) have nothing on you.
Let's see more of your cheap keyword spam:
John Amato: "A federal judge has cleared the way for the government's seizure of a creationism theme park in Pensacola owned by a couple convicted of tax fraud."
Woah you said, "cleared the way," you must be pro.
John Amato: "A ruling by U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers states that the nine properties that make up Dinosaur Adventure Land as well as two bank accounts associated with the park will be used to satisfy $430,400 owed to the federal government."
Oh you love that word satisfy don't you. You look pretty satisfied. I doubt you'll be modeling for any slim fast commercials anytime soon unless you decide to share some of that fat with the needy you pretend to care about.
John Amato: "Kent Hovind, who founded the park and a ministry, Creation Science Evangelism, is serving 10 years in federal prison for failing to pay the Internal Revenue Service more than $470,000 in employee taxes."
Grrrr John, he "failed" grrrr. Oh that "failure". What a dumb, cheap weasel-wording, conniving hypocrite you are. The failure is you John: you repeatedly fail God's tests and repeatedly break his commandments and your own hypocritical, arbitrary, convenient standards.
John Amato: "He was found guilty in November 2006 on 58 counts, including failure to pay employee taxes and making threats against investigators."
"For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you." Have fun on Judgment Day.
John Amato: "The conviction culminated 17 years of Hovind sparring with the IRS."
You must be smart because you said, "culminated" and "sparring". Well I'm just going to believe whatever you now. Not.
John Amato: "Saying he was employed by God and his ministers were not subject to payroll taxes, he claimed no income or property."
This is a sentence? Can you show us your source for this nonsense John the Top Babbler? Talk about "cheap".
John Amato: "Hovind is incarcerated at the Edgefield Federal Correction Institution in South Carolina."
Isn't that a place filled with your liberal friends? Something tells me it's not fundamentalists.
John Amato: "They lie about their dirty dealings"
Who lies stupid? The liberals filling up all the prisons of the world let alone Edgefield Federal Correction Institution? Oh did yo mean Obama and his liberal army who gave trillions of dollars to the rich that he pretends to be against? The same Obama you support who won't show his birth certificate who spent millions to keep it hidden? That "pro-poor" Honest Obama? And can you back this up with evidence and not your mere word or mere claims from a government you pretend is always wrong? And what was that about "dirty"? Wow so you believes in sin? Thanks for acknowledging the existence of God stupid. And the "major blow" to you is this one incident lol? The church isn't composed of 100 people you moron, it's 60+ million not counting angels or the Christian in Heaven awaiting vengeance on morons like you. And the great "dirty" sin to you is this one incident out of countless good deeds which you deliberately ignore both from Christians and God, the source of their good deeds? Why so bitter you fault-finding oaf? Why so bitter at God fat head who can't stop making a fool of himself, who can't stop thinking sick tormenting thoughts of revenge on Christian kids? Oh. That's still not an excuse to hate God. Talk about negative and cheap shots eh? "But, but, but you called me fat head!" Cheap-shot barfs what?
John Amato: "now DrDino.com is in trouble."
*Yawn*. What about trouble fat head babbler? Fat head you think that's trouble? Fat head don't you remember what Jesus suffered at the hands of truth-hating brutes like you? Don't you remember he suffered an eternity of Hell for the countless sins of dozens of millions of people, and that that eternity of suffering was compressed into three days? Did you forget the mass murder of 12+ million Christians, including Christian kids and babies by your liberal pagan friends, including by atheists? And why are you and your atheist friends such massive control freaks, forcing their atheism on others who are minding their own business in their own homes. And besides spending their time not minding their own business by bulldozing homes for being used to worship God, your atheist friends even commit mass murder, while you and they accuse "weak", "stupid", "harmless", Christians as being "bashers" who try to force things on you. Well if you can use murder, we can preach with force you hypocrite. You strain at a gnat you camel, and blow a trumpet when you find one, wasting everyone's time.
John Amato: "Hang on, it's time to call in the Flying Spaghetti Monster. It can help us!"
Har har har that's just such clever humor. Not. Why would Christians call on your imaginary childish cartoon god? It compares to God how? I hear crickets. God repeatedly cuts you with his best selling book while at the same time using it to bring peace all over the world, and exposing the malicious murderous hate within your anti-truth group for over 2000 years, always the center of your attention for "ruining" your lives, and you think that compares to your baby joke? What a gluttonous idiot. I can see why you're obsessed with flying, Spaghetti, and monsters, being that you must get exhausted weighted down by so much "excess" all day and see your reflection when you come near shiny spoons and mirrors and the cracked-smile faces of your bitter-faced friends all day long.
Johnny The Hypocrite Amato (checking for left over bread crumbs?)
One of John's psycho liberal (yes that's redundant) friends
John Amato: Oh, no.., What will the Dinosaurs think? The pro-birth anti-evolution Christian evangelism movement just suffered a horrible blow.
Oh no..., could you be keyword spamming you moron anti-child, pro-murder, anti-science Liberal evangelism movement which repeatedly suffers horrible blows to its fat beaten bitter target of a head? Spammer much? What is, "...,"? So you're what liberal baby-haters consider a top blogger? *Laughs*.
And why are you asking what dinosaurs would think? How is that funny? Where's the punchline idiot? Insane much? Terrorists a.k.a. "bombers" (lol) have nothing on you.
Let's see more of your cheap keyword spam:
John Amato: "A federal judge has cleared the way for the government's seizure of a creationism theme park in Pensacola owned by a couple convicted of tax fraud."
Woah you said, "cleared the way," you must be pro.
John Amato: "A ruling by U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers states that the nine properties that make up Dinosaur Adventure Land as well as two bank accounts associated with the park will be used to satisfy $430,400 owed to the federal government."
Oh you love that word satisfy don't you. You look pretty satisfied. I doubt you'll be modeling for any slim fast commercials anytime soon unless you decide to share some of that fat with the needy you pretend to care about.
John Amato: "Kent Hovind, who founded the park and a ministry, Creation Science Evangelism, is serving 10 years in federal prison for failing to pay the Internal Revenue Service more than $470,000 in employee taxes."
Grrrr John, he "failed" grrrr. Oh that "failure". What a dumb, cheap weasel-wording, conniving hypocrite you are. The failure is you John: you repeatedly fail God's tests and repeatedly break his commandments and your own hypocritical, arbitrary, convenient standards.
John Amato: "He was found guilty in November 2006 on 58 counts, including failure to pay employee taxes and making threats against investigators."
"For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you." Have fun on Judgment Day.
John Amato: "The conviction culminated 17 years of Hovind sparring with the IRS."
You must be smart because you said, "culminated" and "sparring". Well I'm just going to believe whatever you now. Not.
John Amato: "Saying he was employed by God and his ministers were not subject to payroll taxes, he claimed no income or property."
This is a sentence? Can you show us your source for this nonsense John the Top Babbler? Talk about "cheap".
John Amato: "Hovind is incarcerated at the Edgefield Federal Correction Institution in South Carolina."
Isn't that a place filled with your liberal friends? Something tells me it's not fundamentalists.
John Amato: "They lie about their dirty dealings"
Who lies stupid? The liberals filling up all the prisons of the world let alone Edgefield Federal Correction Institution? Oh did yo mean Obama and his liberal army who gave trillions of dollars to the rich that he pretends to be against? The same Obama you support who won't show his birth certificate who spent millions to keep it hidden? That "pro-poor" Honest Obama? And can you back this up with evidence and not your mere word or mere claims from a government you pretend is always wrong? And what was that about "dirty"? Wow so you believes in sin? Thanks for acknowledging the existence of God stupid. And the "major blow" to you is this one incident lol? The church isn't composed of 100 people you moron, it's 60+ million not counting angels or the Christian in Heaven awaiting vengeance on morons like you. And the great "dirty" sin to you is this one incident out of countless good deeds which you deliberately ignore both from Christians and God, the source of their good deeds? Why so bitter you fault-finding oaf? Why so bitter at God fat head who can't stop making a fool of himself, who can't stop thinking sick tormenting thoughts of revenge on Christian kids? Oh. That's still not an excuse to hate God. Talk about negative and cheap shots eh? "But, but, but you called me fat head!" Cheap-shot barfs what?
John Amato: "now DrDino.com is in trouble."
*Yawn*. What about trouble fat head babbler? Fat head you think that's trouble? Fat head don't you remember what Jesus suffered at the hands of truth-hating brutes like you? Don't you remember he suffered an eternity of Hell for the countless sins of dozens of millions of people, and that that eternity of suffering was compressed into three days? Did you forget the mass murder of 12+ million Christians, including Christian kids and babies by your liberal pagan friends, including by atheists? And why are you and your atheist friends such massive control freaks, forcing their atheism on others who are minding their own business in their own homes. And besides spending their time not minding their own business by bulldozing homes for being used to worship God, your atheist friends even commit mass murder, while you and they accuse "weak", "stupid", "harmless", Christians as being "bashers" who try to force things on you. Well if you can use murder, we can preach with force you hypocrite. You strain at a gnat you camel, and blow a trumpet when you find one, wasting everyone's time.
"It is a dreadful thing to fall into
the hands of the living God."
Hebrews 10:31
"Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked.
A man reaps what he sows."
Galatians 6:7
"You hate all who do wrong."
Psalm 5:5
"Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but
cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One
who can destroy both soul and body in hell."
Matthew 10:28
the hands of the living God."
Hebrews 10:31
"Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked.
A man reaps what he sows."
Galatians 6:7
"You hate all who do wrong."
Psalm 5:5
"Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but
cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One
who can destroy both soul and body in hell."
Matthew 10:28
You don't know "trouble" John,
yet.
yet.
John Amato: "Hang on, it's time to call in the Flying Spaghetti Monster. It can help us!"
Har har har that's just such clever humor. Not. Why would Christians call on your imaginary childish cartoon god? It compares to God how? I hear crickets. God repeatedly cuts you with his best selling book while at the same time using it to bring peace all over the world, and exposing the malicious murderous hate within your anti-truth group for over 2000 years, always the center of your attention for "ruining" your lives, and you think that compares to your baby joke? What a gluttonous idiot. I can see why you're obsessed with flying, Spaghetti, and monsters, being that you must get exhausted weighted down by so much "excess" all day and see your reflection when you come near shiny spoons and mirrors and the cracked-smile faces of your bitter-faced friends all day long.
