Wednesday, September 9, 2009
George Noory You Hypocrite
George, disgustingly, tried to cover his own presumptuous accusation by saying it would really upset him if someone had him saying something he didn't (and therefore condemning all fiction, which includes his beloved sci-fi genre) even though Alex said it was a server error. In other words, "But Alex: I don't like it if someone makes a story about me, that makes me mad, so you shouldn't make stories about anyone saying things they didn't because it makes me mad."
Pandering to George; now that's a mistake.
George, can you be honest and admit your mistake? You don't think the fear of not being able to use your show to warn millions of a great danger to their lives wouldn't be an unfair pressure on anyone when repeatedly trying to get them to admit a lie without witnesses to back up your accusation?
Oh, and besides George's psychic lie, why did he keep glorifying John Titor even though it's been shown to be an absurd, disgusting, hoax? Why did George "put at the bottom" the fact that John Titor had made failed predictions during his ramblings about him on Coast to Coast AM? When it was brought up by a caller George begrudgingly admitted the error but immediately tried excusing it away with the absurd excuse that this failed prediction wasn't really a failure at all but due to John being from a parallel universe (what a desperate idiot). During that show George had as a guest the owner of the JohnTitor website, who said that he didn't accept emails because he didn't want to be distracted in his research on John Titor. What a scum liar. More like: "I can't be bothered with the truth and people repeatedly showing me research (evidence) that my research (website) is an evil lie which I'm trying to make money off of."
Maybe Alex will have some Not Ready to Make Nice regrets later on, while, George and the rest of the Coast to Coast AM lying hosts continue to twist and ignore Scripture and and promote the obvious liars who support it.
Bank of America and Shareholders Needs Salvation From Hell
“Transaction Sorting”
Maximizes Overdraft Fees for Banks
by Kristy Welsh
With the new credit card laws about to go into effect, banks are scrambling to replace the usurious income they used to be able to generate through late fees and sudden high interest rates. Overdraft fees on checking accounts are now being referred to in the banking industry as the “motherlode”. The method for maximizing these fees is called “transaction sorting”, a process where banks can clear charges in any order they choose to generate the maximum number of overdrafts.
For instance, lets say you have a $35 balance in your checking account, and pending checks and debit card transactions of $15, $10 and $100. Even if the transaction dates of the $15 and $10 charges precede the $100 check, the bank can choose to clear the $100 check first. Clearing the transactions out of order will result in three overdraft charges instead of one, or $90 versus $30 in fees. In short, the bank took things out of sequence to make more money.
Read the rest of the article here.
More here:
Wachovia, BofA, Citibank Sued Over 'Bad-Faith' Overdraft Fees