About My Isohunt Poll

I got an email from someone on a post I made in a forum a few days ago:

On Feb 9, 2008 7:13 PM, wrote:

"Your poll's at Isohunt have gotten alot of responses, At 5+ pages they are a hit, Thank you. You really should stop by and rebuke them, as the expert debater and speaker of the truth that you are.

PS Keep up the good work with the Blog, Man I didn't know there were that many stupid hypocrites
in the world.

Thanking you for your efforts to speak your truth."

Hi, I noticed from my stats that people have been coming from isohunt to my sad little blog ever since I posted to threads there. I haven't thought anything much of it. I guess in the back of my mind I figured it was just the usual atheist stalker types and rare christian supporter. In fact there was someone from aim called prepare4descent who was harassing me (going so far as to switch names when I blocked him) to try and get me to respond back in the threads. All that did was affirm to me that if I were to go back to respond to the atheists I would be playing into Satan's hand and get drawn in their usual time-wasting fighting.

There was one thing that annoyed me about the atheist poll I made, and that I forgot to put "I can't see God therefore he doesn't exist, and neither does anything else I can't see directly" as an option.

If any atheists thought I was stereotyping them well I gave many different options on the thread with the poll to say why you didn't believe in God, and I don't believe that all atheists are exactly the same and never had save that. I do talk about them in a way that sounds stereotypical however because most of them are the same. I've only noticed four out of what seemed like 1000 that were significantly more decent then the others. I talk to one of them now and then on my messenger. The conversations are nearly always shallow no surprise to me. I humor her often to get her to say something or to cheer her up. It was interesting for me to hear from her that she only cared about those "close" to her. Yet earlier had let me know she was adopted after I started talking about who should be adopted. I noticed she seemed to be adopted herself by her careful wording on the topic. The hypocrisy is that if you only care about those close to you, or should, then she never would have been adopted. It reminds me of the "I don't know you therefore I don't want to" line that shallow paranoid bitter people will use to make you go away when you attempt to get to know them or befriend them.

Also if any thought that my thread on atheists not and a stereotype, well, it wasn't. It was a response to atheists who believed they were morally superior to Christians and that Christians were mainly to blame for the world's problems, or religion in general. Most atheists I've met (99.9%) believe that every single type of religion does immoral or evil harm in some way. So, my point was, "are you innocent, are you perfect, do atheists never do anything evil?". And the answer of course is obvious even to those poisoned with hatred. There are some though who are so warped that they literally murder or ruin a person's life (like many psychologists and doctors do to their patients) and think they are doing good to them.

I don't plan on returning to the isohunt threads to waste time fighting. I stated what I what I had to say on those topics and my points were obvious, and I'd rather not experience a moderator deleting my account or locking the posts because, as a teenspot moderator once told me, "You're preventing others from talking" (rolls eyes). Yeah, hypocritical huh? One of the moderators there banned me and locked one of my threads (thereby preventing others from talking lol) because of that stated reason and because she had gone to the link I posted and saw a site I made which LISTED using numbers various sites with criticisms against various religions including Catholicism. She claimed I was insulting other religions by that site, even though the title for each category was merely: "The problem with...". So mentioning problems about various religions is forbidden on teenspot unless it's protest Christianity. That is the way of the non-Christian, to rage against you if you dare refute them, to play the hypocrite, to hide the truth at the cost of the lives of many because of the personal irrational hatred for God. When I made a new account right away to point out his or her hypocrisy for doing what she or he did (yes she or he was an anonymous coward) she or he replied, "I don't care," a typical non-Christian reply. "I don't care" = "I don't care about the truth, it's not welcome here." That is why I will only poke my head in momentarily to rebuke or witness in non-Christian forums. In other words, it's almost a waste of time. What's said has been said and the best Christians can do now is to make what they say more organized and well said and to make it more convenient to read and hear. Spending a lot of time in non and anti-Christian forums to witness will end up doing more bad then good in my opinion.

Satan rounds up nay-sayers to prevent Christians from leading others to Christ and to destroy anyone who already is a saved Christian. I was virtually stabbed to death on Yahoo Answers and was punished severely by the moderators. If you look at the history page on Yahoo Answers on wikipedia look for versions which make mention of novangelis being a troll and you'll see I got harassed pretty bad. Even this one atheist harasser named Gazoo admitted that a fellow atheist called gorgeoustxwoman was harassing the christians there and with a condemning tone. Besides being a major hypocrite for condemning her and not himself he ridiculously thought that I was her, meanwhile atheists love to pretend that they are not the conspiracy minded or paranoid ones.

