A Journal of Daniel Knight

The Savage Religion: Kill Bad Muslims for God and Beg Him For Forgiveness Forever

2009-09-14T21:17:00.000-07:00

Tonight Michael Savage has gone on another arrogant tirade against liberals and the entire world. He's ignored and warped the teachings of the Bible by proclaiming on his radio show, to the world: You don't go to church to celebrate, you go to get on your hands and knees and worship God." "You go to church to beg for forgiveness." "We're all bad." "Prayer is begging." "God is not your friend, it' s a vengeful God we have." He also said that we must "understand what the Muslim knows" (as in his Michael Savage's of God), we will fail. It's clear Michael Savage is trying to turn the non-violent type Jews and Christians into warmongers that will crush Islam by propaganda and war. In his madness he trying to make warmongers as bad who are as bad as Muslims and who will crush both atheists, socialists, communists, and Muslims who support war against Christians and Jews and attacks against himself.

It's obvious Michael wants to be the leader of these war monger Jews, Christians and anti-"extremist" Muslim Muslims. How deluded to think he will last as a leader of people who will become more corrupt than "extremist" Muslims and liberals, more corrupt because they will be turning their backs on the second greatest law: "Love your neighbor as yourself."

How can this so called modern "Samuel", one of the greatest Christians to ever live, have missed so many verses commanding God's people to be happy about him?:

"Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation?
Tell me, if you understand. Who marked off its dimensions?
Surely you know! Who stretched a measuring line across it?
On what were its footings set, or who laid its cornerstone
while the morning stars sang together
and all the angels shouted for joy?"
Job 38:4-7

I will build you up again and you will be rebuilt,
O Virgin Israel. Again you will take up your tambourines
and go out to dance with the joyful.
Jeremiah 31:4

Then maidens will dance and be glad,
young men and old as well.
I will turn their mourning into gladness;
I will give them comfort and joy
instead of sorrow.
Jeremiah 31:13

Sing to him a new song;
play skillfully, and shout for joy.
Psalm 33:3

But may all who seek you rejoice and be glad in you;
may those who love your salvation always say,
"Yahweh be exalted!"
Psalm 40:16

My tears have been my food day and night,
while men say to me all day long,

"Where is your God?"

These things I remember as I pour out my soul:
how I used to go with the multitude,
leading the procession to the house of God,
with shouts of joy and thanksgiving
among the festive throng.
Psalm 42:3-4

Clap your hands, all you nations;
shout to God with cries of joy.
Psalm 47:1

God has ascended amid shouts of joy,
Yahweh amid the sounding of trumpets.
Psalm 47:5

The meadows are covered with flocks
and the valleys are mantled with grain;
they shout for joy and sing.
Psalm 65:13

Shout with joy to God, all the earth!
Psalm 66:1

may all who seek you rejoice and be glad in you;
may those who love your salvation always say,
"Let God be exalted!"
Psalm 70:4

My lips will shout for joy
when I sing praise to you—
I, whom you have redeemed.
Psalm 71:23

Sing for joy to God our strength;
shout aloud to the God of Jacob!
Psalm 81:1

Come, let us sing for joy to the Yahweh;
let us shout aloud to the Rock of our salvation.
Psalm 95:1

Shout for joy to Yahweh, all the earth,
burst into jubilant song with music;
make music to the Yahweh, with the harp,
with the harp and the sound of singing,
with trumpets and the blast of the ram's horn—
shout for joy before Yahweh, the King.
Let the sea resound, and everything in it,
the world, and all who live in it.
Psalm 98:4-7

He brought out his people with rejoicing,
his chosen ones with shouts of joy
Psalm 105:43

Shouts of joy and victory resound
in the tents of the righteous:
"Yahweh's right hand has done mighty things!"
Psalm 118:15

When the righteous prosper,
the city rejoices; when the wicked perish,
there are shouts of joy.
Proverbs 11:10

Shout aloud and sing for joy, people of Zion,
for great is the Holy One of Israel among you.
Isaiah 12:6

They raise their voices, they shout for joy;
from the west they acclaim Yahweh's majesty.
Isaiah 24:14

But your dead will live; their bodies will rise.
You who dwell in the dust, wake up and shout for joy.
Your dew is like the dew of the morning; the earth
will give birth to her dead.
Isaiah 26:19

The desert and the parched land will be glad;
the wilderness will rejoice and blossom.
Like the crocus, it will burst into bloom;
it will rejoice greatly and shout for joy.
The glory of Lebanon will be given to it,
the splendor of Carmel and Sharon;
they will see the glory of Yahweh,
the splendor of our God.
Strengthen the feeble hands,
steady the knees that give way;
say to those with fearful hearts,
"Be strong, do not fear;
your God will come,
he will come with vengeance;
with divine retribution
he will come to save you."
Then will the eyes of the blind be opened
and the ears of the deaf unstopped.
Then will the lame leap like a deer,
and the mute tongue shout for joy.
Water will gush forth in the wilderness
and streams in the desert.
Isaiah 35:1-6

Let the desert and its towns raise their voices;
let the settlements where Kedar lives rejoice.
Let the people of Sela sing for joy;
let them shout from the mountaintops.
Isaiah 42:11

I have swept away your offenses like a cloud,
your sins like the morning mist.
Return to me, for I have redeemed you."
Sing for joy, O heavens, for Yahweh has done this;
shout aloud, O earth beneath. Burst into song,
you mountains, you forests and all your trees,
for Yahweh has redeemed Jacob,
he displays his glory in Israel.
Isaiah 44:22-23

Leave Babylon, flee from the Babylonians!
Announce this with shouts of joy and proclaim it.
Send it out to the ends of the earth; say,
"Yahweh has redeemed his servant Jacob."
Isaiah 48:20

Shout for joy, O heavens; rejoice, O earth;
burst into song, O mountains! For Yahweh
comforts his people and will have compassion
on his afflicted ones.
Isaiah 49:13

Listen! Your watchmen lift up their voices;
together they shout for joy.
When Yahweh returns to Zion,
they will see it with their own eyes.
Isaiah 52:8

Sing, O barren woman,
you who never bore a child;
burst into song, shout for joy,
you who were never in labor;
because more are the children
of the desolate woman
than of her who has a husband
Isaiah 54:1

Sing with joy for Jacob;
shout for the foremost of the nations.
Make your praises heard, and say,
"O Yahweh, save your people,
the remnant of Israel."
Jeremiah 31:7

They will come and shout
for joy on the heights of Zion;
they will rejoice in the
bounty of Yahweh—the grain,
the new wine and the oil,
the young of the flocks and herds.
They will be like a well-watered garden,
and they will sorrow no more.
Jeremiah 31:12

Then heaven and earth and all
that is in them will shout for joy
over Babylon, for out of the north
destroyers will attack her,"
declares Yahweh.
Jeremiah 51:48

Rejoice in the Lord always.
I will say it again: Rejoice!
Philippians 4:4

I'm a Christian, and will never endorse Savigism, a religion where Michael would have you kill those who made him look bad in court in order to bury that humiliation.

Some Comments from Bob Brinker on Money Talk

2009-09-13T15:01:00.000-07:00

"Even if we do decrease our [oil] imports from OPEC, we have to increase them from somewhere else... and we're not doing anything about our domestic [drilling]" (so we're stuck with trillions of dollars in debt).

"Now this is the second time in the year that I see an anti-China tone in [America's government policy]... There's no reason on Earth that we should be discouraging [China] from buying national treasuries, there was no reason on Earth for [Hillary Clinton] to [encourage them not to] do that... she never apologized for saying [that they shouldn't]... now [Obama] comes our of left field and slaps this tremendous tariff on American tires... [American] manufacturers operating in China. ... Those who deny globalization will fail."

"That's what we have: celebrity politicians, especially! on Capitol Hill."

"Why [the American government] is dragging it's feet on natural gas is beyond me. ...if the president would simply call a new conference starting in November, [announcing that] all the new vehicles in the government portfolio would be natural gas propelled... it would create jobs for the creation of the vehicles... natural gas is a cleaner burning fuel, as you know, then gasoline... it's positive across the board, it would reduce our dependence on gasoline... Dr. Bill's been talking about this, I've been talking about this... we've been pounding on this for a long time... everything would change right away... So many pluses that comes out of this thing it boggles the mind that we're not already doing it." - Some comments today from the global currency proponent Bob Brinker on his MoneyTalk, show today.

A short while after making those comments a caller called into his show to say, among other things: "Politicians are very happy to keep control of the power [they currently have]..." Part of Bob's reply was, "by running up this national debt... by doing this as an official U.S. government policy now, what were doing is, we're actually lowering our future growth potential of our country, this is not the policy you want to pursue if you want to create jobs... talk about bogus programs, misguided policy, boy I'll tell yah, that is a direct hit when you mention that ethanol program."

Bob doesn't believe that there are American elitists in the U.S. government who are deliberately trying to destroy America, but he say more than once today, on Money Talk, that he believed that there were some American congressman (99% of them according to his past shows) that were destroying it in ignorance. He is forgetful of the obvious: bitterness, revenge, and complacency.

Rush Limbaugh: Trojan Communist?

2009-09-13T04:06:00.000-07:00

On "patriot day" Obama villified 9/11 truthers, saying that they had lied through their teeth to get on to his show, said that they were "politically insane" and that he did as much as he could to make sure that they remained a small minority. In his babbling arrogance he apparently forgot that "politically insane" is a nonsense accusation used by socialists and communists against those who would not agree with their political dogma in order to have an arbitrary reason to jail or kill them. This is the same Rush Limbaugh who in December 2008, allowed a caller to say to him, "You are my God." Excuse-maker for Gluttony Rush the Lie-for-a-High-Dimbog is not a conservative, but rather a trojan horse for the elitist anti-Christians. He's obviously trying to make Christians look stupid and gullible, and no doubt, Satan is behind him. But Satan's accusing the children of God backfires, as only the false fundamentalist Christians, the Arminians, stick with Rush, and that makes the true Christians shine true all the more in this world.

George Noory You Hypocrite

2009-09-09T22:29:00.000-07:00

I almost puked again listening to George The Presumptuous Noory just now grilling Alex Jones as he talked with him about Alex's supposed lie. George was being a jerk and wouldn't get off the subject, and just before the interview ended, like a scheming weasel, said, "Honest mistake: you should have put the disclaimer on the top?" after Alex said it was a server problem that the disclaimer didn't upload with the mock Obama/Sheen inteview. George asked Alex that well into the time when the commercial break music could be heard, and Alex no doubt could hear it, and not wanting to lose Coast to Coast AM as a platform gave in and said it was a mistake. So, George, in order to save his own image, wouldn't admit fault in rushing carelessly to judgment, wouldn't let go of his "it really upset me [that you uploaded a fake interview]" pretense, and instead got Alex to admit fault, with the possible threat of not allowing him back on the show, though George didn't have a single witness to back him his claim that Alex deliberately lied.

George, disgustingly, tried to cover his own presumptuous accusation by saying it would really upset him if someone had him saying something he didn't (and therefore condemning all fiction, which includes his beloved sci-fi genre) even though Alex said it was a server error. In other words, "But Alex: I don't like it if someone makes a story about me, that makes me mad, so you shouldn't make stories about anyone saying things they didn't because it makes me mad."

Pandering to George; now that's a mistake.

George, can you be honest and admit your mistake? You don't think the fear of not being able to use your show to warn millions of a great danger to their lives wouldn't be an unfair pressure on anyone when repeatedly trying to get them to admit a lie without witnesses to back up your accusation?

Oh, and besides George's psychic lie, why did he keep glorifying John Titor even though it's been shown to be an absurd, disgusting, hoax? Why did George "put at the bottom" the fact that John Titor had made failed predictions during his ramblings about him on Coast to Coast AM? When it was brought up by a caller George begrudgingly admitted the error but immediately tried excusing it away with the absurd excuse that this failed prediction wasn't really a failure at all but due to John being from a parallel universe (what a desperate idiot). During that show George had as a guest the owner of the JohnTitor website, who said that he didn't accept emails because he didn't want to be distracted in his research on John Titor. What a scum liar. More like: "I can't be bothered with the truth and people repeatedly showing me research (evidence) that my research (website) is an evil lie which I'm trying to make money off of."

Maybe Alex will have some Not Ready to Make Nice regrets later on, while, George and the rest of the Coast to Coast AM lying hosts continue to twist and ignore Scripture and and promote the obvious liars who support it.

Bank of America and Shareholders Needs Salvation From Hell

2009-09-09T07:09:00.001-07:00

“Transaction Sorting”

Maximizes Overdraft Fees for Banks

by Kristy Welsh

With the new credit card laws about to go into effect, banks are scrambling to replace the usurious income they used to be able to generate through late fees and sudden high interest rates. Overdraft fees on checking accounts are now being referred to in the banking industry as the “motherlode”. The method for maximizing these fees is called “transaction sorting”, a process where banks can clear charges in any order they choose to generate the maximum number of overdrafts.

For instance, lets say you have a $35 balance in your checking account, and pending checks and debit card transactions of $15, $10 and $100. Even if the transaction dates of the $15 and $10 charges precede the $100 check, the bank can choose to clear the $100 check first. Clearing the transactions out of order will result in three overdraft charges instead of one, or $90 versus $30 in fees. In short, the bank took things out of sequence to make more money.

Read the rest of the article here.

More here:

bankofamericafraud.com

Overdraft Fees Revisited

Wachovia, BofA, Citibank Sued Over 'Bad-Faith' Overdraft Fees

Ripoff Report

George Noory: Lying, Self-righteous, Hypocrite

2009-09-09T03:49:00.000-07:00

Yesterday on Coast to Coast AM, one of its hosts, George Noory - who supported Alex Jones - said he was disappointed in Alex for lying, and that it would forever tarnish his (Alex's) reputation. George, it also forever tarnishes yours for supporting him, as do all your other anti-Christian bashing lies. And do you need to be reminded of your deceiving a caller for the laugh of the rest of them, and you saying you'd go to Hell for it? Or how about when you lied about having a psychic insight?

More Coast to Coast AM Folly

2009-09-08T01:28:00.001-07:00

LOL, a caller called into Coast to Coast AM right now, ignorant of Michael Cremo, who told George Noory that there was no way humans could have made nuclear weapons thousands of years ago, and when George mentioned that the caller must not have heard of Michael Cremo, the caller replied that he'd give Michael some credit and his sources, but that until he saw National Geographic and Popular Science say it was true, then it wouldn't be definitively true. Don't ya know the writers of National Geographic (who supported the Archeoraptor Hoax) and the Pop. Sci. editors (who's 9/11 debunking article was refuted) are the standard for truth, let alone scientific truth? Not. Then, incredibly, the caller asked if one of George Noory's past guests (Lynn McTaggart, an anti-Christian, sterotyping, myth-spreading, psuedo-scientist) would send some (good) intentions his way so that he could get a job (after having been out of a job since the end of January 2009. While listening to the caller I thought, "So these are the idiots supporting National Georgraph and Popular Science".

Earlier in the show George had a guest on named Frank Joseph Hoff, and a caller asked Frank what he thought of the possibility of Atlanteans having red hair, to which Frank replied, "You could do a whole show on that." George replied, "Well I'm not doing a whole show on red hair." LOL.

At 11:47 A.M., George said, "Allyou have to do is look at the book of revelation, apocalypse, look at the signs."

These people really need prayer. How sad their lives will be if they end up in Hell forever - the eternal shame they will have to live with.

Two Wrongs Do Make A Right

2009-09-07T01:45:00.001-07:00

I bought two bicycle parts which by themselves turned out to be garbage, but when I put them together it evened things out. Thanks God.

"And we know that in all things God works
for the good of those who love him,
who have been called according to his purpose."
Romans 8:28

Horrible

2009-09-07T01:42:00.000-07:00

The last two Coast to Coasts were so sickeningly stupid I had to turn the radio off, and latest one almost made me puke with that rambling fake Christian idiot ranting away like an idiot teen about his stupid dreams, UFOs and the Bible. Sickening.

Anatomy of Evil: Pyschotic Witch Hunter Narcissist and False Christian Ian Punnet

2009-09-05T22:10:00.000-07:00

After reading the news at the beginning of the Coast to Coast A.M. show tonight, Ian Punnet, a host of Coast to Coast A.M., endorsed his upcoming guest (an evil) author Michael Baigent, saying that he as coming out with a new book on Christian and Muslim fundamentalists. (Ian later said he was going to have a guest on tonight who wrote a book called Anatomy of Evil, and that this book has been on his mind for a long while.)

Ian, rather than merely reading the subject of Michael's book with a "this is merely his opinion" tone, instead, had a tone of voice in which he was endorsing it as true, and after his description, to my disgust, called, said that "Christian" "fundamentalists" are "extremists" and that "We should be mindful of the fact that they don't care if we live or not." You stupid psycho. What an evil slanderer you are. A person who makes comments like that, not based on facts is the one who hates God, is the one who hates his neighbor, is the one who could care less if people die or not, even babies and kids.

So psycho, 60+ million Christians, Jesus (who repeatedly condemned slanderers like you to Hell), God (who said, he "hate[s] all who do wrong. - Psalm 5:5), even the kids and teens don't care huh Ian, not even about babies being aborted? OOOPS YOU FORGOT ABOUT THAT STICKS OUT LIKE A SORE THUMB PART. You're a moron. So no fundamentalist gives to the poor, DOESN'T abort a baby in order to be responsible for it, DOESN'T adopt orphans to help them, doesn't let anyone borrow anything from them, HASN'T contributed to science in any way? Evil mocking ignorant much? In denial of the utter obvious much?

My God what a psycho you are to casually vilify dozens of millions of people and then, as usual, to go on making stupid smug childish jokes about stupid things like smurfs.

Where is your conscience you sick narcissist slim? I'm happy to be called an extremist and fundamentalist for obeying the two greatest laws of the Bible:

"Love the Lord your God with all your heart" and "Love your neighbor as yourself" which includes, "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you."

Why have you never said once either of those laws, which Jesus said were the two greatest, on Coast to Coast A.M.? Why instead do you keep vilifying Christians who are clearly kind to all?

Clearly "Anatomy of Evil" should have included an analysis of your damaged brain.

So much for "Do not judge" Mr. Do Not Judge.

Here is what the Lord you supposedly love says, Ian:

"The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.

"First of all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. 4They will say, "Where is this 'coming' he promised? Ever since our fathers died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation." But they deliberately forget that long ago by God's word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water. 6By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed. 7By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men. But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare. Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming. That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the heat. But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness." - 2 Peter 3:9-13

"Just as it was in the days of Noah, so also will it be in the days of the Son of Man. People were eating, drinking, marrying and being given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the ark. Then the flood came and destroyed them all. It was the same in the days of Lot. People were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building. But the day Lot left Sodom, fire and sulfur rained down from heaven and destroyed them all." - Luke 17:26-29

"Dear friends, this is now my second letter to you. I have written both of them as reminders to stimulate you to wholesome thinking. I want you to recall the words spoken in the past by the holy prophets and the command given by our Lord and Savior through your apostles.

"mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— 5having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with them." - 2 Timothy 3:1-5

Oh what an extremist Jesus was! Aren't we Christians just oh so dangerous you hypocrite?

10:54 P.M. Update: Ian asked the author of Anatomy of Evil, "Is there a prophylactic response, if you will" to prevent evil. How about obeying God and teaching kids to obey him, self-called proclaimed "Christian" Ian?

10:57 P.M.: Ian says Michael Baigent's new book should be called "Holy Smokes". God you're just so funny and clever Ian.

11:18 Update: Ian said to Michael Baigent: "If some of the new testament writers were with us today... what they might say about [how] what they wrote... when they were writing something to encourage and do whatever... people... are making a set of in stone beliefs."

It was hard to write down Ian's ramblings but that is the order of the words of his idiotic rant. Clearly this is a stupid man who pretends to care about the "new testament" writers said, but doesn't take them seriously, and twists what they so that it comes out as, "Well in our opinion, Jesus might be God, there's no Hell, he was joking and so were we when we talked about Hell, we were just giving you a jokey scare, don't take us seriously, even when we say not to lie, steal, murder, commit adultery, and to obey your parents, just do what you feel like and have a good time." Is that it Ian? Is that what the Bible says?

You're religious degree is as worthless as your babbling mind. Stop slandering you evil idiot.

And Michael Baigent said:

"The fundamentalist Christians believe that their Messiah will convert all the Jews to Christianity, and it gets even worse than that..." OH HOW EVIL FOR CHRISTIANS TO BELIEVE THE "NEW TESTAMENT WRITERS OF THE BIBLE".

How horrible for Christians to believe that Jesus would cause the Jews to obey, "Love the Lord your God with all your heart" and "Love your neighbor as yourself" and to worship the Messiah that they say is to come to Earth one day. Baigent you're an idiot who tries to vilify the good that has been in plain sight for hundreds of years. Stop pretending to be Christopher Columbus and pretending to be wise.

Update: 11:29 P.M.: Ian said, "We've got to stop this from happening. Tomorrow is too late." Stop what from happening you idiot? OOOoooooo we must stop the extremist Christians from making a red cow and giving it to the Judaics who want it! Oooooo we must stop the extremist Muslims from being extreme! You stupid raving witch hunter. And if you hadn't noticed already moron, America doesn't want to keep spending it's time fighting exploding morons in Iraq and Afghanistan. The hateful, extremist, fundamentalist is you. Stop war-mongering.

George Noor, Atheist-Hater, Shows His Hate For God

2009-09-05T00:17:00.001-07:00

When a caller called in at 12:15 P.M. tonight, he asked George if he could quote the Bible (to give his opinion on his UFO experiences), George replied, "Well, we don't take quotes from the Bible." This is the same George that said atheists were evil.

12:21 Update:

George said that after having a sound sleep he sometimes hears his doorbell, and has gone outside to see if anyone had pressed it, but finds no one around. Demons anyone? I wonder why demons would be attracted to George.

12:23 Update:

George claims that he's seen shadow "rats" "with antenna" that move across the road.

May God save him.

Bill Oreilly, False Conservative and Witch

2009-09-04T20:38:00.000-07:00

"In the end Karama will deal with this people [extremeists]." - June 2007, Billy Oreilly, a bad-tempered conservative extremist, condemning Michael Savage and others.

Bill: Since when do conservatives believe in "Karma"? And do you plan on retracting that Karma was capitalized either, as if it were God? It's not a person, let alone a god. You are evil, as are all "conservatives" who place themselves above God's will.\

And stop throwing around the word "extremist" on whoever you hate, and pretending "extreme" simply means "Evil". "Extreme" the way you use it to condemn others, means, "to go beyond what is right", and it describes you.

To Jessie: On Judgment

2009-09-03T21:02:00.000-07:00

Part of judging is deciding; it's required for determining what you are sensing. Even the word "determine" is a synonym for decide too, which starts to show how judging is required for living a peaceful and useful life. At least judgment is required for thoughts beyond simply sensing something and wondering it is what you are sensing. In other words if you see a ball, but don't recognize it, you may feel curiosity as to what the ball is, but unless you start making judgments or a judgment (determining), you'll just wonder what the ball is till you lose interest in it.

So, you're actually judging all the time as is obvious from knowing humans, since humans are always trying to figure out things, but sadly, usually not wanting to figure out what is truly good or evil, because deep inside, they hate the truth, because it condemns them, figuratively speaking, it judges them, and people are addicted to doing wrong, to living life their way in spite of knowing they are doing wrong.

What you seem to at least partly mean by saying that you don't judge is that you don't condemn anyone for their moral beliefs, but that's wrong since people who say they don't condemn people who DO condemn others who DO condemn others for what they believe to be wrong moral beliefs. And think about that, isn't that a massive irony since you're then indirectly saying, "You may not tell anyone when they are doing moral wrong even if you believe you are supposed to or if that's part of your religion, if you do, then I condemn you your morality or religion." So you do condemn / "judge", and more ironically, you condemn most of the world and yourself without realizing it since everyone, including you as I just pointed out, condemn what they believe to be moral wrong. And what you believe to be morally wrong, is what you say is wrong! I'm not yelling by putting the exclamation mark, just pointing out more clearly the irony.

So what you should say, so that there is no confusion, which leads to strife, is, "I condemn those who condemn what they believe to be morally wrong." And again, that would mean, you condemn yourself, whether you realize it or not.

Another thing which you know, at least to a vague degree, is that being condemned is humiliating, it hurts your feelings, and I also know that people who say they don't condemn / "judge", say that because they have been deeply hurt from being directly or indirectly condemned, and seeing that their friends don't like to be condemned either, or hoping to make friends or more friends or to keep the ones you have, you warn them that you do not like to be morally judged, and will "love" them back in the same way (so long as they don't condemn you.) But as you've probably realized by now, if you've read up to this point and understood me, such a life style leads to co called "chaos" and confusion (and ironically, given enough time and socializing with people: to more condemnation when arguments break out, and sometimes arguments over the impossible philosophy of "never condemn" itself.)

I've said all this to you out of kindness and love, not at all to hurt your feelings, and if it hurts your feelings well you're rejecting my kindness then, and would be condemning me for not good reason. I say that not because I'm assuming that you're easily offended, but in case you are.

So, I hope you embrace judging soon without feeling even a hint of guilt when others try and make you feeling guilty for it.

Judging is necessary for learning the truth, and you have the right to learn the truth. Only God has the right to keep you from knowing it, but till the day he commands you to not learn or remember it, it's your right. I hope you don't condemn me for these beliefs, or show your condemnation by ignoring me.

I hope my love never leaves you.

Chatroom Added

2009-09-02T09:24:00.001-07:00

For anyone wanting to chat to other users on this site or other sites of mine, try the chatroom on the bottom.

Jim Villaniccu Says He Was An Idiot, George Promotes Bad Intentions

2009-09-02T00:35:00.000-07:00

Two days ago top radio show host babbler in Albuquerque, Jim Villanuci said, "I was an idiot in January, I thought he [Obama] was a moderate." No Jim you're still an idiot for the same reason you were still an idiot in January: you assume, and worse, call those who speak out against your assumptions, "nuts". And yesterday he spoke out against mandatory swine flu vaccinations, yet said he didn't want to be a "kook" by saying vaccines were bad. At one point Jim joked about his side kick "Billy" trying to get on another radio show, Billy seemingly joked back saying, "Anything to get a little respect." I could tell he was serious however, as Jim often insults him.

And about tonight or rather early this morning, George Noory promoted bad science, and a false scientist called Lynne McTaggart, who at the moment is spreading on-the-fly nonsense on Coast to Coast. One of the things she claims is that there are "intention masters" and that your intentions alone (in other words wishing for something) can cause our wish to come true, and that the more people who wish the same thing, the more likely it will happen. That's obviously wrong since people strongly wish for things all the time, like for someone to love them, and it fails to happen. It just occurred to me that her science is as bad as the evil Arminian Pentecostal / "Evangelical" "just have enough faith" heresy, only Lynne's is non-Christian version which includes using prayer. She also uses the wishes of Christians coming true via prayer as evidence that her claims are true. One clear problem with her using prayer is that intention / wishing is not prayer itself, but rather a necessary component for prayer, and it isn't the intent itself as to why the prayer works, but what the intent is, who you're praying too, if the person you are praying to can fulfill your wishes, and if the person you are praying to wants to fulfill your wish. For example God will not go against his own will, and will only fulfill a wish that is in accordance with his will. On top of that, if you have a prayer fulfilled, it may not have been because you ask him to fulfill it, but because he had a different reason in mind for fulfilling it other than directly pleasing you. Lynn also said that you can call some force she calls "the Field" "God... as long as you don't think of it as some man on a cloud judging you," (nah she's not an anti-Christian bigot at all) to which George Noory replied, "Absolutely." Clearly George is no longer a Catholic as he was raised to be.

On an August 25 show on Coast to Coast AM, guest Philip Imbrogno made this nonsensical statement, "Humans have this problem, they try to categorize everything." No categorization is not a problem, it's what minds do in order to understand how to refer to a thing and how to treat it. For example you categorize a man as a woman then you will possibly treat them wrong, for example if the man is not gay, and neither are you, and ask to marry him in your confusion, think that he is a woman. You could also confuse others by your wrong categorization, wasting their time or even getting them hurt. Another obvious example is if you categorized a knife as a spoon, and decide to use the knife as a spoon, you could end up dead from having cut your tongue.

