Part of judging is deciding; it's required for determining what you are sensing. Even the word "determine" is a synonym for decide too, which starts to show how judging is required for living a peaceful and useful life. At least judgment is required for thoughts beyond simply sensing something and wondering it is what you are sensing. In other words if you see a ball, but don't recognize it, you may feel curiosity as to what the ball is, but unless you start making judgments or a judgment (determining), you'll just wonder what the ball is till you lose interest in it.
So, you're actually judging all the time as is obvious from knowing humans, since humans are always trying to figure out things, but sadly, usually not wanting to figure out what is truly good or evil, because deep inside, they hate the truth, because it condemns them, figuratively speaking, it judges them, and people are addicted to doing wrong, to living life their way in spite of knowing they are doing wrong.
What you seem to at least partly mean by saying that you don't judge is that you don't condemn anyone for their moral beliefs, but that's wrong since people who say they don't condemn people who DO condemn others who DO condemn others for what they believe to be wrong moral beliefs. And think about that, isn't that a massive irony since you're then indirectly saying, "You may not tell anyone when they are doing moral wrong even if you believe you are supposed to or if that's part of your religion, if you do, then I condemn you your morality or religion." So you do condemn / "judge", and more ironically, you condemn most of the world and yourself without realizing it since everyone, including you as I just pointed out, condemn what they believe to be moral wrong. And what you believe to be morally wrong, is what you say is wrong! I'm not yelling by putting the exclamation mark, just pointing out more clearly the irony.
So what you should say, so that there is no confusion, which leads to strife, is, "I condemn those who condemn what they believe to be morally wrong." And again, that would mean, you condemn yourself, whether you realize it or not.
Another thing which you know, at least to a vague degree, is that being condemned is humiliating, it hurts your feelings, and I also know that people who say they don't condemn / "judge", say that because they have been deeply hurt from being directly or indirectly condemned, and seeing that their friends don't like to be condemned either, or hoping to make friends or more friends or to keep the ones you have, you warn them that you do not like to be morally judged, and will "love" them back in the same way (so long as they don't condemn you.) But as you've probably realized by now, if you've read up to this point and understood me, such a life style leads to co called "chaos" and confusion (and ironically, given enough time and socializing with people: to more condemnation when arguments break out, and sometimes arguments over the impossible philosophy of "never condemn" itself.)
I've said all this to you out of kindness and love, not at all to hurt your feelings, and if it hurts your feelings well you're rejecting my kindness then, and would be condemning me for not good reason. I say that not because I'm assuming that you're easily offended, but in case you are.
So, I hope you embrace judging soon without feeling even a hint of guilt when others try and make you feeling guilty for it.
Judging is necessary for learning the truth, and you have the right to learn the truth. Only God has the right to keep you from knowing it, but till the day he commands you to not learn or remember it, it's your right. I hope you don't condemn me for these beliefs, or show your condemnation by ignoring me.
I hope my love never leaves you.
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Chatroom Added
For anyone wanting to chat to other users on this site or other sites of mine, try the chatroom on the bottom.
Jim Villaniccu Says He Was An Idiot, George Promotes Bad Intentions
Two days ago top radio show host babbler in Albuquerque, Jim Villanuci said, "I was an idiot in January, I thought he [Obama] was a moderate." No Jim you're still an idiot for the same reason you were still an idiot in January: you assume, and worse, call those who speak out against your assumptions, "nuts". And yesterday he spoke out against mandatory swine flu vaccinations, yet said he didn't want to be a "kook" by saying vaccines were bad. At one point Jim joked about his side kick "Billy" trying to get on another radio show, Billy seemingly joked back saying, "Anything to get a little respect." I could tell he was serious however, as Jim often insults him.
And about tonight or rather early this morning, George Noory promoted bad science, and a false scientist called Lynne McTaggart, who at the moment is spreading on-the-fly nonsense on Coast to Coast. One of the things she claims is that there are "intention masters" and that your intentions alone (in other words wishing for something) can cause our wish to come true, and that the more people who wish the same thing, the more likely it will happen. That's obviously wrong since people strongly wish for things all the time, like for someone to love them, and it fails to happen. It just occurred to me that her science is as bad as the evil Arminian Pentecostal / "Evangelical" "just have enough faith" heresy, only Lynne's is non-Christian version which includes using prayer. She also uses the wishes of Christians coming true via prayer as evidence that her claims are true. One clear problem with her using prayer is that intention / wishing is not prayer itself, but rather a necessary component for prayer, and it isn't the intent itself as to why the prayer works, but what the intent is, who you're praying too, if the person you are praying to can fulfill your wishes, and if the person you are praying to wants to fulfill your wish. For example God will not go against his own will, and will only fulfill a wish that is in accordance with his will. On top of that, if you have a prayer fulfilled, it may not have been because you ask him to fulfill it, but because he had a different reason in mind for fulfilling it other than directly pleasing you. Lynn also said that you can call some force she calls "the Field" "God... as long as you don't think of it as some man on a cloud judging you," (nah she's not an anti-Christian bigot at all) to which George Noory replied, "Absolutely." Clearly George is no longer a Catholic as he was raised to be.