I'm too disgusted to read what atheists have to say against anymore, they just either insult, repeat the same defeated arguments, even ones from many years ago, use inuendo, or take things out of context. When I hear them it's like listening to someone tell me they've just discovered the Earth round and that you are stupid because you haven't yet. I wrote a list of general anti-Christian attack tactics and it came out to something like 63 methods. I also wrote a book containing over 130 mostly common arguments against the Bible and Christians and ones I thought would be brought up in response to my refutations of them. I haven't published them or given them out for free because I'm not making any money from my stores and so am 'forced' to publish them in part for profit. I haven't done so yet because I get very little money each month and haven't been able to save up to pay for those things. It also seems that about no saved Christians will take my books seriously or read them unless I sell them in Borders, and other popular bookstores.

I've heard all Satan has to say and his blind minions have been rebuked thoroughly. They have no excuse for their attitude or behavior being that there are hundreds of thousands of living Christians, libraries, bookstores and the internet from which they can learn the truth, and if I manage to publish my books and get them well-known, they will have even less of an excuse.

Yet Another Hysterical Anti-Christian Displays His Massive Stupidy for Us

While reading the reviews for a book called The Historical Jesus I came across a typical anti-Christian rant in need of a smack down. In quotes are sections of the rant by "A Customer" and I've replied to them:

The title of his review:

"Please! Faith and historical research don't mix well."

Bcuz! You Said! So! So is that your atheist science lesson for the day? Why then do so many evolutionists believe faith that evolution is true mixes with historical research? Do you even know what faith means? Hint: It doesn't mean "belief without evidence" which you clearly think it means from reading your stupid rant.

"By A Customer"

What's wrong, didn't you have time enough to tell us who you were? Aren't you proud of your scholarly scientific review?

"If this is the 'factual' basis for the historicity of Jesus, then Christianity is in trouble."

Bcuz u said so, and whatever the atheist says is true is true. Not very scientific are you?

"What a joke."

Bcuz u said so, and whatever the atheist says is true is true. Not very scientific are you? Hint: Evidence doesn't mean, "Whatever you feel is true." Use a dictionary and stop being lazy.

"The 'evidence' -- ?"

That's your "evidence" so far --? Atheists, always wasting time with their stupidity and pretension.

"Well, it isn't there."

Am I the only one who feels like there a fly buzzing in my ear, or is it just me?

"I was very excited to read this book;"

Because you had new material to find imaginary faults in.

"it was recommended to me by thoughtful, intelligent Christians who I greatly respect."

I smell self-serving flattery.

"But the book was a real shock -- "

Holy mother of mothers! Really! Shocking!

"the author contradicts himself all the time,"

Bcuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true is true bcuz ye said it.

"the author uses the New Testament primarily to 'prove' the truth of the New Testament -- Hm..."

Hmmmm, he's trying to "prove"? So because it didn't convince your illogical self it wasn't proof to anyone else lol? Did you forget the meaning of proof too? Damn you're an arrogant babbler aren't ya?

Can you shut up already or come up with evidence? You're wasting my time.

"That's some fishy logic, no?"

No, whatever you say is not true bcuz u you posted a rhetorical question. Furthermore, questions do not equal evidence in and of themselves, sarcasm does not equal evidence in and of itself. You are really dying to end up in Hell aren't you? Tell us all wise one where he says, "The NT is true bcuz it says it is true". Show us. Oh, you can't, bcuz you're a careless liar.

"I strongly suggest that those who are earnestly interested in the history of Christianity and its beliefs concerning Jesus -- "

And we saved Christians forgiven of our since care what an opinion-bashing ranter strongly suggests bcuz?

"who are not biased a priori by their 'faith'"

Insane one why did you put "faith" in quotes? Are you stupid? So you don't truly believe that they have faith, LOL? Well what do you think it is then, logical belief? Is that it Mr. Confused?

Mr. A Priori do you think you are smart because you said "a priori" rather than "because" like a non-vain person who truly cares about making sense and helping others (rather than being a show off) would have said? It makes you look stupid and vain to me and the millions of Christians on my side.

And what is your evidence that the author is biased? Do you wan't us to just have, lol, "faith" that you're right because you have "faith" that you're right?