About three days ago Michael Savage, while hosting his Savage Nation radio show had a man call in who said that his dad or grandfather had also been banned from Britain, after which Michael said, "So I wasn't the only hero to be banned..." but quickly corrected himself after realizing his severe narcissistic mistake, and then said, "patriot" was a better description. Despite that bad mistake callers still praised him. What an evil man, who after praising himself despite insulting God whom he pretends to defend, calls himself a hero, yet condemns President Obama for being a narcissist and radio show hosts like Rush Limbaugh. If only there were good men more prominent then these evil babblers who could shut them up by publicly refuting them.

False Conservative Mark Davis Needs A Massive Whack On the Crotch

2009-08-31T11:20:00.000-07:00

According to the annoying-voiced radio show babbler Mark Davis, "I would kick 9/11 Truthers in the crotch if I could" and that he would only listen to their evidence if "even half of structural engineers come forward" to support the movement. He also said that they had no business using "9/11" and "truth" in the same sentence.

Well don't you know Mark the Truth-hater that truth is determined by consensus and is not truth if it after eight years not more than half support the truth it? Common Sense Wrong. Using your anti-Christian logic, Darwinian evolution must be false and anti-9/11 Truthers must be wrong since you've still not come up with any evidence, let alone scientific evidence, to refute ours. You're own evil logic has refuted itself.

And if you and other bigots won't listen to the less than half of engineers supporting 9/11 Truth, than what is it you are angry about them saying? How can you know the evidence they have is wrong if you won't listen? And so good science is to reject any hypothesis because it's not supported "by even half" of whoever is in the field to judge the hypothesis when it's created? What an anti-scientific moron you are. It's because of stupid, babbling, narcissist, anti-God, anti-truth idiots like you that the sciences of the world are stagnating.

If it were you idiot then all kinds of lies would have been perpetuated from the beginning of time, like that LYING is good as long as no one is hurt, idiot. And of course liars, being liars, define "hurt" however they want, just like you, liar.

You're an annoying-voiced hypocrite who insulted kids, female, military service men and women, those who lost their relatives in 9/11, military service men and women and the growing number of structural engineers who support the 9/11 Truth Movement.

And Mr. It's Wrong to Bully and Obfuscate - or should I call you, Mr. Blacks Are Subhumans Because Most Evolutionary Scientists Agreed They Were - do you really think that threatening to kick people in the crotch encourages free speech, let alone truthful free speech? Could it be that it's because of violent-mouthed threatening psychos like yourself that chill free speech, that after eight years not half of structural engineers have supposedly not supported the 9/11 Truth Movement?

And what business do you have judging anyone who is religious, like you did Catholics today, when you use weasel phrases like, 'I oppose indoctrination' to subliminally bias people against religion? Do you know what indoctrination means?

Your no libertarian and you're no conservative; you're sick.

To Calvinists: Does God Predestine Anyone To Hell?

2009-08-31T06:36:00.000-07:00

I don't like the label "Hyper Calvinist". It's puke and reminds me of "spaz" atheists. So don't call me one after reading this.

Who agrees that God destines everything, including who goes to Hell? I believe that it is illogical and unbiblical (and makes Calvinists look stupid) to claim that God doesn't destine anyone to Hell when it's claimed that he is the one who is required to save you. Further, think of it this way: does God do anything without knowing the result? Doesn't God know the result of his action of inaction? Is God the one who decides what will happen or is he not all-knowing? Are there things God is unsure of? Is God only sure of what will happen to a person he intends to save? Further, why wouldn't God destine someone to Hell when he hardens a person's heart so that they WON'T do good? Why cut it short at destining someone to Hell if he chooses what sins a person will commit indirectly? Again:

How can anyone say, "God doesn't destine anyone to Hell," when he is in control of everything either directly or indirectly and knows the future perfectly and his turning our hearts to him for forgiveness is required for us to be saved from Hell?

I hope that any Calvinists who claim God doesn't destine anyone to Hell or who says, "Well I don't know" will stop, and admit the truth so that we aren't seen as insane idiots anymore by Christians and Arminiests, who use that illogical fudging to turn or keep people away from the only way to eternal peace. It's not enough to unifiy under the name "Calvinist" anymore than it was enough to unify under the name "Christian": We must get our gospel straight and stop spreading Hellish confusion and stop pandering and giving Arminiansts room in the Church to spread their deception.

And just what is the problem with saying that God destines anyone to Hell? Everyone knows that false and non-Christians are arbitrary with their condemnation of God anyways, they say, "He's always angry" and hateful for sending anyone to Hell except Satan and the demons that follow him, or that he's always allowing the innocent to suffer (and ironically they unkowingly include "Christians" under 'innocent', sometimes).

There ar already the "blinded" and "hardened" verses and the punishment verses, so what does it matter if we acknowledge that God does destine people to Hell as well? They already say he is mean when about none of us bring that point up and rarely!

This denying that God destines anyone to Hell allows millions of Arminiests, whether they call themselves or not, to disguise themselves as one of us. How? Because in their confused minds they think that so long as they wet say that God doesn't destine anyone to Hell that a person can be saved by their own goodness, and if that is true, then God doesn't need to destine anyone to get eternal life, and if he doesn't need to, then he doesn't. If that's not how they reason then why else would they divide from Calvinists on that point above the others they differ from us on? Why else would they always be babbling about how man has a free will and how God gave us a free will? Their denial that God destines anyone to Hell above destining anyone at all combined with their endless trumping of "free will" and not God's show how they think. We Calvinists must not give them weasel room anymore and must let the falling away occur, and it will occur when we shut the door to their lies. The longer we allow their foot in the door on this issue, the more people they will deceive and the worse the condemnation of those going to Hell will be. It's better for the world to revert back to idolatry as Revelation seems to imply will happen, than people continually drawing near to Christ under the false idea that they can earn their way into Heaven or just by saying, "I accept Jesus into my heart," and ask for forgiveness again and again when they sin and or just doing some good deeds.

Another problem withing denying or hiding that we believe God destines anyone to Hell is that it makes it harder to distinguish a true from a false Christian. The Pentecostal churches are infested with fakes in part, because of true Christians pandering to the fakes and denominations similar to ours, like the Methodists appear to be "as Christian" as us. So, for those Calvinists who keep giving ground to the enemy, stop: draw the line clearly in the sand and stay there.D

Crooks, Liars, and Master Accuser John Amato and Mentally Ill Daughter Abbywood Can't Hide Their Hatred for Science and Truth

2009-08-29T23:50:00.000-07:00

Here's a late pathetic attempt by John Amato to look oh so macho, pro-science, and pro-life,by persecuting the 'stupid pathetic sheep' (in other words, "Dumb", "weak" [and harmless] Christians):

John Amato: Oh, no.., What will the Dinosaurs think? The pro-birth anti-evolution Christian evangelism movement just suffered a horrible blow.

Oh no..., could you be keyword spamming you moron anti-child, pro-murder, anti-science Liberal evangelism movement which repeatedly suffers horrible blows to its fat beaten bitter target of a head? Spammer much? What is, "...,"? So you're what liberal baby-haters consider a top blogger? *Laughs*.

And why are you asking what dinosaurs would think? How is that funny? Where's the punchline idiot? Insane much? Terrorists a.k.a. "bombers" (lol) have nothing on you.

Let's see more of your cheap keyword spam:

John Amato: "A federal judge has cleared the way for the government's seizure of a creationism theme park in Pensacola owned by a couple convicted of tax fraud."

Woah you said, "cleared the way," you must be pro.

John Amato: "A ruling by U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers states that the nine properties that make up Dinosaur Adventure Land as well as two bank accounts associated with the park will be used to satisfy $430,400 owed to the federal government."

Oh you love that word satisfy don't you. You look pretty satisfied. I doubt you'll be modeling for any slim fast commercials anytime soon unless you decide to share some of that fat with the needy you pretend to care about.

John Amato: "Kent Hovind, who founded the park and a ministry, Creation Science Evangelism, is serving 10 years in federal prison for failing to pay the Internal Revenue Service more than $470,000 in employee taxes."

Grrrr John, he "failed" grrrr. Oh that "failure". What a dumb, cheap weasel-wording, conniving hypocrite you are. The failure is you John: you repeatedly fail God's tests and repeatedly break his commandments and your own hypocritical, arbitrary, convenient standards.

John Amato: "He was found guilty in November 2006 on 58 counts, including failure to pay employee taxes and making threats against investigators."

"For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you." Have fun on Judgment Day.

John Amato: "The conviction culminated 17 years of Hovind sparring with the IRS."

You must be smart because you said, "culminated" and "sparring". Well I'm just going to believe whatever you now. Not.

John Amato: "Saying he was employed by God and his ministers were not subject to payroll taxes, he claimed no income or property."

This is a sentence? Can you show us your source for this nonsense John the Top Babbler? Talk about "cheap".

John Amato: "Hovind is incarcerated at the Edgefield Federal Correction Institution in South Carolina."

Isn't that a place filled with your liberal friends? Something tells me it's not fundamentalists.

John Amato: "They lie about their dirty dealings"

Who lies stupid? The liberals filling up all the prisons of the world let alone Edgefield Federal Correction Institution? Oh did yo mean Obama and his liberal army who gave trillions of dollars to the rich that he pretends to be against? The same Obama you support who won't show his birth certificate who spent millions to keep it hidden? That "pro-poor" Honest Obama? And can you back this up with evidence and not your mere word or mere claims from a government you pretend is always wrong? And what was that about "dirty"? Wow so you believes in sin? Thanks for acknowledging the existence of God stupid. And the "major blow" to you is this one incident lol? The church isn't composed of 100 people you moron, it's 60+ million not counting angels or the Christian in Heaven awaiting vengeance on morons like you. And the great "dirty" sin to you is this one incident out of countless good deeds which you deliberately ignore both from Christians and God, the source of their good deeds? Why so bitter you fault-finding oaf? Why so bitter at God fat head who can't stop making a fool of himself, who can't stop thinking sick tormenting thoughts of revenge on Christian kids? Oh. That's still not an excuse to hate God. Talk about negative and cheap shots eh? "But, but, but you called me fat head!" Cheap-shot barfs what?

John Amato: "now DrDino.com is in trouble."

*Yawn*. What about trouble fat head babbler? Fat head you think that's trouble? Fat head don't you remember what Jesus suffered at the hands of truth-hating brutes like you? Don't you remember he suffered an eternity of Hell for the countless sins of dozens of millions of people, and that that eternity of suffering was compressed into three days? Did you forget the mass murder of 12+ million Christians, including Christian kids and babies by your liberal pagan friends, including by atheists? And why are you and your atheist friends such massive control freaks, forcing their atheism on others who are minding their own business in their own homes. And besides spending their time not minding their own business by bulldozing homes for being used to worship God, your atheist friends even commit mass murder, while you and they accuse "weak", "stupid", "harmless", Christians as being "bashers" who try to force things on you. Well if you can use murder, we can preach with force you hypocrite. You strain at a gnat you camel, and blow a trumpet when you find one, wasting everyone's time.

"It is a dreadful thing to fall into
the hands of the living God."
Hebrews 10:31

"Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked.
A man reaps what he sows."
Galatians 6:7

"You hate all who do wrong."
Psalm 5:5

"Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but
cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One
who can destroy both soul and body in hell."
Matthew 10:28

You don't know "trouble" John,
yet.

John Amato: "Hang on, it's time to call in the Flying Spaghetti Monster. It can help us!"

Har har har that's just such clever humor. Not. Why would Christians call on your imaginary childish cartoon god? It compares to God how? I hear crickets. God repeatedly cuts you with his best selling book while at the same time using it to bring peace all over the world, and exposing the malicious murderous hate within your anti-truth group for over 2000 years, always the center of your attention for "ruining" your lives, and you think that compares to your baby joke? What a gluttonous idiot. I can see why you're obsessed with flying, Spaghetti, and monsters, being that you must get exhausted weighted down by so much "excess" all day and see your reflection when you come near shiny spoons and mirrors and the cracked-smile faces of your bitter-faced friends all day long.

Johnny The Hypocrite Amato (checking for left over bread crumbs?)

One of John's psycho liberal (yes that's redundant) friends

And hypocrite, why do you support the Darwinist government when it persecutes "weak", "stupid", "pathetic" sheep, but not when it attacks your either obese or anorexic, truth-hating, liberal friends? Arbitrary much? Contradictory and schizophrenic much?

And who is us stupid? Why would you be calling the imaginary baby cartoon for help if you didn't say you're the one being persecuted? Confused much? Or did you mean that your belly still wasn't satisfied with the government you despise repeatedly breaking the separation of church and state law and therefore persecuting Christians for their religious beliefs? You blind, ignorant hypocrite, don't you know that the government isn't allowed to tax churches, nor force someone to go against their sincere religious beliefs? How convenient for you to forget when it comes to Christians you bigot.

John Amato: "Tags: creationism, IRS, Liars, Religious Right, Scandals"

Nah, ur not a keyword spammer at all Mr. Scandals. And don't you know Mr. 700 diggs too late, ban any replies from fundamentalists and then close the "news" article from further comments that it was a scandal before you and your moron friends said anything? What a pathetic, conniving, liar you are.

So that's your "scientific" rebuttal to "young earth" creation science? So that's what you idiot liberals consider science?: To say, "Haha the Right Wing government I say is always wrong rightly persecuted Right Winger citizens [whose good works I can't bear to acknowledge and science I can't be bothered to even read one sentence on (though love to bash in ignorance)) for being government-hating cheats like me!" That's science you dumb oaf, you glutton, you hypocrite?

Hang on! John's Super Spaz, Hyper Strained Cracking Smiles sufferer daughter Abbywood will save us!:

"Haraharwwwaaaaa!!!!!!! (I'm Choking With Laughter)....!!!!!!

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 17:42 — Abbybwood

Hawarrrahhhhaaaa!!!!!!!! (Still choking...with tears....of...joy....)!

Bo freakin' zo's!!!!!!!!

Soives em' right!!!!!

Kooks!!!!

Go to college!

ANY college!!! Take ANY class in Paleontology 101 at ANY "reputable" university....

DORKS!"

Can't you just smell the intelligence, the genius from his daughter Abbywood? And dont you kow what whatever this demonic moron says is "reputable" is reputable, cuz...

SHE'S ABBYWOOD EVERYONE: THE HYPER SPAZ, IMPULSIVE RANTING HISTORY, SCIENCE, RELIGION AND TRUTH IGNORANT. The bold and capital letters in Abbywood's rant is from her by the way. What a dummy this Abby is, claiming that no Christian college or university is reputable. Wrong moron, look around moron, stop lying in hatred moron. Your feelings and babbling don't make you right moron, let alone hateful lying moron. If no Christian college was reputable moron there would be no modern science moron. It was Christians who started modern science moron, and before that, God moron. Read the Bible moron, and study history moron, and stop being a gullible moron and believing teachers that only say what satifies your lusts moron. It was atheists who tried to destroy scientific progress (read about Galileo moron) and who in their greed, petty jealousy and hatred of God continue to hinder scientific progress so much so that after 40 years since the "first" moon landing the Darwinist morons at NASA still have the world cut off from the moon, let alone Mars and Darwinist morons after 18 years are still selling and prescribing anti-depression pills that cause you to commit suicide, and Darwinist morons are still pretending the paleontological record shows a linear column of transitional fossils leading up to humans and wasting everyone's time and money, billions of hours and billions of dollars, repeating this lie, a lie which was known to be false by Darwin himself, billions of hours and billions of dollars on the lie that the Big Bombed Theory is backed by dark energy and gravitation waves, neither of which has been found (though you Darwinist morons pretend otherwise for more lazy money). Oh and any cure for any diseases yet Darwinists? What? Not even for AIDS? Maybe if you stopped wasting our time telling us we're dumb monkeys like you.

Was that clear enough moron? How many more times do you have to be called a moron before you realize you're an ultra moron, an ultra bigot and an ultra ignorant? Are you done choking and crying over someone who does good being persecuted, over lying and the murder of babies as long as it's your God-hating side that does it (you God-hating hypocrite?). Where is your self-control dummy? How is your mocking a babble proof of anything? How is it science stupid? Dur? Blind to the utter obvious much? And are you choking and crying tears of joy when a Christian does good? When a Christian freely gives his money to Christians and non-Christians who are needy, and when they do physical work to help them survive and prosper, even risking their lives and suffering years of unjust torture and murder to do so? Do you rejoice when Christians minding their own business worshiping in their own homes are robbed, sodomized or raped in front of others including other family members, regardless of their age or sex, or tortured for years or murdered for it? Do you rejoice over that too, stupid Abby? Why are you so full of hate Abby? What's wrong: can't force the millions of successful Christians to worship you and your feelings and tell you you're right no matter what stupidity comes out your mouth? Poor baby. We already have a God, and he's not a hyper spaz like you Abby, doesn't rejoice over the hurt of others Abby, doesn't show favoritism like you Abby, isn't partial like you Abby, won't call himself "she" because you pretend to love equality Abby, won't lie Abby. That is why you hate Him Abby.

The crooks and liars are you anti-Christians, anti-baby, anti-good, anti-truth accusers, who accuse others of being evil like you, because you are evil.

Poor anti-Christian whining babies: as usual, being ignorant of science, they don't comment on it, and so resort to mere, "Nanny nanny boo boo you broke an imaginary law (which we break all the time too!)" Yes you hypocrite crooks and liars, YOU BREAK IRS TAX LAW ALL THE TIME. How could you forget that you blind bigoted self-righteous biased hypocrites? Ooops? So then your own hatred backfires on you, so then Darwinism must be false because you steal and lie all the time! YOU STUPID BLIND HYPOCRITES: HOW CAN YOU EVER WIN WITH MERE MOCKER YOU MORONS? HOW IS BASHING YOUR MERE FEELINGS SCIENCE? YOUR FEELINGS DON'T EQUAL TRUTH YOU IDIOTS, LOOK UP THE WORD TRUTH YOU IDIOTS. God you anti-Christians are massively stupid hypocrites.

All they can do is mock and use false "sins" to accuse others of sin, meanwhile they sin all the time and demand not to be judged for it! HYPOCRITES! They strain at a gnat and swallow a camel, straining to find a "sin" in the wind to dote on and play up, because they are unable to refute the clear goodness of Christ and those who follow him, the clear goodness of:

"Love your neighbor as yourself",
"DON'T MURDER",
"DON'T COMMIT ADULTERY",
"DON'T STEAL"
"DON'T LIE"

(and we Christians know you that you especially hate that last one).

And what happened to those two verses you love to quote you hypocrites? "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" and "Do not judge." YOU HYPOCRITES. Why do those verses only apply to you? INSECURE BITTER WHINING BABY BIGOTS MUCH?

Can't you obey Christ whom you quote and take out of context to suit your sins?

save

Imaginary Ancient Big Bomb Believer Bigot Jim Villanuci and Darwinist Friends Refuted

2009-08-28T16:56:00.000-07:00

According to the KKOB radio show host Jim Villanuci, who said repeatedly today that he doesn't care [about the truth], there are no Christian scientists who believe in a "young" earth (6500 is old young?), and anyone who believes in a young earth can't perform science at all and can't understand anything correctly because they don't listen to the facts, and merely explain everything with, "Jesus did it," or "angels did it". Is that why I'm repeating what you said and refuting it, again?

Where bigot, in this refutation of your ranting, and your ranting anti-Christian callers, have I said anything like that or an earlier one refuting your claim that we must have sex with a person to know if they are gay or straight?

Do you have the patience to read less than a few pages, if not, how can you claim to know what you are talking about when it comes to "young earthers" let alone Christians, science, evolution or the big imaginary bomb no one ever saw from billions and billions of years ago?):

Christians are scientists too, and not merely because I said so. You don't you know history and don't care to know it, and don't know what's going on around you accurately either, and don't want to, that is why in large part you are ignorant. Don't you know that Galileo, Copernicus and Euler were all Christians, and that atheists tried to shut them up using other Christians? No doubt, you being an ignorant mocker, if I hadn't added that last part you would have said, "Yeah and look what the Christians did to them." In addition to that Catholics are false Christians, so big surprise they would turn on their own at the request of atheists. Further, there are two recent polls that show about half of all scientists are religious as in believing in the supernatural, and CHEMISTS especially believe in God (gee can you figure out why CHEMISTS would especially believe in God? Could it be because they not only see the macro design in the universe, but also see the micro design which you stupidly ignore?)

Yet you pretend their are no young earth Christian scientists let alone religious ones, and that we all say, "Jesus did it," or "It looks young" or stupid things like that, which idiots like you actually say with, "But Darwin said so," "It evolved," "Oil is old," "Fission wouldn't work." You google "Evidence against young earth" or "creationism" and believe whatever so called scientific evidence there is against it. What a simpleton. Study Jim, don't just have faith.

Ironically, it's by your bigoted sarcastic statements like, "Jesus did it," or "The Grand Canyon looks young to me," and, "Evolution did it,", "The Big Bang did it", "Dinosaurs died a long time ago and did it", "The Hubble saw it," which shows that you are the one who reasons be feelings. It's you who don't believe in science and you who don't know what science is. Science is not, "It looks old to me so it must be old," or "Darwin did it" (to use your stupid bigoted sarcasm) or "evolution did it." Further, how in the Hell genius, would you figure out the Grand Canyon is very old let alone old from just looking at it? What the Hell? Can you explain that bizarre reasoning? No, you were brainwashed with endless propaganda that you in your gullibility bought into. You were repeatedly taught "this is clearly old" and so you think that way. Further, what the Hell scientist even says you can judge that a rock is old just be looking at it? Stupid. And can you show that any young earth CALVINIST (not some idiot Christian, a false one) doesn't believe in science? The father of microbiology was a Calvinist "young earther" you parrot.

You clearly don't understand what Young Earth geology is about, it's not simply, "The Earth is about 6000 years old" (it's a little older than that actually) and it's not about "Jesus lived with the dinosaurs".

You also don't understand nuclear power. Also the two caller that said it's a matter of faith and non-reason made no sense, unless he meant that old earth geology is non-reason, which would only be figurative. Regardless it was poorly worded and sounded stupid. The woman who mentioned the Christian that said it's just a faith issue was talking about a stupid Christian then, further she herself was ignorant and stupid since she said that young earther's explanation about why carbon dating isn't accurate is complicated, because IT'S NOT complicated, it this simple: Carbon dating has been repeatedly shown to be inaccurate. It's also got nothing to do with nuclear power, you obviously don't know physics very well. Carbon dating is only accurate to about 5000 years, when it's used to measure things beyond that it's wildy inaccurate and what Darwinists / evolutionist SCIENTISTS do is arbitrarily choose the dates that match their dating theories. If it doesn't fit, they dismiss it or won't even mention it.

Also the Hubble has not revealed the universe to be billions of years old, again it has to do with how the data is interpreted, and Darwinist / evolutionist scientist interpret in such a way that it fits evolutionary theory, it's circular reasoning.

Further, you clearly don't know much about evolution even, since you would have known that every informed "young earther" knows to reject carbon dating for the reasons I stated, if you were knowledgeable, you would have referred to other radiometric dating methods (which have also been shown to be inaccurate).

As for Wikipedia being good, no it's not at all, you think it's good because it says things that match your uniformed beliefs. What they do is repeatedly and instantly ban "young earthers" not listening to their arguments and merely stating that websites like answersingenesis.org and other young earth sites are not reliable. They also are against TRUTH. Yes, you heard it right, THEY ARE NOT FOR TRUTH. They will literally tell people like me, when I use a logical argument that Wikipedia is NOT ABOUT TRUTH but rather references. And they will ban you for trying to speak the truths IF it cuts the foundation of atheism or doubt of Christianity. They don't just ban anyone for speaking a religious truth obviously, but that which would leave atheism and anti-Christian skepticism hanging in the wind with nothing to support it. They also obviously wouldn't want themselves to have been shown to have been gullible for over 100 years, as that would be a devastating blow to their own faith, and then where would they turn? They'd have to be agnostic or witches.

Further, no true Christian simply says, "God said it so I believe it" as anti-Christians love to say. We don't think that way, in fact the Bible commands us to have evidence for our beliefs, and says not to be a simpleton, there is a verse that literally says not to be that way, and not to simply believe whatever you hear. It also says to test those who claim to be Christians to see if they are telling the truth about being a Christian.

On top of that, there are many non-Christian physicists who are opposed to the teaching of the Big Bang AND ASTRONOMERS, and some are nominal Christians, simply believing the Bible to be true to a degree. There is not a consensus, and even if there was, you can't vote something to be true or feel it into being true, so your comment "you can believe whatever you want to make yourself feel good" and about you living in reality and not us, is something which applies to you. Further, I study issues regarding truth and reality as do all Christians, but I spend my life doing so, so if anyone is going to know what is real or not and what truth is it would be me, not you, who merely talks about politics all day and avoids getting deep into philosophical and religious matters. Sure you mention religion now and then and how people should be free to have their own religion, but you don't go much further than that, you don't get into critical analysis for the basis of religion beyond you belief that Christians merely feel he exists (no that's not all there is to it).

As for how oiled formed, all you did was read a statement claiming how oil was made, you didn't give any scientific evidence for it. Also, it's been a long time that that theory has been shown to be BASELESS. So you just read a statement that is based on a theory that was shown to be in dispute for many years. That shows how out of touch you are with modern scientific findings let alone old ones, including old ones that are still true which you are clueless about.

Now, if you want data, scientific data backing up what I said, and about their being no evidence for the Big Bang and no consensus:

No consensus, Darwinists ban and libel young earth creationists AND Intelligent Design OLD earth creationists (showing how intolerant they are and arbitrary and that it's about their hate for God, not "pseudoscience" as they pretend)

1) Ben Stein's: Expelled (which shows that Darwinists ban scientists to make it look like there is a consensus against Darwinism)
2) http://s8int.com/bigbang3.html
3) http://cosmologystatement.org
4) http://s8int.com/bigbang5.html
4) http://thunderbolts.info/home.htm
5) http://sn.im/archeology (don't you love how this book shows your "scientists" cover up geological and archeological findings in the name of science and for prestige and more money?)
6) Further, there were many "young earth" scientists
and there still are, and the first ones were the human basis
for modern science (now twisted by evolutionists):

http://answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/default.asp

Clearly these are not scientists/Christians who say, "Jesus made the oil the end."

Oil wasn't made millions of years ago or by dinosaurs:

1) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n1/origin-of-oil
2) http://blogs.answersingenesis.org/aroundtheworld/2007/08/23/australian-oil-its-quite-young

Starlight doesn't show the universe is billions or millions of years old:

1) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v3/n1/star-formation-and-creation
2) http://icr.org/articles/view/214/245

The distance of objects in space has been in dispute for many years Jim. But you Jim, were gullible, you were deliberately ignorant even though you KNEW there is mass propaganda of all kinds. You imply "young earth" creationism is mass propaganda (why else would you say it scares you?) yet it never occurred to you that Darwinists were lying in any way, not even for money? So who's the stupid gullible simpleton? Hint for you skeptic Jim: Don't skeptics (who are nearly all Darwinists) always whine about how there can't be aliens here from other planets because the distance they would have to travel requires an "insane" amount of energy? Hint hint Jim, aliens are clearly still coming and are sighted all the time. Can you take the hint? MAYBE THE STARS AND GALAXIES AREN'T BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF LIGHT YEARS AWAY AS DARWINISTS CLAIM? Super duh? Ultra duh? Massive duh? Big circular reasoning duh? Circular reasoning check Jim: "The stars must be billions of years old because they are billions of light years away, and they are billions of lights away, and they are billions of light years away because scientists said so, and there are no 'young earthers' scientists who say the opposite because I Jim said so, and I'm right because scientists said so, and scientists are right because I said so." Is that science Jim? That's your science Jim, not the science of true Christians.