Johnny The Hypocrite Amato (checking for left over bread crumbs?)
And hypocrite, why do you support the Darwinist government when it persecutes "weak", "stupid", "pathetic" sheep, but not when it attacks your either obese or anorexic, truth-hating, liberal friends? Arbitrary much? Contradictory and schizophrenic much?
And who is us stupid? Why would you be calling the imaginary baby cartoon for help if you didn't say you're the one being persecuted? Confused much? Or did you mean that your belly still wasn't satisfied with the government you despise repeatedly breaking the separation of church and state law and therefore persecuting Christians for their religious beliefs? You blind, ignorant hypocrite, don't you know that the government isn't allowed to tax churches, nor force someone to go against their sincere religious beliefs? How convenient for you to forget when it comes to Christians you bigot.
John Amato: "Tags: creationism, IRS, Liars, Religious Right, Scandals"
Nah, ur not a keyword spammer at all Mr. Scandals. And don't you know Mr. 700 diggs too late, ban any replies from fundamentalists and then close the "news" article from further comments that it was a scandal before you and your moron friends said anything? What a pathetic, conniving, liar you are.
So that's your "scientific" rebuttal to "young earth" creation science? So that's what you idiot liberals consider science?: To say, "Haha the Right Wing government I say is always wrong rightly persecuted Right Winger citizens [whose good works I can't bear to acknowledge and science I can't be bothered to even read one sentence on (though love to bash in ignorance)) for being government-hating cheats like me!" That's science you dumb oaf, you glutton, you hypocrite?
Hang on! John's Super Spaz, Hyper Strained Cracking Smiles sufferer daughter Abbywood will save us!:
saveAnd who is us stupid? Why would you be calling the imaginary baby cartoon for help if you didn't say you're the one being persecuted? Confused much? Or did you mean that your belly still wasn't satisfied with the government you despise repeatedly breaking the separation of church and state law and therefore persecuting Christians for their religious beliefs? You blind, ignorant hypocrite, don't you know that the government isn't allowed to tax churches, nor force someone to go against their sincere religious beliefs? How convenient for you to forget when it comes to Christians you bigot.
John Amato: "Tags: creationism, IRS, Liars, Religious Right, Scandals"
Nah, ur not a keyword spammer at all Mr. Scandals. And don't you know Mr. 700 diggs too late, ban any replies from fundamentalists and then close the "news" article from further comments that it was a scandal before you and your moron friends said anything? What a pathetic, conniving, liar you are.
So that's your "scientific" rebuttal to "young earth" creation science? So that's what you idiot liberals consider science?: To say, "Haha the Right Wing government I say is always wrong rightly persecuted Right Winger citizens [whose good works I can't bear to acknowledge and science I can't be bothered to even read one sentence on (though love to bash in ignorance)) for being government-hating cheats like me!" That's science you dumb oaf, you glutton, you hypocrite?
Hang on! John's Super Spaz, Hyper Strained Cracking Smiles sufferer daughter Abbywood will save us!:
Friday, August 28, 2009
Imaginary Ancient Big Bomb Believer Bigot Jim Villanuci and Darwinist Friends Refuted
According to the KKOB radio show host Jim Villanuci, who said repeatedly today that he doesn't care [about the truth], there are no Christian scientists who believe in a "young" earth (6500 is old young?), and anyone who believes in a young earth can't perform science at all and can't understand anything correctly because they don't listen to the facts, and merely explain everything with, "Jesus did it," or "angels did it". Is that why I'm repeating what you said and refuting it, again?
Where bigot, in this refutation of your ranting, and your ranting anti-Christian callers, have I said anything like that or an earlier one refuting your claim that we must have sex with a person to know if they are gay or straight?
Do you have the patience to read less than a few pages, if not, how can you claim to know what you are talking about when it comes to "young earthers" let alone Christians, science, evolution or the big imaginary bomb no one ever saw from billions and billions of years ago?):
Christians are scientists too, and not merely because I said so. You don't you know history and don't care to know it, and don't know what's going on around you accurately either, and don't want to, that is why in large part you are ignorant. Don't you know that Galileo, Copernicus and Euler were all Christians, and that atheists tried to shut them up using other Christians? No doubt, you being an ignorant mocker, if I hadn't added that last part you would have said, "Yeah and look what the Christians did to them." In addition to that Catholics are false Christians, so big surprise they would turn on their own at the request of atheists. Further, there are two recent polls that show about half of all scientists are religious as in believing in the supernatural, and CHEMISTS especially believe in God (gee can you figure out why CHEMISTS would especially believe in God? Could it be because they not only see the macro design in the universe, but also see the micro design which you stupidly ignore?)
Yet you pretend their are no young earth Christian scientists let alone religious ones, and that we all say, "Jesus did it," or "It looks young" or stupid things like that, which idiots like you actually say with, "But Darwin said so," "It evolved," "Oil is old," "Fission wouldn't work." You google "Evidence against young earth" or "creationism" and believe whatever so called scientific evidence there is against it. What a simpleton. Study Jim, don't just have faith.
Ironically, it's by your bigoted sarcastic statements like, "Jesus did it," or "The Grand Canyon looks young to me," and, "Evolution did it,", "The Big Bang did it", "Dinosaurs died a long time ago and did it", "The Hubble saw it," which shows that you are the one who reasons be feelings. It's you who don't believe in science and you who don't know what science is. Science is not, "It looks old to me so it must be old," or "Darwin did it" (to use your stupid bigoted sarcasm) or "evolution did it." Further, how in the Hell genius, would you figure out the Grand Canyon is very old let alone old from just looking at it? What the Hell? Can you explain that bizarre reasoning? No, you were brainwashed with endless propaganda that you in your gullibility bought into. You were repeatedly taught "this is clearly old" and so you think that way. Further, what the Hell scientist even says you can judge that a rock is old just be looking at it? Stupid. And can you show that any young earth CALVINIST (not some idiot Christian, a false one) doesn't believe in science? The father of microbiology was a Calvinist "young earther" you parrot.
You clearly don't understand what Young Earth geology is about, it's not simply, "The Earth is about 6000 years old" (it's a little older than that actually) and it's not about "Jesus lived with the dinosaurs".
You also don't understand nuclear power. Also the two caller that said it's a matter of faith and non-reason made no sense, unless he meant that old earth geology is non-reason, which would only be figurative. Regardless it was poorly worded and sounded stupid. The woman who mentioned the Christian that said it's just a faith issue was talking about a stupid Christian then, further she herself was ignorant and stupid since she said that young earther's explanation about why carbon dating isn't accurate is complicated, because IT'S NOT complicated, it this simple: Carbon dating has been repeatedly shown to be inaccurate. It's also got nothing to do with nuclear power, you obviously don't know physics very well. Carbon dating is only accurate to about 5000 years, when it's used to measure things beyond that it's wildy inaccurate and what Darwinists / evolutionist SCIENTISTS do is arbitrarily choose the dates that match their dating theories. If it doesn't fit, they dismiss it or won't even mention it.
Also the Hubble has not revealed the universe to be billions of years old, again it has to do with how the data is interpreted, and Darwinist / evolutionist scientist interpret in such a way that it fits evolutionary theory, it's circular reasoning.
Further, you clearly don't know much about evolution even, since you would have known that every informed "young earther" knows to reject carbon dating for the reasons I stated, if you were knowledgeable, you would have referred to other radiometric dating methods (which have also been shown to be inaccurate).
As for Wikipedia being good, no it's not at all, you think it's good because it says things that match your uniformed beliefs. What they do is repeatedly and instantly ban "young earthers" not listening to their arguments and merely stating that websites like answersingenesis.org and other young earth sites are not reliable. They also are against TRUTH. Yes, you heard it right, THEY ARE NOT FOR TRUTH. They will literally tell people like me, when I use a logical argument that Wikipedia is NOT ABOUT TRUTH but rather references. And they will ban you for trying to speak the truths IF it cuts the foundation of atheism or doubt of Christianity. They don't just ban anyone for speaking a religious truth obviously, but that which would leave atheism and anti-Christian skepticism hanging in the wind with nothing to support it. They also obviously wouldn't want themselves to have been shown to have been gullible for over 100 years, as that would be a devastating blow to their own faith, and then where would they turn? They'd have to be agnostic or witches.
Further, no true Christian simply says, "God said it so I believe it" as anti-Christians love to say. We don't think that way, in fact the Bible commands us to have evidence for our beliefs, and says not to be a simpleton, there is a verse that literally says not to be that way, and not to simply believe whatever you hear. It also says to test those who claim to be Christians to see if they are telling the truth about being a Christian.
On top of that, there are many non-Christian physicists who are opposed to the teaching of the Big Bang AND ASTRONOMERS, and some are nominal Christians, simply believing the Bible to be true to a degree. There is not a consensus, and even if there was, you can't vote something to be true or feel it into being true, so your comment "you can believe whatever you want to make yourself feel good" and about you living in reality and not us, is something which applies to you. Further, I study issues regarding truth and reality as do all Christians, but I spend my life doing so, so if anyone is going to know what is real or not and what truth is it would be me, not you, who merely talks about politics all day and avoids getting deep into philosophical and religious matters. Sure you mention religion now and then and how people should be free to have their own religion, but you don't go much further than that, you don't get into critical analysis for the basis of religion beyond you belief that Christians merely feel he exists (no that's not all there is to it).
As for how oiled formed, all you did was read a statement claiming how oil was made, you didn't give any scientific evidence for it. Also, it's been a long time that that theory has been shown to be BASELESS. So you just read a statement that is based on a theory that was shown to be in dispute for many years. That shows how out of touch you are with modern scientific findings let alone old ones, including old ones that are still true which you are clueless about.
Now, if you want data, scientific data backing up what I said, and about their being no evidence for the Big Bang and no consensus:
No consensus, Darwinists ban and libel young earth creationists AND Intelligent Design OLD earth creationists (showing how intolerant they are and arbitrary and that it's about their hate for God, not "pseudoscience" as they pretend)
1) Ben Stein's: Expelled (which shows that Darwinists ban scientists to make it look like there is a consensus against Darwinism)
2) http://s8int.com/bigbang3.html
3) http://cosmologystatement.org
4) http://s8int.com/bigbang5.html
4) http://thunderbolts.info/home.htm
5) http://sn.im/archeology (don't you love how this book shows your "scientists" cover up geological and archeological findings in the name of science and for prestige and more money?)