Contradictory one did you notice you are biased because you have faith that the Bible isn't true? Blind much? Again, look up the meaning of the word faith before spitting all over everyone. Furthermore contradictory one, are you really that stupid as to think 100+ million Christians cannot think logically because they trust that God's word is true based on the logical things it states? You're seriously that stupid? Then you who have faith God and Jesus do not exist can never be logical either.

"which immediately necessitates certain conclusions --"

Trust "immediately" (the hell?) necessitates certain conclusions? Genius, did you mean, trusting in something means you conclude that something is true? Was that so hard to say Mr. Word Salad Master?

And why are you telling us that it's immediate? Hey, I've got some useless information to waste your time with while I'm pretending to be smart too: If you say something you've immediately said something! Neato huh?

Now, your point that trust means you have concluded certain things, IS? So if an evolutionist trusts that evolution is true based on his reading of books endorsing evolution means he is biased? Huh? Can we say, "contradiction" or how about "I'm ranting and have made no point"?

"then check out the work by [blah, blah blah, blah blah], and [blah bleah]."

No thanks, clearly if they have as careless garbage research skills and moral logical as you aren't worth reading.

"The bottom line: the authors of the New Testament simply used Old Testament, Pagan, and Greek sources to construct their jesus tales."

Bottom line: saying "bottom line" with the feeling that you are oh so wise doesn't cut it. Bottom line: Bcuz u said so does not equal evidence. Bottom line: Parroted tales like yours does not equal evidence. Bottom line: Fancy word salad does not equal evidence, let alone nonsensical word salad. Bottom line: You've wasted out time again. Bottom line: You are still sinning against God and pretending he doesn't exist despite the clear evidence the universe has been designed and that Jesus was a good and truthful man. Bottom line: You need to learn the definitions of the words you use before acting like you know what you are talking about.

"It is all there -- for anyone willing to look for the truth."

It is all there -- for anyone willing to look for the truth. Woah, I can say that to you too! That must make me right!

Wikihypocrisy - Darwinists Protect Their False god Darwin

Well did they bury my edits? A very openly gay moderator who instantly erased my edits based on his "doesn't appear to be constructive" feelings did so repeatedly, he even went so far as to delete my rebukes on his talk page. You can tell that this "moderator" (Allstarecho) is trolling because he literally will delete any condemning info about Darwin if he catches a change within seconds. No one is going to tell me this guy is making careful judgments with reasonless personal attacks like that. Ironically I was banned for supposedly attacking him by pointing out his hypocrisy and trolling. That's Darwin-worshipping pleasure-addicts for you. On top of that there was a blatant self-admitted troll who got rid of the criticism on the Origin of Species page. Did any Darwinists undo his dirty work? Nope, they sanction him. It's just like Yahoo Answers where the top moderators use stalkers and harassers to do their dirty work.

Wikipedia Still Dominated By Hypcoritical Snakeoil Scientists

I posted this rebuke on the discussion page on Venus of Wikipedia:

Unscientific Hypocritical Propaganda

Saidsoisms:

"Venus is thought to undergo periodic episodes of plate tectonics, in which the crust is subducted rapidly within a few million years, separated by periods of a few hundred million years of relative stability. This contrasts strongly with Earth's more or less steady state of ongoing subduction and continental drift, but is consistent with how geological processes operate without oceans, since oceans are believed to act as a lubricant in subduction. It is believed the surface rocks of Venus are only about a half-a-billion years old as impact crater analysis suggests that its surface dynamics have exchanged its surface for a clean face (wiping out old craters) sometime in the last billion years."

Where is the citation for even one of these statements? Where even a "citation needed"? Why hypocrites you evolutionists and panspermians are. It is also false as there are many scientists who believe it is about 6000 years old. SINCE WHEN IS EVIDENCELESS SPECULATION, "just trust me" "cuz I said so" objective fact? Is this the same as what so many anti-christians on wikipedia call weasel wording? It should be. It is weaseling in anti-biblical propaganda in the guise of science.

So this is what the wikipedia "community" (anti-christian propagandists) considers one of the best examples of their Wickedpedia work? They are right, it is one of the best examples of their subtle sneaking in of lies without immediately looking like hypocrites to the masses of gullible and deluded. I think you all should watch Tainted Evidence - Forensics On Trial and Forensics on Fire to get another dose of reality. Mere pretension does not make something scientific.