There was no billions of years old big bomb that no one ever saw and never will that they just must believe in to be real scientists, cuz you anti-Christians said so:

1) http://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/davesmith_au.htm
2) http://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/guests08/090807_sjc.htm
3) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v4/n1/big-bang
4) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v3/n1/billion-problems-with-big-bang
5) http://creation.com/no-dark-matter-found-in-the-milky-way-galaxy
6) http://orionfdn.org/papers/arxiv-1.pdf
7) The Cult of the Big Bang
8) http://spaceandmotion.com/Cosmology.htm (is this physicist "insane" Jim? Can you show us why Mr. Physicist Expert Jim Villanuci?)
9) http://orionfdn.org/papers/predicts-enhanced-galaxy-brightness.htm (is this physicist "insane" too Jim? Can you show us why Mr. Physicist Expert Jim Villanuci?)
10) http://physorg.com/news85310822.html (is physorg.com a creationist website Jim?)
11) http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/26666 (is physicsworld.com a creationist website Jim?)
12) http://sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090422085830.htm (is sciencedaily a creationist website Jim?)
13) http://astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=8435 (is astronomy.com a creationist website Jim?)
14) And what were you saying about Hubble Jim, as if you understood his scientific teachings or knew them? Was he and Einstein "dumb nuts" and "young earthers" too Jim?

Yet the true "dumb nuts" like you continue to claim INVISIBLE MATTER is everywhere and is evidence of the Big Bang. WHAT DARK MATTER JIM? OUR DARWINIST SCIENTISTS ARE SAYING IT'S NOT THERE, AND BIG SURPRISE SINCE IT'S INVISIBLE. WHY DO YOU BELIEVE IN WHAT IN INVISIBLE MATTER FOR WHICH THERE IS NO INDIRECT EVIDENCE JIM WHILE MOCKING CHRISTIANS FOR BELIEVING IN GOD WHO TO THOSE ON EARTH IS PURPOSELY INVISIBLE AND FOR WHOM THERE IS COUNTLESS EVIDENCE FOR, AS I'VE PARTIALLY SHOWN HERE? What's wrong with that picture you've given us Jim? Isn't the one who "believe[s] fairies run your engine" you, the guy who believes in invisible matter that no one can detect and in your ignorance keep claiming all scientists say is there?

"Old-earth" radiometric dating is arbitrary and flawed and one form shows the universe is "young" (though 6500 years old is hardly young compared to the age of the oldest humans):

1) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
2) http://answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-radiometric-dating-prove
3) http://answersingenesis.org/media/audio/answers-daily/volume-058/radiometric-dating-shows-young-earth
4) http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i1/dating.asp
5) Creation's Tiny Mystery

Man did live and still does live with dinosaurs you idiot.

"Jesus lived with the dinosaurs" you said in sarcasm. MORON: DARWINISTS SAY HUMANS LIVED WITH DINOSAURS AND HAVE BEEN SAYING SO FROM THE BEGINNING YOU IDIOT. IT WAS ONLY RECENTLY THAT NORONS LIKE YOU, IGNORANT OF DARWINIST EVOLUTIONARY THEORY STARTED COMING UP WITH NONSENSE LIKE THAT, WHICH DARWINIST SCIENTISTS STILL DON'T USE YOU IDIOT. What they say moron, is that Noah's Ark is absurd, and for those who are more clever, they say it's also a contradictory story. You're so dumb you can't even be bothered to learn the precious theory of your heros correctly. That's how careless you are with the truth. On top of that moron, who in the Hell said dinosaurs were all dead, or that they all magically died when the first "Homo sapien" appeared? Do you know what living fossils are? Now that's not a big surprise you wouldn't though still is hardly excusable since Darwinist mention them now and then, and of course not to often SINCE THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH CREATURES REFUTE EVOLUTION. Here Jim, more easy work for you that you could have done for yourself:

1) http://creationwiki.org/Living_fossil. Some are also listed in your precious Wikipedia (is Wikipedia a creationist website Jim?)

And how are you ignorant of dragon sightings and other dinosaur sitings, both ancient and modern? Why are you so unfun that you can't look into such stories? Why didn't the Loch Ness Monster sightings get you to start reading about such sightings? Is everyone who lives around the Loch Ness and all the tourists who have been there, who have seen dinosaurs there "nuts" too Jim? Is everyone nuts who sees what you don't?

And you're so stupid you can't figure out that we wiped out most of the dinosaurs by hunting them down for food, sport, or prestige, or that we burned down their habitat, as Aboriginees in Australia and those living in the Amazon still do today, in order to make the land safer for ourselves and to farm? But no, you think, "A comet did it," "A meteor did it," or "A volcano did it," don't you gullible Jimmy? And of course we just happened to survive while all the dinosaurs magically died or shurnk to the size of birds and mice. Nice stupid simpleton "fairy tale" Jim. Here little Jimmy, here unfun Jimmy, here unimaginative Jimmy, here Magic Meteor Jimmy; more help for your hardly imaginitive, lazy mind, lazy eyes and hands:

2) http://cryptozoology.com
3) http://theserenedragon.net/Tales/tales.html
4) http://s8int.com/dinolit1.html
5) http://s8int.com/dino1.html
6) http://newanimal.org
7) http://lorencoleman.com/top_cryptids.html
8) http://cryptozoo.monstrous.com
9) http://cryptids.net/cryptopedia/index.htm
10) http://nwcreation.net/dinosdragons.html
11) http://genesispark.com/genpark/history/history.htm

And no biased Jim, those aren't all creationist websites; only three are. And even if they were, what matters is if they are true, not, "But those are all Darwinist sites." Even your precious Wikipedia lists cryptids Jim, even they declare them to be "noteworthy" Jim. Even "skeptics", your mentally ill kin, talk about cryptids in Skeptic Magazine, and very often.

And Jim, what happened to mammoths? Don't they count as dinosaurs? Oh, is it because they weren't reptiles? So only reptiles are dangerous? Mammoths were nice huh? And who said reptiles can't be lived near? I think you deluded yourself into thinking that all dinosaurs eat people from all the silly propaganda you were raised on, on those silly dinosaur coloring books, Discovery Channel and Jurassic Park cartoons, and B horror movies. But if only you had paid a little closer attention and put in a little more thought, and realized not all dinosaurs ate flesh you idiot, no dinosaur was said to have eaten humans you idiot, and that Discovery Channel isn't a nonprofit company that shows cartoons because they are just so concerned about teaching you how the entire planet was covered with man-eating Tyrannosaurs. Oh wait, they don't teach that. But you're an idiot who misses the details even when the propaganda is light.

And are Komodo Dragons good enough for you Jim? Do they count as dinosaurs? Duh? Are all the people living near Komodo Dragons dead? No, in fact the Komodo Dragons are the ones who are almost dead, and hardly anyone goes near them except to take a picture.

Your dumb Jim.

Another thing about your Wikipedia, where "the site all you nuts come from":

The long term editors and administrators deliberately try and make alternative scientists look bad regardless of whether or not their theories have been shown to be true, they try to have articles on breakthrough scientists and inventors deleted or made to look silly. You just are ignorant and don't care much about the truth Jim, no offense. You obsess on what you feel is true and believe what merely sounds to be true to you, and don't go further.

Jim, you're being hypocritical: many Darwinist Scientists and non-scientist Darwinists, often simply as you do, say the equivalent of, "It's so," "That's the way it is," "There's [scientific evidence]", and some even say, "Atheist" as their source/reference, referring to themselves. They might as well say, "Me,". You also merely make empty claims backed by mere emotion. You merely claim that oil is formed in such and such way and that's it's millions of years old. That's not evidence let alone scientific evidence. It's no better than your sarcastic stereotypes like,"Jesus made the oil" or "angels make radio waves".

As for your magical scientific evidence, "They all come from the same website" as in "Young Earth Creationists all come from the same website", says who? And what does that even mean? So all "young earthers" contact you via answersingenesis.com? Really? So now it's, "AIG did it!" Jim? That's your new scientific evidence against young earthers? Lame. AIG is staffed by people born from humans raised in many different ways, some who were former atheists or agnostics, not people who were born by a website. "Young Earthers" no more all or mostly come from AIG anymore than Gullibles like yourself all come from Wikipedia (Mr. Wikipedia Referring Jim). AIG refers to scientific evidence from multiple sources, they don't just invent things from a vacuum or say, "The Bible did it," and unlike Wikipedia - which you love and seem to think is evidence in and of itself - does not reject truth in favor of keeping the appearance of truth to suit their feelings.

Further, if we "all c[a]me from the same [web]site," whatever that means, how is that evidence, let alone scientific evidence that "young earth" creationism is wrong? So if "you all" Billions of Years Old Big Bombers came from Wikipedia, TalkOrigins or KKOB that would make you wrong? Well then you must be wrong too; you've contradicted your own arbitrary logic. And oooo, how bad: "They all have an organization, they're all organized," is basically what you said: yeah what a horrible thing Jim, what a sin, gotta really hate ORGANIZATION, cuz ORGANIZATION is so bad, right Mr. Chaos? Why do you chaos believers hate DESIGN, and ORGANIZATION so much? See how illogical your DISORGANIZED CHAOTIC mind is? Your hang ups say some powerful things about your false logic. It's just so bad to make things convenient for you anti-Christians isn't it Jim? If the information was chaotically spread out all over the Internet no doubt your hateful self would then say something like, "They're scatter brained and disorganized." Sorry to make things convenient for you Jim, so sorry to help you out by putting the info all in one place. So evil and unscientific of us. Wait, if that's a sin, why do you love Wikipedia?; yet again your insults backfire. Can't you stop contradicting yourself?

Further, you really don't know Christians or young earth scientists: you said 60+ million Calvinists come from ansswersingenesis. Really? Yes Jim, that's how many "young earth" believers there are. You're truly ignorant. But no, we don't all simply use that website, there are many "young earth" science sites, some of which are linked to the side of my journal and two others I have:

http://creationengineeringconcepts.org
http://answersincreation.org
http://answersingenesis.com
http://christiananswers.net
http://creationwiki.com
http://genesispark.com
http://creationists.org
http://unevolved.org
http://creation.com
http://orionfdn.org
http://nmidnet.org
http://halos.com
http://yecs.org
http://icr.org

So what was that about us all coming from one site Jim? Is what matters is, "Nanny nanny boo boo you only have one site we have more," or, "It's just a few people," "They're all from one house," "They're all from one apartment complex," "They're all from one block," "They're all from one town," "They're all from one city," "They're all from one state," "They're all from one country," "They're all from one side of the planet," "They're all from one planet," "They're all from one solar system," "They're all from one galaxy," "They're all from one galaxy cluster", "They're all human," "They're all from one universe"? No, what matters is: IS WHAT "THEY" SAY TRUE."

Ironically I met a moron even dumber than you who made fun of Christians for being "lazy" she said, because,"notice" she said, "You have more sites", "MORE" Jim, not "They're all from one site." So which nut arbitrary nut should the world, including us "young earthers" believe Jim? Oh God of Science and Religion Jim, which stupid insult defeats us? They can't be both right since they contradict. Hence, why we don't believe your ranting, because that's all you anti-true Christians do. You anti-true Christians show every hour that you are arbitrary, paranoid, racked with bitterness, and that your morality and logic is backwards. Yes "conservative" Jim, you're better than liberals in that you say Christians should have the right to home-school their children under Christianity, but you err when you discriminate against "young earthers", claiming that we're teaching children "to answer wrong on tests" you said. As you would notice if you bothered to READ FIRST OUR TEACHINGS, rather than putting childish words in our mouth, you bully, you would see WE TEACH YOUR STUPIDITY NECESSARILY, since you idiots won't shut up about it. You moron.

If you or others think I've not read the rebuttals to the sites and specific arguments I showed, you're wrong:

1) There isn't a rebuttal for many arguments against your arguments against the Bible. Can you guess the reason why besides some cheap lie you'd first think like, "We'll because you Christians are just nuts, and you say things that don't make sense"? Hints: THEY ARE TRUE AND CLEARLY TRUE, AND WHO IS GOING TO CHALLENGE ANTI-CHRISTIANS WHEN THEY SAY THE SAME THING AS "YOUNG EARTHERS". Were those hints clear enough?

2) I refuted the rebuttals, for example on Yahoo Answers and on Amazon.com. On Amazon.com I refuted a ranting nut like you, only more clever and who actually bothered to at least read what the opposition said, whole books even. I documented it early in my journal here. But what did two Amazon moderators do when I complained about this nut deliberately skewing the ratings of creationist books by repeatedly voting them down, and by repeatedly voting down my replies to him so that they would be hidden, and stalking me?: They deleted not only some of my reviews but dozens of my replies in the comment field to the ranting nut who was clearly stalking me. And what were your Amazon moderator buddies' reason for doing so? The one who bothered to email said it was because what I said was all hateful. Sure. Isn't that just such a good reason to censor replies to a ranting stalker Mr. "Christians Just Say Jesus Did It" Loving Non-Hateful Jim? You hypocrites. Ooops, I shouldn't have said that that's hateful because it hurts your feelings, your loving scientific "Christians are hypocrites for judging right from wrong and have no right to judge others who call themselves Christians or not," feelings. No you didn't literally say that, but you said the equivalent in your ranting one day against a congregation that was judging a former member who was still calling herself a Christian, the same day you said we can only know if someone is gay or straight if we have sex with them. No, ur not nuts and evil at all, not.

And Mr. Jim Pro Science Villanuci, how can there be scientific progress if you slander "young earthers" and misrepresent them and try and block them from being heard? So that's science, to block opposing view points that you can't even be bothered to listen to? So we should just believe whatever you and your Darwinists say is true and ask no questions and never point out any errors we see? It's because of morons like you, Darwinist morons like you, afraid of facing God, that there is gross scientific stagnation and fraud in Darwinist Mainstreamer dominated organizations like Wikipedia, the Smithsonian, NASA, and the U.S. Government in general, the same government you constantly rail against forgetting that it's mostly composed of Darwinists like you.

As usual, you anti-Christians accuse us of what you are guilty of doing, while pretending to be for Christ or neutral, while we really are for Christ, and believe the truth, rather than being neutral.

So is it any wonder that you're stuck below the top 65 radio show hosts in the US? Being a smug, boring, mocker who makes cheap lazy slanderous insults at Christians who spend their time and money helping the poor and needy only gets you so far.

Your the one teaching kids to answer wrong on man's tests, and much worse: wrong on God's tests.

Duckie

2009-08-27T17:10:00.000-07:00

At about 2 AM I made friends with a cute black duck. Unlike the other ducks I found it with by an apartment, it was much less timid and stayed behind. I decided to seize it and got it by the neck and then lifted up from underneath. It barely struggled and I kissed its head as I took it to my apartment. It was calm in my apartment, pecking and biting at my broken laptop, closed on my floor (I think it thought it was a little puddle since it was black and reflective). It tried out other things to, and got a little noise after a while. It sat on my chest for a while and I could feel it was nervous whenever I stroked its neck, and sometimes it would look behind it when I petted it on its wings, and I could tell it was nervous about me doing that too since it would get noisy. Strangely it didn't want bread, and I remembered a woman by a nearby pond who said she fed them seeds, so I gently got the duck to step off me and got it some seeds to eat. Funnily, when I stopped, and having accidentally dropped some seeds on the floor and near a plastic grocery back, it started pecking at the bag repeatedly and got nothing from it since the seeds fell onto the floor. It was being noisy again so I fed it by hand and after taking some vids of pics of it I let it back outside. I followed it around for a while and it seemed at one point to be sticking around with me. I fed it a little more seeds. Eventually I picked it back up and it seemed to have fun standing on my hands. While walking it back to the pond it turned to lean against my chest and then Simba the black cat saw me and began meowing. Simba hangs around early in the morning near my place and runs to me to be petted on its head. It didn't like that I had a big black duck on my chest, and after petting it a little bit I kept heading for the pond and I face the duck forward and it preened a little. Simba followed me and I put the duck down by a little outside building with lights on its side so that I could pick up and kiss Simba and see how the duck and him would act around each other. When I put Simba back down and went back to the duck, Simba followed me and meowed, and the duck walked to my knees when Simba came near. Then I picked the duck back up and went to the pond but it didn't seem to want to go in so I put it down by the pond. A mallard in the pond broke away from the rest of the ducks when it saw the the black duck with me wasn't running away like the other ducks. Eventually the mallard jumped up onto the ground and darted at the black duck and the black duck came near to me again, and then I ran the mallard back into the pond. I picked up the black duck again and went to an inlet to the pond and sat there with it for a while. The rest of the ducks in the lake, typically cowardly, swam to the other side of the pond nearly, but two parties broke off at two different times, investigating I'm sure as to why the black duck was with me. But eventually both parties joined the rest of the ducks. I was getting pretty depressed because I knew that as soon as I left that the duck would probably forget me, and that it would hardly be good if the duck bonded to me and stayed away from its friends. So, I said goodbye to it and walked away slowly, seeing if it would follow me. It didn't, but I headed back again and it swam up the side of the lack next to me and after a few minutes I touched its beak, and then left. I came back about two hours later and finally found it near to where I had caught it, and it was with some ducks again to my relief. It stayed behind when I videod it, but after about a minutes of looking at me sideways, walked off with its friends.

Shawn Hannity's Worthless Religion

2009-08-27T15:50:00.000-07:00

Today, Shawn Hannity showed once again how Catholics really feel about God, when he said on his radio show,

"I don't care what a person says or does, I really don't." And this is the same Shawn Hannity who a few days ago entertained being president, saying, "I've never made a decision in my life without [God] – whatever destiny God has you've got to fulfill it, I'm not sure that's my destiny." when another evil Catholic, Phil Cunningham, tried to persuade him, again, to become president. There is even a problem with him saying that, despite it sounding good:

1) You don't need to know God's will for your destiny to be carried out by God, so Shawn wrongly implied (like a typical God-hater) is that we share in controlling our destiny by knowing God's will (and who in the Hell knows God's will besides what the Bible tells us about it?).

2) For Shawn, as a Catholic, to speak about God destining anything is AGAINST official Catholic doctrine, which teaches that we must earn our forgiveness by good deeds and keep it by obedience to God's Law.

3) It's also hypocritical of Shawn to teach that God destines anyone since Catholics vilify "Hyper-"Calvinists (Christians who teach God destines everything) and Calvinists in general for teaching that God destines who will be forgiven (and therefore who won't be forgiven).

But does this mean Shawn isn't a Catholic and that I've therefore wrongly attacked Catholics? No: Catholics often contradict themselves like this, especially when they are being show-offs for the world, trying to sound and look wise and holy rather than actually say what is wise and actually being holy. They let their mouths babble, being careless about what God's will really is, ironically. I am reminded of this verse again:

The Lord says:
These people come near to me with their mouth
and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are
far from me. Their worship of me is made up only
of rules taught by men.
Isaiah 29:13

Ian Punnet and His Careless Mouth Blaspheme Again

2009-08-23T00:27:00.000-07:00

According to Ian Punnet, who stupidly supported the Coast to Coast AM shows title of their show tonight, which is "Fundamentalism and Cults" (thanks a lot liberals!), the preaching of the family is and isn't heresy, [and that it isn't because], "[this is] the prosperity gospel [of] Calvinism...", saying that some were chosen and some weren't. What HELL? IAN, Calvnists OPPOSE PENTACOSTAL ARMINIANS: THEY ARE THE ONES THAT CAME UP WITH THAT. And what the Hell does the prosperity gospel have to do with "some are chosen"? Ian, Calvinists teach that God chooses everything that happens, and indirectly what living things think, that's not the prosperity gospel as you call it. The prosperity gospel is taught by Pentecostals, mainly Arminian Pentecostals, and it IS a heresy because it teaches that God will give you 100 times the amount back that you tithed soon, if it was to any Christian congregation (but of course the ones doing the preaching promote their own ministry/ies 99% over other congregations' ministries), that you'll be repaid soon, if you tithe with faith, and that if you don't have faith when you tithe, or not enough faith, that you won't get your "100 fold" in repayment.

In addition to that, what kind of title is "Fundamentalism and Cults"? Are you Coast to Coast AM employees so stupid you think that a cult of people who preach AGAINST Fundamentalist Christians and would be happy to see them all in dungeons or slaves in their homes, should be called Fundamentalists? THOSE ARE LIBERALS, NOT "FUNDAMENTALISTS". And though you said "fundamentalism" you are a fundamentalists too by your stupid midefinition of that word. Fundamentalism by your definition means that because you have definite beliefs and follow them, that you are a fundamentalist, therefore you are ones too Coast to Coast AM crew who supported the title of the show. Please use a dictionary and look up the difference between fundamentalism and liberalism, they are not the same, stop bullying fundamentalist Christians and the Muslims you stupidly associate with fundamentalist Christianity in your bigotry.

And how in the Hell can you not know what Calvinism is by now after having me refute you on your blog many days ago? I was the second one to comment and that didn't catch your attention? Are you so self-centered?

Would you stop preaching in ignorance and further you also spoke carelessly in that you didn't clarify what you meant by what the heresy is? Yes you said Jesus shouldn't be likened to Hitler but you said that many minutes ago not everyone may have understood what you meant. Stop speaking carelessly when it comes to Christ and stop casually risking the lives of other Christians!

Yahoo! quietly Removes Yahoo Answers Link In Homepage Revamp

2009-08-22T01:11:00.001-07:00

Notice anything missing from the new Yahoo! homepage? It's missing the Yahoo! Answers link. What's wrong Yahoo stockholders? Finally realizing what a shameful failure your propaganda anti-Christian venture was? You can read more about their sneaky ruse here.

Area 51 Hoaxer Calls Into Coast to Coast AM Once Again

2009-08-21T23:49:00.000-07:00

About 4o minutes ago the Area 51-employee-on-the-run hoaxer called into Coast to Coast AM, it was obviously him/her, having the same style of speech and same voice, and George Noory, who was hosting, noticed the caller wasn't breathing through their nose and called him/her on it. The caller was pretending to have some ghost experience. George didn't warm up to the caller and it seemed like he recognized his/her voice. To my amazement he took his mind off the caller entirely it seemed and focused fully on the next caller. I was surprised George was able to laugh after hearing that sickening hoaxer lie yet again.

Scientist On Coast to Coast AM Introduces Breakthrough Nonsense Explanation for Everything

2009-08-19T00:14:00.000-07:00

On 8/19/2009, George interviewed an atheist guest named Nassim Haramein. According to Nassim, gravity is information moving out and electromagnetism is information moving out, and this is feedback, and it's this feedback is what generates consciousness and the universe ordered itself into extreme complexity and continues to, and how life was able to be created, survive, live well and evolve and learn, feel and multiply. Nassim doesn't have any evidence for his theory at all. The end.

Nassim knows that the so called "Big Bang" can't explain the ordered complexity in the universe, yet promotes this magical theory which is just as baseless as a big explosion creating a complex ordered universe, let alone one with living, replicating, self-aware, feeling beings in it that enjoy things and hate things.

Nassim also said, "I think dark matter was invented because our calculations didn't work out... we've done that many times." Who is "we"? It's not the Young Earth Creationist Scientists. Though some might think Nassim said that because he doesn't consider that group to be valid scientists, he did say early in his interview that creationists had good arguments for their beliefs. So, I believe, he was speaking careless and arrogantly, trumping up atheist scientists above creationist scientists (which would make sense since he is an atheist), otherwise he would not have spoken of young earth creationists as having accepted the dark matter theory or having helped come up with it. Or, by "we", he meant his type of scientists.

Update (At about 1:23 A.M.) Nassim said, "I fundamentally don't believe in evil. I believe in confusion. ... Our world has a tendency to become quite violent." Violence is defined as evil, Nassim has then contradicted himself, unless he'd truly like us all to believe that violence is a good thing or isn't evil. Nassim is definitely confused. At least he believes in that, hopefully he'll acknowledge that he too is confused.

Afterwards, when asked about Karma, Nassim babbled about how it's been talked about (no really?), and described it as feedback. Apparently Nassim doesn't doesn't believe in good or evil.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Update (12:27 A.M., 8/20/2009):

I just looked at Nassim's picture, I recognize him: I saw him last year on Youtube promoting his wacky "theory of everything" theory. He's a very confused person.

P.S.

George also interviewed guest Jordan Maxwell on his show before Nassim was on. Jordan is a symbologist who denies the obvious teachings of the Bible and replaces them with shallow "hidden" meanings that are not useful for anything. He said that the gospels were all metaphors. I imagine he thinks one of the hidden meanings of the gospels is that God and Jesus are the sun. That is some of the type of stupidity Jordan teaches, and often he won't say what he believes in and claims that this is because he's afraid for his life even though he knows men like Alex Jones and millions of others say what he claims would get him killed or tortured in prison. Obviously then he says things like that to try to make himself appear more valuable then others.

He also claimed last night that the swine flu vaccine wasn't a danger and that there was a secret meaning indicated by the name of the vaccine, but claimed he was warned by the FBI, with the phrase, "You better watch your mouth." Sure. Really though, he should take that advice, because he speaks with carelessness, as in, he doesn't care what God thinks, what Jesus thinks or any Christian, despite his repeated claims to hold the Bible in high regard. What he holds in high regard is his own feelings, his own opinions, and that includes his hatred for those who tell the truth.

Jordan, you're somewhat good at creating an air of mystique around you and duping the gullible, but that doesn't show high regard for the truth, or the Bible. What you symbolize is sin, and the air around you is sinful and stinks badly. Hear is a threat you should take seriously:

You better watch your mouth: stop being pretentious, stop being arrogant, humble yourself and accept God's will with love. Stop misdefining love in whatever way suits you, and stop hiding behind the study of symbols. Promote what Christ said is the greatest law: "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your mind..." and the second, "Love your neighbor as yourself" and "Do to others as you would have them do to you." Would you want others to treat you as less valuable then them? Would you want them to lie to you when you wanted to know the truth? No.

My Journal Continued on Livejournal

2009-08-09T22:59:00.000-07:00

I've continued my journal here:

http://djknight.livejournal.com

and may recontinue it here due to some atheist stalkers who have followed me out of Yahoo Answers! no thanks to the sicko moderators there and their CEO who refuses to do what is good.

I Knew Comcast Was Cheating Me!

2008-03-28T22:11:00.000-07:00

By DEBORAH YAO,
AP Business Writer Thu Mar 27, 5:21 PM ET

PHILADELPHIA - Under pressure from federal regulators, Comcast Corp. reversed its stance over hampering online file-sharing by its subscribers and promised Thursday to treat all types of Internet traffic equally.

The Internet service provider said it will collaborate with BitTorrent Inc., the company that invented a more efficient successor to file-sharing services such as Napster and Kazaa, to improve the transmission of large files over the Internet — and it will eventually stop delaying file transfers based on the specific technology used.

Since user reports of interference with file-sharing traffic were confirmed by an Associated Press investigation in October, Comcast had vigorously defended its practice, most recently at a hearing of the Federal Communications Commission in February.

At issue was whether a service provider like Comcast has the right to control what types of Internet traffic it will let through, block or delay. Comcast said it needs to clamp down on heavy users of Internet bandwidth so others won't be slowed down.

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said that while he was "pleased" that Comcast has reversed course, he remains concerned that the nation's largest cable company isn't stopping the practice now. Comcast gave itself until year's end.

"While it may take time to implement its preferred new traffic-management technique, it is not at all obvious why Comcast couldn't stop its current practice of arbitrarily blocking its broadband customers from using certain applications," Martin said in a statement.

Martin said the FCC will remain "vigilant" to ensure consumers can access any lawful content online.

Consumer-rights groups say the FCC should still act to protect consumers against other "discriminatory" network-management practices.

"Any arrangements made now would not cover any future developments in blocking, throttling or filtering that any other companies may use," said Gigi Sohn, president of Public Knowledge.

Consumer and "Net Neutrality" advocates have accused Comcast of playing judge and gatekeeper for the Internet by secretly blocking some connections between file-sharing computers. They also accused Comcast of stifling delivery of Internet video, an emerging competitor to its core business.

"This deal is the direct result of public pressure, and the threat of FCC action, against Comcast," said Marvin Ammori, general counsel of Free Press, a media reform group. "But with Comcast's history of broken promises and record of deception, we can't just take their word that the Internet is now in safe hands."

Comcast did not specify how it would manage traffic in the future but said one option was to delay file transfers for the heaviest downloaders, regardless of the specific mechanism used, as the company has been doing.

Comcast said it also was monitoring Time Warner Cable Inc.'s experiment in placing explicit caps on the monthly downloads for new customers in Beaumont, Texas. Subscribers who go over their allotment will pay extra, much like a cell-phone subscriber who uses too many minutes in a month.

