That would be Darwin of course, and before him the spiritualist and pagans he ripped off, and of whom learned to lie from Satan.
Besides being a credit thief who tried to hide the fact that he ripped off natural selection from a creation scientist, Darwin was very stupid too. Eloquent maybe, but he was very DUMB as is evidenced by what he considered proof of evolution. His followers continue in his steps of time-wasting thievery by inventing and making a show of idiotic 'proofs'.
Showing posts with label proof of evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label proof of evolution. Show all posts
Sunday, February 3, 2008
Friday, January 11, 2008
A Critical Critique of the Critical Thinking Skills of Harvard University's Evolutionists
According to some evolutionists at Harvard evolution has been proven true to everyone in the world. Yeah.
Some excerpts from their rant "Snails Caught in Act of Evolution" with my commentaries:
"Walking along the south shore of Great Inagua Island, the Agassiz Professor of Zoology noticed a telltale change in the shells of land snails scattered on a mud flat. He saw large, finger-shaped shells of Cerion excelsior, an extinct snail once widespread in the Bahamas. Nearby were smaller, rounder, vertically striped shells with prominent whorls, belonging to a species called Cerion rubicundum"
He found devolved snails, small and puny. That's some great convincing "proof" of evolution already. Why is it "proof" of MICROevolution (yes, there are more then two kinds despite evolutionists repeatedly "forgetting" that important fact) always comes in less complicated punier versions of their ancestors?
"The history of life on Earth is written in shells, bones, footprints, and imprints found in mountains, canyons, and at the bottom of the seas. Over millions of years, movements of air, water, and continents destroy these silent signs, creating gaps in the natural record, or the fossils are scattered and compressed in different layers of sedimentary rocks."
In other words, "Satan did it; he removed layers of strata and put all those inexplainable fossils, polonium halos, and artifacts that 'shouldn't be' in millions or billions of year old strata and rocks. If not, then God is oh so devious trickster for making us evolutionists assume the earth is billions of years old. He made them draw false conclusions. God made us do it. Forget the fact he let others figure out the truth and he spread it at the cost of their family and lives, they are liars and don't deserve to speak! Cuz!"
Moving on:
" ... That was just a theory, however; Gould hadn't proved it. ... the researchers used a more expensive and time-consuming clock, the decay of radioactive carbon present in the shells. ... The oldest hybrids, those most resembling excelsior, were alive about 17,000 years ago. The youngest fossils, those most resembling the rubicundum invaders, lived on Great Inagua as recently as 3,000 years ago."
Cuz faulty radiocarbon dating which is unreliable after 5000 years according to your own anti-creationists said so: see What about carbon dating? "The dates provided enough proof for Gould and Goodfriend to go public."
Not enough proof for me and saved creation scientists however.
"They published their findings in the Dec. 13 issue of Science, the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (and got applauses from ignorant, wannabe scientists desperate for vain exaltation and easy and gullible "chics" and the back pats and prizes of deluded anti-creationists, therefore: Snails Caught in Act of Evolution By William J. Cromie of the Gazette Staff is true.)
So Harvard is a university of critical thinking skills and "higher learning" huh? Evolve into reality already.
Now here's a" real" article on snails: The Historical Development of the Old-Earth Geological Time-Scale
Some excerpts from their rant "Snails Caught in Act of Evolution" with my commentaries:
"Walking along the south shore of Great Inagua Island, the Agassiz Professor of Zoology noticed a telltale change in the shells of land snails scattered on a mud flat. He saw large, finger-shaped shells of Cerion excelsior, an extinct snail once widespread in the Bahamas. Nearby were smaller, rounder, vertically striped shells with prominent whorls, belonging to a species called Cerion rubicundum"
He found devolved snails, small and puny. That's some great convincing "proof" of evolution already. Why is it "proof" of MICROevolution (yes, there are more then two kinds despite evolutionists repeatedly "forgetting" that important fact) always comes in less complicated punier versions of their ancestors?
"The history of life on Earth is written in shells, bones, footprints, and imprints found in mountains, canyons, and at the bottom of the seas. Over millions of years, movements of air, water, and continents destroy these silent signs, creating gaps in the natural record, or the fossils are scattered and compressed in different layers of sedimentary rocks."