6) Further, there were many "young earth" scientists
and there still are, and the first ones were the human basis
for modern science (now twisted by evolutionists):
http://answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/default.asp
Clearly these are not scientists/Christians who say, "Jesus made the oil the end."
Oil wasn't made millions of years ago or by dinosaurs:
1) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n1/origin-of-oil
2) http://blogs.answersingenesis.org/aroundtheworld/2007/08/23/australian-oil-its-quite-young
Starlight doesn't show the universe is billions or millions of years old:
1) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v3/n1/star-formation-and-creation
2) http://icr.org/articles/view/214/245
The distance of objects in space has been in dispute for many years Jim. But you Jim, were gullible, you were deliberately ignorant even though you KNEW there is mass propaganda of all kinds. You imply "young earth" creationism is mass propaganda (why else would you say it scares you?) yet it never occurred to you that Darwinists were lying in any way, not even for money? So who's the stupid gullible simpleton? Hint for you skeptic Jim: Don't skeptics (who are nearly all Darwinists) always whine about how there can't be aliens here from other planets because the distance they would have to travel requires an "insane" amount of energy? Hint hint Jim, aliens are clearly still coming and are sighted all the time. Can you take the hint? MAYBE THE STARS AND GALAXIES AREN'T BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF LIGHT YEARS AWAY AS DARWINISTS CLAIM? Super duh? Ultra duh? Massive duh? Big circular reasoning duh? Circular reasoning check Jim: "The stars must be billions of years old because they are billions of light years away, and they are billions of lights away, and they are billions of light years away because scientists said so, and there are no 'young earthers' scientists who say the opposite because I Jim said so, and I'm right because scientists said so, and scientists are right because I said so." Is that science Jim? That's your science Jim, not the science of true Christians.
There was no billions of years old big bomb that no one ever saw and never will that they just must believe in to be real scientists, cuz you anti-Christians said so:
1) http://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/davesmith_au.htm
2) http://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/guests08/090807_sjc.htm
3) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v4/n1/big-bang
4) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v3/n1/billion-problems-with-big-bang
5) http://creation.com/no-dark-matter-found-in-the-milky-way-galaxy
6) http://orionfdn.org/papers/arxiv-1.pdf
7) The Cult of the Big Bang
8) http://spaceandmotion.com/Cosmology.htm (is this physicist "insane" Jim? Can you show us why Mr. Physicist Expert Jim Villanuci?)
9) http://orionfdn.org/papers/predicts-enhanced-galaxy-brightness.htm (is this physicist "insane" too Jim? Can you show us why Mr. Physicist Expert Jim Villanuci?)
10) http://physorg.com/news85310822.html (is physorg.com a creationist website Jim?)
11) http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/26666 (is physicsworld.com a creationist website Jim?)
12) http://sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090422085830.htm (is sciencedaily a creationist website Jim?)
13) http://astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=8435 (is astronomy.com a creationist website Jim?)
14) And what were you saying about Hubble Jim, as if you understood his scientific teachings or knew them? Was he and Einstein "dumb nuts" and "young earthers" too Jim?
Yet the true "dumb nuts" like you continue to claim INVISIBLE MATTER is everywhere and is evidence of the Big Bang. WHAT DARK MATTER JIM? OUR DARWINIST SCIENTISTS ARE SAYING IT'S NOT THERE, AND BIG SURPRISE SINCE IT'S INVISIBLE. WHY DO YOU BELIEVE IN WHAT IN INVISIBLE MATTER FOR WHICH THERE IS NO INDIRECT EVIDENCE JIM WHILE MOCKING CHRISTIANS FOR BELIEVING IN GOD WHO TO THOSE ON EARTH IS PURPOSELY INVISIBLE AND FOR WHOM THERE IS COUNTLESS EVIDENCE FOR, AS I'VE PARTIALLY SHOWN HERE? What's wrong with that picture you've given us Jim? Isn't the one who "believe[s] fairies run your engine" you, the guy who believes in invisible matter that no one can detect and in your ignorance keep claiming all scientists say is there?
"Old-earth" radiometric dating is arbitrary and flawed and one form shows the universe is "young" (though 6500 years old is hardly young compared to the age of the oldest humans):
1) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
2) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-radiometric-dating-prove
3) http://answersingenesis.org/media/audio/answers-daily/volume-058/radiometric-dating-shows-young-earth
4) http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i1/dating.asp
5) Creation's Tiny Mystery
Man did live and still does live with dinosaurs you idiot.
"Jesus lived with the dinosaurs" you said in sarcasm. MORON: DARWINISTS SAY HUMANS LIVED WITH DINOSAURS AND HAVE BEEN SAYING SO FROM THE BEGINNING YOU IDIOT. IT WAS ONLY RECENTLY THAT NORONS LIKE YOU, IGNORANT OF DARWINIST EVOLUTIONARY THEORY STARTED COMING UP WITH NONSENSE LIKE THAT, WHICH DARWINIST SCIENTISTS STILL DON'T USE YOU IDIOT. What they say moron, is that Noah's Ark is absurd, and for those who are more clever, they say it's also a contradictory story. You're so dumb you can't even be bothered to learn the precious theory of your heros correctly. That's how careless you are with the truth. On top of that moron, who in the Hell said dinosaurs were all dead, or that they all magically died when the first "Homo sapien" appeared? Do you know what living fossils are? Now that's not a big surprise you wouldn't though still is hardly excusable since Darwinist mention them now and then, and of course not to often SINCE THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH CREATURES REFUTE EVOLUTION. Here Jim, more easy work for you that you could have done for yourself:
1) http://creationwiki.org/Living_fossil. Some are also listed in your precious Wikipedia (is Wikipedia a creationist website Jim?)
And how are you ignorant of dragon sightings and other dinosaur sitings, both ancient and modern? Why are you so unfun that you can't look into such stories? Why didn't the Loch Ness Monster sightings get you to start reading about such sightings? Is everyone who lives around the Loch Ness and all the tourists who have been there, who have seen dinosaurs there "nuts" too Jim? Is everyone nuts who sees what you don't?
And you're so stupid you can't figure out that we wiped out most of the dinosaurs by hunting them down for food, sport, or prestige, or that we burned down their habitat, as Aboriginees in Australia and those living in the Amazon still do today, in order to make the land safer for ourselves and to farm? But no, you think, "A comet did it," "A meteor did it," or "A volcano did it," don't you gullible Jimmy? And of course we just happened to survive while all the dinosaurs magically died or shurnk to the size of birds and mice. Nice stupid simpleton "fairy tale" Jim. Here little Jimmy, here unfun Jimmy, here unimaginative Jimmy, here Magic Meteor Jimmy; more help for your hardly imaginitive, lazy mind, lazy eyes and hands:
2) http://cryptozoology.com
3) http://theserenedragon.net/Tales/tales.html
4) http://s8int.com/dinolit1.html
5) http://s8int.com/dino1.html
6) http://newanimal.org
7) http://lorencoleman.com/top_cryptids.html
8) http://cryptozoo.monstrous.com
9) http://cryptids.net/cryptopedia/index.htm
10) http://nwcreation.net/dinosdragons.html
11) http://genesispark.com/genpark/history/history.htm
And no biased Jim, those aren't all creationist websites; only three are. And even if they were, what matters is if they are true, not, "But those are all Darwinist sites." Even your precious Wikipedia lists cryptids Jim, even they declare them to be "noteworthy" Jim. Even "skeptics", your mentally ill kin, talk about cryptids in Skeptic Magazine, and very often.
And Jim, what happened to mammoths? Don't they count as dinosaurs? Oh, is it because they weren't reptiles? So only reptiles are dangerous? Mammoths were nice huh? And who said reptiles can't be lived near? I think you deluded yourself into thinking that all dinosaurs eat people from all the silly propaganda you were raised on, on those silly dinosaur coloring books, Discovery Channel and Jurassic Park cartoons, and B horror movies. But if only you had paid a little closer attention and put in a little more thought, and realized not all dinosaurs ate flesh you idiot, no dinosaur was said to have eaten humans you idiot, and that Discovery Channel isn't a nonprofit company that shows cartoons because they are just so concerned about teaching you how the entire planet was covered with man-eating Tyrannosaurs. Oh wait, they don't teach that. But you're an idiot who misses the details even when the propaganda is light.
And are Komodo Dragons good enough for you Jim? Do they count as dinosaurs? Duh? Are all the people living near Komodo Dragons dead? No, in fact the Komodo Dragons are the ones who are almost dead, and hardly anyone goes near them except to take a picture.
Your dumb Jim.
Another thing about your Wikipedia, where "the site all you nuts come from":
The long term editors and administrators deliberately try and make alternative scientists look bad regardless of whether or not their theories have been shown to be true, they try to have articles on breakthrough scientists and inventors deleted or made to look silly. You just are ignorant and don't care much about the truth Jim, no offense. You obsess on what you feel is true and believe what merely sounds to be true to you, and don't go further.
Jim, you're being hypocritical: many Darwinist Scientists and non-scientist Darwinists, often simply as you do, say the equivalent of, "It's so," "That's the way it is," "There's [scientific evidence]", and some even say, "Atheist" as their source/reference, referring to themselves. They might as well say, "Me,". You also merely make empty claims backed by mere emotion. You merely claim that oil is formed in such and such way and that's it's millions of years old. That's not evidence let alone scientific evidence. It's no better than your sarcastic stereotypes like,"Jesus made the oil" or "angels make radio waves".
As for your magical scientific evidence, "They all come from the same website" as in "Young Earth Creationists all come from the same website", says who? And what does that even mean? So all "young earthers" contact you via answersingenesis.com? Really? So now it's, "AIG did it!" Jim? That's your new scientific evidence against young earthers? Lame. AIG is staffed by people born from humans raised in many different ways, some who were former atheists or agnostics, not people who were born by a website. "Young Earthers" no more all or mostly come from AIG anymore than Gullibles like yourself all come from Wikipedia (Mr. Wikipedia Referring Jim). AIG refers to scientific evidence from multiple sources, they don't just invent things from a vacuum or say, "The Bible did it," and unlike Wikipedia - which you love and seem to think is evidence in and of itself - does not reject truth in favor of keeping the appearance of truth to suit their feelings.