But Comcast may be wary about charging certain users more because of competitive pressure, especially after rival Verizon Communications Inc. said recently that such traffic is legitimate and that its FiOS network can handle the flow, said Harold Feld of Media Access Project, a nonprofit advocacy group in Washington, D.C.

BitTorrent and the eDonkey protocol are used for about a third of all Internet traffic, according to Arbor Networks.

The vast majority of file-sharing is illegal distribution of copyright-protected files. But file-sharing is also emerging as a low-cost way of distributing legal content — in particular, video.

Comcast initially veiled its traffic-management system in secrecy, saying openness would allow users to circumvent it. The company now promises to release details on the new technique and take into account feedback from the Internet community.

Comcast and BitTorrent said they want to work out network management issues privately, without government intervention.

BitTorrent acknowledged service providers have to manage their networks somehow, especially during peak times.

"While we think there were other management techniques that could have been deployed, we understand why Comcast and other ISPs adopted the approach that they did initially," Eric Klinker, BitTorrent's chief technology officer, said in a statement.

Comcast also said that the issue is larger than BitTorrent. It said it was in talks with other parties to find solutions, although the cable company might not have much choice.

Verizon recently announced that by sharing information with Pando Networks, another file-sharing company, it simultaneously sped file-sharing downloads for its subscribers and reduced the strain on its network. AT&T Inc. has been looking at similar collaborations.

But phone companies are better positioned than cable companies to deal with file-sharing traffic because neighbors don't share capacity on phone lines.

Shares in Philadelphia-based Comcast rose 17 cents to $19.88 in afternoon trading Thursday.

Associated Press Business Writer Barbara Ortutay and Technology Writer Peter Svensson in New York contributed to this story.

Yet these theives charged me extra for having to call them to restore my internet service and after their software messed up my ability to connect on top of it. On top of that they expect me to pay even higher rates and a whopper of a bill from last month. HELL NO, I WANT ALL MY MONEY BACK OR FOUR MONTHS FREE FOR PREVENTING ME FROM COMPLETING MY DOWNLOADS! THEY HAVE BEEN DOING THIS SINCE ABOUT 5 DAYS AFTER I'VE BEEN USING BITORRENT!

A Review of a Confused Yahoo

2008-03-28T04:35:00.000-07:00

A Review of
"Confused, Prurient and Amateur:
A debate is needed,
but this isn't the book to lead it,
By O. Buxton 'Olly Buxton'"

by Daniel Jackson Knight

Originally published here.

This is my review of Olly's review of The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet is Killing Our Culture

"Confused, Prurient[pretentious word] and Amateur"

"A debate is needed, but this isn't the book to lead it[citation needed][dubious][POV pushing]"

Because you said so.

"By O. Buxton 'Olly Buxton'[pretentious][redundant]" "Since Andrew Keen is so instinctively dismissive about amateur contributors to the internet[citation needed][dubious][ranting] - people like me - it's hardly surprising that I should instinctively dismiss his book,"

Do as you say not as you do huh? Yep, you're a true Yahoo Wikipedian.

"so let me declare an interest right away: I like Web 2.0.[ranting]"
And this has what to do with whether or not this book contains truths or lies how?

"I've been a contributor to it - through Amazon customer reviews, Wikipedia[citation needed], discussion forums[citation needed], MySpace[citation needed], Napster[citation needed] and so on - for nearly a decade now,[citation needed]"
And this has what to do with whether or not this book contains truths or lies how? Oh, and so you're right because you've contributed.; excellent Yahoo Wikipedian logic: It's you're feelings that matter, not the truth, and not doing as you say Mr. "No Citation Is Needed As Long As You Appease the Yahoo and Wikipedia Moderators".

"and I've followed the emergence of the political movement supporting it, exemplified by writers such as Larry Lessig and Yochai Benkler, with some fascination.[citation needed]"
And this has what to do with whether or not this book contains truths or lies how?
"and no, I've never made a dime out of it (though I have been sent a few books to review, not including this one).[citation needed]"
And this has what to do with whether or not this book contains truths or lies how? Mr. "Didn't Get a Dime (But Wait: I Did Get Free Books)" you get man-praise from like-minded liars which you clearly love more than God-praise for telling the truth.

"Andrew Keen is that classic sort of British reactionary: the sort that would bemoan the loss of the word 'gay' to the English language, and regret the damage caused by industrial vacuum cleaners on the chimney sweeping industry.[citation needed]["personal attack"][ranting]"
True Yahoo Wikipedian babble. And aren't personal attacks against the rules of both Yahoo Answers and Wikipedia and isn't POV pushing against the rules of Wikipedia? Blind much? Hypocritical much? Repeatedly forget what truth, evidence, reality, hypocrisy and contradiction mean much?

"His book is an empassioned[spelling], but simple-minded, harkening[spelling]"

Did you mean "impassioned" and "hearkening"? Hey, if atheists can dote on spelling errors of Christians, can't I at least point their's out? Atheists love to make fun of Christians for not using a spell checker; will they do the same to you?

"to those simpler times which concludes that our networked economy has pointlessly exalted the amateur, ruined the livelihood of experts, destroyed incentives for creating intellectual property, delivered to every man-jack amongst us the ability - never before possessed - to create and distribute our own intellectual property and monkeyed around mischievously with the title to property wrought from the very sweat of its author's brow.[citation needed]"
And besides missing yet another citation and getting that 132nd thumbs up for it, can you speak in a way that makes sense to everyone rather than pretending to be an expert on the truth by using awkward grammar and phrases posing as eloquent Shakespearean speech?

"Keen thinks this is a bad thing;[citation needed] but that is to assume that the prior state of affairs was unimpeachably good.[dubious]"

Who made this assumption? You, or him Mr. Weasel in the "But"? Isn't weasel-wording against Wikipedia's rules too? You don't even seem to be an amateur with your repeated violations of Wikipedia's Universal Religious Code. James the Wikipope and Essjay the Wikibishop shall hear of this.

"You don't have to be a paranoid Chomskyite to see the pitfalls of concentrated mass media ownership (Keen glosses over them), or note that the current intellectual property regime - which richly rewards a few lucky souls and their publishers at the expense of millions of less fortunate (but not, necessarily, less talented) ones, isn't the only way one could fairly allocate the risks and rewards of intellectual endeavour.[Pov pushing]"

Is this about the book's content or your views of the value of Wikipedia and Yahoo! Answers as a source of useful references let alone truthful references? You know personal commentaries not on the book but what the book talk about in the review space is against Amazon's rules right?

"Keen's world is one where there is a transcendental reality; a truth, purveyed by experts, trained journalists, and in great danger of dissolution by the radically relativised truths of Wikipedia where the community sets the agenda, and if two plus two equals five, then it is five.[citation needed][pretentious ranting][POV pushing]"

"So much Big Brother: Orwell's novel gets repeated mention,[citation needed] it apparently having escaped Keen that a media owned by a concentrated, cross-held clique of corporate interests[pretentious ranting] - which is what the old economy perpetuated[pretentious ranting] - looks quite a lot more totalitarian than publishing capacity distributed to virtually every person on the planet.[citation needed][pretentious ranting][POV pushing] "

"Keen laments[pretentious wording: Keep it simple genius; I know you hate kids and teens but wish to impress them at the same time, but not all of are mindless followers who enjoy hearing you pretending to be Andy Rooney] the loss of a 'sanctity of authorship'[citation needed][pretentious ranting] of the sort which vouchsafed[pretentious ranting] to Messrs Jagger and Richards (and their recording company)[citation needed] a healthy lifetime's riches for the fifteen minutes it took to compose and record Satisfaction[citation needed] (notwithstanding their debt - doubtless unpaid - to divers blues legends from Robert Johnson to Chuck Berry) and seems to believe individual creativity will be suddenly stifled by undermining it[weasel-wording][POV pushing][entire quoted section is here is word salad]"

"There's no evidence for this (certainly not judging by MySpace, the proliferation of blogs, Wikipedia, and so forth, as Keen patiently recounts), and no reason I can see for supposing it to be true on any other grounds.[citation needed][POV pushing]"

And show us your citation for "no evidence" for whatever the Hell you meant by your word salad up there. Dosado, mix those words 1 2 3, swing your partners, now clap your hands, rant and rant to all your fans, harass to death every man! Yaaaaaahoooooo!

"On the contrary, Yale law professor Yochai Benkler in his excellent (and freely available!)[citation needed] "

Yaaaaaahoooooo! This is also freely available: mininova.org/tor/1273681 and so is cheap candy and bug-ridden freeware.

"The Wealth Of Networks has a much more sophisticated analysis:[citation needed]"

And "more sophisticated" is what matters most don't ya know, not the truth! True Yahoo-Wikipedian logic: "using uncommon words and complex wording to make yourself look as wise as genuine wisemen matters more than being a wise man."

"there is a non-market wealth of information and expertise - residing in heads like yours and mine - which the networked economy has finally unlocked, for the benefit of all, and at the cost of the poor substitute that preceded it.[word salad][Pov pushing]"

"That this might have compromised the gargantuan earnings capacity of one latter day Rolling Stones (to the incremental benefit of a few thousand others) is far less of a travesty - and more of a boon - than Keen thinks it is.[citation needed][word salad][POV pushing]Now rock bands have to sing for their supper. [citation needed][pretentious wording][word salad]"

And what does copyright law being broken (which is against Wikipedia's rules) have to do with whether or not Wealth Of Networks or Cult of the Amateur say anything worth listening to?

"Keen may regret that but, as a concert goer, I sure don't.[weasel words][POV pushing]"

And why does it matter, that you, a moral ignorant, "sure don't"?

"Keen also, irritatingly, keeps returning to the Monkeys and Typewriters analogy (writes your dear correspondent, a monkey).[citation needed][pretentious rant][POV pushing]"

"It is true there may not be much talent behind the infinite typewriters,[rant] but the evolutionary lesson is that there doesn't need to be,[citation needed][POV pushing]"

Since when are evolutionary lessons automatically are true and useful or any lessons? Thanks for those revealing weasel words DARWINIST. Yet another Darwinist defending Yahoo! Answers, the Myspace forums (where a Satanist and some anti-Christian were harassing me and who myspace banned for it. Would you like to see the confirmation emails I received? Or should I not allow the chance of another Darwinist to harass me with emails?) Using your logic creation science theories are also true and valid merely because they've been used as lessons.

And it's "true that it's maybe true" lol? Actual quote from you: rearranged so that everyone can more clearly see nonsense you said: "It is true there may ... be not much [truth]". And did you mean "It's true THAT there" Mr. Communication Expert?

"as long as we have tools,[citation needed][POV pushing]"

Oh, so as long as "we" have tools (including us creationists, Calvinists right, and anti-"the truth isn't important; all you need is references which appease the Yahoo and Wikipedia moderators"ists, right?) then the tools will magically make us do what's useful. I think I'll add that line to my book of arguments against God: "but we have tools and as long as we have them, we can defeat God and don't need the truth."

Wow you're still ranting and the amazon moderators have allowed your dissertation to remain long enough to get 131 votes up since July 24, 2007. How hypocritical that amazon kept removing my review, a "dissertation" as one amazon moderator called it, and which his master agreed with, despite it being shorter than your rant. Biased they are, just like you.

"be they Google algorithms or manual reputation management devices (things like Amazon's 'helpful review' voting buttons):[citation needed][POV pushing]"

Oh yeah, don't you know anti-Christian trolls voting down my review on Bean-zyme as soon as I made it, and creating new accounts to vote any reviews I've made down when they see someone has voted it up is just so useful? Funny how Calvinists don't use the same deceptive tactics. Is that because we're less evolved? Would you like us to evolve and create dummy accounts to vote you down?

"to sort the wheat from the chaff.[pretentious ranting]"

Would you like to give credit to the Bible for that unnecessary sentence? Or would you like everyone to believe that you're just really original? Give honor to whom honor is due credit-thieving Darwinist. Truly you are like your father Darwin who stole credit for the theory of natural selection from Edward Blyth (a creation scientist) and whose lovers continue to do so today on the Charles Darwin and Origin of the Species pages on Wikipedia.

"And like it or not, we *do* have these tools:[pretentious ranting][POV pushing]"

See the last three replies Mr. Pom Poms. And what does this part of your rant have to do with whether or not this book says anything useful? Time-wasting, opinion-parroting, feelings-basher?

"they're the sine non qua of Web 2.0,[pretentious ranting] the thing without which it would never have got off the ground.[citation needed][POV pushing]"

"And Wikipedia (or Linux, or eBay, or Amazon's customer review system) is potent evidence of that.[POV pushing][ranting]"

YOU JUST MENTIONED THOSE THINGS REDUNDANT TIME-WASTER, example: "be they Google algorithms or manual reputation management devices (things like Amazon's 'helpful review' voting buttons)". Evil opinion-basher: Stop ranting and repeating yourself; you are personally attacking in hypocrisy.

Sickening, you're still babbling:

"That there are notorious cases,[pretentious wording]"

"a few of which Keen recounts,[citation needed]"

What's wrong, don't want us to learn about Essjay the lying Wikipedia moderator and the incredible stubbornness of James, owner of Wikipedia, to admit it and get rid of him? Is that why you don't cite what you're talking about?

"doesn't detract from the fact that Wikipedia is largely comprised of brilliant articles,[citation needed][POV pushing]"

Because ye said so. Since when is everyone a gullible, simpleton like you? Since when is everyone an "ignore the examples showing that mobs cannot trusted" type like you are? And how arrogant that you pretend to be the representative and think you are, of 30+ million Calvinists and other countless numbers of Christians who don't worship Darwin or your mob moderators. Delusions of Grandeur much? Do you have any references that show you speak for the 30+ million Calvinists and anti-Darwinists?

Wow, please, shut up already:

"with helpful links and useful surrounding discussion, a complete history, and those articles that aren't so good are obviously not: all you need to pack for a visit is your critical faculties. Again, if the choice were blind faith[citation needed][POV pushing] in Encyclopaedia[weasel word][personal attack] Britannica"

Did you mean Encyclopedia, or pedophile? Got something on your mind that you'd like to share with us Mr. Paedia?

"or a sceptical"[Britishism]

Did you mean "skeptical"?

"read of Wikipedia, I know which I'd have, and which I'd counsel for my children - especially since Wikipedia is automatically up-to-date,[citation needed][POV pushing] "

If your idea of skeptical reading is to claim without evidence that Wikipedia magically updated whenever new information about THE TRUTH (oopsie, Wikipedia ain't about the truth it says as well as one of their harassing moderator repeated to me) is p made then you are a extremely deluded moron. Hopefully your kids are already sick of your over-weening pride and have seen through your gross, immoral, stupidity.

"preternaturally[pretentious wording (kids, look in the dictionary, your dad is playing scholar again)] "

"following the zeitgeist,[pretentious word] and replete[pretentious word] with good know-how on things that Britannica would never have in a million years.[citation needed][dubious][POV pushing]["personal attack"] "

Are ya done playing scholar yet? Oh no:

"Most of the time, we don't need a nobel-prize certified article,[citation needed][pretentious ranting]"

"and in Britannica wouldn't get one anyway,[dubious][POV pushing]"

"if what we wanted to know about was *The Knights who say 'Ni'.[pretentious rant]"

Stop ranting please. No, he won't:

"Elsewhere Keen misunderstands Adam Smith, Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jaques Rousseau, the Correspondence Theory of Truth,[dubious][citation needed] "

"implies that traditional media isn't systemically biased, assumes his fellow men have no sense of scepticism whatever (because something is watched on YouTube,[citation needed]"

"Keen assumes it is necessarily believed true),[citation needed]"

"and constantly fails to see the double standards in his own arguments:[citation needed]"

"Complaining that traditional media is losing out to a swarm of unpaid, underresourced amateurs,[citation needed][punctuation: should end in a period (which would help make it look less like you're ranting. Oh wait, you are.)]"

Did you mean undererererersourced? Were you tired of ranting? I wonder if it's considered "poor etiquette" in Wikipedia's holy guidelines as well to not make sure you haven't posted any typos rather than simply because you didn't sign your post which automatically gets signed anyways. Hmmm, lsince Wikipedia's morality is backwards and petty... probably not.

STOP: You are vandalizing Amazon's review section and your review will be removed. Dang, it didn't work (must only work on creationists):

"Keen suddenly remarks 'but in reality it's often those with the loudest, most convincing message, and the most money to spread it, who are being heard'. Plus ca change, eh?[nonsense]"

Plus what? Are done gushing stupid garbage yet? Yet? Nope, Darwin still gotsum opinions to show off:

"Lastly,"

Really? We're almost there yet? Please? How about you stop the car now so us kids can get out and find some foster parents who aren't full of themselves? I'll trade you some printed pages of Wikipedia.

"Keen laments[pretentious wording] the passing of specialist record and book shops like Tower, whose 'unparalleled' and 'remarkably diverse selection' will be lost to us for ever.[citation needed][word salad]"

"Clearly he's no online shopper then,[dubious][citation needed][POV pushing]"

Dang, he doesn't shop online, he's bad, very bad. Is "Thou shalt shop online." part of the Web 2.0 religious code?

"since dear old Amazon[pretentious rant]"

"Dear" to you. You're not the spokesperson for Calvinists and creationists.

"would lick all of them put together[pretentious rant]"

What? Essjay? Essjay is that you? Come on, I know it's you Essjay.

"- but Amazon, he says, lacks the dedicted[typo] expertise of sales assistants"

STOP: It is considered poor etiquette (by uh) to post a long rant without at least checking for spelling errors, so that only your Darwinist friends can mock pagans and Christians for making them.

I thought this was the "last"? God bless you but can you leave now? I have a life you know, it's not about listening to people like you rant nonstop about how wonderful you and your "contributions" are oh Benefactor.

"that could have stepped out of Nick Hornby's Hi Fidelity.[pretentious ranting]"

(yawn)

"Except that it doesn't, since it has literally millions of them -[ranting]"

"people like you and me -[ranting][pouting]"

"who can offer our tuppence[pretentious wording] "

Where did you get these words? Wikipedia's page on How to Sound Like You're Smart and Even If You're An Ill-tempered Knows-nothing? Or was it that book, The Art of Verbal Self-Defense: For Dummies.

"worth gladly and without thought of recompense.[pretentious word][word salad]"

"The thing is, there *is*[pom poms]"

Still talking Mr. Lastly or should we called you Pom Poms?

"debate to be had here, though not quite the apocalyptic one that this author believes is necessary, and at times Keen touches on it, but his brimming prurience[pretentious wording] and needless moral disgust[ranting][POV pushing]"

Becuz, u, said, so. And ooooo damn his morals. Your Amazonian, Yahooligan, Wikipedian, Darwinian Truth-Don't Matter Just Evolution and Amazonian, Yahooligan, Wikipedian, Darwinian Approved References religion is the right one. I'm so happy that all I have to do is call myself an Calvinistic Christian or just an eternian to identify what I stand for.

Curls nose:

"- at the cost of level-headed anlysis[typo] and expostion[typo][pretentious rant]"

"- towards a community which has simply adjusted to the new social envinronment[typo] more quickly than traditional political and business models have makes this a poor entry for the purposes of kicking off that debate.[pretentious rant][word salad]"

Do I need to call the police? I said no solicitations, can you read spammer? What little you know about good and evil you are confused about; that's not debatable.

"In the mean time, Yochai Benkler's The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom and Lawrence Lessig's Code: Version 2.0 (neither of which Keen seems to have read)[dubious][POV pushing][pointless repetition]"

"might be a better place for interested persons to start."

A Mob Spokesman: Hey everyone, our mob of Congressman have decided to pass the Patriot Act (except presidential candidate Ron Paul). Does that men the FBI might come to your house and that you might lose some of your rights when they come to investigate you? Maybe, maybe. But which is more important? Your security, or your freedom? Maybe it's your security. It just might be a better country now that we get to spy on you whenever we feel like it. It just maybe might be the truth. So yeah. There.

Visit this excellent store and gain wisdom. Purchase a book to help me continue to expose lies and to spead the truth.

Things I Hate

2008-03-21T15:06:00.000-07:00

I hate

circumcision (God doesn't require that you chop off a piece of your private part anymore, so get over it and stop messing with baby boys' private parts, it's sick)

the U.S. gov. oppressive behavior. Stop the "drug war", stop the oil wars, stop the anti-intelligent design teaching in public schools war

Bill Gate's oppressive stupidity (Bill, please improve Windows XP in a way other than by fixing it's security weaknesses)

I hate it when

people judge a thing based on a shallow understanding of what they are judging (who forget "Don't judge a book by its cover")

stingy people expect you to be generous

people who ignore you for no good reason think that as long as they don't feel hate or call you a "bad" or "mean" word that they're not doing anything wrong

unfriendly people expect kindness from strangers, hearing the word "indeed" (sounds nerdy)

arrogant people use the pretentious comeback line: "do please..." as if the person thinks they're the queen of England because they said, "do please"

and when people complain that you're being negative if you complain and who ignore the good you do, and yet act like they're being "positive". Hints: complaining and criticizing isn't defined as "being negative" in any dictionary and I don't want any bullshit hypocritical religion of "Thou shalt not be negative in my eyes" whatever the hell that means, to your self. I've already got a God, and he's not you. If you don't like my speech then find somewhere else to play Speech Police instead of acting like you're being forced to listen to me by my mind control powers.

Stopped by the Wind and Sand

2008-03-19T13:49:00.001-07:00

I never made it, so there goes $40+. I got slammed by the wind and sandblasted and had to keep spitting sand out. It was hellish, I felt like I was going to die and only made it half way.

I applied for food stamps but they want me to meet with them on the 24th, and I just spent most of my plasma money on food, and am about to spend what little left I have before I go crazy from lack of candy.

I hate my life.

More Hellish Struggling

2008-03-16T13:33:00.000-07:00

If I make it to the plasma center, and don't, get arrested, or anything bad like that, I'll have to bike back home in 40 mph winds : (

Someone please help me

2008-03-16T12:06:00.000-07:00

I have to sell plasma again, but the wind speed outside is 21 mph. I wish I had something to cover my mouth with. Well, at least it's not cold outside this time.

Please, if there are any lawyers willing to help me sue the s.s.a. for damages, please contact me at oppressedbytheus-at-gmail.com

: (

Oppressed by the U.S.: Why Not to Trust the U.S. Governments or "The Assmblies of God"

2008-03-16T12:05:00.001-07:00

I started getting disability checks last year I think. I asked a social security phone operator if plasma "donations" counted as (reportable?) income and he or she said "yes". I think I even repeated because I was a little astonished since to donate plasma saves lives and because you don't get much for it (and for me it's a huge tormentuous effort to do so being that one of my disabilities is quick exhaustion), and maybe because it was apparent that only the desperately poor sold plasma.

Anyways, so I told them something like that I made $160 one month, and $80 another month (and the operator I noticed was rude, and said something like, "Look, you just said you made ___ this much and now you said ___" (part of my disability was my memory with numbers) and to my disgust, this confession turned into taking out much much more than I made, which I found out on Friday. Insanely, two operators appear to have misheard me about the plasma selling thing, and turned it into me making continuous income from it so that they counted me as getting payment each month totaling something like over $1400. But two days ago, I found out I only made $300, yet they've been cutting into my check so that where I was once getting something like $700 a month, it's now about $364. And because I'm relying on a prepaid debit card (no thanks to them keeping me from getting the money I needed to keep my bank account open), I get even less than that.

Though this may seem off topic, it's not, but I have been desperately trying to get a girlfriend / wife for years but have been struggling with poverty. There was this girl at the plasma center that I wanted to ask out, but she went outside and I wasn't allowed to leave or I'd have to restart the process of donating again. So I watched as she left, being desperate for money. For all I know that might have been the only girl I would have ever wanted to go out with that I could have. Things like that have been happening ever since they started taking money out of my check. It's hellish and feels crushing. I lost my bank account because of this, the only one that I was able to open because of my credit, being unable to pay my bills (guess why?) and couldn't pay off my paypal bill so lost my paypal account privilege.

I stopped attempting to get medical care or orthotics for my high arches (also part of my disability) and any medical care period because:

1. I think they took away my Medicare because of the plasma money they counted against me

2. they give me less that I can use for rent, and only about the amount I need for food each month, toiletry, laundry, and house cleaning supplies.

3. they took away my social security payments

Ironically, I stopped selling plasma because they told me it was income that I was required to report. And then, when I decided to start selling it again, it was winter, and I wasn't able to afford winter clothes to go donate. I suppose I would have made even more than $300 since I would have had the money to get an electric bicycle motor and complete a lightweight bike I had in mind (which I also wanted to use to get a job).

I can't even afford a landline and ran out of money for my cell phone a few days ago, and I think I'm about to lose my internet again because I can't afford it. On top of that, I'm using comcast internet who has been ripping me off on bandwidth big time; they've been disconnecting me over 3 times an hour every day and when I went to call them for a refund, my cell phone time had expired.

This hell from them has repeatedly driven me back to the depression that caused me to end up with suicidal thoughts, which I've been trying to fight off since I was 13.

I went to sell plasma again two days ago and was sand blasted by the wind, and since I couldn't afford goggles or a face mask, my eyes and mouth got sandblasted too.

When I went to bike home, I was nearly crying at times as I was so exhausted and angry that I was going through Hell all because of some idiot employees and their cold-hearted stupid managers that couldn't be bothered to make sure they knew what they were doing and who were too lazy to go and listen to the tape recordings of what I said.

I got so desperate I ended up writing a letter to them trying to convince them that I never sold any plasma.

My dad as usual let me know that he can't help me forever (and gets a stingy attitude on me almost all the time), and that really stresses me out because I'm always telling him I'm doing the best I can, and he won't believe me and when I tell him I want to sue for damages, he scoffs at me for it and tells me to keep silent and not make any enemies.

I've also been trying forever to publish some books I finished, but of course, I can't afford the book covers or the publishing costs for any publishers that will advertise my books! Guess why? On top of that I can't afford to repair my computer or a new computer (which keeps messing up on me and taking out my research and notes for other books when it freezes and suddenly reboots on me), so, the s.s.a. is indirectly hindering me from finishing new books on top of it.

I even have the proof that what I write is acceptable to many people, but will that do me any good if I can't even afford to get anyone to listen?

All this in turn has been messing up my ability to sleep and wake up early enough to sell plasma without having to wait 2 hours and 30 minutes just to get it over with (that's not counting the 40 minutes it takes me to bike there).

I wish the s.s.a. would do what's right and pay me back for putting me through Hell.

What's most ironic about all this, is that I spent a ton of my time on Yahoo! Answers helping the depressed and suicidal, trying to keep them from killing themselves and to have a good life. Meanwhile, I had atheists, pagans, and false Christians harassing me and reporting me and getting over 20 of my accounts deleted.

At the same time, I was hoping my reputation for helping others would be usable information on a resume to get a job at a nearby Calvary Chapel church.

I finally made a "run" of help on Y.A. that was only picked on once, by a moderator (big surprise) but when I complained, for the first time out of my tons of ignored complaints, my answer to one question was restored.

Now, if only I could get my life restored: For over a year I've stayed in my apartment because of how I would get mistreated and looked down on at churches for being and looking poor and for looking sad all the time. For example, a pastor called Pastor Galen of First Family Assembly Church of God in Albuquerque, N.M. said to me, after telling him about my money problems and disabilities, and being fired from my job, with a cold look, "You reap what you sow."

Why his cold response? Because I had sharply corrected his son, who is (unless he's married by now) an illegitimate pastor. His dad even unintentionally confirmed it when I asked him if he believed a pastor must be married, and he said, "yes". I wonder if he would have been honest if I had instead said, "Do you believe Dustin is an illegitimate pastor because he isn't married?"

So, I reaped what I sowed by deciding to admit to the s.s.a. that I made money from selling plasma, for deciding to be honest. So I reaped insults from Pastor Galen by deciding to turn to pastor Galen for help more than once, and being ignored by hum, and his son Dustin even getting in the way of me trying to recover money owed to me by one of his disciples. More offensive was that this disciple was someone who had joked that his church (the catholic church) got away with molesting kids, boasted about it, and then said he would make fun of his own son (if he had one) if he had gotten molested, and on top of that, afterwards, was called out to be rewarded for helping to sell pumpkins for Pastor Galen's church, when in fact he had sat in the trailor playing games while I was the one helping on two different years and in the first year, gave a $20 tip I was given (which I did however because I thought the people in the trailor there would think I was pocketing sales). But did I get called out to be rewarded? No.