In other words, "Satan did it; he removed layers of strata and put all those inexplainable fossils, polonium halos, and artifacts that 'shouldn't be' in millions or billions of year old strata and rocks. If not, then God is oh so devious trickster for making us evolutionists assume the earth is billions of years old. He made them draw false conclusions. God made us do it. Forget the fact he let others figure out the truth and he spread it at the cost of their family and lives, they are liars and don't deserve to speak! Cuz!"
Moving on:
" ... That was just a theory, however; Gould hadn't proved it. ... the researchers used a more expensive and time-consuming clock, the decay of radioactive carbon present in the shells. ... The oldest hybrids, those most resembling excelsior, were alive about 17,000 years ago. The youngest fossils, those most resembling the rubicundum invaders, lived on Great Inagua as recently as 3,000 years ago."
Cuz faulty radiocarbon dating which is unreliable after 5000 years according to your own anti-creationists said so: see What about carbon dating? "The dates provided enough proof for Gould and Goodfriend to go public."
Not enough proof for me and saved creation scientists however.
"They published their findings in the Dec. 13 issue of Science, the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (and got applauses from ignorant, wannabe scientists desperate for vain exaltation and easy and gullible "chics" and the back pats and prizes of deluded anti-creationists, therefore: Snails Caught in Act of Evolution By William J. Cromie of the Gazette Staff is true.)
So Harvard is a university of critical thinking skills and "higher learning" huh? Evolve into reality already.
Now here's a" real" article on snails: The Historical Development of the Old-Earth Geological Time-Scale
Thursday, January 3, 2008
2nd Blog On Carl Flygare, a Super Anti-Christian Bigot
Note that the moderators of amazon.com are severe hypocrites. They have deleted my reviews for being "dissertations" and always reviews which are on anti-Christian books. Yet why then do these hypocrites allow Carl's dissertations which are much longer then the longest reviews they've deleted? Here is another example of Carl's ranting stupidity masquerading as a scientific review:
Carl Flygare - The wannbe scientist and bigot who amazon moderators sanction,January 3, 2008
Apologetics Cross-Dressed As Science Redux, or Whack-a-Mole 2.0, November 30, 2007
By Carl Flygare
"Did you know that Master Books, the publisher of "The Young Earth: The Real History of the Earth - Past, Present, and Future" by John Morris, President of The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is the publishing arm of the ICR - an ethical, functional, intellectual and in this case incestuous oxymoron - staffed by a bizarre bestiary of barking-mad biblical literalists; a priori dedicated to the preposterous presupposition that any myth or fable in the Bible - however hermeneutically contrived or at odds with objective reality - must trump the findings of modern science?"
Yawn. When will Carl stop wasting time being pretentious, pretending that his ranting mockery is evidence. When will this demon-loving hypocrite get down to real science?
"The Master Books mission statement commits to "Publishing creation-based materials for all ages that defend the Bible from the very first verse." No reputable mainstream publisher would ever consider or release such a farcical farrago of fervent faith-based fantasy - Morris essentially self-published his own book, the iconic imprimatur of a crank."
When will this hypocrite review the book and stop pretending to be putting forth evidence of wrong doing? We're waiting.
"This "Revised and Expanded" edition, burdened by an equally puerile fact and content-free PowerPoint presentation on CD (for witnessing to the witless perhaps), regurgitates the same creationist canards, denialism, and fallacies - in the service of the supposedly divine - that defaced and laced the original printing of "The Young Earth" in 1994."
Learn what evidence hypocrite: Hint, it doesn't mean, "Whatever Carl the hypocrite says it means."
"Morris falls into the "God said it, I believe it, that settles it" dogma dumpster"
Why is this hypocrite raving and slandering? Why is he taking Morris and all creationists out of context? Lying hypocrite who needs to learn what context means, we believe God because what he says is evident you moron, not because someone called God merely said it you moron. That is why the book Morris wrote and Ken Ham contains scientific evidence you moron, not simply one page with one sentence saying "God said it therefore it's true." Idiot liar, stop lying already. You're not cool, you're a lying hypocrite who thinks his opinions are evidence in and of themselves.