Further, if we "all c[a]me from the same [web]site," whatever that means, how is that evidence, let alone scientific evidence that "young earth" creationism is wrong? So if "you all" Billions of Years Old Big Bombers came from Wikipedia, TalkOrigins or KKOB that would make you wrong? Well then you must be wrong too; you've contradicted your own arbitrary logic. And oooo, how bad: "They all have an organization, they're all organized," is basically what you said: yeah what a horrible thing Jim, what a sin, gotta really hate ORGANIZATION, cuz ORGANIZATION is so bad, right Mr. Chaos? Why do you chaos believers hate DESIGN, and ORGANIZATION so much? See how illogical your DISORGANIZED CHAOTIC mind is? Your hang ups say some powerful things about your false logic. It's just so bad to make things convenient for you anti-Christians isn't it Jim? If the information was chaotically spread out all over the Internet no doubt your hateful self would then say something like, "They're scatter brained and disorganized." Sorry to make things convenient for you Jim, so sorry to help you out by putting the info all in one place. So evil and unscientific of us. Wait, if that's a sin, why do you love Wikipedia?; yet again your insults backfire. Can't you stop contradicting yourself?
Further, you really don't know Christians or young earth scientists: you said 60+ million Calvinists come from ansswersingenesis. Really? Yes Jim, that's how many "young earth" believers there are. You're truly ignorant. But no, we don't all simply use that website, there are many "young earth" science sites, some of which are linked to the side of my journal and two others I have:
http://creationengineeringconcepts.org
http://answersincreation.org
http://answersingenesis.com
http://christiananswers.net
http://creationwiki.com
http://genesispark.com
http://creationists.org
http://unevolved.org
http://creation.com
http://orionfdn.org
http://nmidnet.org
http://halos.com
http://yecs.org
http://icr.org
So what was that about us all coming from one site Jim? Is what matters is, "Nanny nanny boo boo you only have one site we have more," or, "It's just a few people," "They're all from one house," "They're all from one apartment complex," "They're all from one block," "They're all from one town," "They're all from one city," "They're all from one state," "They're all from one country," "They're all from one side of the planet," "They're all from one planet," "They're all from one solar system," "They're all from one galaxy," "They're all from one galaxy cluster", "They're all human," "They're all from one universe"? No, what matters is: IS WHAT "THEY" SAY TRUE."
Ironically I met a moron even dumber than you who made fun of Christians for being "lazy" she said, because,"notice" she said, "You have more sites", "MORE" Jim, not "They're all from one site." So which nut arbitrary nut should the world, including us "young earthers" believe Jim? Oh God of Science and Religion Jim, which stupid insult defeats us? They can't be both right since they contradict. Hence, why we don't believe your ranting, because that's all you anti-true Christians do. You anti-true Christians show every hour that you are arbitrary, paranoid, racked with bitterness, and that your morality and logic is backwards. Yes "conservative" Jim, you're better than liberals in that you say Christians should have the right to home-school their children under Christianity, but you err when you discriminate against "young earthers", claiming that we're teaching children "to answer wrong on tests" you said. As you would notice if you bothered to READ FIRST OUR TEACHINGS, rather than putting childish words in our mouth, you bully, you would see WE TEACH YOUR STUPIDITY NECESSARILY, since you idiots won't shut up about it. You moron.
If you or others think I've not read the rebuttals to the sites and specific arguments I showed, you're wrong:
1) There isn't a rebuttal for many arguments against your arguments against the Bible. Can you guess the reason why besides some cheap lie you'd first think like, "We'll because you Christians are just nuts, and you say things that don't make sense"? Hints: THEY ARE TRUE AND CLEARLY TRUE, AND WHO IS GOING TO CHALLENGE ANTI-CHRISTIANS WHEN THEY SAY THE SAME THING AS "YOUNG EARTHERS". Were those hints clear enough?
2) I refuted the rebuttals, for example on Yahoo Answers and on Amazon.com. On Amazon.com I refuted a ranting nut like you, only more clever and who actually bothered to at least read what the opposition said, whole books even. I documented it early in my journal here. But what did two Amazon moderators do when I complained about this nut deliberately skewing the ratings of creationist books by repeatedly voting them down, and by repeatedly voting down my replies to him so that they would be hidden, and stalking me?: They deleted not only some of my reviews but dozens of my replies in the comment field to the ranting nut who was clearly stalking me. And what were your Amazon moderator buddies' reason for doing so? The one who bothered to email said it was because what I said was all hateful. Sure. Isn't that just such a good reason to censor replies to a ranting stalker Mr. "Christians Just Say Jesus Did It" Loving Non-Hateful Jim? You hypocrites. Ooops, I shouldn't have said that that's hateful because it hurts your feelings, your loving scientific "Christians are hypocrites for judging right from wrong and have no right to judge others who call themselves Christians or not," feelings. No you didn't literally say that, but you said the equivalent in your ranting one day against a congregation that was judging a former member who was still calling herself a Christian, the same day you said we can only know if someone is gay or straight if we have sex with them. No, ur not nuts and evil at all, not.
And Mr. Jim Pro Science Villanuci, how can there be scientific progress if you slander "young earthers" and misrepresent them and try and block them from being heard? So that's science, to block opposing view points that you can't even be bothered to listen to? So we should just believe whatever you and your Darwinists say is true and ask no questions and never point out any errors we see? It's because of morons like you, Darwinist morons like you, afraid of facing God, that there is gross scientific stagnation and fraud in Darwinist Mainstreamer dominated organizations like Wikipedia, the Smithsonian, NASA, and the U.S. Government in general, the same government you constantly rail against forgetting that it's mostly composed of Darwinists like you.
As usual, you anti-Christians accuse us of what you are guilty of doing, while pretending to be for Christ or neutral, while we really are for Christ, and believe the truth, rather than being neutral.
So is it any wonder that you're stuck below the top 65 radio show hosts in the US? Being a smug, boring, mocker who makes cheap lazy slanderous insults at Christians who spend their time and money helping the poor and needy only gets you so far.
Your the one teaching kids to answer wrong on man's tests, and much worse: wrong on God's tests.
Where bigot, in this refutation of your ranting, and your ranting anti-Christian callers, have I said anything like that or an earlier one refuting your claim that we must have sex with a person to know if they are gay or straight?
Do you have the patience to read less than a few pages, if not, how can you claim to know what you are talking about when it comes to "young earthers" let alone Christians, science, evolution or the big imaginary bomb no one ever saw from billions and billions of years ago?):
Christians are scientists too, and not merely because I said so. You don't you know history and don't care to know it, and don't know what's going on around you accurately either, and don't want to, that is why in large part you are ignorant. Don't you know that Galileo, Copernicus and Euler were all Christians, and that atheists tried to shut them up using other Christians? No doubt, you being an ignorant mocker, if I hadn't added that last part you would have said, "Yeah and look what the Christians did to them." In addition to that Catholics are false Christians, so big surprise they would turn on their own at the request of atheists. Further, there are two recent polls that show about half of all scientists are religious as in believing in the supernatural, and CHEMISTS especially believe in God (gee can you figure out why CHEMISTS would especially believe in God? Could it be because they not only see the macro design in the universe, but also see the micro design which you stupidly ignore?)
Yet you pretend their are no young earth Christian scientists let alone religious ones, and that we all say, "Jesus did it," or "It looks young" or stupid things like that, which idiots like you actually say with, "But Darwin said so," "It evolved," "Oil is old," "Fission wouldn't work." You google "Evidence against young earth" or "creationism" and believe whatever so called scientific evidence there is against it. What a simpleton. Study Jim, don't just have faith.
Ironically, it's by your bigoted sarcastic statements like, "Jesus did it," or "The Grand Canyon looks young to me," and, "Evolution did it,", "The Big Bang did it", "Dinosaurs died a long time ago and did it", "The Hubble saw it," which shows that you are the one who reasons be feelings. It's you who don't believe in science and you who don't know what science is. Science is not, "It looks old to me so it must be old," or "Darwin did it" (to use your stupid bigoted sarcasm) or "evolution did it." Further, how in the Hell genius, would you figure out the Grand Canyon is very old let alone old from just looking at it? What the Hell? Can you explain that bizarre reasoning? No, you were brainwashed with endless propaganda that you in your gullibility bought into. You were repeatedly taught "this is clearly old" and so you think that way. Further, what the Hell scientist even says you can judge that a rock is old just be looking at it? Stupid. And can you show that any young earth CALVINIST (not some idiot Christian, a false one) doesn't believe in science? The father of microbiology was a Calvinist "young earther" you parrot.
You clearly don't understand what Young Earth geology is about, it's not simply, "The Earth is about 6000 years old" (it's a little older than that actually) and it's not about "Jesus lived with the dinosaurs".
You also don't understand nuclear power. Also the two caller that said it's a matter of faith and non-reason made no sense, unless he meant that old earth geology is non-reason, which would only be figurative. Regardless it was poorly worded and sounded stupid. The woman who mentioned the Christian that said it's just a faith issue was talking about a stupid Christian then, further she herself was ignorant and stupid since she said that young earther's explanation about why carbon dating isn't accurate is complicated, because IT'S NOT complicated, it this simple: Carbon dating has been repeatedly shown to be inaccurate. It's also got nothing to do with nuclear power, you obviously don't know physics very well. Carbon dating is only accurate to about 5000 years, when it's used to measure things beyond that it's wildy inaccurate and what Darwinists / evolutionist SCIENTISTS do is arbitrarily choose the dates that match their dating theories. If it doesn't fit, they dismiss it or won't even mention it.
Also the Hubble has not revealed the universe to be billions of years old, again it has to do with how the data is interpreted, and Darwinist / evolutionist scientist interpret in such a way that it fits evolutionary theory, it's circular reasoning.
Further, you clearly don't know much about evolution even, since you would have known that every informed "young earther" knows to reject carbon dating for the reasons I stated, if you were knowledgeable, you would have referred to other radiometric dating methods (which have also been shown to be inaccurate).
As for Wikipedia being good, no it's not at all, you think it's good because it says things that match your uniformed beliefs. What they do is repeatedly and instantly ban "young earthers" not listening to their arguments and merely stating that websites like answersingenesis.org and other young earth sites are not reliable. They also are against TRUTH. Yes, you heard it right, THEY ARE NOT FOR TRUTH. They will literally tell people like me, when I use a logical argument that Wikipedia is NOT ABOUT TRUTH but rather references. And they will ban you for trying to speak the truths IF it cuts the foundation of atheism or doubt of Christianity. They don't just ban anyone for speaking a religious truth obviously, but that which would leave atheism and anti-Christian skepticism hanging in the wind with nothing to support it. They also obviously wouldn't want themselves to have been shown to have been gullible for over 100 years, as that would be a devastating blow to their own faith, and then where would they turn? They'd have to be agnostic or witches.