Pastor Galen is the one who first said I was that my rebukes of Dustin were the most "venomous", "critical" (he needs to learn the definition of critical), and hateful that he'd ever read (I guess he's had his head in the sand during the continuous attacks of Satanists, atheists, pagans, and Catholics). He even implied that what I wrote was of Satan because I didn't sign what I sent to Dustin, which would make the gospels are Satanic too using that warped logic.

So, I gave $20 extra to Pastor Galen's church, helped them make money, and get told with a mean critical venomous spirit, that I "reap what I sow." Yes, I did reap what I sowed by helping you Pastor Galen and Dustin, Dustin who in cowardice sicked his dad on me to get rid of me. Yes, I did reap persecution by leaving a polite note at Whole Foods, telling them that I thought some questions on their employee test were anti-Christian. Yes, Job did reap what he sowed right Pastor Galen? Yes, Jesus did reap being mistreated for being poor, including being slandered, and including being slandered by you with your using God's word against me in revenge, and taking it out of context to do so.

Yes, Jesus did reap being tortured and murdered, right Pastor Galen? And whatever you say is true because you said so, or, as your son said to me in defense of his telling me not to talk to his disciple about his theft (even after telling him about his disciples sick jokes, which was few seconds after him justifying to me his helping keep adult strangers away from kids at church) :

"I'm the pastor, law of the land".

The law of the land = a pastor being able to do and say whatever he wants in other words. No surprise to me Dustin said that to me since while at a restaurant with him, before his declaration of American dictatorship, he said to me and the other Christians before him:

"I want to be just like my dad, he's a great man."

Hopefully, when I go to anymore Christians for help in the future, I'll not be let down by weak-willed ones like the "leader" Kevin Guido, who decide to break their word and abandon you, just because they feel like you might blame them if they fail to help you. I'm would like to know how pointing out how I've been oppressed excuses anyone, let alone leaders, to avoid helping you. Pretty ironic huh?: Tell a Christian leader you're oppressed, and be insulted and avoided by him. That's what will get you blamed Kevin:

Not doing your job, despite you saying that helping people is what, "church is for" (you should have included your small print commandment (unless you feel like they might get mad at you one day)

So much for your support groups. So much for protecting "your kids" (his college groups / support groups = his kids and protecting them from me = protecting the girls of his groups from me asking any of them out, which by him saying, excluded me from his groups, despite me sighing up with one of them and him knowing it.)

You know who I want to be like? I want to be like Jesus. Now that's a great man. Don't you agree?

AMERICAN MEDIA GIANTS STOP CENSORING RON PAUL!

2008-03-16T11:43:00.002-07:00

Youtube, or Google's owners rather, have taken Ron Paul off their presidential candidates page despite him having the most subscribers of all the candidates. Shameful. What's next Google, my blog?

Scorpion Tears

2008-03-04T21:57:00.000-08:00

I watched a video on msn about a man who was trying to get Americans to eat bugs as much as they eat anything else. There was this one scene where he put a little cooked scorpion on top of some other food, and I think because of the sad sounding music that was playing, I suddenly started to feel very sad for the scorpion.

Then I started thinking about all the animals dying everywhere, animals that were little smarter than little children, who all seem to feel pain and probably love amd joy just as much.

Then I thought about how Adam felt when he was told by God that he would have to eat animals (if that did happen). If it happened, he must have felt scared, very guilty, and very sad, having seen all of God's amazing creatures, and seeing how peaceful they were, but because of his one act of carelessness, would be reminded constantly of what he did by having to kill to stay healthy.

The Greatest Law of the Anti-Christian: "Do as I feel, not as the Bible says."

2008-03-04T06:55:00.001-08:00

Check out what this oh so wise and peaceful celsius233 from youtube, who thinks he knows everything about Christians, and who doesn't know me, said to me on March 4, 2008, 3:52 A.M.:

"Curious that creationists never allow people to freely comment on their videos or channels.
What exactly is it you people are afraid of?"

Here is my reply to you people:

1. Curious you people are too lazy to read past one sentence from a Christian who opposes your stupid shallow self-centered hypocritical morality, and call anything more then one sentence or a long sentence from a Christian "ranting", "nonsense", "whining", or "bitching", and say, "Listen to yourself, did you hear what you said?" Yet hypocritically claim that you don't have the time to read what they've said, and on top of that, as if you are being forced to read it all at once.

And hypocritically you demand that Christians read far more than one sentence from you, and carefully, or they, "don't want to listen", "don't care about the truth", are "close-minded", "just want to argue," or say to them "ignorance is bliss" when you are the ones doing the ignoring as best you can.

2. Curious you:

a. troll me on yahoo answers (see snipurl.com/stalkers)

b. troll me on wikipedia (see the history section of snipurl.com/stalkers and notice how the yahoo answers troll atheist novangelis keeps reverting pages made by someone criticizing him and his stalker friends or pages in which evolution propaganda was removed?)

c. troll me on digg (notice all the negatives on every comment I make?)

d. troll me on amazon.com (notice all the negatives on nearly all my reviews and the same atheists commenting on my reviews and the last review in which I point out that you people had it deleted twice? Notice that's not the only review you people have tried to have deleted?)

e. endlessly post snide baseless comments in the religion section of all websites, especially bashing the Bible when it clearly speaks against you

f. make false reviews on nearly all the christian books, especially the latest ones, and vote them 1 star no matter how much solid evidence it contains against evolution, the big bang, atheism, and for the Bible

g. PRE-block me on yahoo answers so that I can't email them or see their questions, answers, friends or fans

h. often have friendlock on on youtube, strong-arming anyone who wants to say anything to you to add you as a friend regardless if you are an enemy or not so that you people can prevent any christians that don't appear to agree with your feelings about their religion from saying anything to you at all

i. prevent Christians from making video responses to you on youtube and block comments from Christians

Therefore, according to your own JUDGMENT, you people must be the dishonest, truth-hating cowards.

Yet you people think it's o.k. for you to say whatever you want and whenever you want about and to Christians.

Yet if I or any other Christian blocks or screens comments or videos, gently refutes or reports hateful or time-wasting nonsense posted by you, then all Christians in the universe (who don't agree with your hateful opinions of God) we are automatically are "liars", "cowards", "drunkards", "close-minded", "insane", 'trolls", "stalkers", "whiners", "rapists", "hypocrites", "hatefully propaganda spreading for money and total control over everything", "disturbing the peace" and "harassing" you.

3. Curious you people call Christians mindless, yet you think you think you've always got something new to say that disproves Christianity, never bothering to see if someone already asked or said the same thing, never bothering to seriously consider or see if Christians already responded to it with a good answer.

4. Curious you people don't even bother to ponder let alone look to see if anyone has already asked or said something to a Christian but for no logical reason, and in arrogance, think ur a Christopher Columbus.

5. Curious you people constantly gush lies from your mouth and contradict yourself as I've shown you've done with your snotty, rankly childish and obviously wrong email, yet then have the nerve to say Christians are aggressive for no reason.

6. Curious after repeatedly being defeated in anti-Christian argument after anti-Christian argument you keep trying to win despite being shown to be wrong on all the essentials. You'd think that you people were illogically aggressive, bitter, sore-losing, prideful, violence-lovers who pretend to care about the truth but are really only looking to play tyrant over Christians for pleasure.

7. Curious you people think that YOUR mere sarcasm, YOUR mere insults, YOUR mere claims, YOUR mere belief, and YOUR mere doubt = proof, yet think you are scientists and say, "If the Bible said it I believe it".

8. Curious you assume all Christians are as dumb as you people when you hardly know any of them, don't want to know, and can't be bothered to listen carefully, and despite them repeatedly defeating you, even when you people engage in mass unjust torture and murder of Christians, including of Christian kids and babies.

9. Curious most of you people aren't scientists and repeat anti-biblical 'scientific' statements from atheist, pagan, or false Christian scientists as long as it's anti-biblical, yet if a non-Christian scientist repeats a scientific statement FROM ANY SCIENTIST, CHRISTIAN OR NOT you mock, "it's so honest of you to only mention scientific statements that fit the Bible".

10. Curious you people love to call Christians untrustworthy and hypocrites when they sin even slightly, yet you people do whatever you feel is best for yourselves, yet claim and act as if whatever you say can be trusted whenever you speak to a Christian.

11. Curious, you people hate it when Christians obey God, yet if they disobey him in the slightest, you call them untrustworthy and hypocrites.

12. Curious you people often resort to "I don't care" as your last line of defense when refuted completely, yet spent your time acting as if you cared about right from wrong and true from false.

13. Curious you people cite your own word or obscure sources or with few references which also cite their own word as evidence, yet if a Christian cites sources, including the Bible, it's just "faith" preaching.

14. Curious you people dote on a typo from a Christian or their use of a slang word, and claim it's evidence of a poor education or not being able to be understood because their English is too bad, yet when you people do the same, and a Christian points it out to show that you people also do the same, you call them petty, insulting, making low blows, or taking cheap shots.

15. Curious you people love to praise poor non-Christians as being oppressed by Christians or as being "holy" like Gandhi (who was a black-hater by the way) or the glutton Buddha, or the money-hording torturer Mother Teresa, yet when I pointed that I'm poor and jobless you people make fun of me as being lazy and not being able to afford drugs for my mental problems.

16. Curious you people glory in your mental problems and taking medication for them, yet make fun of me because im supposedly insane.

17. Curious you people love to claim I'm not a Christian because I'm "so hateful", yet if a "Christian" agrees with whatever you say, never scolding you for speaking evil after already being repeatedly corrected for it, or insults me for correcting you, they are "reasonable", "peaceful", "honest" and know what "love is" and "what being a Christian means".

18. Curious you people preach survival of the fittest yet imply Christians are evil for trying to survive.

19. Curious you people love to dish hatred but hate to take hatred of your hatred from a Christian.

20. Curious you people are allowed to do whatever you feel like, but not Christians.

21. Curious you people claim lying can be a good thing in certain situations or because it's "human", "natural", "helpful" and sometimes necessary to survive. Yet if a Christian who hates your morality tells a small lie, they are doing severe evil and are a hypocrite.

22. Curious you people do all these things and 99.9% refuse to stop in stubborn pride when it's pointed out, and say, "I don't care", especially in private to me, yet call me hateful and cowardly.

23. Curious after all these obvious points you people still think you should be able to say and do whatever, wherever and whenever you want, and that Christians should always pay attention carefully to it, or praise you for it, or totally ignore it.

24. Curious you people think if something is curious to you that whatever you say about it must be true, yet if a Christian thinks something is 'curious' you say or think that they're just ignorant and stupid.

25. Curious you people always have an excuse for your sick behavior, pointing the finger at everyone but yourselves, or trying to make everyone look equally guilty, even a little kid doing good to you, or saying, "Can't you take a joke?", "Why are you so uptight?"," Why are you so serious all the time?", "Relax." Yet if a Christian has a good answer, with derision you call it an "excuse" and say, "Can't you just admit you don't know for once?" or "You're not listening."

26. Curious you claim Christians are stupid for claiming not to know how God created the universe and that you do know how the universe was created any why it happened, how life came about, how life evolved, the purpose of life, and what will happen to the universe in the end. Yet you dersively say to them, "Can't you just admit you don't know for once?"

27. Curious you people are hypocrites like I've pointed out, yet if a Christian says something that points that out, whether one hypocritical thing or all of them, and you know they are a Christian, you call them hypocrites and mock, "Do as I say not as I do" and say, "You're not listening."

28. Curious you people claim that all Christians are the same, and refer to them as "you people" yet if a Christian says, "you people" you mock, saying, "Gotta love those generalizations", "Gotta love those stereotypes", "Yep, you know me".

29. Curious you people refer to yourselves as "non-Christians", "we", or "a group", and arrogantly speak for everyone, including the countless millions of "deceived" and "dangerous" who oppose you that you magically forget exist, and in your self-delusion, thinking there is only one Christian in the universe who opposes you. And yet even for that supposed one Christian you speak for, saying, "It is believed that man evolved..." or as if they can't possibly be a scientist, saying, "scientists say man evolved".

30. Curious you people scold a Christian and call them harsh, negative, critical, and judgmental if they gently judge a harsh judgment from you, because you claim they must "know" you (as in know your favorite color? Walk by your side and listen to you carefully for years? Know your contradictory, incomplete and poorly worded 100 Commandments?). Yet you people don't hesitate to judge the whole life of a Christian and lump them all together based on a moment of YOUR casual observation (or someone else's pathetic judgment).

31. Curious your kind approve of this childish reply to a Christian when they ask you anything about God, "There is no God," yet if they were to answer you that way when asking them about evolution you would no doubt accuse them of being anti-scientific and dishonest. Curious you people may take the easy, lazy, evil way out when answering Christians who oppose you, but they must walk over spikes for your mere pleasure.

32. Curious your kind resorts to bullying, torture, lying, careless illogical parroting, theft, and murder to get your way, even against your own kind, yet Christians who oppose you for it are the evil ones.

Though it may seem best to copy the tactics of these anti-Christians who refuse to stop harassing, to ignore them back and say, "Yawn", the Bible instead says to do good to them, by avoiding them if possible so that they won't condemn themselves, cause you to sin, prevent you from leading others to Christ or helping those who love him to love him even more, and to do good to them by blessing and praying for them.

May God bless all you anti-Christians.

Update!

On March 4, 2008 celcius the wise responded to the shorter inferior version of my list above! Are you ready of it? Note that it may not be wise to show it to your kids since it's a little harsh (apparently anti-Christians don't care about what kids are exposed to, not surprising to me since it matches their "Do whatever I feel like doing" commandment), are you ready? Scroll down:

"Get f[*]cked, spammer!"

I know I know it's just so, scholarly and, scientific and oh so undefeatable. For God is now forever refuted.

My reply:

Thank you for reminding me of one of your endless, lazy-brained, slanderous hit and run cop-outs, and shame on you for proving my point, or rather God's, which I already emailed to you:

"A fool finds no pleasure in understanding but delights in airing his own opinions." - Proverbs 18:2

I didn't mention this one however:

The poor use treaties; the rich respond roughly. - Proverbs 18:23

Amazingly celcius has allowed that and my previous comments to remain on his profile page. He seems to be one of those ultra-deluded types that are so deluded that they thinks what I've said truly proves him right and so doesn't bother to delete it.

Relying On a Mormon Isn't Fun

2008-03-02T13:53:00.000-08:00

Having to use the computer of a certain Mormon person who only wants to have fun isn't fun. He'd rather look at porn then help me spread the gospel. Hopefully he'll change, but I can't see how since he's already been through Hell and has a horrid life. If what he's going through now doesn't phase him, I don't know what will except Judgment Day, and by then, it will be too late.

Another Genius Atheist Challenges Me - Smell the Love

2008-03-01T18:19:00.000-08:00

From: trevorlarson-at-vandals.uidaho.edu
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:31:52 -0800:

" So i hear that you are a off the wall christian, well don't christians accept everyone for who they are and not tell them they are going to hell? and i also heard that you counsel christians why do christians need counseling? that makes a lot of sense. [...]"

My reply:

Why do Christians need counseling lol? That [question] stopped me from reading the rest of your email, no offense.

Use common sense.

Don't believe everything you hear, [...] are you gullible?

Don't be mentally and spiritually lazy; read the Bible carefully this time, it's already got your answer many times over, in fact, it's part of the main theme. There's also google and search engines like it, and I'm sure there's a church next to you somewhere. Don't be scared or the traditional Baptists or Presbyterians, usually they don't bite. You can hopefully go to a church and ask why Christians need counseling... lol.

You just made atheists look bad again.

That first part of your letter is going on my blog because man, that's funny, [(]though very sad[)].

God bless you.

Advice to atheists who email me, starting out with a hostile tone isn't exactly encouraging me to read your whole letter. Learn from history already, bashing, sarcastic insults, assuming, reasonless violence, laziness and murder will not get a God-loving Christian to bow down and worship you let alone or listen or read to whatever you want them to.

Note: Trevor's original letter was not bold, I did that to make it this post easier to read and to contrast his letter from my reply.

Cute Atheist Kara Isn't So Cute On the Inside

2008-02-28T10:42:00.000-08:00

Has turned out to be a paranoid morally blind atheist, social ignorant and poisoned with the stupidity of Darwinism. This is a young red head, about two years ago, waited with her friend in her car till I walked by to give me a ride to wherever it was I was walking. After giving me their numbers I called them and was friendly but Kara decided to play rude. I hadn't talked to her for two years till I decided to try and add her to my messenger again (she gave me her email) and she is so messed up in the head that she things saying hi to her every other time she comes on the messenger = stalking lol. She doesn't bother to find out anything about me, accuses me of (lol) trying to trying to lure young women (despite her having picked me up in person without knowing me) because I don't put my true age all the time (she stupidly assumed that I meant the age showing on my profiles) and I told her I don't anymore than everyone else does. On top of that she hadn't even bothered to look at my profiles hah, she just popped out that accusation based on a paranoid childish thought. I told her I don't always put my real age because of the psychotic atheists and false Christians like the ones pointed out extensively on snipurl.com/stalkers but forgot to mention the sick U.S. federal government which I'd even warned her was breaking the law on privacy, but which she also took as stalking hah (I emailed her three or four vids on the presidential candidates and how Obama voted for the patriot act).

She also claims I used two different emails to email her as proof I was stalking her but I have no idea what she means since I only first emailed her yesterday or the day before that and had used only one email address as far as I know.

I told her that if she had bothered to read my blog that she would have seen that I have no working bike, to which she replied, "walk". Sounds like she is into role playing doesn't it hah? So if Mr. Stalker with his oh so deceptively sexy profiles can't bike over to stalk her, he must walk in the cold, and to who knows where since she never told me where she lives and I've never asked.

Now I understand why she is obsessed with "her" animals: She sucks with humans.

Is anyone thinking, "Oh, she's just some young idiot, you can't judge all atheists by her"? If you are, 1) I don't; I judge all atheist by the many atheists I've met and observed 2) She's about 18 apparently, and wealthy enough to have learned plenty about Darwin and religion. She even told me she likes to read books. So, she has no excuse. Atheism clearly leads to major and increasing moral stupidity, stubbornness, mental laziness, and vanity.

So, be warned people of the world, here lies the bizarre rules of atheism on social correctness:

1. You musn't say "hi" every other time an atheist comes on to their messenger

2. You musn't email an atheist nore than once in three years.

3. You musn't answer an atheist asking you questions as to why you believe what you do because that's forcing them to believe something they don't want to (yeah, makes no sense, take that up with her not me).

Thanks again atheists of the world for demonstrating the awesome power and love of atheism and it's usefulness in the world. Not.

Atheists like Kara demonstrate to no end that both evolution and belief in it are not about "progress" but rather being confused, backwards, hindering and stupid. The "primitives" are Darwinists.

Charm is deceptive and beauty is fleeting,
but a woman who fears Yahweh is to be praised.
Proverbs 31:30

Brookers and Her Friend Lead Kids and Adults to Hell on Youtube

2008-02-23T11:20:00.000-08:00

On a youtube profile made by a silly and reckless user called Brookers is the typical stupid, life-wrecking and immoral preaching you can find from non-Christian zealots.

I am about to send them a letter that has responses to what she wrote on her profile page about passion (in the way she used it it means "compelled by, or ruled by intense emotion or strong feeling). My letter says,

You two young women are being offensive to God. I can say that factually being someone who is very learned in religion and history. I'll show you how you are deceiving the world for the worst, not better:

You: "Passion is everything,"

Says who?

"Passion is everything, it doesn't matter what you do in life"

Doesn't matter? So this doesn't matter?:

God: "Do not bear false testimony"

God: "Do not steal"

God: "Do not murder"

God: "Do not commit adultery"

God: "Do not hate your brother in your heart"

God: "Do not take your wife's sister as a rival wife"

God: "Love your neighbor as yourself"

God: "Correct your neighbor frankly"

God: "Do not mistreat an alien or oppress him"

God: "Do not pervert justice; do not show partiality to the poor or favoritism to the great, but judge your neighbor fairly."

God: "If one of your countrymen becomes poor and is unable to support himself among you, help him as you would an alien or a temporary resident, so he can continue to live among you."

God: "Do not take advantage of a widow or an orphan."

God: "Do not take advantage of a hired man who is poor and needy, whether he is a brother Israelite or an alien living in one of your towns. Pay him his wages each day before sunset, because he is poor and is counting on it. Otherwise he may cry to Yahweh against you, and you will be guilty of sin."

You: "and if other people think that you do it well or not.."

Ignore God? Don't listen to advice from anyone? Wow, what bad preaching, what evil, hateful, enemy-making, friendship and life destroying advice. You two obviously do care or you wouldn't be showing off and seeking the praise of men. What you don't want people to care about is truth that stands in the way of your selfish plans, that is obvious since you listen to those who praise you but reject and ignore those who oppose you with logical and truthful wisdom.

This advice however, from God via the ancients, is life-improving and life-saving advice that leads to permanent peace and happiness in the end:

God: "The way of a fool is right in his own eyes, but a wise man listens to advice." - Proverbs 12:15

God: "Whoever walks with the wise becomes wise, but the companion of fools will suffer harm." - Proverbs 13:20

God: "A wise son hears his father's instruction, but a scoffer does not listen to rebuke." - Proverbs 13:1

God: "Whoever loves discipline loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid." - Proverbs 12:1

You: "if you have a passion for what you do no matter WHAT that is people will see that and truly appreciate it"

Does that include child abuse, rape, theft, adultery, blasphemy, arguing hatefully, lying, and murder? So, now matter "WHAT" you say? Who in the hell are you to speak for the 60+ million Christians who God forgave and the countless angels who love him? What arrogance, what stupidity, what blindness and self-centeredness.

You: "and overall most importantly YOU will be happy !"

Does that include the millions of people in jail for having committed crimes of passion, those who are starving from being reckless in their passion, those who have hellish relationships with their children, siblings, husbands or wives or relatives from being passionately selfish and abusive? Does that include those who ended up brain-dead from a failed suicide committed in passion or those who attempt suicide or committed suicide from having become sorrow stricken from passionately being self-centered to the hurt of others?

Turn to God and get forgiven before you are killed by him and condemned for the evil and destructive teaching of self-worship you are spreading.

http://snipurl.com/prophecies

What are the consequences for not caring what others think or have to say as you hypocritically tell others to do?

God: "I have called and you refused to listen, have stretched out my hand and no one has heeded, because you have ignored all my counsel and would have none of my reproof, I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when terror strikes you, when terror strikes you like a storm and your calamity comes like a whirlwind, when distress and anguish come upon you. Then they will call upon me, but I will not answer; they will seek me diligently but will not find me. Because they hated knowledge and did not choose the fear of Yahweh, would have none of my counsel and despised all my reproof, therefore they shall eat the fruit of their way, and have their fill of their own devices. For the simple are killed by their turning away, and the complacency of fools destroys them;..." - Proverbs 1:24-33

But if you do listen and care: "...but whoever listens to me will dwell secure and will be at ease, without dread of disaster." - Proverbs 1:33

God: "One who is wise is cautious and turns away from evil, but a fool is reckless and careless." - Proverbs 14:16

Update:

A few minutes ago I just sent that letter to Brookers and her friend in two halves. I found this set of verses just now, in which Paul is speaking to a church in Thessaloníki:

"For you know what instructions we gave you through the Lord Jesus. For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you abstain from sexual immorality; that each one of you know how to control his own body in holiness and honor, not passionately longing for evil things, even like the Gentiles who don't know God; so that no one transgress and wrong his brother in this matter, because the Lord is an avenger in all these things, as we told you beforehand and solemnly warned you. For God has not called us for impurity, but in holiness. Honestly, he that rejects this, as a result, doesn't reject man, but God, who gives his Holy Spirit to you. " - 1 Thessalonians 4:2-8

To strongly care about something is not wrong, but to strongly care about only what will please you, or, or more about it then that which pleases God.

COMCAST IS GARBAGE

2008-02-21T17:34:00.000-08:00

Do not use comcast, they cut you off for downloading small amounts over a few minutes or hours. FORGET THAT. I think I'm going to report them to the BBB.

: (

2008-02-21T14:53:00.000-08:00

My other tube popped, and I was using tire levers this time, they sure were junky. Electric tape seemed to work at first but when I put them in the tire and started inflating them fully air started coming out again.

Well, at least I got a better tire for the rear. Too bad I can't use it.

Rare and Heirloom Seeds Offer, Trade

2008-02-21T09:29:00.001-08:00

If you are willing to grow up to 200 rare kinds of plants including trees that need different types of climates to grow, and who has the money and or greenhouses to grow them as soon as is best to grow the seeds from these plants (as opposed to when is most convenient for you) and is willing to send me the seeds packets I need to repackage the seeds, $20-40 for shipping and effort, and is willing to send me 20 seeds back from each kind of successfully grown plant (not every single plant) as soon as it bears viable seeds, then please contact me.

I have bamboo seeds, and I read somewhere that they don't bear seed any time soon, but I will still be requiring seeds from them if you successfully grow them to the point where they bear seeds. Alternatively, you can send me 20 cuttings of the bamboo trees that can grow into a healthy stalk themselves. But don't send me then when you can do so, but rather when I ask because at the moment I don't have the land to grow them to their fullest possible size.

If you can't manage that many seeds because they were damaged or the plant just did poorly then try again if you can until you can meet the quota. But if the plants you grow can't produce decent seed because the original seeds were just poor to begin with, then you are not obligated to send me any seeds from that kind of plant back since it won't produce healthy seeds.

Also, if you already had the type of seed or plant that bears the types of seeds I sent you, and your seeds are viable, then of course you don't need to send me any seeds back, but send me the ones I sent you back.

If you are you know of anyone willing to agree to the above terms please contact me at kyleain-at-gmail.com, and be ready to print out the above contract and to sign it and saying, on the document that you agree to abide by the terms.

Still Grounded by God

2008-02-21T07:10:00.000-08:00

I just spent what seemed to be 2 hours trying to get my front wheel inflated. I used electrical tape for this hole and cut in the 26" tube that wasn't holding air. Strangely it worked when the tube was by itself while inflated, but inside the tire and on the rim it would leak. And eventually I made major puncture in the tire using a round ended knife to get the tire tucked in.

Then I tried two 24" tubes I had, with slime in them and found out one of them had a puncture as well despite being able to hold air by itself. I punctured that one with a knife after a few minutes, and also the next one.

I also found out why the valve of the 26" tube was cut into: a poorly drilled rim hole, sharp on the inner cut.

It was from a bicycle that cost about $350. So far that's about 6 tubes down the drain in 4 months and riding the bike about 6 times a month.

Told my dad it's better to buy the parts separately so you can get the most reliable parts, but he never listens to reason when it comes from me.

Ironically, he'll complain about how expensive things are and implying I waste his money. He's the one wasting it by buying substandard things that end up breaking quickly.

Eeek

2008-02-20T07:06:00.000-08:00

Accidentally gave a bad review to a book. Good thing you can delete it, but then again I might never have written it in the first place if I knew it was so easy to delete. Sorry to the author and viewer of that page. I got no helpful votes up at least.

I Just Ate Dried Durian Chunks

2008-02-20T06:55:00.002-08:00

EW.

It's weird because the chemical distribution isn't even throughout the fruit apparently so that you get different flavor concentrations. In one chunk it had a planty taste, in one it had a burnt garlic mixed with sweet onions taste. The first chunk or two tasted like very sweet onions mixed with chives (ugh sick man), and at one point I can only describe as tasting this tropical like taste, as if I was tasting the island air, and at one point (the most pleasant) it was this like dried apple chunks with the sweetness but zero apple taste.

It smelled like, herbal wheat crackers and or crossed with chutney, and it smelled like bee pollen on one sniff. I think it smells like something else but can't think of what.

On the back of the package it says: Prime Minister's Export Award 2004.

The name of the product is Durian Monthong.

Well, at least it had a lot of vitamin c and I know what dried durian taste like now. I hope fresh durian is better and there is some variety out there that has just the sweet creamy taste without the nasty elements.