"but surreptitiously substitutes "I said it, God agrees with it, that settles it logic."
Carl said it, therefore it's true. You hypocrite, you are doing the very thing you are falsely accusing Morris and Ken and Duane for doing. You hypocrite, we present scientific evidence and logical evidence, where the hell is yours you raving hypocrite? Your logic stinks, when will you come up with actual evidence?
"He uses God like a ventriloquist uses a dummy - by putting words into his mouth - to defend otherwise indefensible arguments from authority; a desperate gambit necessary to sustain a contorted and contrived strain of anti-intellectual Christian fundamentalism with spectacularly inane pseudoscience."
Massive hypocrite insults and mere claims are not evidence and of themselves. Because Carl said it does not make it true. When do you think Carl will stop being such a hypocrite and pretending that what he says is true merely because he said it? This is Carl the hypocrite's logic:
"If a Christian says it it must not be true, if an anti-Christian like me Carl says it, then it must be true." That's you, hypocrite, not us. Carl the hypocrite then said:
""The Young Earth" - with increasing ineptitude in every chapter - attempts to justify a 6,000 year old Earth; a harlequin hypothesis conjured into existence by Archbishop James Ussher who credulously concluded that the Earth was created on Sunday, October 23, in 4,004 BC. John Lightfoot, a contemporary of Ussher even ventured a time of day - 9:00 AM!"
Massive hypocrite, once again, mere mockery is not evidence in and of itself your opinion is not magically self justifying. Laughing is not evidence. What a hypocrite. The hypocrite then says:
"Over the past two hundred years scientific advances in a number of disciplines, ranging from cosmology to physics and geology, have allowed researchers to determine the age of the Earth with remarkable accuracy - 4.54 billion years (plus or minus 1%)."
Because you said so bigoted moron. Master hypocrite, there are also creation scientists, did you notice? Did you notice super hypocrite that not all say the Earth is billions of years old? Hyper moron how could you miss that when you've "reviewed" the books of some of them? Dur? Duh? Doh? Super hypocrite how does it escape your ignorant self that Copernicus, Galileo and Newton, were all creationists? How does it escape your evil self that Christians scientists are the ones who created the modern scientific method and not idiot atheists like you? Big duh. Learn history and stop bashing people merely because they disagree with your stinky breathed self. Here ignorance-lover, more legwork for you:
Five historians all agree that the Bible and Christianity led to the modern scientific methods.
So, Carl the ranting hypocrite who posted a false stinky review, will you also post false reviews against those historians and pretend to be a historian yourself? Clearly the rest of your rant is not worth reading. You are a stubborn rebellious hypocrite trying to look cool, dying for worthless temporary back pats and invitations to parties from fellow hypocrites like yourself. See how many back pats you'll be getting in Hell.
Note to my readers, amazon moderators have deleted my reviews on various anti-christian and anti-calvinistic books for being dissertations, yet they sanction Carl's false raving reviews which are at least twice the size of my longest reviews. Amazon's CEO sanctions the moderators' actions, that makes amazon.com an anti-christian company who merely tolerates Christian books so as to not look totally biased and lose all their Christian customers. I suggest you buy the books through my amazon store and boost their rank to the top of amazon's book rank and by doing so push their junk propaganda to the bottom.
Carl Flygare - The wannbe scientist and bigot who amazon moderators sanction,
A Kid's Review (lol, Carl is a kid? Something tells me not, emotionally it's no doubt true though. Look up the definition of kid instead of taking Carl's word for it).
Since Car refuses to give a true review, and the amazon hypocrite moderators approve of that, shouldn't I, a Christian, also be allowed to post a non-review in like manner? At least mine are true. Now, let's analyze what the bigot ignorant Prententious Carl the Mentally Ill Mad Raving Wannabe Scientist and Contentious Genie said:Apologetics Cross-Dressed As Science Redux, or Whack-a-Mole 2.0, November 30, 2007
By Carl Flygare
"Did you know that Master Books, the publisher of "The Young Earth: The Real History of the Earth - Past, Present, and Future" by John Morris, President of The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is the publishing arm of the ICR - an ethical, functional, intellectual and in this case incestuous oxymoron - staffed by a bizarre bestiary of barking-mad biblical literalists; a priori dedicated to the preposterous presupposition that any myth or fable in the Bible - however hermeneutically contrived or at odds with objective reality - must trump the findings of modern science?"