References:

http://media.gospelcom.net/aig/Volume_072/03.mp3
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i3/venus.asp
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i4/galileo.asp

Pirate Bay and Mininova, Self-Defeating, Anti-Christain, Money-Loving Hypocrites

While posting various comments and links to my sites on piratebay, in order to be able to afford to safely upload to it without the authorities being able to pester me, some hypocrite or hypocrites decided to report me. Why hypocritical?

1. I was posting critical information that the world needed to know but is suffering and dying from not knowing: That the teaching of micro-evolution is a destructive life-threatening teaching, and that Darwin's very theft of his idea of natural selection from a Christian Creation Scientist was clear evidence that atheists could not be trusted to tell the whole truth let alone give credit to whom it belongs.

2. On piratebay exists massive amounts of space-wasting banter totally unrelated to the torrents uploaded. Often the comments or chatting is very foul. But who is reporting them for spreading hateful filthy comments that kids can easily see? No one.

3. Furthermore, you can find a huge amount of links promoting sites other than piratebay and using porn to do it.

4. Furthermore, some of my posts were relevant need-to-know comments, far more relevant than "seed plz" or mere opinions like "christians are stupid" or "great vid".

5. As can be seen from one of my blog entries, I not only defended the likes of piratebay, but I directly defended them on youtube. Some appreciate huh? But since they have played the part of Nebal; attacked the one who defended them.

6. I joined their suprnova forum to ask why I wasn't able to post urls and a moderator named Dr. something or other insulted me for asking and said basically, "You can!" and spammed his personal site which was totally unrelated to my post. Another member then posted a reply and severely insulted me for asking and excused his insult by saying that my post would be trashed anyways. I rebuked the moderator and told him that merely saying, "You can" was not evidence that I could post urls and that he was spamming. For that he banned me and his reason was "Idiot". He banned me again when I signed up a few minutes afterwards and again his reason was "Idiot" despite me not having posted anything. This is his typical behavior I found out. A few minutes later I discovered why piratebay was giving me error messages when I tried t post, it turned out that snipurl.com was banned from being posted. That sure makes me an idiot doesn't it?

7. I also learned that on that forum foul language reigns supreme as well as making jokes about abusing children, and that includes raping, molesting and murdering them.

It was days later that I then began my hours long campaign of "spamming" myself, but of course, good spam is an abomination to the wicked, and so I was banned.

And how about mininova? Is that a good site? No way. I had uploaded a book I wrote showing how all anti-Christian arguments used against Christians failed. On one attempt however I accidentally mistyped something and so unseeded the torrent. For that alone I was banned. Nope, no bigotry there. I made another account later, and one of the forum moderators got anally upset out on me when I asked for the keys to various programs. Why? He implied I was lazy and that they could be found despite the fact that I looked everywhere and could not find them which was why I was posting my request in the first place, and despite the fact that unlike so many I had carefully typed out the program names and version numbers and their location and said I was disabled. He also had to say that he didn't think anyone would help me. Isn't that just so helpful? Who cares about his stupid ignorant opinions? But this moderator banned me for pointing out he was being stupid. On top of that, for no logical reason, the word "eternian" is designated as a swear word on mininova. Imagine that, a Christian denomination name is a swear word, but not the ones of proven murderous groups: Islam, Muslim, Catholic, Mormon and atheist.

I also signed up again to use mininova's forums about two days ago. It was stupid. There was no explanation as to why you couldn't edit your forum profile, and no link or button to go directly to the forum posts. When I clicked the link to see the newest posts I got an error message. I got a few more error messages when I tried to do other things there. It was a big waste of time.

In conclusion, the owners and keepers of piratebay and mininova are clearly anti-christian bigots.

That's atheists and evolutionists for you, self-defeating, greedy, reasonless brutes.

You know who is better than piratebay and better than mininova?: Torrentreactor. They don't engage in truth-hiding and it's a lot more useful. I like Btjunkie better too.