I Just Remembered a Sad Dream

2008-02-20T03:40:00.000-08:00

I was sitting on my bed thinking about things, and I suddenly remembered a horrible dream I had a few hours ago. I was in some sort of cross between a prison and mental institution. There was this young boy there who was disliked by the mean woman in charge of the place. I give him sort of Christian book before she locked him up in a cell or small room which I felt she did.

Months later it seemed (in the dream) I was going somewhere, maybe out of the institution, and I saw the boy wheeled by and when he ended up close to me and I looked at him, and from his wheel chair he seemed to smile and he waved at me. I felt saddened over him, and then I woke up and immediately forgot the dream.

I just realized after writing that, that it's not so unrealistic that alien abduction victims could suddenly remember something or fragments of events they totally forgot about.

Should The U.S. Federal Government Penalize the Disabled For Selling Plasma?

2008-02-19T17:12:00.000-08:00

One of my disabilities is that I'm easily exhausted, the plasma place is like 2 or 3 miles away, part up hill part flat part down hill for a long long way, part of the way is by a horse stable thing, a huge one, that reeks of horse p*ss and I have to smell it for what seems like 8 mins on the first pass.

My other disability is things sound way loud, so if don't have ear plugs in traffic I will mostly likely get blasted by sounds from passing vehicles and from their noisy motors or engines. It's so stressful I hate to go outside and often stay inside because of it.

Sometimes the wind blows hard, and there is sand on the road and it gets into my eyes or mouth. Not fun.

My current working bicycle keeps getting flat tires yet I hardly ride it, right now I'm stuck with a flat.

Should I choose to use the bus it costs a dollar and then another to get back.

I only get $20 regular so take out $2 if I choose the bus too and back from the center.

To donate I have to sit there waiting for maybe two hours unless I manage the near impossible and that's getting up early in the morning.

Then when I donate I have to wait for at least an hour for the plasma to drain from me.

While the plasma is drained I have about no immune cells to protect me from infection and must buy good food to get it back quickly.

The process is also very painful: getting a large needle stuck in my arm, and moving makes it hurt. One arm for some reason feels pain behind the elbow, so when I switch to it it's more painful then usual.

Also the person doing the needling sometimes messes up and that can cause scarring.

After leaving the plasma place both I and my clothes reek of what smells like formaldehyde for more than 2 days. It costs money I'd rather not spend to wash it out since I get so little from donating plasma in the first place.

On top of that if I put on sunscreen while biking I literally get blackened from the car smog. It's pretty embarrassing.

If I show up on a Monday to donate I won't get as much money, I think $5 less. Sometimes I would show up on Monday's because one of my other disabilities is memory problems with it comes to gauging time correctly consistently, and it gets harder to remember right if I get exhausted, as is the case with anyone with a normal memory.

Also it seems to drain your energy from donating plasma. Everyone who donates knows you will get tired after a few minutes of having donated. So besides the biking sapping my strength the donating does too.

I stopped donating for a long time yet both stupid clerks that heard me say I donated for some idiotic evil reason wrote me down as donating / getting income monthly from plasma, that is wrong wrong wrong yet they wanted me to jump through hoops to show that they were wrong.

They have decided that I must have over $1400 removed for donation money that was way less than $1400, way less.

For me to get that amount would mean I donated 9 times a month for 7 months in a row. Yeah, right.

Being the evil people some of them are, they decided that I stopped getting plasma income not because I said so, but but some reason that makes no sense, literally makes no sense. So they just make stuff up out of thin air to penalize you.

Because of that I stopped donating plasma. Too bad for the people that need it to live. Shame on whoever allows this kind of oppression, but God bless them, they'll be needing all the blessing they can get after what they put me through.

The greedy elites in the U.S. government = killers.

More Historical Facts Atheists Avoid Like the Plague

2008-02-17T06:31:00.000-08:00

100 Famous
Bible-Believing Scientists

http://unmaskingevolution.com/29-100_scientists.htm

No Donations

2008-02-15T14:43:00.000-08:00

Yesterday night a master wood craftsman spoke to me on AIM. It was nothing amazing. I asked him his religion and he told me he was an atheist. One of the first things he offered was a donation hah. About two hours ago I thought to myself (while waiting for my cable connection to work again because comcast cut me off for not paying my bill on time), how ironic that after heavily preaching since 2007 that the only person to try and donate to me, wasn't a Christian, but an atheist. It was funny at first, but then my nose started to curl. There was this one young Christian woman who offered, but she never sent anything. I turned him down, maybe for an illogical reason.

I think I'll switch to AOL at the end of the month since comcast is going to raise my bill to $60+ a month which is not worth it since every time I torrent share anything that seems over 10kb for a few minutes will get me disconnected. They do it about 3 times an hour. Qwest never did that to me and they were giving me DSL service.

Well I pumped my bicycle tires up but the front one went flat after an hour it seems. At least it got me to the grocery store and back. God was merciful again.

About that shopping list for the future I posted a few days ago, I forgot to figure in the medicated shampoo I need and phone bills, fertilizer, soap, shampoo, toothbrushes, a steam cleaner and detergent.

My Bicycle

2008-02-15T02:24:00.000-08:00

For the fourth time in three months my humiliating loudly squeaking front tire has gone flat, with tire slime in it, the green kind, not the cheap brown kind that the bike shops put in it. This is the third tube, the last one being from Walmart, made by Bell. I found out after trying to clean my apartment (a rare event) while trying to position my bike towards the door so I could go buy some food.

I wish someone would make some lightweight easy to install tire or tube that doesn't need inflating.

Lame Mormon Arguments from F.A.R.M.S. Exposed, Again

2008-02-13T23:45:00.000-08:00

I was reading a page made by F.A.R.M.s, a Mormon apologetics group, a page hosted by B.Y.U. to B.Y.U.'s shame. They aren't doing their students any favors by hosting such stupid stupid stupidity. The page is titled, "Archaeology, Relics, and Book of Mormon Belief [by] John E. Clark

John asks, "Again, if we stumbled onto Zarahemla, how would we know?

Zarahemla is an imaginary city made up by Joseph Smith (or if we are to believe his claim that he got his information from a seer stone, then is was some demon). John, we could know it by seeing if it matches the description of it made by the Book of Mormon. What other way? Would you like us to use a seer stone and consult the dead or demons? Or were you expecting us to believe your question was somehow evidence that the city existed? This question and this quote from his footnotes seem to be his strongest evidence:

"In truth, biblical archaeology is riven with pitfalls and difficulties. Archaeology has not confirmed the Bible in any nontrivial sense."

Yeah, attack the archeologically verified Bible (the genuine word of God which you clearly hate) because your Book of Mormon is archeology unverifiable:

"Hey Mormons hey world, the Bible can't be trusted anymore than the Bible, therefore you should believe the Book of Mormon just as much!"

What an awesome false point.

John doesn't seem to be familiar with Biblical archeology or manuscript evidence having made a historically and morally stupid point like that. And if he is, then he is condemned for denying the obvious that even Middle East archeology specializing atheists won't deny, that being that the Bible is historically accurate:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_archaeology

http://www.christiananswers.net/archaeology

http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i4/archaeologist.asp

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-archaeology-support-the-bible

http://astore.amazon.com/eternia-20 (the first archaeological books are on the 2nd page and continues for a while) and the last book on the 13th page of that store shows an archeological book on the Bible made by a famous atheist who has been used as a commentator on various shows. He doesn't doubt the Jesus of the Bible existed but only disbelieves in the miracles.

Not surprising to me there is a disclaimer on that page, written by who I don't know. It says,

"The views expressed in this article are the views of the author and do not represent the position of the Maxwell Institute, Brigham Young University, or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints"

That good to know, but what about F.A.R.M.S.?

About My Isohunt Poll

2008-02-09T22:37:00.000-08:00

I got an email from someone on a post I made in a forum a few days ago:

On Feb 9, 2008 7:13 PM, wrote:

"Your poll's at Isohunt have gotten alot of responses, At 5+ pages they are a hit, Thank you. You really should stop by and rebuke them, as the expert debater and speaker of the truth that you are.

PS Keep up the good work with the Blog, Man I didn't know there were that many stupid hypocrites
in the world.

Thanking you for your efforts to speak your truth."

Hi, I noticed from my stats that people have been coming from isohunt to my sad little blog ever since I posted to threads there. I haven't thought anything much of it. I guess in the back of my mind I figured it was just the usual atheist stalker types and rare christian supporter. In fact there was someone from aim called prepare4descent who was harassing me (going so far as to switch names when I blocked him) to try and get me to respond back in the threads. All that did was affirm to me that if I were to go back to respond to the atheists I would be playing into Satan's hand and get drawn in their usual time-wasting fighting.

There was one thing that annoyed me about the atheist poll I made, and that I forgot to put "I can't see God therefore he doesn't exist, and neither does anything else I can't see directly" as an option.

If any atheists thought I was stereotyping them well I gave many different options on the thread with the poll to say why you didn't believe in God, and I don't believe that all atheists are exactly the same and never had save that. I do talk about them in a way that sounds stereotypical however because most of them are the same. I've only noticed four out of what seemed like 1000 that were significantly more decent then the others. I talk to one of them now and then on my messenger. The conversations are nearly always shallow no surprise to me. I humor her often to get her to say something or to cheer her up. It was interesting for me to hear from her that she only cared about those "close" to her. Yet earlier had let me know she was adopted after I started talking about who should be adopted. I noticed she seemed to be adopted herself by her careful wording on the topic. The hypocrisy is that if you only care about those close to you, or should, then she never would have been adopted. It reminds me of the "I don't know you therefore I don't want to" line that shallow paranoid bitter people will use to make you go away when you attempt to get to know them or befriend them.

Also if any thought that my thread on atheists not and a stereotype, well, it wasn't. It was a response to atheists who believed they were morally superior to Christians and that Christians were mainly to blame for the world's problems, or religion in general. Most atheists I've met (99.9%) believe that every single type of religion does immoral or evil harm in some way. So, my point was, "are you innocent, are you perfect, do atheists never do anything evil?". And the answer of course is obvious even to those poisoned with hatred. There are some though who are so warped that they literally murder or ruin a person's life (like many psychologists and doctors do to their patients) and think they are doing good to them.

I don't plan on returning to the isohunt threads to waste time fighting. I stated what I what I had to say on those topics and my points were obvious, and I'd rather not experience a moderator deleting my account or locking the posts because, as a teenspot moderator once told me, "You're preventing others from talking" (rolls eyes). Yeah, hypocritical huh? One of the moderators there banned me and locked one of my threads (thereby preventing others from talking lol) because of that stated reason and because she had gone to the link I posted and saw a site I made which LISTED using numbers various sites with criticisms against various religions including Catholicism. She claimed I was insulting other religions by that site, even though the title for each category was merely: "The problem with...". So mentioning problems about various religions is forbidden on teenspot unless it's protest Christianity. That is the way of the non-Christian, to rage against you if you dare refute them, to play the hypocrite, to hide the truth at the cost of the lives of many because of the personal irrational hatred for God. When I made a new account right away to point out his or her hypocrisy for doing what she or he did (yes she or he was an anonymous coward) she or he replied, "I don't care," a typical non-Christian reply. "I don't care" = "I don't care about the truth, it's not welcome here." That is why I will only poke my head in momentarily to rebuke or witness in non-Christian forums. In other words, it's almost a waste of time. What's said has been said and the best Christians can do now is to make what they say more organized and well said and to make it more convenient to read and hear. Spending a lot of time in non and anti-Christian forums to witness will end up doing more bad then good in my opinion.

Satan rounds up nay-sayers to prevent Christians from leading others to Christ and to destroy anyone who already is a saved Christian. I was virtually stabbed to death on Yahoo Answers and was punished severely by the moderators. If you look at the history page on Yahoo Answers on wikipedia look for versions which make mention of novangelis being a troll and you'll see I got harassed pretty bad. Even this one atheist harasser named Gazoo admitted that a fellow atheist called gorgeoustxwoman was harassing the christians there and with a condemning tone. Besides being a major hypocrite for condemning her and not himself he ridiculously thought that I was her, meanwhile atheists love to pretend that they are not the conspiracy minded or paranoid ones.

I'm too disgusted to read what atheists have to say against anymore, they just either insult, repeat the same defeated arguments, even ones from many years ago, use inuendo, or take things out of context. When I hear them it's like listening to someone tell me they've just discovered the Earth round and that you are stupid because you haven't yet. I wrote a list of general anti-Christian attack tactics and it came out to something like 63 methods. I also wrote a book containing over 130 mostly common arguments against the Bible and Christians and ones I thought would be brought up in response to my refutations of them. I haven't published them or given them out for free because I'm not making any money from my stores and so am 'forced' to publish them in part for profit. I haven't done so yet because I get very little money each month and haven't been able to save up to pay for those things. It also seems that about no saved Christians will take my books seriously or read them unless I sell them in Borders, and other popular bookstores.

I've heard all Satan has to say and his blind minions have been rebuked thoroughly. They have no excuse for their attitude or behavior being that there are hundreds of thousands of living Christians, libraries, bookstores and the internet from which they can learn the truth, and if I manage to publish my books and get them well-known, they will have even less of an excuse.

The Origin of the Murderous Stupidity of Darwinism

2008-02-03T15:35:00.000-08:00

That would be Darwin of course, and before him the spiritualist and pagans he ripped off, and of whom learned to lie from Satan.

Besides being a credit thief who tried to hide the fact that he ripped off natural selection from a creation scientist, Darwin was very stupid too. Eloquent maybe, but he was very DUMB as is evidenced by what he considered proof of evolution. His followers continue in his steps of time-wasting thievery by inventing and making a show of idiotic 'proofs'.

Lisa Simpson, Moderator of Stupidity and an Incredibly Rude Hypocrite

2008-02-01T22:24:00.000-08:00

From the hate-filled time wasting James Randi forum system I received this time-wasting (and therefore rude) email and then an incredibly rude one from Lisa, am opinion-bashing hypocrite with a self-placed chip on her shoulder:

"*Automated response*

Unfortunately we couldn’t complete your registration for the JREF Forum.

We do not retain details of accounts that have not been approved however the most likely reason is that some required information wasn’t entered during the registration process (First name, Last name, Country and State if in the USA).

Please either try again to register or drop me an email and I will do my best to sort out any problems you may be experiencing.

**Note** my email address is lisa_simpson@randi.org, if you reply to the email address this email was sent from (jrefweb@gmail.com) it will cause a delay in our response to any query you may have,

Regards

Lisa Simpson
lisa_simpson@randi.org
JREF Forum Administrator
------------------------"

My Reply:

the hell did you remove my account for?

------------------------

Lisa Simpson's reply to me at 8:12 PM:

"Because you've already been banned from the forum. Even if you hadn't
been banned, this incredibly rude email would keep you out of the forum.

Have a nice day.
Lisa"

-------------------------

My reply to this absurd hypocrite:

Lisa the massive hypocrite:

From your regular rude and hateful member articulette:

"I hate creationist gobbledy gook, it sounds sort of like they are saying something, but they just aren't saying anything. Their whole goal is to muck up understanding and then insert god into the miasma.

I imagine that they can make individual people feel like they don't understand something, but when I'm able to understand every single post except those arguing against evolution and for some nebulous "intelligent designer" then I'm convinced that the problem is with them."

Questions for you: when will you stop being a massive hypocrite? When will stop being a defender of evil and hate? When will you stop spinning the truth? Lisa, you have no life, you are, a loser, you are filled with bitterness and hate. Stop taking your anger out on those who are not harming you and stop defending mocking murderous hate-inciting violence-mouthed villains like articulette and others like her. The reason you don't want me in your foum is because you hate the truth and hate being shown your real face. You are cowardly paranoid mentally and spiritual ill hypocrite.

You are a hypocrite Lisa, God is your judge and I am one of his millions of witnesses that you will have to face one day if you do not stop being a hypocrite.

God bless you lover of lies.

-------------------------

As any Calvinistic Christian knows who has gone to the Randi forums, the forums are regularly filled with genuinely incredibly rude rants like articulett's. Lisa knows this but has spiritual and mental problems when it comes to hearing the truth and being peaceful. She is like all her kind, a finger pointing accuser who accuses the innocent of doing the very evil she accuses them of.

Stuff To Buy

2008-02-01T17:39:00.000-08:00

My Personal Purchase List With Rounded Off Prices:

300-500 gigabyte hard drive ($80)
book covers for my books ($400 for 2)
an electric bicycle ($1300)
3 or 4 custom skateboards with accessories ($600)
land ($7000-$10,000)
tent accessories ($1500)
2 tents or or 1 tent and steel workshop ($1600)
winter mask ($15)
winter clothes ($100)
chairs ($300)
computer desks ($300)
boards games ($400)
30 or more books and a video on the Shroud of Turin ($300)
bicycle parts to complete a bicycle ($670-$1000)
smoking pipes ($300)
vaporizers ($160)
fencing ($?)
tiller ($90)
tractor ($500)
farm animals ($5200)
grills ($300)
grass seed ($200)
fishing equipment ($200)

Total: $24,545 total, not including the fencing.

At the moment I make about $300 a month. Yes, a month. It would take me about 7 years to get all this stuff assuming I kept making that amount. If I donated the maximum amount of plasma allowable each month it would take me about 4 years and 3 months. If I could get a regular job, it would take me a little over a year, assuming God lets me.

Yet Another Hysterical Anti-Christian Displays His Massive Stupidy for Us

2008-01-28T11:47:00.000-08:00

While reading the reviews for a book called The Historical Jesus I came across a typical anti-Christian rant in need of a smack down. In quotes are sections of the rant by "A Customer" and I've replied to them:

The title of his review:

"Please! Faith and historical research don't mix well."

Bcuz! You Said! So! So is that your atheist science lesson for the day? Why then do so many evolutionists believe faith that evolution is true mixes with historical research? Do you even know what faith means? Hint: It doesn't mean "belief without evidence" which you clearly think it means from reading your stupid rant.

"By A Customer"

What's wrong, didn't you have time enough to tell us who you were? Aren't you proud of your scholarly scientific review?

"If this is the 'factual' basis for the historicity of Jesus, then Christianity is in trouble."

Bcuz u said so, and whatever the atheist says is true is true. Not very scientific are you?

"What a joke."

Bcuz u said so, and whatever the atheist says is true is true. Not very scientific are you? Hint: Evidence doesn't mean, "Whatever you feel is true." Use a dictionary and stop being lazy.

"The 'evidence' -- ?"

That's your "evidence" so far --? Atheists, always wasting time with their stupidity and pretension.

"Well, it isn't there."

Am I the only one who feels like there a fly buzzing in my ear, or is it just me?

"I was very excited to read this book;"

Because you had new material to find imaginary faults in.

"it was recommended to me by thoughtful, intelligent Christians who I greatly respect."

I smell self-serving flattery.

"But the book was a real shock -- "

Holy mother of mothers! Really! Shocking!

"the author contradicts himself all the time,"

Bcuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true is true bcuz ye said it.

"the author uses the New Testament primarily to 'prove' the truth of the New Testament -- Hm..."

Hmmmm, he's trying to "prove"? So because it didn't convince your illogical self it wasn't proof to anyone else lol? Did you forget the meaning of proof too? Damn you're an arrogant babbler aren't ya?

Can you shut up already or come up with evidence? You're wasting my time.

"That's some fishy logic, no?"

No, whatever you say is not true bcuz u you posted a rhetorical question. Furthermore, questions do not equal evidence in and of themselves, sarcasm does not equal evidence in and of itself. You are really dying to end up in Hell aren't you? Tell us all wise one where he says, "The NT is true bcuz it says it is true". Show us. Oh, you can't, bcuz you're a careless liar.

"I strongly suggest that those who are earnestly interested in the history of Christianity and its beliefs concerning Jesus -- "

And we saved Christians forgiven of our since care what an opinion-bashing ranter strongly suggests bcuz?

"who are not biased a priori by their 'faith'"

Insane one why did you put "faith" in quotes? Are you stupid? So you don't truly believe that they have faith, LOL? Well what do you think it is then, logical belief? Is that it Mr. Confused?

Mr. A Priori do you think you are smart because you said "a priori" rather than "because" like a non-vain person who truly cares about making sense and helping others (rather than being a show off) would have said? It makes you look stupid and vain to me and the millions of Christians on my side.

And what is your evidence that the author is biased? Do you wan't us to just have, lol, "faith" that you're right because you have "faith" that you're right?

Contradictory one did you notice you are biased because you have faith that the Bible isn't true? Blind much? Again, look up the meaning of the word faith before spitting all over everyone. Furthermore contradictory one, are you really that stupid as to think 100+ million Christians cannot think logically because they trust that God's word is true based on the logical things it states? You're seriously that stupid? Then you who have faith God and Jesus do not exist can never be logical either.

"which immediately necessitates certain conclusions --"

Trust "immediately" (the hell?) necessitates certain conclusions? Genius, did you mean, trusting in something means you conclude that something is true? Was that so hard to say Mr. Word Salad Master?

And why are you telling us that it's immediate? Hey, I've got some useless information to waste your time with while I'm pretending to be smart too: If you say something you've immediately said something! Neato huh?

Now, your point that trust means you have concluded certain things, IS? So if an evolutionist trusts that evolution is true based on his reading of books endorsing evolution means he is biased? Huh? Can we say, "contradiction" or how about "I'm ranting and have made no point"?

"then check out the work by [blah, blah blah, blah blah], and [blah bleah]."

No thanks, clearly if they have as careless garbage research skills and moral logical as you aren't worth reading.

"The bottom line: the authors of the New Testament simply used Old Testament, Pagan, and Greek sources to construct their jesus tales."

Bottom line: saying "bottom line" with the feeling that you are oh so wise doesn't cut it. Bottom line: Bcuz u said so does not equal evidence. Bottom line: Parroted tales like yours does not equal evidence. Bottom line: Fancy word salad does not equal evidence, let alone nonsensical word salad. Bottom line: You've wasted out time again. Bottom line: You are still sinning against God and pretending he doesn't exist despite the clear evidence the universe has been designed and that Jesus was a good and truthful man. Bottom line: You need to learn the definitions of the words you use before acting like you know what you are talking about.

"It is all there -- for anyone willing to look for the truth."

It is all there -- for anyone willing to look for the truth. Woah, I can say that to you too! That must make me right!

Wikihypocrisy - Darwinists Protect Their False god Darwin

2008-01-26T00:16:00.000-08:00

Well did they bury my edits? A very openly gay moderator who instantly erased my edits based on his "doesn't appear to be constructive" feelings did so repeatedly, he even went so far as to delete my rebukes on his talk page. You can tell that this "moderator" (Allstarecho) is trolling because he literally will delete any condemning info about Darwin if he catches a change within seconds. No one is going to tell me this guy is making careful judgments with reasonless personal attacks like that. Ironically I was banned for supposedly attacking him by pointing out his hypocrisy and trolling. That's Darwin-worshipping pleasure-addicts for you. On top of that there was a blatant self-admitted troll who got rid of the criticism on the Origin of Species page. Did any Darwinists undo his dirty work? Nope, they sanction him. It's just like Yahoo Answers where the top moderators use stalkers and harassers to do their dirty work.

I Wonder If the Atheist Evolutionists Will Allow This Relevant Info

2008-01-24T21:33:00.001-08:00

I decided to add some important information to the wikipedia pages on evolutionist "Eiseley" and "Origin of the Species" concerning Darwin's credit thievery. I wonder if they've buried it already.

Wikipedia Still Dominated By Hypcoritical Snakeoil Scientists

2008-01-23T14:36:00.000-08:00

I posted this rebuke on the discussion page on Venus of Wikipedia:

Unscientific Hypocritical Propaganda

Saidsoisms:

"Venus is thought to undergo periodic episodes of plate tectonics, in which the crust is subducted rapidly within a few million years, separated by periods of a few hundred million years of relative stability. This contrasts strongly with Earth's more or less steady state of ongoing subduction and continental drift, but is consistent with how geological processes operate without oceans, since oceans are believed to act as a lubricant in subduction. It is believed the surface rocks of Venus are only about a half-a-billion years old as impact crater analysis suggests that its surface dynamics have exchanged its surface for a clean face (wiping out old craters) sometime in the last billion years."

Where is the citation for even one of these statements? Where even a "citation needed"? Why hypocrites you evolutionists and panspermians are. It is also false as there are many scientists who believe it is about 6000 years old. SINCE WHEN IS EVIDENCELESS SPECULATION, "just trust me" "cuz I said so" objective fact? Is this the same as what so many anti-christians on wikipedia call weasel wording? It should be. It is weaseling in anti-biblical propaganda in the guise of science.

So this is what the wikipedia "community" (anti-christian propagandists) considers one of the best examples of their Wickedpedia work? They are right, it is one of the best examples of their subtle sneaking in of lies without immediately looking like hypocrites to the masses of gullible and deluded. I think you all should watch Tainted Evidence - Forensics On Trial and Forensics on Fire to get another dose of reality. Mere pretension does not make something scientific.

References:

http://media.gospelcom.net/aig/Volume_072/03.mp3
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i3/venus.asp
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i4/galileo.asp

Are Aliens and UFO's Satanic?

2008-01-22T21:01:00.000-08:00

I received a question on youtube, on whether or not I believe aliens were demons. I already said I didn't in various ways on the homepage of my youtube page itself, but, here is an extensive analysis by me as to why I don't believe aliens are demons. This is my personal response to the questioner:

I've thought about that and a few days ago too. I was thinking about the behavior of ghosts / demons, non-sinning angels, humans and aliens, and have concluded that aliens do not fit into the category of demons:

1. Demons are interested in causing strife, does flying around in a ufo or appearing as an alien and showing themselves collecting some plants have that effect, even indirectly to any great degree? It's as useful as pretending to be a human with purple skin, walking by someone's house, and hoping an argument will arise over someone seeing a purple guy walking by, which is absurd. Demons may be immoral to the point of occasional stupidity, but in my educated opinion that is too stupid even for a demon to spend their time on. There known behaviors are this:

a) They love appearing in photos as humans, animals or perhaps showing an occasional object related to the history of an area. The obvious idea they are trying to convey is that there is no heaven or hell or that the Bible is a lie because God doesn't really make an unsaved person "sleep" or end up in Hell and they can just wander around or go to a higher plane etc.

b) They love scaring people:

b1) messing with objects, like throwing them around or making them appear in another place. The idea behind that is related to a. and to get people to fear or be in awe of them rather then god.

b2) Demons often physically harm people, either the people they possess or those they rule over, and in many different ways. The worst aliens are known for doing, and it's rare, is helping one army defeat another, a few instances of kidnapping, and maybe two or three of mass kidnappings, destroying jets that were pursuing them, giving people one or few minor scars, temporarily suppressing scary memories (is that what a demon would do?) causing electronic interference, destroying the space shuttle Columbia, destroying the space tether, destroying a Russian probe going near the moon called Phobos, and supposedly giving false gospels or making the false claim that they've been genetically engineering humans in mass. All those acts of violence or defensive behavior are very rare. Over a period of 5000 years that's the worst most people can think of, unless you include the supposed butt probing and alien breeding. Now, compare those incidents with the mass murder of Christians and people of various ethnicities. How does that compare? The two behaviors are very distinct: Demons are frequently violent, and often boastfully so, and aliens are hardly ever around and apparently don't do much but explore and take a break, as if they were tourists.

c) Assuming Satan goes about like a roaring lion and that that means he regularly possesses people and gets them to do evil, such as preaching false gospels and committing major acts of violence, why then do so few aliens behave the same way? Why aren't aliens regularly committing violent acts to the point of ending up committing suicide or accidentally ramming homes and trees just like a human being violent or who is drunk? If aliens are the ones responsible for kidnapping people all the time, why are so few aliens caught doing so? Why do so many show up dazzling, using tractor beams, or having to get people to come out and get you? Why wouldn't God want us to know that Satan is the one making people disappear? Furthermore, since when to people simply vanish? What's Satan doing, burying them 400 feet underground? Making them reappear in space? What kind of violent act is that? If he's that powerful why not make them reappear in a jail cell of a violent person to be raped and have their body scattered all over the ground? That way stories would spread about loved ones being raped or their bodies being found scattered all over. An example of Satan's known style is to get a person kidnapped, tortured maybe, then they get buried in place that is sometimes found. Then the parents or friends sometimes find out and turn against God usually more so then before. But making a person disappear, and not even hinting to anyone that it was caused by a UFO or hardly ever doing so, is that his style? And how tormented would a foolish person who thinks aliens are friendly? Surely Satan knows that there a great many people who think all aliens are friendly, so then why would he choose such a poor means of tormenting anyone? And sure he knows that God would not let him simply vanish the human race by making them disappear to who knows where if that is his true intent as some might argue.