Yawn. When will Carl stop wasting time being pretentious, pretending that his ranting mockery is evidence. When will this demon-loving hypocrite get down to real science?
"The Master Books mission statement commits to "Publishing creation-based materials for all ages that defend the Bible from the very first verse." No reputable mainstream publisher would ever consider or release such a farcical farrago of fervent faith-based fantasy - Morris essentially self-published his own book, the iconic imprimatur of a crank."
When will this hypocrite review the book and stop pretending to be putting forth evidence of wrong doing? We're waiting.
"This "Revised and Expanded" edition, burdened by an equally puerile fact and content-free PowerPoint presentation on CD (for witnessing to the witless perhaps), regurgitates the same creationist canards, denialism, and fallacies - in the service of the supposedly divine - that defaced and laced the original printing of "The Young Earth" in 1994."
Learn what evidence hypocrite: Hint, it doesn't mean, "Whatever Carl the hypocrite says it means."
"Morris falls into the "God said it, I believe it, that settles it" dogma dumpster"
Why is this hypocrite raving and slandering? Why is he taking Morris and all creationists out of context? Lying hypocrite who needs to learn what context means, we believe God because what he says is evident you moron, not because someone called God merely said it you moron. That is why the book Morris wrote and Ken Ham contains scientific evidence you moron, not simply one page with one sentence saying "God said it therefore it's true." Idiot liar, stop lying already. You're not cool, you're a lying hypocrite who thinks his opinions are evidence in and of themselves.
"but surreptitiously substitutes "I said it, God agrees with it, that settles it logic."
Carl said it, therefore it's true. You hypocrite, you are doing the very thing you are falsely accusing Morris and Ken and Duane for doing. You hypocrite, we present scientific evidence and logical evidence, where the hell is yours you raving hypocrite? Your logic stinks, when will you come up with actual evidence?
"He uses God like a ventriloquist uses a dummy - by putting words into his mouth - to defend otherwise indefensible arguments from authority; a desperate gambit necessary to sustain a contorted and contrived strain of anti-intellectual Christian fundamentalism with spectacularly inane pseudoscience."
Massive hypocrite insults and mere claims are not evidence and of themselves. Because Carl said it does not make it true. When do you think Carl will stop being such a hypocrite and pretending that what he says is true merely because he said it? This is Carl the hypocrite's logic:
"If a Christian says it it must not be true, if an anti-Christian like me Carl says it, then it must be true." That's you, hypocrite, not us. Carl the hypocrite then said:
""The Young Earth" - with increasing ineptitude in every chapter - attempts to justify a 6,000 year old Earth; a harlequin hypothesis conjured into existence by Archbishop James Ussher who credulously concluded that the Earth was created on Sunday, October 23, in 4,004 BC. John Lightfoot, a contemporary of Ussher even ventured a time of day - 9:00 AM!"
Massive hypocrite, once again, mere mockery is not evidence in and of itself your opinion is not magically self justifying. Laughing is not evidence. What a hypocrite. The hypocrite then says:
"Over the past two hundred years scientific advances in a number of disciplines, ranging from cosmology to physics and geology, have allowed researchers to determine the age of the Earth with remarkable accuracy - 4.54 billion years (plus or minus 1%)."
Because you said so bigoted moron. Master hypocrite, there are also creation scientists, did you notice? Did you notice super hypocrite that not all say the Earth is billions of years old? Hyper moron how could you miss that when you've "reviewed" the books of some of them? Dur? Duh? Doh? Super hypocrite how does it escape your ignorant self that Copernicus, Galileo and Newton, were all creationists? How does it escape your evil self that Christians scientists are the ones who created the modern scientific method and not idiot atheists like you? Big duh. Learn history and stop bashing people merely because they disagree with your stinky breathed self. Here ignorance-lover, more legwork for you:
Five historians all agree that the Bible and Christianity led to the modern scientific methods.