Atheists Who Love Torturing (Including Raping) and Murdering Christians

(Note, this entry was removed by Yahoo 360 moderators from a 360 blog I was using under the Cave Atheist account when either the atheist anti-christian stalker Gorgeoustxwoman or Footprints in the Sand (a.k.a. Persephone) reported it to them. Isn't she just so loving like she claims to be? Not. You won't find this entry in the Cave Atheist 360 blog because it is trolled by sanctioned atheist stalkers like gtxwoman who would just get it deleted again. Yahoo sanctions stalker-harassers like her and does not want any negative articles on China's human rights abuses, apparently because there are Chinese people in control of Yahoo and China is one of their major customers. Yahoo's moderators ignored me when I pointed out that I was being harassed by her and her other friends on my other Yahoo 360 blog. When I reported that stalkers like Jesus Myth Superstar - who called me a rapist on my blog -, Run James Run, Footprints in the Sand and Gtxwoman were slandering me I was ignored. But when I responded to Gtxwoman in my blog by pointing out her own major family problems she or or one of her group retaliated by reporting me to the moderators who then erased all my blog entries except the last one which was linked to the one in which the one in which they had heavily slandered and mocked me. Want evidence? I save a ton of pages showing how the moderators were treating me vs. the atheists and neo-pagans who were harassing me, I even saved emails I sent to them. You can ask to see this evidence at cbg777 - at - gmail.com. One of their group, Novangelis, went so far as to edit the wikipedia entry about things like this so that no one would realize that atheism is a life-threatening belief. And now the article that they deleted:)

According to some childish Christian-hating atheists (Footprints in the Sand a.k.a. Persephone and Jesus Myth Superstar - see http://snipurl.com/stalkers) no atheist has ever raped anyone or even been accused of being a rapist. Well besides that being childishly absurd because there are a large number of atheists in the world and atheists aren't known for being peaceful anymore than anyone else in any encyclopedia (just the opposite actually) and it should be obvious then that out of a large population of such people there would be crimes of all sorts committed by them. It also demonstrates an incredible willful ignorance and lack of care for what really goes on around them and what has been recorded all throughout history.

Irrefutable Evidence That Atheists Are Far More Prone To Committing Atrocities Than Bible-Obeying Christians

Did you know Japan has the highest suicide rate in the world, or one of them? You know what their main religion is right? Did you know Catholic dominated Lithuania has the highest suicide rate in the world?

Did you know atheist dominated Sweden is number 31 on the list of countries with the highest suicide rates? "Just a coincidence"?

Would you like to know atheist dominated Vietnam's dirty little rape-those-Christians-for-worshipping-Christ "secrets"?:

Christian Persecution in Vietnam
Homes in Vietnam Burned for Refusing to Deny Christ
U.S. and Vietnam Reach Agreement on Religious Freedom

How about atheist dominated China's "secrets"?:

China's Christians suffer for their faith

How about Buddhist dominated Burma's?:

Country Report: Burma

How many suicides occur in Tonga every year? Here's a clue:

Becoming Tongan: An Ethnography of Childhood

Can you figure out what the main religion of Tonga is and what that main religion teaches in comparison to the others?

Evolutionists Approve of Rape, Child Molestion, Thievery and Lying

What has happened when not just your typical ignorant evolutionists, but the most well educated ones do not accept these most basic and obvious and facts, even scientifically evident: that the universe is designed and all the things in it?

What happens when people think mere rhetorical questions, sarcasm, mockery, insults, their skepticism, disbelief or belief or the strength of their belief = evidence?

What happens when people forget the most basic meanings of common and essential words and concepts such as truth, lie, evidence, proof, love, mercy, justice, law, good, evil, material, spiritual, and God?

What happens when Darwin-worshipers, anti-creationists, and moral, scientific, and historical ignoramuses pretend that everyone is his own god? You get a nutty rape-infested liar's paradise:

http://digg.com/world_news/Rapists_and_Child_Molestors_Find_Paradise
http://digg.com/world_news/Darwin_Plaguarized_a_Creation_Scientist

Stupidity, bias, and complacency leads to destruction, not evolution. The fittest won't just survive, but will live forever in peace and joy.

The Evolutionary Advantage of Christianity

I'm in the middle of reading an article titled Why the intelligent design lobby thanks God for Richard Dawkins by Madeleine Bunting of The Guardian news magazine and have come across various statements in it:

"Dennett cites those who argue that faith improves cooperation within groups (though not between them). This argument raises the crucial question of whether, in an era of globalisation and limited resources, religion has outrun its evolutionary advantage."