Now contrast the frequency of human and animal violence to that of aliens. If aliens are demons because aliens sometimes scar people that would make all humans demons as well, and animals. You could even argue trees were demons then because trees sometimes scratch and kill people.

d) They attempt to tempt people to commit sins in general, such as how Satan "rose up against" David, which I think was done by possessing someone who was not saved and having that person get David to count his army. I used to think Satan maybe influenced David's thoughts, but I realized the Spirit is in control of the mind of those who are saved, not Satan, and I seriously doubt the Spirit opens a person up for an occasional attack. Assuming Saul was saved the spirit that tormented can be explained as it either whispering hellish things in his ear and or causing him some sort of physical pain. Do aliens do that? Has anyone ever reported the appearance of a UFO coinciding with someone being tormented with a demon? I've never heard of such a thing in my many years worth of studying UFO's and ghosts / demons. How is an alien floating in the air often from very far away and then zipping away or slowly floating away, or crashing into the ground, an attempt at getting you to sin? You might as well say the moon is a demon, that birds are demons, and that anything unclear you can't make out or that is very strange to you is a demon or Satanic. Remember what the Catholics did to Galileo? That's where that kind of flawed logic leads.

e) Some demons love to frequent or stay at a certain spot, a very limited area usually. There are only a very few stories of false humans (demons pretending to be humans). These stories are about a few ghost hitchhikers who were in the image of formerly living persons. UFO's on the other hand are almost always seen traveling great distances or only showing up a few times in the space of a week. As for UFO's caught by infrared cameras, there are no reports of these UFO's coming back to the same spot and interestingly, no ghosts have been caught floating around in the air or sky using infrared cameras. As for ghosts caught on infrared cameras in homes, why are they always in the shape of blobs or something living like an animal or human rather than a disc, cigar or saucer shape if it's really demons who are making such things? Are demons not clever enough to try and trick people into thinking UFO's also explore the interior of homes? What would make more sense is that UFO's do not enter into homes is because the aliens in them can easily observe humans from outside or remove them or do not want to accidentally damage a person's home or their ship (which could happen if the ship were to revert to being solid). The risk of aliens or ships being destroyed by merging with solid objects explains why they becoming solid again before entering oceans or lakes and are never seen passing straight through mountains or the ground or even going into them a little whether in solid or in a "higher vibratory" form.

f) If demons can frequently appear as aliens and UFO's, why not anything else? Why not appear as planets, asteroids, animals, plants, humans, cars, needles, x-ray machines, computers, and on and on. Is there some demon with a "let's look like weird people and boringly shaped ships that sometimes shut off electrical things and kidnap you, get you pregnant and then take the baby off your hands, crash, and mess with wheat fields making pretty designs and not even destroying the wheat, and occasionally go under and out of the lakes and oceans" fetish? That's too bizarre to believe. Even if there was a demon with such a fetish, why is it so narrow as not to include UFO's traveling in and out of the ground, straight through mountains, floating through trees and buildings? Instead they avoid touching anything but the top of the ground, and that's only to land. Ghosts / demons pretending to be human spirits or just being themselves do not give a consistent display of carrying about not doing things that would give the appearance that they were not solid.

g) Demons possess people. Do aliens possess people? Supposedly some claim they do, but there is no evidence for their claims. They haven't gone off and built alien technology or anything that can be verified as being so strange that it surely must have been something from an alien civilization.

h) Demons communicate with a person either verbally or possess them and talk into their mind for lack of a better explanation. Aliens either use verbal, sign language, or telepathy.

Conclusion:

The behavior of aliens does not match demons, only occasionally. and there is no evidence I know of to say, "An alien broke this law of God". There is no evidence that aliens are bound by human laws any more than animals. Their behavior matches more that of angels. In order for them to have developed extremely advanced technology they would have to have a very high desire to learn how better to survive and explore and to avoid strife which would hinder survival and exploration. We know that strife-lovers horde wealth and centralize power to the point where only other strife-lovers have it. They cause the majority of people to be stuck in a limited area, Earth. We know that strife-lovers are materialistic and love causing even strife among themselves. This does not seem to lead to interplanetary exploration on a weekly basis let alone intergalactic. If there is such going on, it's obviously on a very small scale from what was learned about the activities at Area 51, which wasn't that big a deal. The behavior of aliens matches that of beings who God has either restrained to be very peaceful with very little evil behavior, or who he has kept entirely sinless like certain angels and animals who don't harm any humans.

There is the sea, vast and spacious,
teeming with creatures beyond number—
living things both large and small.
There the ships go to and fro,
and the leviathan,
which you formed to frolic there.
These all look to you
to give them their food
at the proper time.
Psalm 104:25-27

Pirate Bay and Mininova, Self-Defeating, Anti-Christain, Money-Loving Hypocrites

2008-01-22T19:27:00.000-08:00

While posting various comments and links to my sites on piratebay, in order to be able to afford to safely upload to it without the authorities being able to pester me, some hypocrite or hypocrites decided to report me. Why hypocritical?

1. I was posting critical information that the world needed to know but is suffering and dying from not knowing: That the teaching of micro-evolution is a destructive life-threatening teaching, and that Darwin's very theft of his idea of natural selection from a Christian Creation Scientist was clear evidence that atheists could not be trusted to tell the whole truth let alone give credit to whom it belongs.

2. On piratebay exists massive amounts of space-wasting banter totally unrelated to the torrents uploaded. Often the comments or chatting is very foul. But who is reporting them for spreading hateful filthy comments that kids can easily see? No one.

3. Furthermore, you can find a huge amount of links promoting sites other than piratebay and using porn to do it.

4. Furthermore, some of my posts were relevant need-to-know comments, far more relevant than "seed plz" or mere opinions like "christians are stupid" or "great vid".

5. As can be seen from one of my blog entries, I not only defended the likes of piratebay, but I directly defended them on youtube. Some appreciate huh? But since they have played the part of Nebal; attacked the one who defended them.

6. I joined their suprnova forum to ask why I wasn't able to post urls and a moderator named Dr. something or other insulted me for asking and said basically, "You can!" and spammed his personal site which was totally unrelated to my post. Another member then posted a reply and severely insulted me for asking and excused his insult by saying that my post would be trashed anyways. I rebuked the moderator and told him that merely saying, "You can" was not evidence that I could post urls and that he was spamming. For that he banned me and his reason was "Idiot". He banned me again when I signed up a few minutes afterwards and again his reason was "Idiot" despite me not having posted anything. This is his typical behavior I found out. A few minutes later I discovered why piratebay was giving me error messages when I tried t post, it turned out that snipurl.com was banned from being posted. That sure makes me an idiot doesn't it?

7. I also learned that on that forum foul language reigns supreme as well as making jokes about abusing children, and that includes raping, molesting and murdering them.

It was days later that I then began my hours long campaign of "spamming" myself, but of course, good spam is an abomination to the wicked, and so I was banned.

And how about mininova? Is that a good site? No way. I had uploaded a book I wrote showing how all anti-Christian arguments used against Christians failed. On one attempt however I accidentally mistyped something and so unseeded the torrent. For that alone I was banned. Nope, no bigotry there. I made another account later, and one of the forum moderators got anally upset out on me when I asked for the keys to various programs. Why? He implied I was lazy and that they could be found despite the fact that I looked everywhere and could not find them which was why I was posting my request in the first place, and despite the fact that unlike so many I had carefully typed out the program names and version numbers and their location and said I was disabled. He also had to say that he didn't think anyone would help me. Isn't that just so helpful? Who cares about his stupid ignorant opinions? But this moderator banned me for pointing out he was being stupid. On top of that, for no logical reason, the word "eternian" is designated as a swear word on mininova. Imagine that, a Christian denomination name is a swear word, but not the ones of proven murderous groups: Islam, Muslim, Catholic, Mormon and atheist.

I also signed up again to use mininova's forums about two days ago. It was stupid. There was no explanation as to why you couldn't edit your forum profile, and no link or button to go directly to the forum posts. When I clicked the link to see the newest posts I got an error message. I got a few more error messages when I tried to do other things there. It was a big waste of time.

In conclusion, the owners and keepers of piratebay and mininova are clearly anti-christian bigots.

That's atheists and evolutionists for you, self-defeating, greedy, reasonless brutes.

You know who is better than piratebay and better than mininova?: Torrentreactor. They don't engage in truth-hiding and it's a lot more useful. I like Btjunkie better too.

Atheists Who Love Torturing (Including Raping) and Murdering Christians

2008-01-21T12:30:00.000-08:00

(Note, this entry was removed by Yahoo 360 moderators from a 360 blog I was using under the Cave Atheist account when either the atheist anti-christian stalker Gorgeoustxwoman or Footprints in the Sand (a.k.a. Persephone) reported it to them. Isn't she just so loving like she claims to be? Not. You won't find this entry in the Cave Atheist 360 blog because it is trolled by sanctioned atheist stalkers like gtxwoman who would just get it deleted again. Yahoo sanctions stalker-harassers like her and does not want any negative articles on China's human rights abuses, apparently because there are Chinese people in control of Yahoo and China is one of their major customers. Yahoo's moderators ignored me when I pointed out that I was being harassed by her and her other friends on my other Yahoo 360 blog. When I reported that stalkers like Jesus Myth Superstar - who called me a rapist on my blog -, Run James Run, Footprints in the Sand and Gtxwoman were slandering me I was ignored. But when I responded to Gtxwoman in my blog by pointing out her own major family problems she or or one of her group retaliated by reporting me to the moderators who then erased all my blog entries except the last one which was linked to the one in which the one in which they had heavily slandered and mocked me. Want evidence? I save a ton of pages showing how the moderators were treating me vs. the atheists and neo-pagans who were harassing me, I even saved emails I sent to them. You can ask to see this evidence at cbg777 - at - gmail.com. One of their group, Novangelis, went so far as to edit the wikipedia entry about things like this so that no one would realize that atheism is a life-threatening belief. And now the article that they deleted:)

According to some childish Christian-hating atheists (Footprints in the Sand a.k.a. Persephone and Jesus Myth Superstar - see http://snipurl.com/stalkers) no atheist has ever raped anyone or even been accused of being a rapist. Well besides that being childishly absurd because there are a large number of atheists in the world and atheists aren't known for being peaceful anymore than anyone else in any encyclopedia (just the opposite actually) and it should be obvious then that out of a large population of such people there would be crimes of all sorts committed by them. It also demonstrates an incredible willful ignorance and lack of care for what really goes on around them and what has been recorded all throughout history.

Irrefutable Evidence That Atheists Are Far More Prone To Committing Atrocities Than Bible-Obeying Christians

Did you know Japan has the highest suicide rate in the world, or one of them? You know what their main religion is right? Did you know Catholic dominated Lithuania has the highest suicide rate in the world?

Did you know atheist dominated Sweden is number 31 on the list of countries with the highest suicide rates? "Just a coincidence"?

Would you like to know atheist dominated Vietnam's dirty little rape-those-Christians-for-worshipping-Christ "secrets"?:

Christian Persecution in Vietnam
Homes in Vietnam Burned for Refusing to Deny Christ
U.S. and Vietnam Reach Agreement on Religious Freedom

How about atheist dominated China's "secrets"?:

China's Christians suffer for their faith

How about Buddhist dominated Burma's?:

Country Report: Burma

How many suicides occur in Tonga every year? Here's a clue:

Becoming Tongan: An Ethnography of Childhood

Can you figure out what the main religion of Tonga is and what that main religion teaches in comparison to the others?

The Insanity of Doubt: The Code of Hammurabi, Ten Commandments, and Skepticemia

2008-01-21T07:10:00.000-08:00

While researching ancient law I came upon a pseudo-history page on a website on the Code of Hammurabi and Ten Commandments, made by, no surprise to me, an atheist. Here are quotes from that page in the order I found them in with my replies to the sections I divided them into:

"Around 1750 B.C.E. the Code of Hammurabi, one of the oldest known legal codes, was cast in stone in Mesopotamia. This remarkable stone exists today in the Louvre museum in Paris.The code has elements of contract law, various human rights, and was considered so fundamental that they even applied to the king. The code included prohibitions against lying, theft, and murder, which are so universal that there are few cultures without them."

Why don't you tell everyone what the punishments were in his code? Why are you such a truth-hiding hypocrite you self-righteous bigot? Why don't you quote these allegedly ripped off laws? What's wrong, too harsh and merciless for you, too arbitrary?

"Roughly a thousand years later, Yahweh, the tribal god of the Israelites,"

What is your evidence he was merely a tribal God when he judged and punished the world, when he judged and punished the Egyptians and Babylon? Why are you so ignorant of the history you pretend to know? He is the God of 100+ million Calvinistic Christians and even more Catholics. Hardly a tribal God, big duh.

"is claimed in Biblical lore to have created a list of commands on stone tablets for Moses"

It's not a mere claim it is evidence from archaeological findings which you clearly don't want to study or hear about because you are a self-obsessed opinion-basher. Now what is the evidence for your claims besides your petty emotional banter?

"to give to his people. Perhaps the writers of the Torah coveted the power of the Babylonian stone tablets and created a story about stone tablets of their own in response."

"Perhaps"? Your evidence is your ignorant speculation yet you call Yahweh a hypocrite? What a massive slanderous hypocrite you are. Talk about stupidity, talk about hypocrisy, talk about a time-waster. So call Christians and Yahweh hypocrites based on your "perhaps"? Get a life you deluded hypocrite.

"Upon returning to his people, Moses found his followers worshiping a golden calf and in a dramatic huff he smashed the tablets and they were never mentioned again."

So the Bible must be repetitive on every single event? Don't fault-finding hypocrites whine about the Bible being boring because it always repeats? Damn God if he does damn him if he doesn't, right arbitrary babbler, right opinion-parrot?

"(Yahweh clearly didn’t foresee the event"

"Clear" because he said so, and whatever the opinion-basher says is true is true, cuz he said so.

"nor did he use a more suitable material for the tablets, such as diamond coated titanium.)"

And it's more suitable cuz? Cuz the confused babbling opinion-parrot said so. Ye said it so I believe it. Aliens like to eat bananas while spinning on inverted toilets because the color blue smells good. Hey, makes as much sense as what you said.

"After 3000 people were immediately killed and a plague sent for their transgression, Yahweh dictated a second set of commandments"

Not blind babbler they are based on the ten. Get a clue and study rather than babbling. Please learn what logic and evidence and stop babbling nonsense so that there is less useless time-wasting clutter on the net to distract people from learning the truth. Oh, my bad, your lies are useful for one thing, pointing out the stupidity and hypocrisy of non-Christians.

"to Moses that were clearly meant to replace the first set"

Cuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true cuz ye said it. If it was meant to replace the first set, why is the first set still in the Bible, and repeated twice, AFTER the golden-calf creation, which for no logical clear reason you imply is why a second set is created? Moreover wannabe scholar, did you notice the first set says not to make idols? So how is the second set a replacement lol? Blind to what is obvious and clear much?

"and the only ones called his commandments by Yahweh."

Wrong again, they are called "the ten words" (Exodus 34:28) more than once, implying they are the main commandments. Furthermore, Yeshuah, who is Yahweh, said, "You know the commandments: 'Do not commit adultery, Do not murder, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother.'" - Luke 18:20. Now how is it you don't know these commandments let alone that they are commandments? So someone needs to say, "This is a command", or you can't recognize what it obviously is? Do you need every little thing pointed out for you fault-finder, to understand what it is that is right in front of your hateful face?How did the utter obvious slip right past you in your "research"? Ooops?

"The second, undamaged set was placed in the mythical Ark of the Covenant."

Mythical cuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true cuz ye said so.

"Strangely, the contents of the second set are largely ignored today."

Cuz ye said so, and whatever the wannabe scholar says is true is true, cuz he said it. Now, largely ignored by who hypocrite? Hypocrites like you of course who make up imaginary 'facts' backed by emotionalism and not evidence.

"You might be surprised to learn that the real tenth commandment is a prohibition on a method of cooking kid goats."

Cuz ye said so, and whatever ye said is true cuz ye said it.

"There are many more problems with the Exodus story and the reader is encouraged to explore skeptical criticisms of it."

Wow, I thought you were giving factual criticisms lol. Not. Instead, big surprise, you tell us it's biased (skeptical) criticisms. Do you know what a pseudoskeptic is? Hint: Or how about skepticemia? Here's more careful legwork for you:

Dictionary
Chapter Entry

After you get the mental and spiritual help you need to cure you of your compulsive hatred, try carefully reading this real scholarly historical piece on the Code of Hammurabi and Moses.

I hope you get the help you need to get true peace.

Evolutionists Approve of Rape, Child Molestion, Thievery and Lying

2008-01-18T21:08:00.000-08:00

What has happened when not just your typical ignorant evolutionists, but the most well educated ones do not accept these most basic and obvious and facts, even scientifically evident: that the universe is designed and all the things in it?

What happens when people think mere rhetorical questions, sarcasm, mockery, insults, their skepticism, disbelief or belief or the strength of their belief = evidence?

What happens when people forget the most basic meanings of common and essential words and concepts such as truth, lie, evidence, proof, love, mercy, justice, law, good, evil, material, spiritual, and God?

What happens when Darwin-worshipers, anti-creationists, and moral, scientific, and historical ignoramuses pretend that everyone is his own god? You get a nutty rape-infested liar's paradise:

http://digg.com/world_news/Rapists_and_Child_Molestors_Find_Paradise
http://digg.com/world_news/Darwin_Plaguarized_a_Creation_Scientist

Stupidity, bias, and complacency leads to destruction, not evolution. The fittest won't just survive, but will live forever in peace and joy.

Big Business Vs. The Little Guys: The Truth About Copyrights and Patents

2008-01-18T00:30:00.000-08:00

My studies have shown me that copyrights and patents or rather copyright and patent enforcement are destructive to the world in general. They temporarily benefit a small few while oppressing most everyone else.

1. Copyrights and patents prevent technological progression from happening fast and even happening at all. It can even drive people to revert to using older and inferior technology if someone decides to be mean or greedy and enforce their copyright and patent 'rights'.

2. It is easily used as a tool by elites to land people in prison merely because they personally don't like that person or because that person is against their philosophical beliefs not even related to copyright or patent philosophy directly.

3. It keeps many people jobless or working poor jobs. For example a person who could be mass producing some valuable and life-saving medication may instead use his money to build himself a new home and buy a car, and then end up working at McDonald's or even homeless should his home burn down. But if he had lived in some cheap apartment, spent his money on a drug business making some cancer drug, he could employ many workers, be a ceo and expand his business. You may think, "Well without copyright and patent people would just face competition from others for the same stuff so it would cancel out the benefits" however that would forget the competition factor. In the face of such competition with such a large population as America's, with decent business laws not including copyright and patent laws, someone wins out and often has a superior and more affordable product. They may at first be making an already available generic cancer drug, but during the competition produce something better in order to stay in business. The huge pharmaceuticals in power now deliberately delay producing more effective drugs because they like to play it safe and conserve their money while making as much profit as possible. That is not good for anyone but the shareholders and even the shareholders are suffering in a sense since they could possibly be making much more money if they would improve their products or sell completely new and better ones.

4. Copyright and patent enforcement wastes money and time. Tax payers end up paying for lengthy trials which end up profiting not necessarily the patent and copyright owners, but the person with the most money who is suing or being sued.

5. It's impossible to enforce. Some argue that if people are stealing hard goods all the time should we just let them do it? Jesus would say to just let yourself be stolen from (although allows for the possibility of complaining to the authorities) but to compare stealing hard goods to information is a poor comparison. The reason is because information is 'stolen' infinitely more than hard goods. The number of copyrighted things being downloaded and copied is way way more then the theft of hard goods stolen each day, unless you want to include kids taking their parents' food and pocket change without permission, but I doubt that even comes close to the amount of copyrighted things being copied each HALF-HOUR let alone day. I know this from personal research. So, should the entire world (minus poor countries to poor to download no thanks to greedy and lazy big businesses) be arrested so that the rich can get richer and the poor more poor to the point of them being murderous rebels?

I believe that musicians and artists and inventors can, without copyright and patent laws, make a good living. They have the possibility of getting donations, or playing their music live, doing artistry before their viewers, continuing to paint (rather then being lazy and trying simply to live off royalties), and inventors, rather than hoping for or relying on royalties, would instead be offered a huge one lump some of cash or steady payments over time regardless of the sales of their invention or not. To me, trying to live off royalties is like someone claiming they own some new dance move, and that anyone making money off it owes them money. Or imagine a teacher telling his students they will owe him or his children money for the rest of their lives if they profit off what they've learned from him, it's absurd, complicated to the point of impossibility, and everyone would end up being poor in the end, or their would be a profit of zero from everyone passing on money repeatedly to give everyone their never-ending royalties.

Related info:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=600802
http://www.tinaja.com/glib/casagpat.pdf
http://libertariannation.org/a/f31l1.html

The Evolutionary Advantage of Christianity

2008-01-11T05:55:00.000-08:00

I'm in the middle of reading an article titled Why the intelligent design lobby thanks God for Richard Dawkins by Madeleine Bunting of The Guardian news magazine and have come across various statements in it:

"Dennett cites those who argue that faith improves cooperation within groups (though not between them). This argument raises the crucial question of whether, in an era of globalisation and limited resources, religion has outrun its evolutionary advantage."

Christians successfully persuade people of hostile life-destroying groups such as the atheist group to be cooperative all the time, and help millions from various anti-Christian groups (to varying degrees) each year to become saved Christians or for a while, outwardly peaceful Christians. Since when have atheists spontaneously decided to become Christians? Since when as any non-Christian? They don't, they become Christians because of either the Bible, penned by Christians under God's control, and / or because of recorded or in person persuasions made by Christians after the Bible was written. It is false to claim Christians only improve cooperation between their groups. Furthermore Christians helped invent or nearly entirely some historians believe the modern scientific methods. And many Christians are scientists or inventors who have helped improve living standards for people all over the world. Some are doctors and nurses who help non Christians and often free of charge. So none of that improves cooperation outside of Christians? Wow. Now that is major historical ignorance and ignorance of the common place things that happen around you. Talk about opinion-obsessed and bigotry.

Also from the article:

"No one argues that it's a useful project for year 10s to research flat-earth theories, so why intelligent design?"

Why doesn't the deliberate history and science ignorant find out instead of asking a question that has been repeatedly answered by the Bible for 6000 years? Why doesn't he read the scientific evidence from anti-creationists and creationists which has been put out for the past 100 years or 6000? And is the type of ignoramus who thinks asking a sarcastic question = scientific evidence? And is the type of bigot who believes only "scientific evidence" counts as evidence? There is no scientific evidence for micro evolution. He would know that if the ranter bothered to read more than his own ancient parroted myths of walking fish with toes interested in sex and eating popping out of magical puddles from an imaginary billions of years old magical bomb from no where.

Also from the article:

"All protagonists in a debate have a moral responsibility to ensure that the hot air they are expending generates light, not just heat. It's a point that escapes Dawkins."

It's a point that escapes you too Miss Bunting.

A Critical Critique of the Critical Thinking Skills of Harvard University's Evolutionists

2008-01-11T03:02:00.000-08:00

According to some evolutionists at Harvard evolution has been proven true to everyone in the world. Yeah.

Some excerpts from their rant "Snails Caught in Act of Evolution" with my commentaries:

"Walking along the south shore of Great Inagua Island, the Agassiz Professor of Zoology noticed a telltale change in the shells of land snails scattered on a mud flat. He saw large, finger-shaped shells of Cerion excelsior, an extinct snail once widespread in the Bahamas. Nearby were smaller, rounder, vertically striped shells with prominent whorls, belonging to a species called Cerion rubicundum"

He found devolved snails, small and puny. That's some great convincing "proof" of evolution already. Why is it "proof" of MICROevolution (yes, there are more then two kinds despite evolutionists repeatedly "forgetting" that important fact) always comes in less complicated punier versions of their ancestors?

"The history of life on Earth is written in shells, bones, footprints, and imprints found in mountains, canyons, and at the bottom of the seas. Over millions of years, movements of air, water, and continents destroy these silent signs, creating gaps in the natural record, or the fossils are scattered and compressed in different layers of sedimentary rocks."

In other words, "Satan did it; he removed layers of strata and put all those inexplainable fossils, polonium halos, and artifacts that 'shouldn't be' in millions or billions of year old strata and rocks. If not, then God is oh so devious trickster for making us evolutionists assume the earth is billions of years old. He made them draw false conclusions. God made us do it. Forget the fact he let others figure out the truth and he spread it at the cost of their family and lives, they are liars and don't deserve to speak! Cuz!"

Moving on:

" ... That was just a theory, however; Gould hadn't proved it. ... the researchers used a more expensive and time-consuming clock, the decay of radioactive carbon present in the shells. ... The oldest hybrids, those most resembling excelsior, were alive about 17,000 years ago. The youngest fossils, those most resembling the rubicundum invaders, lived on Great Inagua as recently as 3,000 years ago."

Cuz faulty radiocarbon dating which is unreliable after 5000 years according to your own anti-creationists said so: see What about carbon dating? "The dates provided enough proof for Gould and Goodfriend to go public."

Not enough proof for me and saved creation scientists however.

"They published their findings in the Dec. 13 issue of Science, the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (and got applauses from ignorant, wannabe scientists desperate for vain exaltation and easy and gullible "chics" and the back pats and prizes of deluded anti-creationists, therefore: Snails Caught in Act of Evolution By William J. Cromie of the Gazette Staff is true.)

So Harvard is a university of critical thinking skills and "higher learning" huh? Evolve into reality already.

Now here's a" real" article on snails: The Historical Development of the Old-Earth Geological Time-Scale

Yet Another Atheist Pretending to Be a Scientist Exposed

2008-01-08T20:54:00.001-08:00

On amazon you can find a false review by IslandMoonWatcher (because the amazon moderators are anti-christian bigots who refuse to be fair to Christian authors and film-makers unless maybe you complain). Here my refutation:

"More idiotic drivel from the creationist camp."

Cuz u said so, and whatever the false scientist says who provides no evidence says is true, is true.

"It actually deserves zero stars. Even your own evangelists like Chuck Colson, Phillip E. Johnson and Hugh Ross agree on a "Big Bang", ie; God waved his magic wand about 14.7 billion years ago (or 6,600 years ago....whatever) and "POOF","

Cuz u said so, and whatever the false scientist says who provides no evidence says is true, is true.

"the universe and everything else was magically created out of pixie dust--fully aged of course,"

Who said it was created by pixie dust you slandering hypocrite? Slandering hypocrite where did the big bang come from? Ooops? Blind and bigoted much? Second, contradictory hypocrite, who said it appeared fully aged? Just because something as an appearance of age to you = it's therefore aged? You can that science you ranting, slandering, hypocrite? Hypocrite, if it was created new, then the AGE is not AGED you hypocrite, big duh. Also hypocrite it's already been shown that a new geological feature can have the appearance of being aged, see Tuluman Island you arguer from ignorance.

"like a good cheese."

God has problems making good cheese? Are you stupid? Why would it be hard for God to make good cheese if he can make a universe? Can you make any sense you babbler?

"PLEASE get a life"

Say what about eating your words?

"and leave science to scientists, not fairy-tale mythicists."

Cuz the non-scientist said so, and whatever the non-scientist says is true is true.

"Maybe I'll write a convincing-sounding fairy tale story about Noah and the Flood so I can sell books to the choir and steal a few thousand dollars too! "

So stereotypes = the truth? Hypocrite? So over 40 million Presbyterians and Baptists including their pastors and elders donating their hard earned money, not out of their riches and risking their lives to save others in third world countries and gang plagued areas, not thanks your evil silly Darwin god's racist preaching and you who parrot it like you've done here, are stealing and greedy? Thanks for the deep reasonless hatred that is the heart of a atheist myth-loving evolutionist.