On an August 25 show on Coast to Coast AM, guest Philip Imbrogno made this nonsensical statement, "Humans have this problem, they try to categorize everything." No categorization is not a problem, it's what minds do in order to understand how to refer to a thing and how to treat it. For example you categorize a man as a woman then you will possibly treat them wrong, for example if the man is not gay, and neither are you, and ask to marry him in your confusion, think that he is a woman. You could also confuse others by your wrong categorization, wasting their time or even getting them hurt. Another obvious example is if you categorized a knife as a spoon, and decide to use the knife as a spoon, you could end up dead from having cut your tongue.
About three days ago Michael Savage, while hosting his Savage Nation radio show had a man call in who said that his dad or grandfather had also been banned from Britain, after which Michael said, "So I wasn't the only hero to be banned..." but quickly corrected himself after realizing his severe narcissistic mistake, and then said, "patriot" was a better description. Despite that bad mistake callers still praised him. What an evil man, who after praising himself despite insulting God whom he pretends to defend, calls himself a hero, yet condemns President Obama for being a narcissist and radio show hosts like Rush Limbaugh. If only there were good men more prominent then these evil babblers who could shut them up by publicly refuting them.
And about tonight or rather early this morning, George Noory promoted bad science, and a false scientist called Lynne McTaggart, who at the moment is spreading on-the-fly nonsense on Coast to Coast. One of the things she claims is that there are "intention masters" and that your intentions alone (in other words wishing for something) can cause our wish to come true, and that the more people who wish the same thing, the more likely it will happen. That's obviously wrong since people strongly wish for things all the time, like for someone to love them, and it fails to happen. It just occurred to me that her science is as bad as the evil Arminian Pentecostal / "Evangelical" "just have enough faith" heresy, only Lynne's is non-Christian version which includes using prayer. She also uses the wishes of Christians coming true via prayer as evidence that her claims are true. One clear problem with her using prayer is that intention / wishing is not prayer itself, but rather a necessary component for prayer, and it isn't the intent itself as to why the prayer works, but what the intent is, who you're praying too, if the person you are praying to can fulfill your wishes, and if the person you are praying to wants to fulfill your wish. For example God will not go against his own will, and will only fulfill a wish that is in accordance with his will. On top of that, if you have a prayer fulfilled, it may not have been because you ask him to fulfill it, but because he had a different reason in mind for fulfilling it other than directly pleasing you. Lynn also said that you can call some force she calls "the Field" "God... as long as you don't think of it as some man on a cloud judging you," (nah she's not an anti-Christian bigot at all) to which George Noory replied, "Absolutely." Clearly George is no longer a Catholic as he was raised to be.
On an August 25 show on Coast to Coast AM, guest Philip Imbrogno made this nonsensical statement, "Humans have this problem, they try to categorize everything." No categorization is not a problem, it's what minds do in order to understand how to refer to a thing and how to treat it. For example you categorize a man as a woman then you will possibly treat them wrong, for example if the man is not gay, and neither are you, and ask to marry him in your confusion, think that he is a woman. You could also confuse others by your wrong categorization, wasting their time or even getting them hurt. Another obvious example is if you categorized a knife as a spoon, and decide to use the knife as a spoon, you could end up dead from having cut your tongue.
About three days ago Michael Savage, while hosting his Savage Nation radio show had a man call in who said that his dad or grandfather had also been banned from Britain, after which Michael said, "So I wasn't the only hero to be banned..." but quickly corrected himself after realizing his severe narcissistic mistake, and then said, "patriot" was a better description. Despite that bad mistake callers still praised him. What an evil man, who after praising himself despite insulting God whom he pretends to defend, calls himself a hero, yet condemns President Obama for being a narcissist and radio show hosts like Rush Limbaugh. If only there were good men more prominent then these evil babblers who could shut them up by publicly refuting them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