Christians successfully persuade people of hostile life-destroying groups such as the atheist group to be cooperative all the time, and help millions from various anti-Christian groups (to varying degrees) each year to become saved Christians or for a while, outwardly peaceful Christians. Since when have atheists spontaneously decided to become Christians? Since when as any non-Christian? They don't, they become Christians because of either the Bible, penned by Christians under God's control, and / or because of recorded or in person persuasions made by Christians after the Bible was written. It is false to claim Christians only improve cooperation between their groups. Furthermore Christians helped invent or nearly entirely some historians believe the modern scientific methods. And many Christians are scientists or inventors who have helped improve living standards for people all over the world. Some are doctors and nurses who help non Christians and often free of charge. So none of that improves cooperation outside of Christians? Wow. Now that is major historical ignorance and ignorance of the common place things that happen around you. Talk about opinion-obsessed and bigotry.

Also from the article:

"No one argues that it's a useful project for year 10s to research flat-earth theories, so why intelligent design?"

Why doesn't the deliberate history and science ignorant find out instead of asking a question that has been repeatedly answered by the Bible for 6000 years? Why doesn't he read the scientific evidence from anti-creationists and creationists which has been put out for the past 100 years or 6000? And is the type of ignoramus who thinks asking a sarcastic question = scientific evidence? And is the type of bigot who believes only "scientific evidence" counts as evidence? There is no scientific evidence for micro evolution. He would know that if the ranter bothered to read more than his own ancient parroted myths of walking fish with toes interested in sex and eating popping out of magical puddles from an imaginary billions of years old magical bomb from no where.

Also from the article:

"All protagonists in a debate have a moral responsibility to ensure that the hot air they are expending generates light, not just heat. It's a point that escapes Dawkins."

It's a point that escapes you too Miss Bunting.

Yet Another Atheist Pretending to Be a Scientist Exposed

On amazon you can find a false review by IslandMoonWatcher (because the amazon moderators are anti-christian bigots who refuse to be fair to Christian authors and film-makers unless maybe you complain). Here my refutation:

"More idiotic drivel from the creationist camp."

Cuz u said so, and whatever the false scientist says who provides no evidence says is true, is true.

"It actually deserves zero stars. Even your own evangelists like Chuck Colson, Phillip E. Johnson and Hugh Ross agree on a "Big Bang", ie; God waved his magic wand about 14.7 billion years ago (or 6,600 years ago....whatever) and "POOF","

Cuz u said so, and whatever the false scientist says who provides no evidence says is true, is true.

"the universe and everything else was magically created out of pixie dust--fully aged of course,"

Who said it was created by pixie dust you slandering hypocrite? Slandering hypocrite where did the big bang come from? Ooops? Blind and bigoted much? Second, contradictory hypocrite, who said it appeared fully aged? Just because something as an appearance of age to you = it's therefore aged? You can that science you ranting, slandering, hypocrite? Hypocrite, if it was created new, then the AGE is not AGED you hypocrite, big duh. Also hypocrite it's already been shown that a new geological feature can have the appearance of being aged, see Tuluman Island you arguer from ignorance.

"like a good cheese."

God has problems making good cheese? Are you stupid? Why would it be hard for God to make good cheese if he can make a universe? Can you make any sense you babbler?

"PLEASE get a life"

Say what about eating your words?

"and leave science to scientists, not fairy-tale mythicists."

Cuz the non-scientist said so, and whatever the non-scientist says is true is true.

"Maybe I'll write a convincing-sounding fairy tale story about Noah and the Flood so I can sell books to the choir and steal a few thousand dollars too! "

So stereotypes = the truth? Hypocrite? So over 40 million Presbyterians and Baptists including their pastors and elders donating their hard earned money, not out of their riches and risking their lives to save others in third world countries and gang plagued areas, not thanks your evil silly Darwin god's racist preaching and you who parrot it like you've done here, are stealing and greedy? Thanks for the deep reasonless hatred that is the heart of a atheist myth-loving evolutionist.

Note: Notice you can't tell what IslandMoonWatcher has "reviewed"? So this is atheist "science" for you: ranting stupidity and falsely accusing others of the very evil the love.

2nd Blog On Carl Flygare, a Super Anti-Christian Bigot

Note that the moderators of amazon.com are severe hypocrites. They have deleted my reviews for being "dissertations" and always reviews which are on anti-Christian books. Yet why then do these hypocrites allow Carl's dissertations which are much longer then the longest reviews they've deleted? Here is another example of Carl's ranting stupidity masquerading as a scientific review:

Carl Flygare - The wannbe scientist and bigot who amazon moderators sanction,

January 3, 2008

A Kid's Review (lol, Carl is a kid? Something tells me not, emotionally it's no doubt true though. Look up the definition of kid instead of taking Carl's word for it).