Further, no true Christian simply says, "God said it so I believe it" as anti-Christians love to say. We don't think that way, in fact the Bible commands us to have evidence for our beliefs, and says not to be a simpleton, there is a verse that literally says not to be that way, and not to simply believe whatever you hear. It also says to test those who claim to be Christians to see if they are telling the truth about being a Christian.
On top of that, there are many non-Christian physicists who are opposed to the teaching of the Big Bang AND ASTRONOMERS, and some are nominal Christians, simply believing the Bible to be true to a degree. There is not a consensus, and even if there was, you can't vote something to be true or feel it into being true, so your comment "you can believe whatever you want to make yourself feel good" and about you living in reality and not us, is something which applies to you. Further, I study issues regarding truth and reality as do all Christians, but I spend my life doing so, so if anyone is going to know what is real or not and what truth is it would be me, not you, who merely talks about politics all day and avoids getting deep into philosophical and religious matters. Sure you mention religion now and then and how people should be free to have their own religion, but you don't go much further than that, you don't get into critical analysis for the basis of religion beyond you belief that Christians merely feel he exists (no that's not all there is to it).
As for how oiled formed, all you did was read a statement claiming how oil was made, you didn't give any scientific evidence for it. Also, it's been a long time that that theory has been shown to be BASELESS. So you just read a statement that is based on a theory that was shown to be in dispute for many years. That shows how out of touch you are with modern scientific findings let alone old ones, including old ones that are still true which you are clueless about.
Now, if you want data, scientific data backing up what I said, and about their being no evidence for the Big Bang and no consensus:
No consensus, Darwinists ban and libel young earth creationists AND Intelligent Design OLD earth creationists (showing how intolerant they are and arbitrary and that it's about their hate for God, not "pseudoscience" as they pretend)
1) Ben Stein's: Expelled (which shows that Darwinists ban scientists to make it look like there is a consensus against Darwinism)
2) http://s8int.com/bigbang3.html
3) http://cosmologystatement.org
4) http://s8int.com/bigbang5.html
4) http://thunderbolts.info/home.htm
5) http://sn.im/archeology (don't you love how this book shows your "scientists" cover up geological and archeological findings in the name of science and for prestige and more money?)
6) Further, there were many "young earth" scientists
and there still are, and the first ones were the human basis
for modern science (now twisted by evolutionists):
http://answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/default.asp
Clearly these are not scientists/Christians who say, "Jesus made the oil the end."
Oil wasn't made millions of years ago or by dinosaurs:
1) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n1/origin-of-oil
2) http://blogs.answersingenesis.org/aroundtheworld/2007/08/23/australian-oil-its-quite-young
Starlight doesn't show the universe is billions or millions of years old:
1) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v3/n1/star-formation-and-creation
2) http://icr.org/articles/view/214/245
The distance of objects in space has been in dispute for many years Jim. But you Jim, were gullible, you were deliberately ignorant even though you KNEW there is mass propaganda of all kinds. You imply "young earth" creationism is mass propaganda (why else would you say it scares you?) yet it never occurred to you that Darwinists were lying in any way, not even for money? So who's the stupid gullible simpleton? Hint for you skeptic Jim: Don't skeptics (who are nearly all Darwinists) always whine about how there can't be aliens here from other planets because the distance they would have to travel requires an "insane" amount of energy? Hint hint Jim, aliens are clearly still coming and are sighted all the time. Can you take the hint? MAYBE THE STARS AND GALAXIES AREN'T BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF LIGHT YEARS AWAY AS DARWINISTS CLAIM? Super duh? Ultra duh? Massive duh? Big circular reasoning duh? Circular reasoning check Jim: "The stars must be billions of years old because they are billions of light years away, and they are billions of lights away, and they are billions of light years away because scientists said so, and there are no 'young earthers' scientists who say the opposite because I Jim said so, and I'm right because scientists said so, and scientists are right because I said so." Is that science Jim? That's your science Jim, not the science of true Christians.
There was no billions of years old big bomb that no one ever saw and never will that they just must believe in to be real scientists, cuz you anti-Christians said so:
1) http://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/davesmith_au.htm
2) http://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/guests08/090807_sjc.htm
3) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v4/n1/big-bang
4) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v3/n1/billion-problems-with-big-bang
5) http://creation.com/no-dark-matter-found-in-the-milky-way-galaxy
6) http://orionfdn.org/papers/arxiv-1.pdf
7) The Cult of the Big Bang
8) http://spaceandmotion.com/Cosmology.htm (is this physicist "insane" Jim? Can you show us why Mr. Physicist Expert Jim Villanuci?)
9) http://orionfdn.org/papers/predicts-enhanced-galaxy-brightness.htm (is this physicist "insane" too Jim? Can you show us why Mr. Physicist Expert Jim Villanuci?)
10) http://physorg.com/news85310822.html (is physorg.com a creationist website Jim?)
11) http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/26666 (is physicsworld.com a creationist website Jim?)
12) http://sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090422085830.htm (is sciencedaily a creationist website Jim?)
13) http://astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=8435 (is astronomy.com a creationist website Jim?)
14) And what were you saying about Hubble Jim, as if you understood his scientific teachings or knew them? Was he and Einstein "dumb nuts" and "young earthers" too Jim?
Yet the true "dumb nuts" like you continue to claim INVISIBLE MATTER is everywhere and is evidence of the Big Bang. WHAT DARK MATTER JIM? OUR DARWINIST SCIENTISTS ARE SAYING IT'S NOT THERE, AND BIG SURPRISE SINCE IT'S INVISIBLE. WHY DO YOU BELIEVE IN WHAT IN INVISIBLE MATTER FOR WHICH THERE IS NO INDIRECT EVIDENCE JIM WHILE MOCKING CHRISTIANS FOR BELIEVING IN GOD WHO TO THOSE ON EARTH IS PURPOSELY INVISIBLE AND FOR WHOM THERE IS COUNTLESS EVIDENCE FOR, AS I'VE PARTIALLY SHOWN HERE? What's wrong with that picture you've given us Jim? Isn't the one who "believe[s] fairies run your engine" you, the guy who believes in invisible matter that no one can detect and in your ignorance keep claiming all scientists say is there?
"Old-earth" radiometric dating is arbitrary and flawed and one form shows the universe is "young" (though 6500 years old is hardly young compared to the age of the oldest humans):
1) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
2) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-radiometric-dating-prove
3) http://answersingenesis.org/media/audio/answers-daily/volume-058/radiometric-dating-shows-young-earth
4) http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i1/dating.asp
5) Creation's Tiny Mystery
Man did live and still does live with dinosaurs you idiot.
"Jesus lived with the dinosaurs" you said in sarcasm. MORON: DARWINISTS SAY HUMANS LIVED WITH DINOSAURS AND HAVE BEEN SAYING SO FROM THE BEGINNING YOU IDIOT. IT WAS ONLY RECENTLY THAT NORONS LIKE YOU, IGNORANT OF DARWINIST EVOLUTIONARY THEORY STARTED COMING UP WITH NONSENSE LIKE THAT, WHICH DARWINIST SCIENTISTS STILL DON'T USE YOU IDIOT. What they say moron, is that Noah's Ark is absurd, and for those who are more clever, they say it's also a contradictory story. You're so dumb you can't even be bothered to learn the precious theory of your heros correctly. That's how careless you are with the truth. On top of that moron, who in the Hell said dinosaurs were all dead, or that they all magically died when the first "Homo sapien" appeared? Do you know what living fossils are? Now that's not a big surprise you wouldn't though still is hardly excusable since Darwinist mention them now and then, and of course not to often SINCE THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH CREATURES REFUTE EVOLUTION. Here Jim, more easy work for you that you could have done for yourself:
1) http://creationwiki.org/Living_fossil. Some are also listed in your precious Wikipedia (is Wikipedia a creationist website Jim?)
And how are you ignorant of dragon sightings and other dinosaur sitings, both ancient and modern? Why are you so unfun that you can't look into such stories? Why didn't the Loch Ness Monster sightings get you to start reading about such sightings? Is everyone who lives around the Loch Ness and all the tourists who have been there, who have seen dinosaurs there "nuts" too Jim? Is everyone nuts who sees what you don't?
And you're so stupid you can't figure out that we wiped out most of the dinosaurs by hunting them down for food, sport, or prestige, or that we burned down their habitat, as Aboriginees in Australia and those living in the Amazon still do today, in order to make the land safer for ourselves and to farm? But no, you think, "A comet did it," "A meteor did it," or "A volcano did it," don't you gullible Jimmy? And of course we just happened to survive while all the dinosaurs magically died or shurnk to the size of birds and mice. Nice stupid simpleton "fairy tale" Jim. Here little Jimmy, here unfun Jimmy, here unimaginative Jimmy, here Magic Meteor Jimmy; more help for your hardly imaginitive, lazy mind, lazy eyes and hands:
2) http://cryptozoology.com
3) http://theserenedragon.net/Tales/tales.html
4) http://s8int.com/dinolit1.html
5) http://s8int.com/dino1.html
6) http://newanimal.org
7) http://lorencoleman.com/top_cryptids.html
8) http://cryptozoo.monstrous.com
9) http://cryptids.net/cryptopedia/index.htm
10) http://nwcreation.net/dinosdragons.html
11) http://genesispark.com/genpark/history/history.htm
And no biased Jim, those aren't all creationist websites; only three are. And even if they were, what matters is if they are true, not, "But those are all Darwinist sites." Even your precious Wikipedia lists cryptids Jim, even they declare them to be "noteworthy" Jim. Even "skeptics", your mentally ill kin, talk about cryptids in Skeptic Magazine, and very often.
And Jim, what happened to mammoths? Don't they count as dinosaurs? Oh, is it because they weren't reptiles? So only reptiles are dangerous? Mammoths were nice huh? And who said reptiles can't be lived near? I think you deluded yourself into thinking that all dinosaurs eat people from all the silly propaganda you were raised on, on those silly dinosaur coloring books, Discovery Channel and Jurassic Park cartoons, and B horror movies. But if only you had paid a little closer attention and put in a little more thought, and realized not all dinosaurs ate flesh you idiot, no dinosaur was said to have eaten humans you idiot, and that Discovery Channel isn't a nonprofit company that shows cartoons because they are just so concerned about teaching you how the entire planet was covered with man-eating Tyrannosaurs. Oh wait, they don't teach that. But you're an idiot who misses the details even when the propaganda is light.