Note: Notice you can't tell what IslandMoonWatcher has "reviewed"? So this is atheist "science" for you: ranting stupidity and falsely accusing others of the very evil the love.

Someone Sweet

2008-01-08T20:14:00.000-08:00

I met someone sweet and loving named Elizabeth.

James Randi Minions Can't Take Sarcasm, From Christians

2008-01-08T10:43:00.000-08:00

Poor James Randi moderator, couldn't stand a christian joking about skepticemia, amazingly, it's okay to talk about big foot, the invisible kind, and all kinds of other absurd "look at me everyone I doubt it!" stories, as long as you don't point out how absurd it is.

"Your account has either been suspended or banned.

If you have any questions regarding this you can use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page to contact the administrators."

Hypocrites.

High Weirdeness: Evidence for God

2008-01-08T01:31:00.000-08:00

I was watching fraggle rock cartroons yesterday, then while looking up info on a invention salesmen named Dennis Lee just now found a wikipedia article on "Dennis Lee" " but it turns out to be another Deniss Lee who wrote the lyrics to the Fraggle Rock intro theme.

And I was talking to an atheist acquaintance about God, the Bible, and why I think I'm saved just before I read the page.

WEIRD.

I found a news article recently showing that Global Warming scare mongers ripped off over $2 billion from poor countries while simultaneously making the whole world worse according to certain of their like-minded scientists. On top of that, these scientists had been warning them that they would make things worse or were for years. That just goes to show how sick these global warmers are.

Damn those stupid auto keywords for blogspot tags are making me sick, they keep inserting words I don't want in there. How can such a rich tech company be so tech poor?

Greenpeace Whines Again When EU Comes To It's Senses

2008-01-04T05:20:00.000-08:00

"European Parliament fails planet, panders to profits, Tough regulations on planet-imperilling chemicals rejected" whined the hypocrite Greenpeace moneybaggers. Greenpeace is a virtual corporation and has decided to spin a planet-saving action into doin' the planet bad:

Hypocritical Whining

Apparently the EU saw this video and decided to stop pandering to Greenpeace money baggers and similar lying thieves:

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Video Size: 640 x 368)

Or maybe they read these great books:

The Satanic Gases: Clearing the Air about Global Warming

Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming

The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World

Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming

Or maybe they felt too ashamed and guilty to continue being hypocritical, planet-destroying, terrorist thieves with greenpeace, earth-first and the sierra club:

CFC Substitutes Fix Ozone Hole, But Speed Up Global Warming. The title of that article from Fox News is a lie by the way. Notice the article says nothing about the hole magically being sealed let alone any evidence for that which would be quite amazing if true. Even when the global scare mongering thieves manage to tell some truth, they can't help but add some lies.

2nd Blog On Carl Flygare, a Super Anti-Christian Bigot

2008-01-03T20:35:00.000-08:00

Note that the moderators of amazon.com are severe hypocrites. They have deleted my reviews for being "dissertations" and always reviews which are on anti-Christian books. Yet why then do these hypocrites allow Carl's dissertations which are much longer then the longest reviews they've deleted? Here is another example of Carl's ranting stupidity masquerading as a scientific review:

Carl Flygare - The wannbe scientist and bigot who amazon moderators sanction,

January 3, 2008

A Kid's Review (lol, Carl is a kid? Something tells me not, emotionally it's no doubt true though. Look up the definition of kid instead of taking Carl's word for it).

Since Car refuses to give a true review, and the amazon hypocrite moderators approve of that, shouldn't I, a Christian, also be allowed to post a non-review in like manner? At least mine are true. Now, let's analyze what the bigot ignorant Prententious Carl the Mentally Ill Mad Raving Wannabe Scientist and Contentious Genie said:

Apologetics Cross-Dressed As Science Redux, or Whack-a-Mole 2.0, November 30, 2007

By Carl Flygare

"Did you know that Master Books, the publisher of "The Young Earth: The Real History of the Earth - Past, Present, and Future" by John Morris, President of The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is the publishing arm of the ICR - an ethical, functional, intellectual and in this case incestuous oxymoron - staffed by a bizarre bestiary of barking-mad biblical literalists; a priori dedicated to the preposterous presupposition that any myth or fable in the Bible - however hermeneutically contrived or at odds with objective reality - must trump the findings of modern science?"

Yawn. When will Carl stop wasting time being pretentious, pretending that his ranting mockery is evidence. When will this demon-loving hypocrite get down to real science?

"The Master Books mission statement commits to "Publishing creation-based materials for all ages that defend the Bible from the very first verse." No reputable mainstream publisher would ever consider or release such a farcical farrago of fervent faith-based fantasy - Morris essentially self-published his own book, the iconic imprimatur of a crank."

When will this hypocrite review the book and stop pretending to be putting forth evidence of wrong doing? We're waiting.

"This "Revised and Expanded" edition, burdened by an equally puerile fact and content-free PowerPoint presentation on CD (for witnessing to the witless perhaps), regurgitates the same creationist canards, denialism, and fallacies - in the service of the supposedly divine - that defaced and laced the original printing of "The Young Earth" in 1994."

Learn what evidence hypocrite: Hint, it doesn't mean, "Whatever Carl the hypocrite says it means."

"Morris falls into the "God said it, I believe it, that settles it" dogma dumpster"

Why is this hypocrite raving and slandering? Why is he taking Morris and all creationists out of context? Lying hypocrite who needs to learn what context means, we believe God because what he says is evident you moron, not because someone called God merely said it you moron. That is why the book Morris wrote and Ken Ham contains scientific evidence you moron, not simply one page with one sentence saying "God said it therefore it's true." Idiot liar, stop lying already. You're not cool, you're a lying hypocrite who thinks his opinions are evidence in and of themselves.

"but surreptitiously substitutes "I said it, God agrees with it, that settles it logic."

Carl said it, therefore it's true. You hypocrite, you are doing the very thing you are falsely accusing Morris and Ken and Duane for doing. You hypocrite, we present scientific evidence and logical evidence, where the hell is yours you raving hypocrite? Your logic stinks, when will you come up with actual evidence?

"He uses God like a ventriloquist uses a dummy - by putting words into his mouth - to defend otherwise indefensible arguments from authority; a desperate gambit necessary to sustain a contorted and contrived strain of anti-intellectual Christian fundamentalism with spectacularly inane pseudoscience."

Massive hypocrite insults and mere claims are not evidence and of themselves. Because Carl said it does not make it true. When do you think Carl will stop being such a hypocrite and pretending that what he says is true merely because he said it? This is Carl the hypocrite's logic:

"If a Christian says it it must not be true, if an anti-Christian like me Carl says it, then it must be true." That's you, hypocrite, not us. Carl the hypocrite then said:

""The Young Earth" - with increasing ineptitude in every chapter - attempts to justify a 6,000 year old Earth; a harlequin hypothesis conjured into existence by Archbishop James Ussher who credulously concluded that the Earth was created on Sunday, October 23, in 4,004 BC. John Lightfoot, a contemporary of Ussher even ventured a time of day - 9:00 AM!"

Massive hypocrite, once again, mere mockery is not evidence in and of itself your opinion is not magically self justifying. Laughing is not evidence. What a hypocrite. The hypocrite then says:

"Over the past two hundred years scientific advances in a number of disciplines, ranging from cosmology to physics and geology, have allowed researchers to determine the age of the Earth with remarkable accuracy - 4.54 billion years (plus or minus 1%)."

Because you said so bigoted moron. Master hypocrite, there are also creation scientists, did you notice? Did you notice super hypocrite that not all say the Earth is billions of years old? Hyper moron how could you miss that when you've "reviewed" the books of some of them? Dur? Duh? Doh? Super hypocrite how does it escape your ignorant self that Copernicus, Galileo and Newton, were all creationists? How does it escape your evil self that Christians scientists are the ones who created the modern scientific method and not idiot atheists like you? Big duh. Learn history and stop bashing people merely because they disagree with your stinky breathed self. Here ignorance-lover, more legwork for you:

Five historians all agree that the Bible and Christianity led to the modern scientific methods.

So, Carl the ranting hypocrite who posted a false stinky review, will you also post false reviews against those historians and pretend to be a historian yourself? Clearly the rest of your rant is not worth reading. You are a stubborn rebellious hypocrite trying to look cool, dying for worthless temporary back pats and invitations to parties from fellow hypocrites like yourself. See how many back pats you'll be getting in Hell.

Note to my readers, amazon moderators have deleted my reviews on various anti-christian and anti-calvinistic books for being dissertations, yet they sanction Carl's false raving reviews which are at least twice the size of my longest reviews. Amazon's CEO sanctions the moderators' actions, that makes amazon.com an anti-christian company who merely tolerates Christian books so as to not look totally biased and lose all their Christian customers. I suggest you buy the books through my amazon store and boost their rank to the top of amazon's book rank and by doing so push their junk propaganda to the bottom.

Ending Abortion Would Save Social Security, Group Argues

2008-01-02T06:17:00.000-08:00

Susan Jones
Morning Editor

(CNSNews.com) - President Bush can protect Social Security by "curing" abortion, a pro-life group says.

The American Life League is running a full-page newspaper ad in Thursday's Washington Times, explaining that since 1973, more than 50 million babies have been killed through abortion.

"Those are the very babies that, today, would be living, working -- and paying into Social Security," said Judie Brown, president of American Life League. "However, the national plague of abortion has eliminated those contributors from society."

Full story here: http://www.crosswalk.com/1306821

Lying About Pygmies - Evolutionists "Bull-shitting" Again

2008-01-01T18:36:00.001-08:00

"Pygmies’ short life spans may be behind their small size

December 11th, 2007 - 4:17 pm ICT by admin

Washington, December 11 (ANI): A new study suggests that the smaller life spans of pygmies across the world might be a reason as to why they are smaller in size than average humans.

The research suggests that brief life spans put evolutionary pressure on pygmy women to stop growing and to start giving birth sooner."

And it "suggests" meaning what? Who wrote this article? An evolutionist of course, so of course it's going to suggest evolution is true. Big duh. And suggests to who lol? To creationists who don't lie for profit and pride? Creationists who aren't in the habit of lying? So that's the powerful evolutionary evidence? To bullshit and be vague? And how does brief life span = stop growing? Is evolution now like karma? It's magically intelligent? It's some sort of god now? The article goes on to say:

"As a result of this, the energy that should normally be expended on growth gets spent on reproduction at a younger age."

Wow, check that out, their evidence is to repeat what they just said. Thanks for wasting my time. No wait, not a total waste, they've demonstrated more evidence for their "repeat a lie enough and people will believe it" technique. The article then says:

"“The idea is that (pygmies) have to stop growing earlier, because when you start reproducing at least for women all the energy you would put in growth is put into reproduction,” the National Geographic quoted Andrea Migliano, the lead author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow at Clare College, Cambridge, in the United Kingdom, as saying."

For the third time the article repeats this theory without citing evidence for its validity. And besides that did you notice any errors? Notice Andrea avoided the issue of why the men would not grow taller being that they don't have to expend much energy carrying around and feeding a baby? So much for her "idea". Furthermore, what is the evidence that "all of the energy" a pygmy uses is put into reproduction? You mean they don't dance, sing, learn, hunt, grow, nurse babies, or have fun doing other things? So they can't do both huh, they can only be baby machines? Would pygmies disappear if they were more active? Furthermore, how much energy could it possibly for a human to grow from 1 foot to 5 or 7 feet in FOURTEEN-EIGHTEEN YEARS? Since when does growing to even eight feet after eighteen years make a person unable to give birth to two or three kids and unable to be a very active person? Does anyone notice anyone living shorter and shorter lifespans from being very active lol? So this is evolutionary science? Teaching evolutionary theory is a shameful waste of tax-payer money (including that of creationist Christians who are illegally made to fund it when it is opposed to their conscience), time that could be used to make real advancements in technology and science. It is worthless compared to bull shit; bull shit can be used as fertilizer and fuel and used to save lives. But what is good is evolution except to show that creationists are right and that evolutionists are wasting-time?

The article then says:

"“You have to choose either you grow or you reproduce,” she added."

Cuz she said so (damn, I can either be 1 foot or have kids), and didn't I virtually read that stupid teaching three other times in this article without any evidence to back it? And what's with the switcheroo? First were talking about life-span, then it shifts to height. What the hell? Can evolutionists stop going off on illogical tangents?

There is no magical evolution law that says, "Hi, if you live longer you can't more kids!"

Ironically, in atheist-evolutionist dominated China, they even force abortions on those, including christians who try to have more then one or two children. Sick atheist-evolutionists try and force their theories to come true. Sick, vile, sick.

The Gospel In All Languages - My Gospel Translation Project

2008-01-01T02:26:00.000-08:00

I started a project that I had forgotten about for many months, a project to translate my version of the gospel into all the major languages of the world. I barely have any money and the majority of it will take up all or almost all of my disability check for next month, leaving me with nothing. I'll finally be forced to use food stamps again. I've already got one translation in Portuguese and one woman is working on a Russian translation.

Should I meet Pastor Galen of First Family Church of Albuquerque, New Mexico again, perhaps he will once again encourage me and make me feel "apart of the family" with another bitter, "You reap what you sow" come back if I tell him that I 'm impoverished again.

My next project is to have certain other verses translated in fulfillment of a certain prophecy.

If anyone wants to donate to me to help me out, contact me.

Obscure Arminiest Kent R. Rieske Calls All Arminiest UFO Sighters Deluded by Satan and More

2007-12-26T17:05:00.000-08:00

On Dec 26, 2007 7:33 AM, in his careless opinion bashing, the Arminius worshiper Kent at RieskeKR@aol.com accidentally bashed all Arminius worshipers who have seen UFO's. Since Arminus worshipers far outnumber those who believe in permanent salvation by Christ's grace alone, Arminians are the majority of those who see UFO's along with Buddhists, Atheists, and Muslims. The comic-looking font is the actual font and style he used along with an altered mocking subject heading (he's real mature and serious guy eh?):

Re: Calvinist Who Believes In UFOs Goes Ballistic.

"[...] I am not surprise that you believe in UFOs, since you are also a Calvinist. Boy... [text deleted due to the fact this Arminiest is an obviously contentious, and deceived moron].

Bible Life Ministries - Salvation Prayer Hahahahaha

Kent"

Those few pieces I read kept my eyes from reading whatever else stupidity had been in reply. One of the problems of being an opinion basher like Kent, is that such bashing repels the eyes and ears of those you hope to bash. So, there you have it, an oh so loving Arminiast not just refusing to repent of his blatant opinion-bashing bigotry, misquoting me by calling me a Calvinist, and bashing all government officials, all police officers, pilots, everyone, including all Christians from Arminiast to Calvinistic as being gullible and deceived, and deluded by Satan while gloating, mocking, and stereotyping on top of it. Great ministry eh? Yet another reason not to worship the deceiver Arminius or to trust his worshipers.

He couldn't even be bothered to correct "surprise" to surprised". Real careful guy. That's the reply of a contentious, self-willed, money-loving, social-climber who is obsessed with airing his own opinions and could care less about the Bible. I checked my file storage site to see if he had downloaded my books which refute Arminian theology using almost 100% verses from the Bible but saw he did not bother to download them. The same is true of a previous Arminiest I had recently talked to who also did not bother to download them. That clearly shows what kind of people Arminiest-worshippers are.

And wasn't that just such a beautiful loving Christian reply? "Hahahaha"? Gloating with derision is Christ-like? Calling me a Calvinist implying that I worship Calvin when I said I was Calvinistic = careful and loving? Slandering all Calvinists = loving?

Here was the original message I sent this ballistic babbler:

In a message dated 12/25/2007 10:49:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, kyle ain writes:

"The reasons people believe in UFOs and aliens go back to the school education system. Kids are taught that life can evolve given enough time." [That's a quote from mocker Kent who illogically associats UFO's and evolution.]

That's an idiotic lie. I am a calvinistic Christian, I am saved and how can you not know better than to say something so stupid? How can you be so massively ignorant as to citing a government study (as if all the government is honest or knows what the other hand is doing lol? talk about naive!) and to ignore MILLIONS of sightings and thousands of videos and testimony from people of every walk of life? How can you ignore ancient art showing obvious ufos and aliens?

I saw two ufo's with my own eyes they were not meteors or airplanes or blimps flares or swamp gas. You have to nearly be nearly a master moron to have said what you did or very lazy or were being very impatient at that time.

I suppose angels are just swamp gas right and God's glory was a meteor shower? Get real man and stop rationalizing in stupid ways.

Check out the videos in my profile [...]

http://snipurl.com/oncesaved

merry christmas

Using Kent's logic if any kid is taught a lie then there is no chance that they can ever make a correct judgment from then on. That effectively makes Kent's ministry worthless since there are no kids who haven't been taught lies. Another problem with his stupid logic is that there are Christians like me who have never been taught evolution in school or who never comprehended being told fossils were millions of years old. I used to have one or two dinosaur books and don't recall either of them saying dinosaurs were millions of years old and even if I was told that, wouldn't have understood since when I was a kid I was very poor with math. In fact I have dyscalculia which often corrupts and distorts how I perceive long periods of time. So then how does Ken's magical judgment corruption apply to me?

Note that I changed the snipurl.com link to a new one so that no one would go to the wrong link.

On the Nearly Useless and Damaging Disclosure Project Movement

2007-12-26T15:57:00.002-08:00

Greer says big media is worse yet says the media is not free, well the corporate and gov elites are free, therefore they are worse then the media. Greer is one of the naive types who thinks that all aliens are peaceful despite the unfriendly abductions and new age nonsense some of them supposedly tell humans. Greer thinks the aliens of the universe have become concerned about us because we obtained nuclear weapons. Well these aliens sure are useless. Where were they when Nagasaki and Hiroshima were bombed? Where were they when ancient India was bombed? Where were they when Egypt was bombed? What are they doing about all the people all over the world dying from malaria, chaga's disease, cancer, starvation, polluted water flowing into the ocean, air pollution? So buzzing about a few nuclear plants or observing them and messing with them a little = concern? Why don't they buzz around coal polluting plants and diamond and coal mines where coal workers (or slaves) are slowly dying or being murdered? Nuclear plants mean more huh? No, that's God testing humans to see if they will keep obeying him when faced with mysterious and unknown things and the world is failing his test.

Marrs made an obvious point which is that all aliens are not the same, but later in the documentary Pippin and Webre implies all aliens are peaceful. Pippin suggests that in order to keep fro being abducted you be an ostrich and pretend you don't see anything and that if you don't it means you want to be abducted. Really? Is that why most aliens allegedly try and erase or suppress your memory, because you volunteered? Or is it they feel they've sodomized you and "don't" want you to remember?

Does that work with the sun too? There are also two human mutilation cases, done by aliens? Don't know, but that's not a good sign.

According to Salla we're just a "resource" to the Reptilians, not sentient beings in deep moral trouble who could really use some moral, medical, housing, food and environmental disaster help. If Reptilians exist and Salla is right, then maybe Icke is right about these Reptilians being evil..

Salla says "WE" doesn't know if withholding advanced technology is beneficial or not. Hey, I do know if it's beneficial or not: If you withhold it from a good person you are doing wrong. If you withhold it from reckless people but still treat the reckless with kindness, you are doing right. The governments of the world who are hiding advanced technology do so for self-centered reasons. That is there way, to do everything that benefits them first.

If Webre is right about these aliens then they are just as useless as the elites U.S. and British government who go about making useless and damaging speeches, traveling here and there, robbing and being stingy, ignoring and ridiculing the poor and needy.

And what is this genetic upgrade nonsense fro Webre? What's his evidence? Webre is one of those naive vain types that thinks ufo technology will rescue the world from environmental pollution. And what does he think will save us from moral pollution which is even more deadly?

Alan G. Tolman claims we haven't (as a planet?) said "hello" in a friendly way to the aliens. Well he obviously doesn't know or could care less about the 100+ million Presbyterians and Baptists who spend their money (and not out of their vast riches) often to help the poor and needy and preach peace in hostile places at the risk of their own lives, risking torture and enslavement. If that's not saying "hello" in a friendly manner then what is? And why should aliens expect the whole planet to be friendly? So the aliens won't budge from watching and butt and nose-probing till the whole world says, "Hi, we're all sane and friendly now, promise!"

The disclosureproject site is selling a book called "Disclosure", an oh so important on how the good guys are battling the bad guys to get them to admit UFO's exist and supposedly share the special technology, yet the d.p. website says on the bottom of it's "donation" page:

"And, NOT INCLUDED IN THE BOOK 'DISCLOSURE': A summary of energy and anti-gravity research which shows how the technologies which are being kept secret, because of the UFO issues, hold the answers to our environmental and energy problems. Such as:
# Tesla's Self-Powered Automobile
# The Moray Radian Energy Device
# Gabriel Kron and the Negative Resistor
# Cold Fusion
# Dr. Randell Mills and Blacklight Power
# and many, many more"

Great! So, not only will the C.I.A., military, aerospace, and oil company elites not show us anything, but we won't be seeing "many, many more" from DISCLOSURE project either. To me that makes disclosure project a calculated move by the government to pacify rebels who would think to over throw them. It's a way of making them feel as if they are making progress.

In conclusion, the Disclosure Project is only useful in that it shows UFO's exist via credible eyewitness testimony or at best and that it might get someone to release technology concerning how to build advanced transportm defense, and medical technology. It is damaging however because many of the people in it are misdirecting people from what really can save their lives forever and so is a quasi-scam, especially since they are selling silly and useless products and using the disclosure website to do so.

Instead of wasting time trying to make the rich budge with silly new age speeches which give false hope, and protesting and threatening, and defending abortion and throwing cut up babies in the trash as if that's, "Hello we're peaceful", turn to God for salvation, get saved, and obey him, and that includes by praying for the governments in power to do the same.

Social life stuff

2007-12-26T15:57:00.001-08:00

I met two nice girls online recently, Ashley and Deborah. They are both Christians. I've been talking for a a month or two on my messenger to an atheist whose name I have a hard time remembering.

Why Vote For Ron Paul for President?

2007-12-26T15:49:00.000-08:00

Ron Paul isn't the best historian on American history (he seems ignorant of the terrorist history of the C.I.A. and F.B.I. leaders) or the best Christian, but he is the best man for president. Click here to read about Ron's book.

Non-Christians Being "Open-minded" Yet Again

2007-12-26T15:45:00.000-08:00

Hate Laws Flog Another Christian

By Harmony Grant
December 5, 2007

Telling the truth is an illegal act in Canada . It’s worse if you’re a Christian. A pastor in Alberta, Rev. Stephen Boissoin, is the latest to make this chilling discovery.

Boissoin has been charged by a human rights panel with violating Canada's "hate crime" law, for words he wrote to a newspaper back in 2002, when he was executive director of the Concerned Christian Coalition. His letter said "war has been declared" against the "homosexual machine."

I wonder which of Boissoin’s words violated the Canadian human rights law. Which of his words were “likely to expose homosexuals to hatred or contempt because of their sexual preference?” Maybe it was the part where he called their militant agenda “a machine.” That might be seen as flattery and certainly isn’t a lie.

In 1977, Quebec became the first jurisdiction in the world to prohibit private or public “discrimination” based on sexual orientation. In 1988, the first Canadian Member of Parliament “came out” to media. Also in 1988, a Canadian church first allowed ordination of openly practicing homosexuals. In 2005, Canada became the fourth country worldwide to federally sanction marriage between people of the same gender. Canadian public school curricula are currently being revised with “LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender] topics.” (Maybe while they’re at it they should include topics about boys who prefer large breasts or girls who like to be handcuffed during sex. Or maybe they should quit bringing sexuality into grade school.)

So. A machine? Fueled by the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith with its anti-Christian “hate crimes” laws, the Canadian homosexual movement is practically bionic. A 2000 Supreme Court decision ruled that homosexuals’ publications are federally protected free speech, even if they are sexually explicit or obscene.

Get this straight: If my homosexual neighbor prints a zine of photos of naked men having anal sex and urinating on each other, that’s protected speech. But I could be jailed if I distribute the same prints labeled with, say, Romans 1:27 (“In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion”).

The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith always claims that hate crime laws won’t stifle freedom of speech or religion. What a joke. They openly brag about their role as creators of “anti-hate” laws On their website you can even view their “model hate crime legislation,” which offers “The ADL Approach” to dealing with hatred, bigotry and racism. Sounds so noble.

But ADL isn’t concerned with preventing true violent crime (which is already against the law, hence the word “crime”). It also isn’t concerned about promoting true health in society, which is fundamentally based on families and healthy sexuality. Instead, ADL—a Jewish fraternal civil liberties organization—seeks to strip Christianity from public life and criminalize the expression of Christian morality (especially that of salvation through Christ alone).

In his excellent essay, “Is Sex Meaningless?”, Joel Hilliker writes that hate crime laws have made it incredibly easy for Christians to be “perceived” by the court as breaking the law. “Illegal discrimination now includes anything “perceived” as different treatment because of behavior “perceived” as not stereotypically male or female,” says Hilliker. “It includes anything that might suggest that a child living with biological Dad and Mom is advantaged over someone living with a single homosexual man or woman who has multiple partners. It could include a business treating a cross-dressing job applicant different from anyone else. It could include a reference to family in a school textbook that fails to mention it’s just fine if it involves a homosexual couple. You can be sure that zealous lawyers are itching to test the new laws by putting such “crimes” on trial.”

ADL is not concerned about bias in general—certainly not against Christians or Christians’ free expression of their faith! In The Conservative Voice, Bonnie Alba points out that Christmas is a time of numerous “hate crimes against Christians” when Christian symbols and public expression are increasingly not allowed. You may remember that last Christmas a rabbi complained about Christmas trees at the Seattle airport. To avoid any fuss this year, airport officials have banned any recognition that there even is such a thing as Christmas! No Christmas trees, carols or stars.
In one Michigan school district, a list of politically incorrect words is forbidden. They include Santa, Christmas, and nativity.

In case anyone has questions about what to disallow, the ADL has provided a helpful “December Dilemma” guide to make sure Christmas gets censored right out of public view. Mention of our Maker’s birth, here to redeem us, might make some people uncomfortable! Heaven forbid (see, ADL's 'December Dilemma').

So would I be speaking hate to say the militant pro-homosexual and “anti-hate” ADL is a machine efficiently stripping Christian faith and morals from North America? No, not hate. Just the facts.

Are All Christians the Same?

2007-12-26T15:42:00.000-08:00

For those of you that don't know, not all Christians are the same, there is one group that is very unlike the others, a group that believes God's Law is perfect and that he hates it when anyone breaks it. I am apart of that group.

The world calls Christians like me fanatics or extremists (and Catholics call us heretics). Why?

It's not always because we believe that it's absolutely wrong to lie, steal, or murder, but for believing that it is wrong because God said not to. Even Catholics detest that. Why? Because they want Christians like me to believe that it's wrong because the CHURCH said so, in other words, men.

But I'm not a Churchian, or Manian, I'm a Christian, a Christ-follower that is. I'd rather be called an Eternian though, to convey that I believe I have eternal life (a spirit that won't die) and will be immortal one day.

The usual stereotypes about people like me are that we only think about God or the Bible, actually we usually do and do so to make sure we are not disobeying him, we don't simply think about it. It's similar to how the world thinks about themselves all the time and tries to please themselves nonstop (and pleasing themselves can be done by pleasing those they love). So, I'm no fanatic, I do what I do because it is logical, unlike most non-Christians, who do what they do because it feels good to them and seems good to them.

I believe that by obeying God that in the end you will be a happier person because you will be in less pain and if God loves you, one day, you will only feel pleasure.

Another stupid myth is that all Christians believe what they do juz cuz. Ironically it's just the opposite: The world believes what it does because they feel like what they believe is the truth, not because it is. They often say themselves that what they believe is their opinion (beliefs not based on facts) and in their confusion also claim that science is on their side (forgetting that Christians invented science) while scientific evidence shows the Bible is true (but most people can't be bothered to read what it is or if they do just laugh it off, as if laughter and their doubt is evidence that what they glanced at is false).

It's sad I have to say all this to keep people from running from me, but helping a person come to their senses and realize they are in danger is worth the trouble.