LOL, a caller called into Coast to Coast AM right now, ignorant of Michael Cremo, who told George Noory that there was no way humans could have made nuclear weapons thousands of years ago, and when George mentioned that the caller must not have heard of Michael Cremo, the caller replied that he'd give Michael some credit and his sources, but that until he saw National Geographic and Popular Science say it was true, then it wouldn't be definitively true. Don't ya know the writers of National Geographic (who supported the Archeoraptor Hoax) and the Pop. Sci. editors (who's 9/11 debunking article was refuted) are the standard for truth, let alone scientific truth? Not. Then, incredibly, the caller asked if one of George Noory's past guests (Lynn McTaggart, an anti-Christian, sterotyping, myth-spreading, psuedo-scientist) would send some (good) intentions his way so that he could get a job (after having been out of a job since the end of January 2009. While listening to the caller I thought, "So these are the idiots supporting National Georgraph and Popular Science".
Earlier in the show George had a guest on named Frank Joseph Hoff, and a caller asked Frank what he thought of the possibility of Atlanteans having red hair, to which Frank replied, "You could do a whole show on that." George replied, "Well I'm not doing a whole show on red hair." LOL.
At 11:47 A.M., George said, "Allyou have to do is look at the book of revelation, apocalypse, look at the signs."
These people really need prayer. How sad their lives will be if they end up in Hell forever - the eternal shame they will have to live with.
Showing posts with label is stupid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label is stupid. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Friday, January 11, 2008
A Critical Critique of the Critical Thinking Skills of Harvard University's Evolutionists
According to some evolutionists at Harvard evolution has been proven true to everyone in the world. Yeah.
Some excerpts from their rant "Snails Caught in Act of Evolution" with my commentaries:
"Walking along the south shore of Great Inagua Island, the Agassiz Professor of Zoology noticed a telltale change in the shells of land snails scattered on a mud flat. He saw large, finger-shaped shells of Cerion excelsior, an extinct snail once widespread in the Bahamas. Nearby were smaller, rounder, vertically striped shells with prominent whorls, belonging to a species called Cerion rubicundum"
He found devolved snails, small and puny. That's some great convincing "proof" of evolution already. Why is it "proof" of MICROevolution (yes, there are more then two kinds despite evolutionists repeatedly "forgetting" that important fact) always comes in less complicated punier versions of their ancestors?
"The history of life on Earth is written in shells, bones, footprints, and imprints found in mountains, canyons, and at the bottom of the seas. Over millions of years, movements of air, water, and continents destroy these silent signs, creating gaps in the natural record, or the fossils are scattered and compressed in different layers of sedimentary rocks."
In other words, "Satan did it; he removed layers of strata and put all those inexplainable fossils, polonium halos, and artifacts that 'shouldn't be' in millions or billions of year old strata and rocks. If not, then God is oh so devious trickster for making us evolutionists assume the earth is billions of years old. He made them draw false conclusions. God made us do it. Forget the fact he let others figure out the truth and he spread it at the cost of their family and lives, they are liars and don't deserve to speak! Cuz!"
Moving on:
" ... That was just a theory, however; Gould hadn't proved it. ... the researchers used a more expensive and time-consuming clock, the decay of radioactive carbon present in the shells. ... The oldest hybrids, those most resembling excelsior, were alive about 17,000 years ago. The youngest fossils, those most resembling the rubicundum invaders, lived on Great Inagua as recently as 3,000 years ago."
Cuz faulty radiocarbon dating which is unreliable after 5000 years according to your own anti-creationists said so: see What about carbon dating? "The dates provided enough proof for Gould and Goodfriend to go public."
Not enough proof for me and saved creation scientists however.
"They published their findings in the Dec. 13 issue of Science, the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (and got applauses from ignorant, wannabe scientists desperate for vain exaltation and easy and gullible "chics" and the back pats and prizes of deluded anti-creationists, therefore: Snails Caught in Act of Evolution By William J. Cromie of the Gazette Staff is true.)
So Harvard is a university of critical thinking skills and "higher learning" huh? Evolve into reality already.
Now here's a" real" article on snails: The Historical Development of the Old-Earth Geological Time-Scale
Some excerpts from their rant "Snails Caught in Act of Evolution" with my commentaries:
"Walking along the south shore of Great Inagua Island, the Agassiz Professor of Zoology noticed a telltale change in the shells of land snails scattered on a mud flat. He saw large, finger-shaped shells of Cerion excelsior, an extinct snail once widespread in the Bahamas. Nearby were smaller, rounder, vertically striped shells with prominent whorls, belonging to a species called Cerion rubicundum"
He found devolved snails, small and puny. That's some great convincing "proof" of evolution already. Why is it "proof" of MICROevolution (yes, there are more then two kinds despite evolutionists repeatedly "forgetting" that important fact) always comes in less complicated punier versions of their ancestors?
"The history of life on Earth is written in shells, bones, footprints, and imprints found in mountains, canyons, and at the bottom of the seas. Over millions of years, movements of air, water, and continents destroy these silent signs, creating gaps in the natural record, or the fossils are scattered and compressed in different layers of sedimentary rocks."
In other words, "Satan did it; he removed layers of strata and put all those inexplainable fossils, polonium halos, and artifacts that 'shouldn't be' in millions or billions of year old strata and rocks. If not, then God is oh so devious trickster for making us evolutionists assume the earth is billions of years old. He made them draw false conclusions. God made us do it. Forget the fact he let others figure out the truth and he spread it at the cost of their family and lives, they are liars and don't deserve to speak! Cuz!"
Moving on:
" ... That was just a theory, however; Gould hadn't proved it. ... the researchers used a more expensive and time-consuming clock, the decay of radioactive carbon present in the shells. ... The oldest hybrids, those most resembling excelsior, were alive about 17,000 years ago. The youngest fossils, those most resembling the rubicundum invaders, lived on Great Inagua as recently as 3,000 years ago."
Cuz faulty radiocarbon dating which is unreliable after 5000 years according to your own anti-creationists said so: see What about carbon dating? "The dates provided enough proof for Gould and Goodfriend to go public."
Not enough proof for me and saved creation scientists however.
"They published their findings in the Dec. 13 issue of Science, the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (and got applauses from ignorant, wannabe scientists desperate for vain exaltation and easy and gullible "chics" and the back pats and prizes of deluded anti-creationists, therefore: Snails Caught in Act of Evolution By William J. Cromie of the Gazette Staff is true.)
So Harvard is a university of critical thinking skills and "higher learning" huh? Evolve into reality already.
Now here's a" real" article on snails: The Historical Development of the Old-Earth Geological Time-Scale
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