And are Komodo Dragons good enough for you Jim? Do they count as dinosaurs? Duh? Are all the people living near Komodo Dragons dead? No, in fact the Komodo Dragons are the ones who are almost dead, and hardly anyone goes near them except to take a picture.
Your dumb Jim.
Another thing about your Wikipedia, where "the site all you nuts come from":
The long term editors and administrators deliberately try and make alternative scientists look bad regardless of whether or not their theories have been shown to be true, they try to have articles on breakthrough scientists and inventors deleted or made to look silly. You just are ignorant and don't care much about the truth Jim, no offense. You obsess on what you feel is true and believe what merely sounds to be true to you, and don't go further.
Jim, you're being hypocritical: many Darwinist Scientists and non-scientist Darwinists, often simply as you do, say the equivalent of, "It's so," "That's the way it is," "There's [scientific evidence]", and some even say, "Atheist" as their source/reference, referring to themselves. They might as well say, "Me,". You also merely make empty claims backed by mere emotion. You merely claim that oil is formed in such and such way and that's it's millions of years old. That's not evidence let alone scientific evidence. It's no better than your sarcastic stereotypes like,"Jesus made the oil" or "angels make radio waves".
As for your magical scientific evidence, "They all come from the same website" as in "Young Earth Creationists all come from the same website", says who? And what does that even mean? So all "young earthers" contact you via answersingenesis.com? Really? So now it's, "AIG did it!" Jim? That's your new scientific evidence against young earthers? Lame. AIG is staffed by people born from humans raised in many different ways, some who were former atheists or agnostics, not people who were born by a website. "Young Earthers" no more all or mostly come from AIG anymore than Gullibles like yourself all come from Wikipedia (Mr. Wikipedia Referring Jim). AIG refers to scientific evidence from multiple sources, they don't just invent things from a vacuum or say, "The Bible did it," and unlike Wikipedia - which you love and seem to think is evidence in and of itself - does not reject truth in favor of keeping the appearance of truth to suit their feelings.
Further, if we "all c[a]me from the same [web]site," whatever that means, how is that evidence, let alone scientific evidence that "young earth" creationism is wrong? So if "you all" Billions of Years Old Big Bombers came from Wikipedia, TalkOrigins or KKOB that would make you wrong? Well then you must be wrong too; you've contradicted your own arbitrary logic. And oooo, how bad: "They all have an organization, they're all organized," is basically what you said: yeah what a horrible thing Jim, what a sin, gotta really hate ORGANIZATION, cuz ORGANIZATION is so bad, right Mr. Chaos? Why do you chaos believers hate DESIGN, and ORGANIZATION so much? See how illogical your DISORGANIZED CHAOTIC mind is? Your hang ups say some powerful things about your false logic. It's just so bad to make things convenient for you anti-Christians isn't it Jim? If the information was chaotically spread out all over the Internet no doubt your hateful self would then say something like, "They're scatter brained and disorganized." Sorry to make things convenient for you Jim, so sorry to help you out by putting the info all in one place. So evil and unscientific of us. Wait, if that's a sin, why do you love Wikipedia?; yet again your insults backfire. Can't you stop contradicting yourself?
Further, you really don't know Christians or young earth scientists: you said 60+ million Calvinists come from ansswersingenesis. Really? Yes Jim, that's how many "young earth" believers there are. You're truly ignorant. But no, we don't all simply use that website, there are many "young earth" science sites, some of which are linked to the side of my journal and two others I have:
http://creationengineeringconcepts.org
http://answersincreation.org
http://answersingenesis.com
http://christiananswers.net
http://creationwiki.com
http://genesispark.com
http://creationists.org
http://unevolved.org
http://creation.com
http://orionfdn.org
http://nmidnet.org
http://halos.com
http://yecs.org
http://icr.org
So what was that about us all coming from one site Jim? Is what matters is, "Nanny nanny boo boo you only have one site we have more," or, "It's just a few people," "They're all from one house," "They're all from one apartment complex," "They're all from one block," "They're all from one town," "They're all from one city," "They're all from one state," "They're all from one country," "They're all from one side of the planet," "They're all from one planet," "They're all from one solar system," "They're all from one galaxy," "They're all from one galaxy cluster", "They're all human," "They're all from one universe"? No, what matters is: IS WHAT "THEY" SAY TRUE."
Ironically I met a moron even dumber than you who made fun of Christians for being "lazy" she said, because,"notice" she said, "You have more sites", "MORE" Jim, not "They're all from one site." So which nut arbitrary nut should the world, including us "young earthers" believe Jim? Oh God of Science and Religion Jim, which stupid insult defeats us? They can't be both right since they contradict. Hence, why we don't believe your ranting, because that's all you anti-true Christians do. You anti-true Christians show every hour that you are arbitrary, paranoid, racked with bitterness, and that your morality and logic is backwards. Yes "conservative" Jim, you're better than liberals in that you say Christians should have the right to home-school their children under Christianity, but you err when you discriminate against "young earthers", claiming that we're teaching children "to answer wrong on tests" you said. As you would notice if you bothered to READ FIRST OUR TEACHINGS, rather than putting childish words in our mouth, you bully, you would see WE TEACH YOUR STUPIDITY NECESSARILY, since you idiots won't shut up about it. You moron.
If you or others think I've not read the rebuttals to the sites and specific arguments I showed, you're wrong:
1) There isn't a rebuttal for many arguments against your arguments against the Bible. Can you guess the reason why besides some cheap lie you'd first think like, "We'll because you Christians are just nuts, and you say things that don't make sense"? Hints: THEY ARE TRUE AND CLEARLY TRUE, AND WHO IS GOING TO CHALLENGE ANTI-CHRISTIANS WHEN THEY SAY THE SAME THING AS "YOUNG EARTHERS". Were those hints clear enough?
2) I refuted the rebuttals, for example on Yahoo Answers and on Amazon.com. On Amazon.com I refuted a ranting nut like you, only more clever and who actually bothered to at least read what the opposition said, whole books even. I documented it early in my journal here. But what did two Amazon moderators do when I complained about this nut deliberately skewing the ratings of creationist books by repeatedly voting them down, and by repeatedly voting down my replies to him so that they would be hidden, and stalking me?: They deleted not only some of my reviews but dozens of my replies in the comment field to the ranting nut who was clearly stalking me. And what were your Amazon moderator buddies' reason for doing so? The one who bothered to email said it was because what I said was all hateful. Sure. Isn't that just such a good reason to censor replies to a ranting stalker Mr. "Christians Just Say Jesus Did It" Loving Non-Hateful Jim? You hypocrites. Ooops, I shouldn't have said that that's hateful because it hurts your feelings, your loving scientific "Christians are hypocrites for judging right from wrong and have no right to judge others who call themselves Christians or not," feelings. No you didn't literally say that, but you said the equivalent in your ranting one day against a congregation that was judging a former member who was still calling herself a Christian, the same day you said we can only know if someone is gay or straight if we have sex with them. No, ur not nuts and evil at all, not.
And Mr. Jim Pro Science Villanuci, how can there be scientific progress if you slander "young earthers" and misrepresent them and try and block them from being heard? So that's science, to block opposing view points that you can't even be bothered to listen to? So we should just believe whatever you and your Darwinists say is true and ask no questions and never point out any errors we see? It's because of morons like you, Darwinist morons like you, afraid of facing God, that there is gross scientific stagnation and fraud in Darwinist Mainstreamer dominated organizations like Wikipedia, the Smithsonian, NASA, and the U.S. Government in general, the same government you constantly rail against forgetting that it's mostly composed of Darwinists like you.
As usual, you anti-Christians accuse us of what you are guilty of doing, while pretending to be for Christ or neutral, while we really are for Christ, and believe the truth, rather than being neutral.
So is it any wonder that you're stuck below the top 65 radio show hosts in the US? Being a smug, boring, mocker who makes cheap lazy slanderous insults at Christians who spend their time and money helping the poor and needy only gets you so far.
Your the one teaching kids to answer wrong on man's tests, and much worse: wrong on God's tests.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Duckie
At about 2 AM I made friends with a cute black duck. Unlike the other ducks I found it with by an apartment, it was much less timid and stayed behind. I decided to seize it and got it by the neck and then lifted up from underneath. It barely struggled and I kissed its head as I took it to my apartment. It was calm in my apartment, pecking and biting at my broken laptop, closed on my floor (I think it thought it was a little puddle since it was black and reflective). It tried out other things to, and got a little noise after a while. It sat on my chest for a while and I could feel it was nervous whenever I stroked its neck, and sometimes it would look behind it when I petted it on its wings, and I could tell it was nervous about me doing that too since it would get noisy. Strangely it didn't want bread, and I remembered a woman by a nearby pond who said she fed them seeds, so I gently got the duck to step off me and got it some seeds to eat. Funnily, when I stopped, and having accidentally dropped some seeds on the floor and near a plastic grocery back, it started pecking at the bag repeatedly and got nothing from it since the seeds fell onto the floor. It was being noisy again so I fed it by hand and after taking some vids of pics of it I let it back outside. I followed it around for a while and it seemed at one point to be sticking around with me. I fed it a little more seeds. Eventually I picked it back up and it seemed to have fun standing on my hands. While walking it back to the pond it turned to lean against my chest and then Simba the black cat saw me and began meowing. Simba hangs around early in the morning near my place and runs to me to be petted on its head. It didn't like that I had a big black duck on my chest, and after petting it a little bit I kept heading for the pond and I face the duck forward and it preened a little. Simba followed me and I put the duck down by a little outside building with lights on its side so that I could pick up and kiss Simba and see how the duck and him would act around each other. When I put Simba back down and went back to the duck, Simba followed me and meowed, and the duck walked to my knees when Simba came near. Then I picked the duck back up and went to the pond but it didn't seem to want to go in so I put it down by the pond. A mallard in the pond broke away from the rest of the ducks when it saw the the black duck with me wasn't running away like the other ducks. Eventually the mallard jumped up onto the ground and darted at the black duck and the black duck came near to me again, and then I ran the mallard back into the pond. I picked up the black duck again and went to an inlet to the pond and sat there with it for a while. The rest of the ducks in the lake, typically cowardly, swam to the other side of the pond nearly, but two parties broke off at two different times, investigating I'm sure as to why the black duck was with me. But eventually both parties joined the rest of the ducks. I was getting pretty depressed because I knew that as soon as I left that the duck would probably forget me, and that it would hardly be good if the duck bonded to me and stayed away from its friends. So, I said goodbye to it and walked away slowly, seeing if it would follow me. It didn't, but I headed back again and it swam up the side of the lack next to me and after a few minutes I touched its beak, and then left. I came back about two hours later and finally found it near to where I had caught it, and it was with some ducks again to my relief. It stayed behind when I videod it, but after about a minutes of looking at me sideways, walked off with its friends.