Since Car refuses to give a true review, and the amazon hypocrite moderators approve of that, shouldn't I, a Christian, also be allowed to post a non-review in like manner? At least mine are true. Now, let's analyze what the bigot ignorant Prententious Carl the Mentally Ill Mad Raving Wannabe Scientist and Contentious Genie said:

Apologetics Cross-Dressed As Science Redux, or Whack-a-Mole 2.0, November 30, 2007

By Carl Flygare

"Did you know that Master Books, the publisher of "The Young Earth: The Real History of the Earth - Past, Present, and Future" by John Morris, President of The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is the publishing arm of the ICR - an ethical, functional, intellectual and in this case incestuous oxymoron - staffed by a bizarre bestiary of barking-mad biblical literalists; a priori dedicated to the preposterous presupposition that any myth or fable in the Bible - however hermeneutically contrived or at odds with objective reality - must trump the findings of modern science?"

Yawn. When will Carl stop wasting time being pretentious, pretending that his ranting mockery is evidence. When will this demon-loving hypocrite get down to real science?

"The Master Books mission statement commits to "Publishing creation-based materials for all ages that defend the Bible from the very first verse." No reputable mainstream publisher would ever consider or release such a farcical farrago of fervent faith-based fantasy - Morris essentially self-published his own book, the iconic imprimatur of a crank."

When will this hypocrite review the book and stop pretending to be putting forth evidence of wrong doing? We're waiting.

"This "Revised and Expanded" edition, burdened by an equally puerile fact and content-free PowerPoint presentation on CD (for witnessing to the witless perhaps), regurgitates the same creationist canards, denialism, and fallacies - in the service of the supposedly divine - that defaced and laced the original printing of "The Young Earth" in 1994."

Learn what evidence hypocrite: Hint, it doesn't mean, "Whatever Carl the hypocrite says it means."

"Morris falls into the "God said it, I believe it, that settles it" dogma dumpster"

Why is this hypocrite raving and slandering? Why is he taking Morris and all creationists out of context? Lying hypocrite who needs to learn what context means, we believe God because what he says is evident you moron, not because someone called God merely said it you moron. That is why the book Morris wrote and Ken Ham contains scientific evidence you moron, not simply one page with one sentence saying "God said it therefore it's true." Idiot liar, stop lying already. You're not cool, you're a lying hypocrite who thinks his opinions are evidence in and of themselves.

"but surreptitiously substitutes "I said it, God agrees with it, that settles it logic."

Carl said it, therefore it's true. You hypocrite, you are doing the very thing you are falsely accusing Morris and Ken and Duane for doing. You hypocrite, we present scientific evidence and logical evidence, where the hell is yours you raving hypocrite? Your logic stinks, when will you come up with actual evidence?

"He uses God like a ventriloquist uses a dummy - by putting words into his mouth - to defend otherwise indefensible arguments from authority; a desperate gambit necessary to sustain a contorted and contrived strain of anti-intellectual Christian fundamentalism with spectacularly inane pseudoscience."

Massive hypocrite insults and mere claims are not evidence and of themselves. Because Carl said it does not make it true. When do you think Carl will stop being such a hypocrite and pretending that what he says is true merely because he said it? This is Carl the hypocrite's logic:

"If a Christian says it it must not be true, if an anti-Christian like me Carl says it, then it must be true." That's you, hypocrite, not us. Carl the hypocrite then said:

""The Young Earth" - with increasing ineptitude in every chapter - attempts to justify a 6,000 year old Earth; a harlequin hypothesis conjured into existence by Archbishop James Ussher who credulously concluded that the Earth was created on Sunday, October 23, in 4,004 BC. John Lightfoot, a contemporary of Ussher even ventured a time of day - 9:00 AM!"

Massive hypocrite, once again, mere mockery is not evidence in and of itself your opinion is not magically self justifying. Laughing is not evidence. What a hypocrite. The hypocrite then says:

"Over the past two hundred years scientific advances in a number of disciplines, ranging from cosmology to physics and geology, have allowed researchers to determine the age of the Earth with remarkable accuracy - 4.54 billion years (plus or minus 1%)."