So, Carl the ranting hypocrite who posted a false stinky review, will you also post false reviews against those historians and pretend to be a historian yourself? Clearly the rest of your rant is not worth reading. You are a stubborn rebellious hypocrite trying to look cool, dying for worthless temporary back pats and invitations to parties from fellow hypocrites like yourself. See how many back pats you'll be getting in Hell.
Note to my readers, amazon moderators have deleted my reviews on various anti-christian and anti-calvinistic books for being dissertations, yet they sanction Carl's false raving reviews which are at least twice the size of my longest reviews. Amazon's CEO sanctions the moderators' actions, that makes amazon.com an anti-christian company who merely tolerates Christian books so as to not look totally biased and lose all their Christian customers. I suggest you buy the books through my amazon store and boost their rank to the top of amazon's book rank and by doing so push their junk propaganda to the bottom.
Tuesday, January 1, 2008
Lying About Pygmies - Evolutionists "Bull-shitting" Again
"Pygmies’ short life spans may be behind their small size
December 11th, 2007 - 4:17 pm ICT by adminWashington, December 11 (ANI): A new study suggests that the smaller life spans of pygmies across the world might be a reason as to why they are smaller in size than average humans.
The research suggests that brief life spans put evolutionary pressure on pygmy women to stop growing and to start giving birth sooner."
And it "suggests" meaning what? Who wrote this article? An evolutionist of course, so of course it's going to suggest evolution is true. Big duh. And suggests to who lol? To creationists who don't lie for profit and pride? Creationists who aren't in the habit of lying? So that's the powerful evolutionary evidence? To bullshit and be vague? And how does brief life span = stop growing? Is evolution now like karma? It's magically intelligent? It's some sort of god now? The article goes on to say:
"As a result of this, the energy that should normally be expended on growth gets spent on reproduction at a younger age."
Wow, check that out, their evidence is to repeat what they just said. Thanks for wasting my time. No wait, not a total waste, they've demonstrated more evidence for their "repeat a lie enough and people will believe it" technique. The article then says:"“The idea is that (pygmies) have to stop growing earlier, because when you start reproducing at least for women all the energy you would put in growth is put into reproduction,” the National Geographic quoted Andrea Migliano, the lead author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow at Clare College, Cambridge, in the United Kingdom, as saying."
For the third time the article repeats this theory without citing evidence for its validity. And besides that did you notice any errors? Notice Andrea avoided the issue of why the men would not grow taller being that they don't have to expend much energy carrying around and feeding a baby? So much for her "idea". Furthermore, what is the evidence that "all of the energy" a pygmy uses is put into reproduction? You mean they don't dance, sing, learn, hunt, grow, nurse babies, or have fun doing other things? So they can't do both huh, they can only be baby machines? Would pygmies disappear if they were more active? Furthermore, how much energy could it possibly for a human to grow from 1 foot to 5 or 7 feet in FOURTEEN-EIGHTEEN YEARS? Since when does growing to even eight feet after eighteen years make a person unable to give birth to two or three kids and unable to be a very active person? Does anyone notice anyone living shorter and shorter lifespans from being very active lol? So this is evolutionary science? Teaching evolutionary theory is a shameful waste of tax-payer money (including that of creationist Christians who are illegally made to fund it when it is opposed to their conscience), time that could be used to make real advancements in technology and science. It is worthless compared to bull shit; bull shit can be used as fertilizer and fuel and used to save lives. But what is good is evolution except to show that creationists are right and that evolutionists are wasting-time?The article then says:
"“You have to choose either you grow or you reproduce,” she added."
Cuz she said so (damn, I can either be 1 foot or have kids), and didn't I virtually read that stupid teaching three other times in this article without any evidence to back it? And what's with the switcheroo? First were talking about life-span, then it shifts to height. What the hell? Can evolutionists stop going off on illogical tangents?There is no magical evolution law that says, "Hi, if you live longer you can't more kids!"
Ironically, in atheist-evolutionist dominated China, they even force abortions on those, including christians who try to have more then one or two children. Sick atheist-evolutionists try and force their theories to come true. Sick, vile, sick.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