Shawn Hannity's Worthless Religion
Today, Shawn Hannity showed once again how Catholics really feel about God, when he said on his radio show,
"I don't care what a person says or does, I really don't." And this is the same Shawn Hannity who a few days ago entertained being president, saying, "I've never made a decision in my life without [God] – whatever destiny God has you've got to fulfill it, I'm not sure that's my destiny." when another evil Catholic, Phil Cunningham, tried to persuade him, again, to become president. There is even a problem with him saying that, despite it sounding good:
1) You don't need to know God's will for your destiny to be carried out by God, so Shawn wrongly implied (like a typical God-hater) is that we share in controlling our destiny by knowing God's will (and who in the Hell knows God's will besides what the Bible tells us about it?).
2) For Shawn, as a Catholic, to speak about God destining anything is AGAINST official Catholic doctrine, which teaches that we must earn our forgiveness by good deeds and keep it by obedience to God's Law.
3) It's also hypocritical of Shawn to teach that God destines anyone since Catholics vilify "Hyper-"Calvinists (Christians who teach God destines everything) and Calvinists in general for teaching that God destines who will be forgiven (and therefore who won't be forgiven).
But does this mean Shawn isn't a Catholic and that I've therefore wrongly attacked Catholics? No: Catholics often contradict themselves like this, especially when they are being show-offs for the world, trying to sound and look wise and holy rather than actually say what is wise and actually being holy. They let their mouths babble, being careless about what God's will really is, ironically. I am reminded of this verse again:
"I don't care what a person says or does, I really don't." And this is the same Shawn Hannity who a few days ago entertained being president, saying, "I've never made a decision in my life without [God] – whatever destiny God has you've got to fulfill it, I'm not sure that's my destiny." when another evil Catholic, Phil Cunningham, tried to persuade him, again, to become president. There is even a problem with him saying that, despite it sounding good:
1) You don't need to know God's will for your destiny to be carried out by God, so Shawn wrongly implied (like a typical God-hater) is that we share in controlling our destiny by knowing God's will (and who in the Hell knows God's will besides what the Bible tells us about it?).
2) For Shawn, as a Catholic, to speak about God destining anything is AGAINST official Catholic doctrine, which teaches that we must earn our forgiveness by good deeds and keep it by obedience to God's Law.
3) It's also hypocritical of Shawn to teach that God destines anyone since Catholics vilify "Hyper-"Calvinists (Christians who teach God destines everything) and Calvinists in general for teaching that God destines who will be forgiven (and therefore who won't be forgiven).
But does this mean Shawn isn't a Catholic and that I've therefore wrongly attacked Catholics? No: Catholics often contradict themselves like this, especially when they are being show-offs for the world, trying to sound and look wise and holy rather than actually say what is wise and actually being holy. They let their mouths babble, being careless about what God's will really is, ironically. I am reminded of this verse again:
The Lord says:
These people come near to me with their mouth
and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are
far from me. Their worship of me is made up only
of rules taught by men.
Isaiah 29:13
These people come near to me with their mouth
and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are
far from me. Their worship of me is made up only
of rules taught by men.
Isaiah 29:13
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Ian Punnet and His Careless Mouth Blaspheme Again
According to Ian Punnet, who stupidly supported the Coast to Coast AM shows title of their show tonight, which is "Fundamentalism and Cults" (thanks a lot liberals!), the preaching of the family is and isn't heresy, [and that it isn't because], "[this is] the prosperity gospel [of] Calvinism...", saying that some were chosen and some weren't. What HELL? IAN, Calvnists OPPOSE PENTACOSTAL ARMINIANS: THEY ARE THE ONES THAT CAME UP WITH THAT. And what the Hell does the prosperity gospel have to do with "some are chosen"? Ian, Calvinists teach that God chooses everything that happens, and indirectly what living things think, that's not the prosperity gospel as you call it. The prosperity gospel is taught by Pentecostals, mainly Arminian Pentecostals, and it IS a heresy because it teaches that God will give you 100 times the amount back that you tithed soon, if it was to any Christian congregation (but of course the ones doing the preaching promote their own ministry/ies 99% over other congregations' ministries), that you'll be repaid soon, if you tithe with faith, and that if you don't have faith when you tithe, or not enough faith, that you won't get your "100 fold" in repayment.
In addition to that, what kind of title is "Fundamentalism and Cults"? Are you Coast to Coast AM employees so stupid you think that a cult of people who preach AGAINST Fundamentalist Christians and would be happy to see them all in dungeons or slaves in their homes, should be called Fundamentalists? THOSE ARE LIBERALS, NOT "FUNDAMENTALISTS". And though you said "fundamentalism" you are a fundamentalists too by your stupid midefinition of that word. Fundamentalism by your definition means that because you have definite beliefs and follow them, that you are a fundamentalist, therefore you are ones too Coast to Coast AM crew who supported the title of the show. Please use a dictionary and look up the difference between fundamentalism and liberalism, they are not the same, stop bullying fundamentalist Christians and the Muslims you stupidly associate with fundamentalist Christianity in your bigotry.
And how in the Hell can you not know what Calvinism is by now after having me refute you on your blog many days ago? I was the second one to comment and that didn't catch your attention? Are you so self-centered?
Would you stop preaching in ignorance and further you also spoke carelessly in that you didn't clarify what you meant by what the heresy is? Yes you said Jesus shouldn't be likened to Hitler but you said that many minutes ago not everyone may have understood what you meant. Stop speaking carelessly when it comes to Christ and stop casually risking the lives of other Christians!
In addition to that, what kind of title is "Fundamentalism and Cults"? Are you Coast to Coast AM employees so stupid you think that a cult of people who preach AGAINST Fundamentalist Christians and would be happy to see them all in dungeons or slaves in their homes, should be called Fundamentalists? THOSE ARE LIBERALS, NOT "FUNDAMENTALISTS". And though you said "fundamentalism" you are a fundamentalists too by your stupid midefinition of that word. Fundamentalism by your definition means that because you have definite beliefs and follow them, that you are a fundamentalist, therefore you are ones too Coast to Coast AM crew who supported the title of the show. Please use a dictionary and look up the difference between fundamentalism and liberalism, they are not the same, stop bullying fundamentalist Christians and the Muslims you stupidly associate with fundamentalist Christianity in your bigotry.
And how in the Hell can you not know what Calvinism is by now after having me refute you on your blog many days ago? I was the second one to comment and that didn't catch your attention? Are you so self-centered?
Would you stop preaching in ignorance and further you also spoke carelessly in that you didn't clarify what you meant by what the heresy is? Yes you said Jesus shouldn't be likened to Hitler but you said that many minutes ago not everyone may have understood what you meant. Stop speaking carelessly when it comes to Christ and stop casually risking the lives of other Christians!
Saturday, August 22, 2009
Yahoo! quietly Removes Yahoo Answers Link In Homepage Revamp
Notice anything missing from the new Yahoo! homepage? It's missing the Yahoo! Answers link. What's wrong Yahoo stockholders? Finally realizing what a shameful failure your propaganda anti-Christian venture was? You can read more about their sneaky ruse here.
Friday, August 21, 2009
Area 51 Hoaxer Calls Into Coast to Coast AM Once Again
About 4o minutes ago the Area 51-employee-on-the-run hoaxer called into Coast to Coast AM, it was obviously him/her, having the same style of speech and same voice, and George Noory, who was hosting, noticed the caller wasn't breathing through their nose and called him/her on it. The caller was pretending to have some ghost experience. George didn't warm up to the caller and it seemed like he recognized his/her voice. To my amazement he took his mind off the caller entirely it seemed and focused fully on the next caller. I was surprised George was able to laugh after hearing that sickening hoaxer lie yet again.
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Scientist On Coast to Coast AM Introduces Breakthrough Nonsense Explanation for Everything
On 8/19/2009, George interviewed an atheist guest named Nassim Haramein. According to Nassim, gravity is information moving out and electromagnetism is information moving out, and this is feedback, and it's this feedback is what generates consciousness and the universe ordered itself into extreme complexity and continues to, and how life was able to be created, survive, live well and evolve and learn, feel and multiply. Nassim doesn't have any evidence for his theory at all. The end.
Nassim knows that the so called "Big Bang" can't explain the ordered complexity in the universe, yet promotes this magical theory which is just as baseless as a big explosion creating a complex ordered universe, let alone one with living, replicating, self-aware, feeling beings in it that enjoy things and hate things.
Nassim also said, "I think dark matter was invented because our calculations didn't work out... we've done that many times." Who is "we"? It's not the Young Earth Creationist Scientists. Though some might think Nassim said that because he doesn't consider that group to be valid scientists, he did say early in his interview that creationists had good arguments for their beliefs. So, I believe, he was speaking careless and arrogantly, trumping up atheist scientists above creationist scientists (which would make sense since he is an atheist), otherwise he would not have spoken of young earth creationists as having accepted the dark matter theory or having helped come up with it. Or, by "we", he meant his type of scientists.
Update (At about 1:23 A.M.) Nassim said, "I fundamentally don't believe in evil. I believe in confusion. ... Our world has a tendency to become quite violent." Violence is defined as evil, Nassim has then contradicted himself, unless he'd truly like us all to believe that violence is a good thing or isn't evil. Nassim is definitely confused. At least he believes in that, hopefully he'll acknowledge that he too is confused.
Afterwards, when asked about Karma, Nassim babbled about how it's been talked about (no really?), and described it as feedback. Apparently Nassim doesn't doesn't believe in good or evil.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update (12:27 A.M., 8/20/2009):
I just looked at Nassim's picture, I recognize him: I saw him last year on Youtube promoting his wacky "theory of everything" theory. He's a very confused person.