Because you said so bigoted moron. Master hypocrite, there are also creation scientists, did you notice? Did you notice super hypocrite that not all say the Earth is billions of years old? Hyper moron how could you miss that when you've "reviewed" the books of some of them? Dur? Duh? Doh? Super hypocrite how does it escape your ignorant self that Copernicus, Galileo and Newton, were all creationists? How does it escape your evil self that Christians scientists are the ones who created the modern scientific method and not idiot atheists like you? Big duh. Learn history and stop bashing people merely because they disagree with your stinky breathed self. Here ignorance-lover, more legwork for you:

Five historians all agree that the Bible and Christianity led to the modern scientific methods.

So, Carl the ranting hypocrite who posted a false stinky review, will you also post false reviews against those historians and pretend to be a historian yourself? Clearly the rest of your rant is not worth reading. You are a stubborn rebellious hypocrite trying to look cool, dying for worthless temporary back pats and invitations to parties from fellow hypocrites like yourself. See how many back pats you'll be getting in Hell.

Note to my readers, amazon moderators have deleted my reviews on various anti-christian and anti-calvinistic books for being dissertations, yet they sanction Carl's false raving reviews which are at least twice the size of my longest reviews. Amazon's CEO sanctions the moderators' actions, that makes amazon.com an anti-christian company who merely tolerates Christian books so as to not look totally biased and lose all their Christian customers. I suggest you buy the books through my amazon store and boost their rank to the top of amazon's book rank and by doing so push their junk propaganda to the bottom.

Lying About Pygmies - Evolutionists "Bull-shitting" Again

"Pygmies’ short life spans may be behind their small size

December 11th, 2007 - 4:17 pm ICT by admin

Washington, December 11 (ANI): A new study suggests that the smaller life spans of pygmies across the world might be a reason as to why they are smaller in size than average humans.

The research suggests that brief life spans put evolutionary pressure on pygmy women to stop growing and to start giving birth sooner."

And it "suggests" meaning what? Who wrote this article? An evolutionist of course, so of course it's going to suggest evolution is true. Big duh. And suggests to who lol? To creationists who don't lie for profit and pride? Creationists who aren't in the habit of lying? So that's the powerful evolutionary evidence? To bullshit and be vague? And how does brief life span = stop growing? Is evolution now like karma? It's magically intelligent? It's some sort of god now? The article goes on to say:

"As a result of this, the energy that should normally be expended on growth gets spent on reproduction at a younger age."

Wow, check that out, their evidence is to repeat what they just said. Thanks for wasting my time. No wait, not a total waste, they've demonstrated more evidence for their "repeat a lie enough and people will believe it" technique. The article then says:

"“The idea is that (pygmies) have to stop growing earlier, because when you start reproducing at least for women all the energy you would put in growth is put into reproduction,” the National Geographic quoted Andrea Migliano, the lead author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow at Clare College, Cambridge, in the United Kingdom, as saying."

For the third time the article repeats this theory without citing evidence for its validity. And besides that did you notice any errors? Notice Andrea avoided the issue of why the men would not grow taller being that they don't have to expend much energy carrying around and feeding a baby? So much for her "idea". Furthermore, what is the evidence that "all of the energy" a pygmy uses is put into reproduction? You mean they don't dance, sing, learn, hunt, grow, nurse babies, or have fun doing other things? So they can't do both huh, they can only be baby machines? Would pygmies disappear if they were more active? Furthermore, how much energy could it possibly for a human to grow from 1 foot to 5 or 7 feet in FOURTEEN-EIGHTEEN YEARS? Since when does growing to even eight feet after eighteen years make a person unable to give birth to two or three kids and unable to be a very active person? Does anyone notice anyone living shorter and shorter lifespans from being very active lol? So this is evolutionary science? Teaching evolutionary theory is a shameful waste of tax-payer money (including that of creationist Christians who are illegally made to fund it when it is opposed to their conscience), time that could be used to make real advancements in technology and science. It is worthless compared to bull shit; bull shit can be used as fertilizer and fuel and used to save lives. But what is good is evolution except to show that creationists are right and that evolutionists are wasting-time?

The article then says:

"“You have to choose either you grow or you reproduce,” she added."

Cuz she said so (damn, I can either be 1 foot or have kids), and didn't I virtually read that stupid teaching three other times in this article without any evidence to back it? And what's with the switcheroo? First were talking about life-span, then it shifts to height. What the hell? Can evolutionists stop going off on illogical tangents?

There is no magical evolution law that says, "Hi, if you live longer you can't more kids!"

Ironically, in atheist-evolutionist dominated China, they even force abortions on those, including christians who try to have more then one or two children. Sick atheist-evolutionists try and force their theories to come true. Sick, vile, sick.