P.S.
George also interviewed guest Jordan Maxwell on his show before Nassim was on. Jordan is a symbologist who denies the obvious teachings of the Bible and replaces them with shallow "hidden" meanings that are not useful for anything. He said that the gospels were all metaphors. I imagine he thinks one of the hidden meanings of the gospels is that God and Jesus are the sun. That is some of the type of stupidity Jordan teaches, and often he won't say what he believes in and claims that this is because he's afraid for his life even though he knows men like Alex Jones and millions of others say what he claims would get him killed or tortured in prison. Obviously then he says things like that to try to make himself appear more valuable then others.
He also claimed last night that the swine flu vaccine wasn't a danger and that there was a secret meaning indicated by the name of the vaccine, but claimed he was warned by the FBI, with the phrase, "You better watch your mouth." Sure. Really though, he should take that advice, because he speaks with carelessness, as in, he doesn't care what God thinks, what Jesus thinks or any Christian, despite his repeated claims to hold the Bible in high regard. What he holds in high regard is his own feelings, his own opinions, and that includes his hatred for those who tell the truth.
Jordan, you're somewhat good at creating an air of mystique around you and duping the gullible, but that doesn't show high regard for the truth, or the Bible. What you symbolize is sin, and the air around you is sinful and stinks badly. Hear is a threat you should take seriously:
You better watch your mouth: stop being pretentious, stop being arrogant, humble yourself and accept God's will with love. Stop misdefining love in whatever way suits you, and stop hiding behind the study of symbols. Promote what Christ said is the greatest law: "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your mind..." and the second, "Love your neighbor as yourself" and "Do to others as you would have them do to you." Would you want others to treat you as less valuable then them? Would you want them to lie to you when you wanted to know the truth? No.
Nassim knows that the so called "Big Bang" can't explain the ordered complexity in the universe, yet promotes this magical theory which is just as baseless as a big explosion creating a complex ordered universe, let alone one with living, replicating, self-aware, feeling beings in it that enjoy things and hate things.
Nassim also said, "I think dark matter was invented because our calculations didn't work out... we've done that many times." Who is "we"? It's not the Young Earth Creationist Scientists. Though some might think Nassim said that because he doesn't consider that group to be valid scientists, he did say early in his interview that creationists had good arguments for their beliefs. So, I believe, he was speaking careless and arrogantly, trumping up atheist scientists above creationist scientists (which would make sense since he is an atheist), otherwise he would not have spoken of young earth creationists as having accepted the dark matter theory or having helped come up with it. Or, by "we", he meant his type of scientists.
Update (At about 1:23 A.M.) Nassim said, "I fundamentally don't believe in evil. I believe in confusion. ... Our world has a tendency to become quite violent." Violence is defined as evil, Nassim has then contradicted himself, unless he'd truly like us all to believe that violence is a good thing or isn't evil. Nassim is definitely confused. At least he believes in that, hopefully he'll acknowledge that he too is confused.
Afterwards, when asked about Karma, Nassim babbled about how it's been talked about (no really?), and described it as feedback. Apparently Nassim doesn't doesn't believe in good or evil.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update (12:27 A.M., 8/20/2009):
I just looked at Nassim's picture, I recognize him: I saw him last year on Youtube promoting his wacky "theory of everything" theory. He's a very confused person.
P.S.
George also interviewed guest Jordan Maxwell on his show before Nassim was on. Jordan is a symbologist who denies the obvious teachings of the Bible and replaces them with shallow "hidden" meanings that are not useful for anything. He said that the gospels were all metaphors. I imagine he thinks one of the hidden meanings of the gospels is that God and Jesus are the sun. That is some of the type of stupidity Jordan teaches, and often he won't say what he believes in and claims that this is because he's afraid for his life even though he knows men like Alex Jones and millions of others say what he claims would get him killed or tortured in prison. Obviously then he says things like that to try to make himself appear more valuable then others.
He also claimed last night that the swine flu vaccine wasn't a danger and that there was a secret meaning indicated by the name of the vaccine, but claimed he was warned by the FBI, with the phrase, "You better watch your mouth." Sure. Really though, he should take that advice, because he speaks with carelessness, as in, he doesn't care what God thinks, what Jesus thinks or any Christian, despite his repeated claims to hold the Bible in high regard. What he holds in high regard is his own feelings, his own opinions, and that includes his hatred for those who tell the truth.
Jordan, you're somewhat good at creating an air of mystique around you and duping the gullible, but that doesn't show high regard for the truth, or the Bible. What you symbolize is sin, and the air around you is sinful and stinks badly. Hear is a threat you should take seriously:
You better watch your mouth: stop being pretentious, stop being arrogant, humble yourself and accept God's will with love. Stop misdefining love in whatever way suits you, and stop hiding behind the study of symbols. Promote what Christ said is the greatest law: "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your mind..." and the second, "Love your neighbor as yourself" and "Do to others as you would have them do to you." Would you want others to treat you as less valuable then them? Would you want them to lie to you when you wanted to know the truth? No.
Sunday, August 9, 2009
My Journal Continued on Livejournal
I've continued my journal here:
http://djknight.livejournal.com
and may recontinue it here due to some atheist stalkers who have followed me out of Yahoo Answers! no thanks to the sicko moderators there and their CEO who refuses to do what is good.
http://djknight.livejournal.com
and may recontinue it here due to some atheist stalkers who have followed me out of Yahoo Answers! no thanks to the sicko moderators there and their CEO who refuses to do what is good.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Hawarrrahhhhaaaa!!!!!!!! (Still choking...with tears....of...joy....)!
Bo freakin' zo's!!!!!!!!
Soives em' right!!!!!
Kooks!!!!
Go to college!
ANY college!!! Take ANY class in Paleontology 101 at ANY "reputable" university....
DORKS!"
SHE'S ABBYWOOD EVERYONE: THE HYPER SPAZ, IMPULSIVE RANTING HISTORY, SCIENCE, RELIGION AND TRUTH IGNORANT. The bold and capital letters in Abbywood's rant is from her by the way. What a dummy this Abby is, claiming that no Christian college or university is reputable. Wrong moron, look around moron, stop lying in hatred moron. Your feelings and babbling don't make you right moron, let alone hateful lying moron. If no Christian college was reputable moron there would be no modern science moron. It was Christians who started modern science moron, and before that, God moron. Read the Bible moron, and study history moron, and stop being a gullible moron and believing teachers that only say what satifies your lusts moron. It was atheists who tried to destroy scientific progress (read about Galileo moron) and who in their greed, petty jealousy and hatred of God continue to hinder scientific progress so much so that after 40 years since the "first" moon landing the Darwinist morons at NASA still have the world cut off from the moon, let alone Mars and Darwinist morons after 18 years are still selling and prescribing anti-depression pills that cause you to commit suicide, and Darwinist morons are still pretending the paleontological record shows a linear column of transitional fossils leading up to humans and wasting everyone's time and money, billions of hours and billions of dollars, repeating this lie, a lie which was known to be false by Darwin himself, billions of hours and billions of dollars on the lie that the Big Bombed Theory is backed by dark energy and gravitation waves, neither of which has been found (though you Darwinist morons pretend otherwise for more lazy money). Oh and any cure for any diseases yet Darwinists? What? Not even for AIDS? Maybe if you stopped wasting our time telling us we're dumb monkeys like you.
Was that clear enough moron? How many more times do you have to be called a moron before you realize you're an ultra moron, an ultra bigot and an ultra ignorant? Are you done choking and crying over someone who does good being persecuted, over lying and the murder of babies as long as it's your God-hating side that does it (you God-hating hypocrite?). Where is your self-control dummy? How is your mocking a babble proof of anything? How is it science stupid? Dur? Blind to the utter obvious much? And are you choking and crying tears of joy when a Christian does good? When a Christian freely gives his money to Christians and non-Christians who are needy, and when they do physical work to help them survive and prosper, even risking their lives and suffering years of unjust torture and murder to do so? Do you rejoice when Christians minding their own business worshiping in their own homes are robbed, sodomized or raped in front of others including other family members, regardless of their age or sex, or tortured for years or murdered for it? Do you rejoice over that too, stupid Abby? Why are you so full of hate Abby? What's wrong: can't force the millions of successful Christians to worship you and your feelings and tell you you're right no matter what stupidity comes out your mouth? Poor baby. We already have a God, and he's not a hyper spaz like you Abby, doesn't rejoice over the hurt of others Abby, doesn't show favoritism like you Abby, isn't partial like you Abby, won't call himself "she" because you pretend to love equality Abby, won't lie Abby. That is why you hate Him Abby.
The crooks and liars are you anti-Christians, anti-baby, anti-good, anti-truth accusers, who accuse others of being evil like you, because you are evil.
Poor anti-Christian whining babies: as usual, being ignorant of science, they don't comment on it, and so resort to mere, "Nanny nanny boo boo you broke an imaginary law (which we break all the time too!)" Yes you hypocrite crooks and liars, YOU BREAK IRS TAX LAW ALL THE TIME. How could you forget that you blind bigoted self-righteous biased hypocrites? Ooops? So then your own hatred backfires on you, so then Darwinism must be false because you steal and lie all the time! YOU STUPID BLIND HYPOCRITES: HOW CAN YOU EVER WIN WITH MERE MOCKER YOU MORONS? HOW IS BASHING YOUR MERE FEELINGS SCIENCE? YOUR FEELINGS DON'T EQUAL TRUTH YOU IDIOTS, LOOK UP THE WORD TRUTH YOU IDIOTS. God you anti-Christians are massively stupid hypocrites.
All they can do is mock and use false "sins" to accuse others of sin, meanwhile they sin all the time and demand not to be judged for it! HYPOCRITES! They strain at a gnat and swallow a camel, straining to find a "sin" in the wind to dote on and play up, because they are unable to refute the clear goodness of Christ and those who follow him, the clear goodness of:
"DON'T MURDER",
"DON'T COMMIT ADULTERY",
"DON'T STEAL"
"DON'T LIE"
(and we Christians know you that you especially hate that last one).
And what happened to those two verses you love to quote you hypocrites? "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" and "Do not judge." YOU HYPOCRITES. Why do those verses only apply to you? INSECURE BITTER WHINING BABY BIGOTS MUCH?
Can't you obey Christ whom you quote and take out of context to suit your sins?